Assessing the damage

MF-World Bank meeting judges MENA crisis response

 

The annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank offer a relatively informal atmosphere for finance ministers, central bank governors and private sector executives to discuss the previous year and set a direction for the next. In Istanbul last month, the meetings reviewed a year of economic turmoil and vast change in government policies. Representatives from the Middle East recalled that the 2008 annual meetings in Washington occurred in a week when crude oil prices dropped 17 percent, the United Arab Emirates federal government guaranteed bank deposits and intra-bank lending and the Saudi stock exchange dropped to their lowest level in four years.

This year’s affair was far calmer. The broad consensus in Istanbul was that the worst was over and that the Middle East had survived the global crisis better than most of the world. Lebanon and Saudi Arabia were praised by many, including Mohsin Khan, the former regional IMF chief, for their conservative banking policies. “Both countries didn’t allow their banks to hold structured products, and this was a very smart move,” he told me. But whatever the successes they may claim for the past year, representatives in Istanbul acknowledged that major challenges remain, especially over unemployment and poverty.

The region already has relatively high jobless figures. The World Bank projects unemployment will rise by 25 percent in 2009 and 2010 in the Middle East and by 13 percent in North Africa, despite regional growth second only to Asia.

“The message, globally, is that, yes, there are signs of recovery, but it [the situation] hasn’t settled deeply,” said Shamshad Akhtar, the World Bank vice-president for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). “We already had 20 million people unemployed [in MENA], and we have new entrants to the labor force [due to high population growth], so we have a problem.” The IMF’s Regional Economic Outlook, launched in Dubai on October 11, projects regional growth will fall from 5.4 percent in 2008 to 2 percent in 2009, before rebounding to 4.2 percent in 2010. A particular danger is that a disproportionate number of people, especially in Egypt and Morocco, live just above the $2-per-day income threshold for poverty, meaning the region cannot afford complacency over joblessness. This has been the major factor behind the World Bank’s increased lending in MENA from $1.8 billion in 2008 and 2009 to over $3 billion in 2009 to 2010. “Demand is steep,” said Akhtar. “Our clients need [to finance] reforms – and not just at the macro-level. Countries want to strengthen their financial structures, they want more microfinance. They want affordable mortgages and pension reform. They want to restructure social safety nets.”

The World Bank’s 2009: Economic Developments and Prospects, launched in Istanbul, drew attention to the opportunity presented by the economic crisis for governments to “ease infrastructure bottlenecks and restructure ineffective — yet expensive — subsidies programs.”

Iran is the clearest case, with around 30 percent of GDP going into subsidies. Egypt’s food and energy subsidies are around 30 percent of government spending and 10 percent of GDP, while in Morocco 90 percent of subsidies go to groups other than the poor.

At the macro-management level, the annual meetings generally endorsed the region’s approach to the economic crisis, although there was also a clear sense that governments had much left to assess in their performance.

The region’s monetary reaction to the crisis was “unprecedented,” especially in guarantees to banks, explained Khan, now senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington. “Back in 2007, there was a lot of worry about the inflation rate. There was talk of reining in monetary expansion, the revaluation of exchange rates…that has changed.”

Governments, much like in developed countries, have lowered interest rates as inflationary pressures have eased. Although inflation is considered a danger in Egypt — where the IMF projects a rise to 16.2 percent in 2009 from 11.7 percent in 2008 — representatives at Istanbul agreed it would not become a regional issue in the near future. Their greater fear is that the global economic recovery could falter and depress the price of oil.

In the Gulf Cooperation Council, fiscal policies — especially with the vast reserves of Abu Dhabi and Saudi Arabia — have been at the forefront of the response to the downturn. But many in Istanbul pointed out that fiscal stimuli have been less innovative than monetary changes, as several state infrastructure projects in the Gulf are already in the pipeline.

The shadow of politics, as ever, loomed over discussion at the annual meetings of the regional outlook. Both Saudi Arabia and the UAE moved quickly to squash a poorly-sourced story in The Independent that secret meetings were underway to abandon the dollar as the currency in which oil contracts are made.

But their anger at the report reflected a sense that the region can ill afford any further disruption — and that any serious sharpening of tensions, especially over Iran, could quickly upset a mood of cautious optimism.

GARETH SMYTH has reported from the Middle East since 1992, mainly for The Financial Times

*

Top