Home Money MattersDo or Die

Do or Die

The fallout in the insurance sector is already under way

by Avo Tavoukdjian

I t seems Nasser Saidi means business after all. Back in May 1999,

when the new insurance law was finally passed in parliament,

many wondered if it would be enforced. Meeting the new minimum

capital requirement of $1 .5 million, up from $200,000, and

depositing $3.3 million in order to sell premiums for all lines of insurance

wouldn’t be easy. But then again that was the intention all along.

By demanding a high capital, the ministry of trade and economy

would force financially weaker firms to merge to meet the requirements.

Otherwise, they would have to shut down and leave the sector

to those with the financial backbone to remain solvent.

Since then a wave of reform has washed through the sector, with

the number of companies unable to stay afloat gradually rising.

Insurers that didn’t already have these funds in place were given

until last June to come up with the first half of the difference needed

in order to meet the new requirements and June 2001 to come

up with the remainder. But even the first installment proved too

much for many. When the law was first issued, many expected that

the number of insurers would be reduced by at least a third. Now

that prediction is being realized.

When EXECUTIVE went to print – some firms are still under study –

29 insurers were involved in the initial shakeout. Of these, 13 had

Their licenses revoked, five merged with other firms, three transferred

their portfolios to other companies, two stopped operating, while six

more requested that their own licenses be revoked. Still others are in

the process of merging and several have been referred to the public prosecutor’s

office for not complying with current laws.

But is the new insurance law a good one? “I consider this law better

than the old one,” says Abraham Matossian, chairman of AlMashrek

and the Lebanese Insurance Companies’ Association

(ACAL). “But I believe we can do better.” Strict requirements on solvency

are essential. More than once we’ve seen companies that fell in

the maw of insolvency, like Income, Mesir, and Phoenix, and left trusting

clients stranded. The number of insurers is also too high for

Lebanon’s small market-around 75 for a population of3.5 million.

With a population of 60 million, Egypt has about ten insurance firm

Nonetheless, the stricter regulations are considered extreme by

some. “If a company has a good solvency ratio and is adequately supported

by credible reinsurers, the blocked capital wouldn’t be necessary,”

says Zareh Basmadjian, chairman of Oriental Insurance, whose

portfolio of $ l.2 million in 1999 was transferred to Al-Mashrek.

And he’s not alone. Chehade Raad, chairman of Kafra Insurance and

Reinsurance, believes that problems arise not from a comparatively

Low capital but from not reinsuring properly. According to Matossian,

“If an insurer is adequately reinsured, he will not need to liquidate his

assets. This happens with large companies in Europe, which were forced

to liquidate stock they’d been holding for a century to meet liabilities.

The risk in Lebanon is much less if things are done properly.”

Critics of the new law also suggest that capital requirements

should actually be based on the size of a company’s portfolio with

adjustments made as business grows. Basmadjian believes a capital

of $1.5 million might be necessary for insurers with large portfolios,

but not for small companies. “Each firm should have been

studied and a raise in their capital should have been required

based on its solvency and the size of its portfolios,” he says.

If a company could comply with the required capital, does it

make more sense to do so or to pull out? Companies with several

shareholders might consider injecting additional funds or bringing

in new shareholders as a good idea. Considering the relatively

small amount each shareholder has invested and how profits are divided,

boosting the capital may be the easiest and best option. Middle

East Assurance and Reinsurance Co (MEARCO), which had a capital

of $400,000, has done just that. With over a dozen shareholders,

many of them brokers, the company found it more convenient to comply

with the law’s requirements. “We paid up $550,000, the first half

 on the due date, and will cover the rest by June 200 I,” says Rached

Rached, MEARCO’s chairman.

But what of those who have a majority stake in their own company,

in the case of Basmadjian 75%?

“The $1.5 million in capital I’m

required to put up could be better

invested in other ventures,” he

says. With returns of just 12% a

year, he would make $135,000:

“I’m not making that much in the

insurance business,” he says. All

this without yet considering the

necessary deposits, a total of $3 .3

million to operate in all lines of

insurance. For an individual, letting

that kind of money sit idle

isn’t too appealing.

But in the end, the insurance

sector is moving toward greater

discipline – even if some are

being dragged, kicking and

screaming. The law itself is an

improvement, providing more

security for the consumer and

even for the insurer. It’s true

many of the smaller firms are

being hit hard, but adhering to a

strict regulation policy is the

ministry’s only recourse to keep

insurers in line.

You may also like