Blame it on the sushi. The rising popularity of the Japanese delicacy has brought the northern bluefin tuna to the brink of extinction, while at the same time profoundly altering the dynamics of fishing in the Mediterranean.
On June 9, the European Commission closed the Mediterranean bluefin tuna season, which had opened just three weeks earlier, because the annual quota had already been caught — predominantly by the ultra-efficient industrial fishing vessels sailed by Spain and France. At 13,500 tonnes, the 2010 quota was already set 40 percent lower than 2009 — a concession to environmental organizations, which had argued for a complete ban on bluefin fishing this year. For them, the European Union’s decision to halt bluefin fishing is too little, too late.
The Mediterranean’s stock of bluefin has shrunk to less than 15 percent of its original size due to overfishing.
“Bluefin tuna must be given a break,” said Sergi Tudela, head of fisheries at the World Wildlife Federation — Mediterranean. He advocates a global trade ban as the only way to ensure a sustainable tuna fishing industry in the Mediterranean. But the latest fishing ban applies only to EU countries — non-European fishermen will continue to fish the waters. Greenpeace believes that European boats will circumvent the ban by flying non-EU flags and gravitating to territorial waters off the North African coast, which are harder to regulate.
Japan, which receives around 80 percent of the world’s tuna catch, has repeatedly moved to block an international tuna trade ban by the United Nations. Similarly, few Mediterranean countries are volunteering to give up a lucrative source of income, as tuna prices have shot up in recent years with the global popularity of sushi. A ton of the fish now sells for $1,000, up from $300 in 2005.
On the other side of the coin, declining supplies have had a deep impact on local fishing communities, especially in North Africa, where fishermen employ smaller vessels and outdated technology. In Morocco, where fishing is a pillar of the agricultural industry, tuna catches dropped 96 percent between 2006 and 2007, from 8,800 tons to 343 tons, leading to the discontinuation of local tinned tuna brand Tam.
Some North African countries have increased measures to protect their dwindling fish resources. In April 2010, Tunisia passed a bill aimed at preventing illegal fishing in its territorial waters, where a tuna recovery program was initiated in the summer of 2009. Foreigners found fishing in these waters will be fined up to 300,000 dinars ($196,860), while Tunisian fisherman will be penalized up to 100,000 dinars ($65,620).
However, Africa remains a weak spot for the prevention of bluefin exploitation. The Gulf of Sidra off Libya, previously the largest breeding ground for Mediterranean bluefin, has been identified as the greatest site of illegal fishing in recent years, and yields approximately 40 percent of total bluefin catch.
While Libya has relatively scant fishing production itself, the country sells major European companies access to these waters. As a result, it has been one of the most vocal opponents of a bluefin fishing ban, which it believes disadvantages the developing nations that rely on the trade.
At the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species held in March 2010, Libya’s delegate forced a vote on the matter before any debate had taken place. The result was 68 votes against and 20 for, with 30 abstentions, clearly demonstrating that “governments are not ready to adopt trade bans as a way to protect species,” a spokesman for the UN told international press. In the minds of environmentalists, this nearsightedness has sealed the fate of the bluefin tuna.
