• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
Comment

The outdoors’ beauty and scars

by Norbert Schiller June 3, 2009
written by Norbert Schiller

For hundreds of years, travelers have criss-crossed Lebanon’s mountains and valleys in search of ancient mysteries and hidden treasures, or just to marvel at their majestic splendor. From Alexander Kinglake and Lady Hester in the mid-19th century, to H. V. Morton and Colin Thubron a century later, the mountains of Lebanon have held an allure for many intrepid travelers.
It was Thubron’s book, The Hills of Adonis, that first led me to discover the Lebanese mountains. His four-month journey, which began just prior to the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, is no typical travel journal. Rather, he weaves an intricate story which looks at the terrain, the people, the myths and legends that once dominated this land. His ultimate mission was to discover the cult of Adonis.
The first time I read Thubron’s book I wanted to retrace his exact footsteps and see for myself the country he describes. Unfortunately, I read Adonis 30 years too late and much of the landscape he depicted had already been altered beyond recognition, a casualty of 15 years of civil war and the Israeli occupation of the south. However, that did not stop me from pursuing my quest to explore the country. Fearful of walking over an unsuspecting mine field or stumbling onto a restricted military area, I joined Libantrek, a local hiking group founded by one of Lebanon’s ecotourism pioneers, Michel Moufarrij. Moufarrij showed me a side of Lebanon I thought did not exist anymore and he introduced me to the Lebanon Mountain Trail (LMT), the first long distance trekking trail in the Arab world.
The LMT is more than just a long distance path; it is a journey through the heart and soul of Lebanon. Beginning in Al Qbaiyat in the north, the trail makes its way through the interior of the country until it reaches Marjaayoun in the south. The total length of Lebanon is only 225 kilometers, but the trail is almost twice as long, climbing its way over mountains and descending into deep valleys. The trail, conceived by a group of non-partisan Lebanese, provides a rare view of the heartland rarely visited by outsiders. This group, which includes Moufarrij, broke down sectarian barriers and called themselves environmentalists. Now, their sole purpose is to develop ecotourism in economically depressed rural areas of Lebanon. Lebanese and foreign tourists who walk the trail are encouraged to use local guides and stay in local rest houses and designated family homes, as well as buy and eat local products along the way. As the villagers view the LMT as a source of income, they are expected to look after the trail and protect the natural environment in their area.
In April, I was invited to be part of a six-person team which was to be the first to walk the entire 440 kilometer trail. On April 2, the group set out on what can best be described as a journey of a lifetime. For the entire month we traversed the length of Lebanon, eating and sleeping in local homes and guest houses. As a way to promote the trail the LMT Association, the organization behind the trail, encouraged others who wanted to enjoy part of the experience to join us during weekends and holidays. Overall, the journey was a magical experience for all those involved. We walked through parts of the country that we didn’t imagine existed in Lebanon.
There was also a downside to this experience. It was impossible for us to overlook the garbage dumps, illegal rock and sand quarries and ugly unfinished cement structures that dotted the breathtaking landscape, leaving irreversible scars. No matter how hard we tried to ignore these eyesores, it was difficult because of the extent of the damage.
Lebanon is a tiny country that has so much to offer for the outdoor enthusiast. The old cliché that Lebanon is a country where you can ski in the morning and swim in the afternoon still holds true today as it did a generation ago. However, Lebanon’s size may one day prove to be its demise. Since it is so small, the harm done to the environment has a far greater impact and thus a longer lasting effect. It is imperative now for the Lebanese government to take the lead and implement laws to protect the environment. In order to do so, authorities will need to establish and train special teams in charge of environmental protection. Of course, public awareness campaigns should be launched to educate the public. However, as long as no punitive action is taken, these campaigns will land on deaf ears.
Since independence in 1943, Lebanon, its people and the land have been through a great deal of turmoil and suffering. It is one thing to have stopped the fighting, but it is a whole other issue to repair the damage. On the human level, there are still raw scars that need healing, but there are some efforts to avoid provoking new ones. On the environmental front, however, it is as if the civil war has never stopped.

Norbert schiller is a Dubai-based photo-journalist and writer

June 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Society

IWC – Georges Kern (Q&A)

by Executive Staff June 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

Georges Kern, 37, has been chief executive officer of the International Watch Company (IWC) since January 2002. He has worked in the watch industry since 1992, when he was responsible for TAG Heuer’s global distribution network. Kern recently sat down with Executive for a one-on-one interview to offer up a CEO’s view of how IWC and the watch industry are weathering the current global recession.

E Are Swiss watch manufacturers and the IWC focusing more on the Middle East and the Levant region? What’s your strategy?
The Middle East is a strong buying region for all brands and luxury goods, specifically the Gulf region. Dubai has been booming for years, they have a slowdown now, but the fundamentals are there and the region will continue to grow. Concerning the Levant, let’s face it, it’s Lebanon. In Lebanon you have a much more developed luxury culture than any other country [in the region] and the education towards luxury goods is much more developed. What we try to do is to develop local markets. We don’t need your purchases in only Paris, London or Dubai. We want to have business at a local level because it creates a much more sustainable business model. This is why everybody is coming to Lebanon and is looking for opportunities to do a drive.
The second question is always: ‘Yes, but Lebanon is smaller than France or whatever.’ That is not the point. The point is that we are a global brand; we are not a local brand. The customer in Lebanon is the same as in Paris, New York or Tokyo. He has a certain level of income, a certain level of knowledge and he is part of a certain club. He wants to see the brand with the same quality worldwide, in Avenue Montange as well as in Solidere. That is why we have to offer the same service, the same boutiques and the same environment because otherwise it’s not a real successful global brand.

E How has the financial crisis affected IWC and the luxury watch industry as a whole?
I think we have to be realistic and pragmatic. We cannot hide. I don’t think any brand in the world can hide from this crisis. The question is: How badly are you affected? I like the quote by Warren Buffet who said ‘when the tide goes down you see who was swimming naked.’ This really depends on how resilient you are in terms of your prices and what you offer in terms of real value, because consumers today don’t want ‘show value.’ The days when bankers who made a good bonus walked into a store and bought a watch for $50,000 are over. That customer base is done. Today it’s really back to the roots and you need preparation. The easy money is gone. You need to really build on your values, your history, your roots and have the confidence of the consumer. Thank God we have [that confidence] because of everything we have done over the last 140 years.

E Have you turned your focus away from the luxury watch sector as a result of recession? Are there plans to market more mid-range products?
You might see this in the exports; that some segments and cross segments have been hit harder than others. I think that in any price segment you can be successful or you can have major problems. The point is how strong your brand is, not which price segment you are [in]. You can be successful in any segment. The question really is how good your products are, how good your image is, how solid your values are and then you are fine. I can give you examples of total flops in any price segment and I can give you examples of very good brands in any price segment. We stick to where we are. There might be some technical adaptation but nothing fundamental.

E So there is no paradigm shift in your strategy to focus less on high-end segments?
I mean this would be a drama because then it would mean that our strategy was really wrong. But we had our bathing suits on.

E Swiss watch exports dropped 26 percent this year from last year, according to the Swiss Watch Federation. Are you experiencing a similar decline in exports?
As I said, you cannot hide. You cannot seriously say that such a crisis is not affecting you. The two fundamental questions are, in such a situation, what is your business model, and number two: how strong is your brand. Your business model, in terms of your cost structure to ensure strong profitability and cash flow, how ‘verticalized’ you are in terms of production and how many boutiques you have. What is your cost basis? That is the first question. The second question is how strong is your brand? I think we have those aspects under control.

E Watches and luxury goods in the Americas have been hit hard. Is this why you are focusing on other regions like the Middle East?
Of course we are looking for opportunities. Fundamentally, I think the United States will get out of the crisis. I think it’s a very reactive region. Most probably Europe will suffer longer than the US. In such a situation you optimize everywhere and we know that we have a lot of potential in the Middle East, including Lebanon. You have the [Lebanese] elections that will see 100,000 people travelling to Lebanon to vote, all paid for by political parties. Well, thank you very much. Go to our stores and buy some watches before flying back.

E There have been signs that a global economic recovery could be approaching, especially in this region. Have these signs translated into increased activity?
I don’t have a crystal ball but indeed we should all hope and pray that the financial system will be consolidated by the end of the year. You have to consider the real economy. The real economy is coming [back] one year or two years later [than the financial economy]. We are just starting to see the real economy in the US and Europe be affected. Unemployment rates in the States in April were announced at 8.9 percent. It’s a historical high and the impact is being felt now. If everything falls back into place we can hope that the real economy will be affected [positively] by, say next year. I explained the financial crisis to my 12-year old son by saying ‘finance in a body is like a heart and the money is the blood. If the heart doesn’t beat there is no money flow and the body is dying.’ If you cut off a hand like General Motors, you will still survive but if the financial system does not work, it’s over.

June 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Executive Insights

The need for renewable energy in an oil-rich region

by Tarek El Sayed June 3, 2009
written by Tarek El Sayed

Since 2000, many political and business leaders have shifted their focus from lowering energy costs to diversifying their energy supply, in part through the introduction of renewable energy. This change was triggered by concerns over security of supply, fuel cost volatility, climate change and fast-growing demand from emerging countries. Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries were able to defer this discussion by several years, thanks to their domestic oil and gas resources, but have recently undertaken a number of initiatives to introduce new energy sources.

In the process, they have generated some skepticism: Why should a region that contains almost half of the world’s remaining oil and gas reserves adopt renewable energy? 
Actually, in many respects, the case for renewable energy is stronger in the GCC than in many other places in the world. Cost is one driver in developing the rationale for renewables. Some technologies, such as wind, already reaching grid parity, and others, such as solar, are projected to become cost competitive with power generation from conventional fuels in the coming years. But beyond renewables’ overall cost competitiveness, the GCC region in particular is uniquely suited to some types of renewable energy: the region has very high levels of solar irradiance, coupled with limited cloud cover; these factors place the GCC among the top regions in the world in terms of technological potential for solar power generation.
Renewables will also become increasingly necessary as a complement to fossil fuels in the region, despite some critics’ alarm over renewables’ competition with the oil and gas industry. Even under the most optimistic forecasts for renewables, fossil fuels will remain the dominant source of global energy for the foreseeable future. In addition, according to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) World Oil Outlook 2008, OPEC’s share of world oil supply is expected to grow from 42 percent in 2006 to 52 percent by 2030. The burden of this

The Masdar Initiative
    The Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company (ADFEC) launched the Masdar Initiative in April 2006 to establish an entirely new economic sector dedicated to alternative and sustainable energy. There are five key components to this entity:

 

  • The property development unit is responsible for developing Masdar City, the first zero-emissions city in the world.
  • The utilities and asset-management unit is building a portfolio of operating assets and strategic investments in renewable energy.
  • The industries unit will invest in production assets and develop Masdar’s high-tech solar cluster.
  • The carbon management unit is developing a portfolio of clean development mechanism projects and a carbon capture and storage network in Abu Dhabi.
  • The Masdar Institute is a graduate level scientific and engineering institution focused on education and research in renewable energy and sustainable technology.

growth will be concentrated on a handful of suppliers, who will be responsible for providing significant additional capacity every year.
If the oil and gas currently used to generate electricity can be partially replaced by renewable sources, then new volumes of fossil fuels become available for export (or more profitable downstream applications, such as petrochemicals). By supplementing — rather than replacing — oil and gas, renewable energy could help maintain the GCC’s position as a major energy exporter for the world if the technology is developed early and competitively.
There are a host of other benefits to be realized if the GCC is an early adopter of renewable energy. For instance, its use would help the region manage its rapidly rising pollution levels and associated costs. Countries in the region have some of the highest per-capita carbon footprints in the world. In 2007, Qatar emitted — on a per capita basis — three times more CO2 than the US.
Renewable energy would not only improve the region’s own environment, but create opportunities for revenue. Under the Kyoto Protocol, developing countries can realize financial benefits from reducing their CO2 emissions and selling carbon credits to developed countries that need these credits to fulfill their emission reduction obligations.
Renewable energy also offers advantages that directly address the specific energy needs of the GCC. For instance, countries could use certain renewable technologies, such as solar photovoltaic and small-scale wind power, to provide energy to sparsely populated areas. Because such technologies function in distributed mode, they can replace expensive fuel-fired generators and eliminate the need for governments to make costly investments in extending grid infrastructure.
To take another example, about two-thirds of the electricity consumption in the GCC is used for cooling purposes; the use of solar energy for cooling could offer significant opportunities to address the large excess capacity required to meet electricity demand driven by cooling loads. This energy could be either converted into electricity to be used in traditional cooling systems, or used in direct thermal cooling applications, potentially offering higher conversion efficiencies and cheaper means of storage.
Finally, a local renewables sector and a substantial global presence in this industry would foster the development of a sustainable knowledge-based economy and create employment opportunities. The creation of such a sector would leverage the wealth generated by hydrocarbons and use it to diversify GCC economies and reduce their dependence on oil.
But in developing renewable energy, GCC countries will face many challenges. First, these countries will have to master a wider array of complex, cutting-edge technologies. They will have to develop their workforce to harness the capabilities required by investors. They should also create a regulatory framework that will attract investors and developers with the technological know-how, capital and project-development expertise to build the sector.
In the short term, GCC countries need to build the requisite financial systems to support the sector. Implementing technology specific feed-in tariffs is widely considered to be the most effective way to do so, especially when they are accompanied by efficient planning and registration procedures. Under the terms of these tariffs, utility companies are required to support the development of new technologies by purchasing electricity from renewable generators at a fixed price defined by public authorities. However, tariffs are not the only option; other regulatory models and incentive schemes include capital expenditure subsidies, grants for research and develoment, mandatory grid connection, tax incentives and renewable energy portfolio standards. Each country should review all of its options before selecting a model that meets its unique needs.
Competitive positions in the renewables sector are not yet set, and there is substantial opportunity for first movers to become global leaders by adopting the requisite policies and launching bold initiatives. Countries that move quickly, such as the United Arab Emirates, with its unique Masdar Initiative and its bid to host the International Renewable Energy Agency headquarters, could build a sizable and sustainable competitive advantage.

Tarek El Sayed is a senior associate and Walid Fayad a principal at Booz & Company

June 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Executive Insights

Private equity at the gates of public markets

by Imad Ghandour June 3, 2009
written by Imad Ghandour

Private equity investment in a public company is always a headline-capturing affair. The epic tale Barbarians at the Gate — The Fall of RJR Nabisco, chronicles how Kohlberg Krabis and Roberts, a large American private equity house, took over RJR Nabisco for almost $26 billion in 1987. The book has memorialized the thrill and excitement surrounding such an affair.

There has usually been a clear distinction between private and public equity investments. The style, objective, structure and active involvement are distinctive between these two classes of investment. But in many instances, the “barbarians” like to cross over and hunt for deals in public markets. The appeal is clear: public companies are prized targets by the way they naturally graduate to become public, and most shareholders of public companies are more or less willing sellers at the share price plus some premium.
Private equity investments in public markets come in two main flavors. The more opportunistic flavor is PIPEs, or Private Investments in Public Equities. A PIPE is basically a privately held company owned by a group of investors that purchases a substantial and influential equity stake in a public company, but keeps the target company listed.
On the other hand, the “take-private” flavor has become a well established strategy in the past few years, and is by definition the complete takeover and delisting of a target company. A private equity fund offers shareholders in the target company a price (usually above the listed price) and, if the fund’s offer is accepted by the vast majority, the fund will squeeze out (subject to the availability of such rules) the remaining dissenting shareholders and take over 100 percent of the company. Ambitious mega buyout funds have repeatedly adopted this strategy in the past three years.
Private equity financiers in the region have been inspired, and have successfully tried to hunt for deals in regional public market. Aramex is the best known example. It was taken private in 2002 from NASDAQ, and then taken public again in 2005 on the Dubai Stock Exchange, resulting in 197 percent gross capital gains for the investors. Egypt seems to be a fertile ground for such an investment strategy, as we can see from the table below, mainly because of its deep public markets, its semi-developed takeover laws and its laissez-faire regulators. The Gulf Cooperation Council, on the other hand, has not witnessed substantial take-private activity, as both the laws and the regulators deter such activities.
With valuations of regional markets rock bottom, the coffers of private equity funds full and the number of private deals limited, funds are figuring out how to take advantage of this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. The arbitrage potential is crystal clear, and willing (or distressed) sellers are available.
There are private hints and public announcements that private equity funds are actively working on public deals. They better hurry. Markets have risen by 20 to 40 percent since they hit bottom in March, and valuations have increased by 20 to 50 percent over the past few months.

Imad Ghandour is the executive director at Gulf Capital

June 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Executive Insights

Tuning the public relations machine for crisis

by Nohad Mouawad & Ramsay G. Najjar June 3, 2009
written by Nohad Mouawad & Ramsay G. Najjar

Companies around the world seem to have down-shifted their usual mass-market, flashy-ad campaigns to opt for more targeted and subtle forms of communication. This comes as no surprise, with almost every crisis in the past giving rise to two trends: companies begin squeezing their communication budgets and shifting their spending away from expensive communication campaigns to more cost efficient public relations activities. At the same time, they scramble to protect and preserve their image by calling on the “spin doctors” or public relations practitioners to reassure shareholders and consumers. Both trends ultimately lead to a greater demand for effective public relations (PR) services.

One example of turning to PR in crisis was when Australian company James Hardie Industries was accused of poisoning homeowners with its asbestos filled products. The first thing JHI did was hire spin doctors to try and divert audiences’ attention away from its unethical practices.
During the current financial crisis, US and global banks have been scrambling to preserve their image with shareholders and customers through PR activities. These range from including special messages in annual reports, to emphasizing their socially responsible activities in order to downplay the “greedy” image the crisis has tainted them with.
It is not surprising then that today’s crisis has led to a burgeoning interest in PR. The industry is abuzz with discussion about how it can be better leveraged to offer companies an image building and immunization tool with more bang for each buck spent on communication.
The Middle East is no exception, as we witness an increase in PR activities aimed at warding off the demons of the financial crisis, not only in the corporate world but even at the level of governments. The Dubai government, for example, has been regularly issuing press releases, interviews and articles to counter rumors of the Emirate’s demise.
Up until the crisis, however, the PR landscape in the region seemed to be rather limited to tactical press releases and occasional press conferences, alongside the endless flashy events and glitzy parties, which appeared to be exactly what companies and their audiences were looking for.
Today, with public relations being revived as a hot topic, regional conferences about “strategic PR” are on the rise, and PR agencies are clamoring to re-position themselves as offering “strategic public relations” services.
The growing interest in strategic PR, however, can be misleading as it may not result in the expected return on communication investment. PR can only be truly effective if it actually follows a strategic thinking exercise that culminates in developing a fully fledged communication strategy. This strategy defines the company’s aspired positioning and translates it into messages and channels that successfully engage each of its stakeholders. PR then comes as an application of the strategy, representing one of the tools in a company’s communication arsenal — and one of the most powerful and cost efficient ones when used effectively and in tandem with the other communication efforts.
PR that is in line with a company’s communication strategy and effective in times of crisis is one that can engage an organization’s stakeholders and reach them wherever their interests lie. This also means reaching out to opinion leaders or “influencers” in each target group who can spread the company’s strategic messages, and generate the needed buzz to restore credibility or remind target audiences of the value of a particular brand.
Walt Disney is a company that has proven the effectiveness of PR as part of an integrated communication strategy during crisis. Disney ensures that its president constantly communicates with shareholders and employees, highlighting the sustainability of the company and how its corporate strategy will help it ride out the crisis. The company does this through special letters, speeches that can be downloaded from its website, dedicated sections of its annual report and a regular flow of financial updates available on its website.
Looking at the strongest brands globally, there are numerous examples of how these companies practice such PR tactics, using a barrage of new media and other unconventional channels to convey their strategic messages. Starbucks launched a “My Starbucks Idea” website for its customers to propose ideas they would like to see implemented in terms of the company’s products and services, bringing them closer to a brand that is traditionally seen as a luxury during difficult financial times.
Apple’s famous blog is full of tips on how to use its products, targeting Apple technology aficionados who are looking for a new way to integrate their iPod, iPhone or i-something into their everyday lives and work.
The number of creative applications PR offers that are both attention grabbing and cost efficient are endless — from town hall meetings that rally communities, to online contests, to gathering members of the media for round-table discussions.
The universe of PR activities is certainly vast, and their strategic value should by no means be underestimated by regional companies, especially in times of crisis. However, their strategic benefits can only be reaped if they are preceded by a holistic strategy that provides companies with a road map that guides all of their communication activities, including PR.

Nohad Mouawad & Ramsay G. Najjar S2C

June 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lebanon

Airlines – Delta landing

by Executive Staff June 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

American owned airlines have been prohibited from flying to Lebanon since 1985, when kidnappings and hijackings were more common than tourists at Beirut International Airport.

But now Delta will become the latest American owned airline to open an office in Beirut, joining United Airlines and American Airlines. Jimmy Eichelgruen, Delta’s director of sales for the Middle East and Africa, explained the new Beirut office is part of Delta’s global expansion. 
“Delta was predominately a domestic airline and it has only been in the past four years that it has grown to [have a 50-50 split between] domestic and international flights,” he said. “The expansion of Delta has been phenomenal. Only two years ago the airline did not fly to the Middle East at all.”
Delta currently flies direct to Dubai, Kuwait, Cairo, Amman, Istanbul and Tel Aviv. Delta has 37 weekly flights to the Middle East, which is more than the other American airlines combined. This has meant that Delta has been in a prime position to profit in one of the fastest growing regions for aviation.
As to whether the new Delta office might suggest that the ban on US carriers flying to Lebanon will be lifted, Eichelgruen would not say.
“At the present time, US carriers are prohibited by the US government from flying to Lebanon,” he said. 
During the Nahr al-Bared conflict, the US government did relax  flight restriction, allowing military and humanitarian flights to arrive. But the ban remains for commercial airlines, and there is no sign that the restriction on US carriers will be lifted or even eased any time soon.
The new Delta office is set to open in the Starco building, with an initial staff of three that will deal with flight reservations and sales. Eichelgruen said the demand for American airlines to set up offices in Lebanon exists.
“Lebanon has a massive number of people living in the US, as many as 750,000, and the open skies policy is a good incentive to set up an office here,” he said.
Eichelgruen said it is especially important to have a presence in the country during Lebanon’s all important summer high season.
Delta has an air-sharing agreement with Air France and KLM enabling them to expand their operations. These agreements help in places such as Lebanon where Delta is unable to fly directly.
The company’s 2007 Chapter 11 bankruptcy represented a challenging period for the airline. But far from ruining the business it allowed Delta to restructure and be better prepared to face the financial turmoil that has hurt airlines more than any other sector.
One year after Delta Airways filed for Chapter 11 it became the largest airline in the world following its purchase of Northwest Airlines for $3.6 billion. Yet up until now Delta had no presence in Beirut, despite the fact many of its American competitors have had a presence in the Lebanese capital for years.  

June 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Executive Insights

Keeping one’s cool riding investment‘s reflexive roller coaster

by Rehan Syed June 3, 2009
written by Rehan Syed

Most studies of historical risk and return tell us to sell when prices rise and buy when they fall. “Bull markets are born on pessimism, grown on skepticism, mature on optimism and die on euphoria,” goes the old adage. Sell greed and buy fear, as they say. Yet, we often end up doing the opposite. Sometimes that works for a short period, but it often ends in tears. The only way to avoid this emotional roller coaster is to stick to a disciplined investment plan.

“To invest successfully over a lifetime does not require a stratospheric IQ, unusual business insights or inside information,” said veteran investor Warren Buffett. “What is needed is a sound intellectual framework for making decisions and the ability to keep emotions from corroding that framework.”
The figure which follows traces our emotional range on the investment roller coaster. Financial risk peaks when we are euphoric and troughs when we are disgusted. The only antidote to emotion is a disciplined investment strategy which balances portfolio management rigor with adjustments for behavioral biases.

To reflect or reflex?
Could we be our own worst enemy by enacting such a disciplined investment plan? Data confirms that most investors fail at timing markets. “The investor’s chief problem —  and even his worst enemy — is likely to be himself,” said Benjamin Graham, Warren Buffett’s mentor. Does success depend as much on managing emotions as it does on sound financial analysis?
Behavioral science suggests the answer is yes. With due apology to my creationist friends, the science of evolution asserts we have two brains. The first is a modern “executive” brain which is reflective, analytical, rational, logical and predictable. The second is the first brain’s alter ago: a reflexive or “lizard” brain, which is the residue of our primordial ancestors. The reptilian latter is impulsive, hyperactive and prone to hasty and often erroneous decisions. In fact, studies show two different computational ‘systems’ are at work inside us: the reflexive system is made of emotional circuits, and the reflective one of analytic circuits. When there is a strong stimulus, especially a negative one, like a sudden fall in the price of one’s stock or bond, fear kicks in and the reflexive system overwhelms the reflective system.
This is not kooky pop psychology; it is the result of decades of research by scholars like Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky The former being awarded the Nobel Prize in 2002 for having “integrated insights from psychological research into economic science, especially concerning human judgment and decision-making under uncertainty,” according to the Nobel committee. The science was further popularized by Harvard researcher Terry Burnham, who describes our lizard brain as a “pattern-seeking, backward-looking system which allowed us to forage successfully for food, and repeat successful behaviors.”
Emotions push an investor toward pro-cyclical reflexive behavior: buying when rising prices stoke excitement and selling when falling prices prompt fear. A disciplined, value-conscious investor would reflect and do the opposite: sell risky asset classes as they rise in value and buy the undervalued ones. In the long run, I believe this counter-cyclical process results in more portfolio stability, less volatility and greater compound return on investments.

The denominator effect
The investment world is emotionally exciting because it is overloaded with kinetic energy, just as action movies, even bad ones, often outsell good but slow moving dramas. Stoked by rapidly moving price signals, our sensible reflective system is sometimes overtaken by our impulsive reflexive system. The result is smart people who make unwise investment decisions.
The prices of most instruments change almost daily, creating a push and pull of emotions and expectations. This emotional angst is best understood by distinguishing between the emotional impact of a single asset’s return versus the portfolio’s overall return. Lets say 2 percent of one’s portfolio is invested in a single stock. Even if it doubles in value, which is very emotionally rewarding, you have an uninspiring gain of ‘only’ 2 percent on your portfolio, known as the denominator effect. In other words, the largeness of the denominator subdues the rapid movements of the numerator, yet your ‘emotional equity’ is centered on the numerator. What matters in the long run is the unexciting denominator, which is the overall portfolio’s final value, better known as your early ticket to a cozy retirement. Often an investor is inappropriately focused on the numerator not just because he owns it but, also because he has perhaps bragged about this hot stock tip with his cocktail party cohorts. Given such social conditioning, if the stock is in trouble he is unwilling to sell; even if that is the correct thing to do, because his ego or emotions are too wrapped up in it.

Desperately seeking patterns
The reflexive part of our brain is pattern seeking, groping for logical patterns to often illogical stock price movements. Too many investors rely too much on historical prices for predictions about the future. Buffett has a little advice to avoid this reflexive trap.
“I always like to look at investments without looking at the price, because if you see the price it automatically has some influence on you,” he said.
In other words, focus on enduring business value, not the more emotional issue of price. Also, by the time a price pattern or trend is visible, the easy money has already been made by investors who overcame their fear to buy before the positive news emerged. As George Soros said, “the big money is made when things go from God-awful to just plain awful.”
A disciplined rebalancing plan ensures that, at the bottom of the emotional roller coaster, you are methodically buying some asset classes which look awful in the rear-view mirror, and thus ignoring both illogical patterns and fears.
Current emotional state
Currently, with the MSCI World Index (a benchmark for global stock prices) at 922 and delicately poised 45 percent below the October 2007 high (about 33 percent above the March 2009 low) what should the reflective investor do? I believe we are still in the fear phase, but have passed through the desperation phase since the worst of the deflationary risk appears to be behind us. But equity investors may have become too optimistic about a V-shaped recovery, which I believe is unlikely. Only when bouts of optimism, such as the one we are currently experiencing, are repeatedly extinguished will we reach the disgust and capitulation stages which will signal the true market bottom.
For example, US and European stocks were mostly range bound, rising and falling within a specific range, during the “lost decade” between 1968 and 1979. The bottom and capitulation came in 1974, but the long lingering disgust eventually led to the infamous 1979 Business Week headline, ‘Death of Equities.’ With emotions washed out, an equity bull market began barely three years later.
With many leading banks forecasting global equities’ fair value at about 10 percent higher than current levels, is this the time to keep climbing the wall of worry? On the local front, with MSCI Arabia trading at 435, a strong 35 percent above its March lows and with oil having already recovered 70 percent from its recent low of $34 per barrel, is it wise to continue adding Middle East exposure to our global investment portfolios?
Both globally and locally, I believe a middling macro recovery will materialize late this year or early 2010, and that equity markets will bottom out about six months prior to that. Since it is extremely difficult to catch the bottom, I believe it is better to average into the market over the next six to nine months. Using this strategy, an investor will likely buy into the bottom of the market. From examinations of historical recovery pattern data, it looks like at least one additional price correction is likely to occur. Whether there will be a future round of capitulation and disgust depends on how successful the Group of 20 is with its ambitious reflationary and stimulus policies and how well those policies can keep populist protectionism at bay.

Two ways to roll unemotionally
There are two approaches to investing without emotion. First, commit to a disciplined investment process which is diversified and is based on the tried and true concepts of averaging and rebalancing. Second, one can invest in funds that use sophisticated computer models to trade many markets at once, rapidly trading price trends before emotional humans can, and arbitraging price discrepancies across markets.
In all cases, putting a wall between emotions and investment decisions is more difficult than it might seem, and is best achieved by first carefully formulating risk and return goals. Hiring a trained, unemotional and discretionary asset allocator to diversify a large portion of your portfolio, while allocating a small portion to funds run by unemotional, quantitative systems, can also help to keep one’s hot head from making unwise decisions.

Rehan syed is the head of portfolio management at the ABN AMRO Private Bank in Dubai. The opinions expressed here are personal and not necessarily those of his employer

June 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lebanon

Real estate – Beirut in an eggshell

by Executive Staff June 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

In the heart of Beirut is the distinctive shell of what was once a complex called the “City Center,” also affectionately known as the “Egg.”

The Egg, with its nose chopped off and deep scars on its once smooth concrete exterior skin, has passed through dramatic changes in its 50 years of existence. Ever since Solidere in 2005 sold the land to Abu Dhabi Investment House (ADIH) as part of the Beirut Gate project, the Egg has been constantly threatened with demolition.
Solidere sold the land without any legal protection or financial incentive to save the Egg, meaning its destruction is almost inevitable. For now, the July 2006 war stopped its imminent demolition and the financial crisis delayed the bulldozers further. However, the end appears to be near for one of the last iconic, modernist architectural structures in the center of Beirut that also carries with it the physical manifestations of the civil war years.
The Egg was built between 1965 and 1968 as a multi-use shopping center, movie theater and office building. The developers, Samadi and Salha, had ambitious plans for this development and wanted to make it the biggest multi-use center in the Middle East. The egg-shaped cinema was designed to hold 1,000 seats and is 24 meters wide and 11 meters high. It was to be accompanied by two towers, of which only one was built and has since been destroyed. George Arbid, professor of architecture at the American University of Beirut (AUB), explained that the distinctive shape of the Egg came about through unintended consequences.
“The building code at this time was very strict about building movie theaters for structural safety,” Arbid said. “So the architect, Joseph-Philippe Karam, convinced the authorities that the law did not forbid the use of the space below the movie theater, so he created a retail space underneath. Once the movie theater was raised and visible, he was forced to give it a distinguished shape, hence the concrete egg shell.”

The architect and the egg
Joseph-Philippe Karam was one of Lebanon’s most distinguished modernist architects who trained in Lebanon and designed buildings throughout the region.
“The Beirut City Center was one of several examples of his innovative contributions to architecture,” said Joseph-Philippe Karam’s son, Sami Karam. “The surviving cinema [or Egg] has become an icon of avant-garde Lebanese modernism.”
Many of Karam’s buildings were destroyed in the civil war and the few that remain are being demolished to make way for high-rise developments, most notably the Building Gondole, in Rouche, that was demolished in 2004.
The architectural importance of the Egg is contested despite many top-notch international architects admiring the structure.
“Architecturally speaking the Egg does not have architectural value,” said architect Bernard Khoury. “There are many more important buildings in Beirut that are, architecturally speaking, more important. The attraction [to the Egg] is the curiosity of the building in terms of its role with the war and the fascination that it creates.”
Residents of Lebanon confirm this enchantment with the Egg and the history it represents in its current appearance.
Marie-Louise Ramy, who grew up during Lebanon’s civil war, explained the fascination.
“When we came down from the mountains to Beirut, the whole of Beirut used to look like the Egg does now,” she said. “So the structure acts as a reminder.”
Arbid disagreed with the idea put forth by Khoury that the Egg does not have any architectural value.
“It is one of the rare free-form structures in the city [and] it was a difficult task to execute such a form. It is also important because it is one of the rare cinema halls raised above a freed ground floor,” he said.
While the architectural importance of the building is contested, the debate over whether to demolish the structure or not has certainly stirred public interest. Dania Bdier, a student at AUB, started a Facebook group to ‘Save the Egg’ at the beginning of 2009.
“Within four days 3,000 people had joined up to the group,” she said.
The group now has more than 5,000 members and had to move to ‘Save the Egg Cause’ due to having so many members in the group. Much of the debate of the group does not center on the architectural intricacies of the building, but instead on the role the Egg plays in Lebanese identity.

The battle for identity
For many the Egg is becoming a centerpiece in the battle for the identity, not just of the downtown area, but the whole of Lebanon. Bdier was very clear about her reason for starting up the Facebook group.
“We are starting to look so much like Dubai and we are not, we are like the Egg. The Egg is very important in Lebanese history,” she said.
Many of those on the Facebook group who support preserving the Egg do so because they want to stop what they call the ‘Dubai-ification’ of Lebanon. This allegation is particularly sensitive given that the land where the Egg is located is now owned by the ADIH and the decision as to whether the Egg stays or goes rests not in Lebanon but in Abu Dhabi. This point has not been lost on those who argue for preserving the Egg. As Jack Samaha, on the Facebook group proclaimed, “Our identity and culture as Lebanese is not for sale [to] Gulf millionaires.”
Not all agree with this notion that the destruction of the Egg will make Lebanon more like the Gulf, and many posts support the demolition of the Egg.
“I saw the Beirut Gate project and I have to say it’s very nice,” wrote Patrick Saab on the Facebook group. “The Egg is a mess, and it can be replaced or rebuilt anywhere else. Put culture aside, think modern look for Lebanon… How do we expect to get more exposure if we keep our old, almost destroyed buildings standing?”
The ADIH would not speak to Executive but in an interview with Bdier, in January, an unnamed representative stated: “Solidere wishes us to keep the soul of this dome by either reshaping it or doing something similar. We took it into consideration and we are considering it, because it also has to financially make sense for us to do it. For this plot, we bought and paid [for] 39,000 meters squared of built up area, and the dome is only taking up 6,000 or 7,000 meters squared. The developer who is going to buy it is looking at it.”
French architect Christian de Portzamparc was commissioned to produce a study for the site, and according to the local architectural consultant ERGA Group, produced two designs for the site.
“One of the proposals keeps the shell of the Egg and the other demolishes it and no decision by the developers has been made as to which one will be built,” said Eli Abu Ghazaly, chief operating officer of ERGA.
With no legal obligation to keep the Egg it is highly unlikely that the developer will wish to keep the structure, as it reduces the built up area of the site and thus significantly reduces its profitability. Abu Ghazaly said that because no decision has been made as to which proposal would be accepted, no images of the proposals could be released.

The project that never was
One project proposal for the renovation of the Egg was Khoury’s 2004 commission by Solidere. In previous statements, Solidere Chairman and CEO Nasser Chamma, in The Wall Street Journal in 2004, admitted that Solidere wanted to demolish the structure straight away. But many of the star architects brought to Lebanon by Solidere, such as Philippe Stark and Jean Nouvelle, were struck by the Egg and Solidere decided to think again. It was then that they approached Khoury to propose a scheme to redevelop the Egg.
“There was deadlock over this site for a while and Solidere did not know what to do with it,” Khoury said. “Then in 2004, they called me to develop a temporary structure that would last five or six years while they figured out what to do with the land. But then with the assassination of [former Prime Minister] Rafiq Hariri everything changed. There was a huge change in Solidere with big interest in the real estate and many big transactions were made,” he said.
“It all occurred much faster than Solidere ever thought it would happen… The land where the Egg is was sold in one of the biggest deals and so my project was stopped,” Khoury added.
The role of Solidere in the Egg’s sale has also been highly controversial, primarily because of the way the company parceled up the land and sold it. When Solidere sold the land they expressed a “wish” for the dome to be kept, but they made no legal stipulations enforcing it. Abu Ghazaly defended Solidere by stating that “to make it illegal, there needs to be a government decree.”
But as Arbid explained, “the way Solidere sold the land makes it impossible to save the Egg.”
The manner in which the land was sold, with a total amount of built up area, including the area where the Egg is situated, did not leave any real possibility for saving the structure. Despite having already sold the right to make any assertion as to the future of the Egg, Solidere still maintains the structure is going to be preserved.
As another of Lebanon’s historical sites is destroyed many will be frustrated by the lack of transparency and debate over these architecturally significant sites. There is a clear lack of will to engage by Solidere or the ADIH in any sort of debate over whether these buildings are worth saving or not. Those who want to preserve Lebanon’s built environment face an uphill struggle.

June 3, 2009 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Comment

A blue line dance

by Nicholas Blanford June 3, 2009
written by Nicholas Blanford

Despite recent speculation to the contrary, it appears that the Israelis intend to indefinitely remain on Lebanese soil in the northern section of Ghajar, the village bisected by the United Nations-delineated Blue Line.
The continued Israeli troop presence in northern Ghajar is a lingering legacy of the July 2006 war and has become a source of frustration for Lebanese, Israelis, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon(UNIFIL) and Alawite residents of the village.
Still, the monthly UNIFIL-hosted tripartite meetings, attended by Lebanese and Israeli military delegations, have raised hopes of reviving the long defunct military commission that monitored the 1949 Armistice Agreement. A renewed monitoring group, under UN auspices, may even generate sufficient confidence for Israel to withdraw from the Shebaa Farms, the last significant territorial dispute between Lebanon and Israel.
The curious fate of Ghajar is a consequence of the historically murky sovereignty of the tri-border area — the junction of the Lebanese, Syrian and Israeli frontiers.
Ghajar, populated by Syrian Alawites, was occupied by Israel during the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. The invading Israelis actually stopped just short of the village, as, according to their maps, Ghajar lay in Lebanon. A delegation from Ghajar traveled to Marjayoun and asked the local authorities to formally incorporate the village into Lebanon. The Lebanese rejected the request and after some hesitation the Israelis moved into Ghajar.
In 2000, the UN delineated the Blue Line which corresponded to the international border — behind which Israel was required to withdraw its forces from south Lebanon. UN cartographers discovered that over the years Ghajar had spread northward, actually crossing the then unmarked border onto Lebanese soil. The Blue Line split the village so that the northern two-thirds fell inside Lebanon while the southern third remained in Israeli-occupied Syria.
For a short period in the summer of 2000, it was possible to have some unusually close encounters with Israelis in Ghajar, as journalists from both sides stumbled around the village not realizing exactly where the path of the Blue Line lay. On one occasion, an Israeli television crew encountered a team from Lebanon’s LBC win the northern — Lebanese — two-thirds of the village. The Israelis asked the LBC team what they were doing inside Israel. We informed the Israelis that they were in fact standing on Lebanese soil. The two camera crews filmed each other filming each other as a convoy of shaven-headed Israeli security men drove past, glaring at us from behind their sunglasses.
After Hezbollah launched its campaign to liberate the Shebaa Farms in October 2000, the northern part of Ghajar was placed off-limits. But the village continued to be a conduit for Hezbollah’s intelligence penetration of northern Israel. Drugs were smuggled into Israel via Ghajar in exchange for cash for the Lebanese dealers and intelligence information for Hezbollah. The Israeli army described Ghajar as “Israel’s soft underbelly,” and struggled to find a way to secure the loophole along the border.
During the 2006 war, Israeli troops moved into the Lebanese part of the village, and there they have remained.
After the August 14 ceasefire, UNIFIL helped arrange a now monthly tripartite meeting of Lebanese and Israeli army officers at a UNIFIL position at Ras Naqoura on the border to discuss issues related to the implementation of UN Resolution 1701.
The tripartite group has been unable to resolve the Ghajar issue, despite indications in early May that the Israelis were preparing to vacate the northern end of the village. Israeli officials have hinted that they will review their stance on Ghajar after the Lebanese parliamentary elections, suggesting that there will be no withdrawal if the Hezbollah-led opposition wins.
Still, the tripartite meetings have achieved some minor successes, such as an agreement to mark the Blue Line with blue painted barrels in several locations to prevent accidental boundary violations. Alain Le Roy, the UN under-secretary general for peacekeeping who attended the May meeting, described the forum as an “indispensable instrument” to address security and military issues related to Resolution 1701.
The tripartite sessions have spurred some in Washington to mull the possibility of formalizing the meetings by reestablishing the Israel-Lebanon Mixed Armistice Commission (ILMAC), which monitored the 1949 Armistice Agreement. ILMAC, grouping Lebanese and Israeli army officers, met regularly from 1949 until Israel abrogated the armistice agreements with its Arab neighbors in 1967.
A renewal of the Lebanon-Israel armistice agreement itself is probably unachievable for the time being — in Lebanon, Hezbollah would oppose a revived armistice, and in Israel it would required a change of law. But a resuscitated ILMAC could help further stabilize the Blue Line, serving as a forum for airing grievances and resolving disputes. In time, if ILMAC was shown to be a capable instrument, it could encourage the Israelis to withdraw from the Shebaa Farms and be replaced by, perhaps, a combined Lebanese army and UNIFIL force.
Whether the ILMAC idea bears fruit or not largely depends on June’s election results. UN sources said they expect greater restrictions to be imposed upon UNIFIL’s freedom of operations if the opposition wins. In that event, the continuation of the tripartite meetings may be threatened and ILMAC’s resurrection will be place on the backburner.

Nicholas Blanford is a Beirut-based correspondent for The Christian Science Monitor and The Times of London.

June 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lebanon

Automotives – Sales in the passing lane

by Executive Staff June 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

Lebanon’s automobile market seemingly defies economic analysis, as it’s currently experiencing growth while others are in decline. In the Gulf, automobiles sales in the first quarter have plunged by some 23 percent and in the United Arab Emirates alone by 45 percent, while Lebanon saw 19 percent growth in sales. Last year, when the financial crisis came to a head, the Lebanese car sector had its best results in years, increasing from around 20,000 units sold in 2007 to more than 35,000 units in 2008. As Fayez Rasamny, vice chairman of Rymco, the dealer for Nissan, Infiniti and GMC put it, 2008 was a “perfect year.”
“The sector was growing very fast last year, no one had stocks so [we] ordered more and en route shipments were even pre-sold. There was no holding cost of inventories,” he said.
For Rymco, the market leader, 2008 certainly was an excellent year, with sales increasing nearly 50 percent, up from 4,200 cars sold in 2007, to nearly 8,000. While the upswing in mid-range cars could be expected, the luxury end also did well. For Mercedes dealership T. Gargour and Fils, last year was “the best year ever for five years,” said Marketing Coordinator Krystel Hajj. Sales of used cars have equally spiked, up by an estimated 50 percent over the past year, according to Cesar Aoun, the Chrysler Car Group Manager.

So what explains this surge in sales?
“To be honest, no one knows, and because we don’t know, we are having problems now,” said Rasamny. Indeed, developing a marketing plan in a volatile market like Lebanon’s has always been tricky, but when sales unexpectedly spike, this presents further issues — how many cars do you import, what kind of marketing will work and ultimately, why the up-tick?
Rasamny said their first assumption was that consumers were switching from used to new vehicles, but used cars sales also spiked. Then the Rymco team, just like other dealerships, considered the surge was due to an increase in purchasing power, but that had also remained unchanged. The dealers came to a consensus that the responsibility for the increased sales can be traced to two factors that have been the bane and savior of the Lebanese economy: politicians and the banking sector.
Following the dismantling of the opposition’s “tent city” in downtown Beirut, the Doha agreement and the appointment of a president in May, 2008, stability meant an upswing in sales.
“The president’s appointment meant sales went up like crazy, showing Lebanese had the money but were waiting on the political situation to improve,” said Hajj.
But the first quarter of 2008 was very different from the rest of the year as well as the first quarter of 2009.
“In Lebanon, you never compare year-on-year, [because] if there was a bomb in January, you cannot compare to last January,” said Rasamny.
The banks also played their part by offering car loans, with lower non-acceptance rates of clients and more access to funds than in previous years.
“A main reason for growth was that banks were very aggressive in loans, so this was good for prospective buyers rather than just replacements,” he added.
But while last year dealerships couldn’t wait for orders to be delivered, this year retailers have stocked more inventory, forecasting this year to be even better. However, comparing the first quarter to the last quarter 2008, Rasamny said “we’ve seen a slowdown in retail sales this year.”
The sector’s health now hinges on the outcome of the elections and continued stability.
“If nothing happens during the elections it will be a great year. I personally forecast similar sales to last year, less but similar, with profitability nowhere near 2008,” said Rasamny.

June 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 465
  • 466
  • 467
  • 468
  • 469
  • …
  • 686

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    Executive Magazine
    • ISSUES
      • Current Issue
      • Past issues
    • BUSINESS
    • ECONOMICS & POLICY
    • OPINION
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • EXECUTIVE TALKS
    • MOVEMENTS
      • Change the image
      • Cannes lions
      • Transparency & accountability
      • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
      • Say No to Corruption
      • The Lebanon media development initiative
      • LPSN Policy Asks
      • Advocating the preservation of deposits
    • JOIN US
      • Join our movement
      • Attend our events
      • Receive updates
      • Connect with us
    • DONATE