• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
GCC

Cityscape 2009

by Executive Staff April 9, 2009
written by Executive Staff

As April begins, so does the countdown for Abu Dhabi Cityscape 2009. Just a few weeks separate Abu Dhabi’s real estate developers, investors and market players from the capital’s most prestigious property show. Usually, Cityscape is where developers launch their multi-billion dollar projects such as high-rise towers, mixed-use developments and even entire new cities. This year, however, the definition has changed. Instead of bragging about their new projects, developers have to prove their resilience in the face of current market conditions. Experts will also have to demonstrate their understanding of the current situation and prove Abu Dhabi’s strong position. On the other hand, investors and end-users will be watching to see whether Abu Dhabi still represents a good opportunity for investment.

Cityscape Abu Dhabi will take place in the Abu Dhabi National Exhibition Center April 19 to 23 and will include a series of conferences and summits, during which 101 key speakers will be discussing the most important challenges and issues facing the property market. Moreover, three post-conference workshops will take place on the last day of Cityscape. In the first workshop, Louise Sunshine, chairwoman and CEO of Domineum will be tackling the global property solution in the current challenging economy. In the second, Oscar Marquez, a real estate master trainer at the Leader’s Edge Training will be discussing new marketing strategies. The third conference will be lead by Matthia Gelber, who will confer about how companies can become green and make money out of it. Additionally, Middle East Real Estate Awards will be held on April 19 at the Emirates Palace in the presence of 500 industry leaders, where distinctive projects that combine architectural excellence with eco-friendly solutions will be awarded.

The optimistic view

Marquez, who remains very optimistic about the real estate market in the Middle East, says that Cityscape will give people a lot of hope.

“People think that this is the end of the world, while it is not. Many investors will become aware [during Cityscape] of the big opportunities that are right now in real estate,” he explains. Moreover, Marquez also thinks that at Cityscape, developers will make up their mind on how much prices have to be reduced in order to keep the economy moving forward. “It is just a matter of time before [developers] realize that they can’t make 100 percent profit,” he adds. 

Other experts agree with Marquez, while saying that this year, the number of transactions that are going to take place will be minimal. Indeed, now more than ever investors are cautious about their investment decisions. They will likely consider Cityscape as a means to see how developers are progressing on their previously launched projects as well as the prices and payment plans that they are going to present.

Hussain Ali Al Shamkhani, chief investment officer at Escan Real Estate PJSC, says that Cityscape 2009 represents an opportunity for developers to show that they are still in the market and still going ahead. He explains that “developers should show the benefit of the demand-supply gap [in Abu Dhabi] and show people that instead of speculating, they can buy units and rent them out and make seven to eight percent return. [Developers] should sell that as the main benefit of buying a unit.”

Shamkhani also adds, “they need to emphasize and explain the potential of Abu Dhabi, how it is very different from Dubai and why it is much safer and more profitable. I think this should be the theme for the show and this is the best message to get across.”

IIR Middle East, the organizers of the event, introduced the first Cityscape Connect breakfast recently, where 150 real estate and property stakeholders met to increase confidence in Cityscape and the market in general. At the breakfast, Sami Eid, Aldar’s senior marketing manager, said “it’s one of the biggest events and we’ll be showcasing ourselves and showcasing Abu Dhabi… We won’t be unveiling anything new but it’s important to be out there and we’ll be showing all our projects.”

This statement is likely to apply to all developers who are considering Cityscape a chance to prove themselves as well positioned to face the current turmoil. Since early February, 95 percent of the exhibition stands were booked, Cityscape organizers asserted. They added that 40 percent more floor space has been sold than last year. Moreover, attendance is expected to increase up to 27 percent from 35,000 during Cityscape 2008.

Real estate stakeholders are looking forward to this year’s show, waiting to see what Abu Dhabi has to offer. Consequently, Cityscape 2009 has a hard task to meet, since it will have to prove that Abu Dhabi is still, despite the current market turbulence, one of the most attractive destinations for investment in the Middle East.

April 9, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Private equity – Stacks of dry powder

by Executive Staff April 9, 2009
written by Executive Staff

Big or small, PE firms in the Middle East are faring much better than most other financial institutions in the region, despite the amount of “dry powder” — i.e. capital called or committed that is yet to be deployed — in the area. Nevertheless, sitting on a mountain of cash and not spending it because you don’t like what you see is more enviable then struggling to pay off your creditors.

The phenomenon of dry powder is not just an effect of the financial crisis and the ensuing downturn, which started to take effect in the last quarter of 2008. Investments by PE firms began to make an about-face around the beginning of 2008. PE investments over the whole of 2008 saw a significant decrease in both number and size year-on-year by 22 and 31 percent respectively, the principle reason for this being that private valuations still seem to be out of touch with public market perceptions.

“At the moment, valuations are generally too high so PE firms are saying ‘give us another six to nine months for them to fall,’” says Robert Hall, head of transaction services Middle East & South Asia at KPMG.

Hisham El Khazindar, managing director and co-founder of Citadel Capital, adds that “in the grand scheme of things valuations across the board are 70 percent of what they were two years ago.”

When the region’s PE firms will start to sprinkle their powder around will, for the most part, depend on how long it will take owners’ willingness to break away from their egos and admit that they are in trouble.

“A contraction is taking place, but certainly we are not seeing the valuations that are in the public sector. We are not in a situation where we see distressed shareholders who are willing to sell at any price,” Christophe de Mahieu, co-head at Gulf Growth Capital at Investcorp, said to The National.

Yahya Jalil, senior executive officer and head of private equity at The National Investor in Dubai, remarks that, “it’s a little bit of an ego thing to admit that things have gone bad; this region is not known for being forthcoming as people like to contain their problems.”

Overcoming egos aside, many shareholders and owners don’t see the point of going into the market.

“People who have been in the market for 20 to 25 years see the blip in the market as very temporary, so they are thinking: why should they off a portion of their equity at these valuations,” says Jalil.

Ammar Al-Khudairy, managing director and CEO of Amwal Al Khaleej Investment Co., says “one private consumer goods company said to me, ‘I brought in one of the big four, they did a valuation for me and said my company was worth $100 million back in August [2008] and nothing has changed since. I sell no less if not more and, in fact, my cost of raw material has come down. So why should I sell for less than 100?’”

The stalemate that is brewing between firms and investors doesn’t seem to be going away anytime soon and it remains to be seen if the same understanding with regards to delaying capital calls will be extended to the firms for much longer.

Stressed out

The possibility of distressed or mezzanine funds is something that many in the industry are starting to look at as a result of the trauma being suffered by many regional organizations. Significantly, the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) wants the Dubai International Financial Center (DIFC) to consider establishing the Gulf’s first private equity secondary market. This could provide a respite for many PE firms looking to rid themselves of their dry powder.

“The whole issue of distressed assets in this region hasn’t been fully experienced in previous recessions. If you look at what the ‘ultimate’ distress is, which is a company becoming insolvent and unable to pay debts as they become due, then you really haven’t seen much of that yet,” says Hall. “In the recession this time around, the economy is much bigger and there are undoubtedly going to be some companies that will have significant problems. For PE firms this will provide some great opportunities.”

However, for the time being things don’t look that bad and the omnipresent attitude in the region today is not one of going after high risk and high return opportunities.

“Mezzanine capital is definitely more expensive than traditional forms of capital and it works well when valuations are improving and in upward cycle,” says Tamer Bazzari, deputy CEO of Rasmala.

Jalil says, “in the long term mezzanine is a huge unmet need in the region, but for the next year or two I think that, relatively speaking, it is not going to be interesting for investors — the risk profile between mezzanine and secured is night and day.”

April 9, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Quick & lean

by Executive Staff April 9, 2009
written by Executive Staff

With the financial crisis at hand the question is: what are businesses going to do about it? The response many businesses in the region have is to look inwards and improve internal business processes in order to hold down the fort until the onslaught subsides. The next and perhaps more important question is: how will regional businesses restructure their organizations?

Despite the dismal undertone of the business news coming out of the region, there are a few encouraging signs. One sector that is doing surprisingly well as a result of the need for businesses to restructure and improve efficiency is the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) industry. According to the International Data Corporation (IDC), ERP growth within the GCC will range between nine and 12 percent, an enormous figure considering many regional states will not grow at all this year.

“We will probably have the best month we have ever had this month,” says Bill Tomlinson, general manager of Dynamic Vertical Solutions, a multinational Microsoft partner that specializes in vertical add-on solutions to Microsoft Dynamics ERP platforms.

Much of this anomalous growth results from owners and managers  realizing that ERPs can increase efficiency for them.

“Before the crisis there was more time and more money,” says Sergio Maccotta, managing director of SAP Middle East and North Africa. “Now companies are taking the opportunity to change, through IT adoption, in order to improve their internal processes.”

The industry itself is also experiencing a paradigm shift in relation to its operating environment. Before the crisis, many regional businesses were hesitant to adopt standard ERP processes, opting instead to fit the system to their businesses or not to adopt one at all. Today, however, the tables have turned.

“What we are seeing that we didn’t see before is that many of the upper to mid-market organizations are coming to us, while we used to go to them and try to prove our solutions,” says Tamer Elhamy, regional business solutions manager at Microsoft Gulf.

What’s on offer?

The ERP companies in the region are increasingly being queried about how their systems can help companies save on the more costly elements of doing business and keep in touch with their customer base.

“People want to manage their [human] resources a lot better now so they are looking for payroll and HR solutions more than ever,” explains Tomlinson. Maccotta adds that, “the money in the market is lower, so in order to secure your portion you have to execute better and stay closer to your customer.”

It should be noted that internally, ERP solution providers are also benefiting from some of the more sinister effects of the global downturn, such as rising unemployment, decreasing real estate valuations and weakening currencies. Although there has been “no drastic change,” according to Maccotta, in the resource pool for providers, there has been a decrease in the acquisition and retention costs of consultants for providers. “The [Indian] rupee rate is at 51 to the dollar, whereas it used to be 39 to the dollar and that cuts 25 percent of cost because I am on dollar fixed,” says Tomlinson. “Another benefit of the crash is that all the rents are down by about half, so if you want to bring in some big people for a project then you can do it cheaper and it’s making our job easier.”

The argument within the industry, however, is centered around the size of the solutions on offer.

“Many of the customers are deciding to adopt an ERP to increase their efficiency but they are trying to start with the minimum number of users and functionalities and taking a step-by-step approach,” says Elhamy. That approach is prompting many people in the industry to predict that smaller and less expensive ERP solutions will be the trendsetters in the future.

“In the global scheme of things, SAP and Oracle’s figures are down because they are too expensive. People are more cash conscience now and are actually exposing the product for what it is,” claims Tomlinson. Perhaps unsurprisingly, that assertion is being bitterly contested by the larger and more complex solution providers.

“I don’t agree when you say we are more expensive because our solution is extremely flexible, as well as scalable, and can fit any kind of business,” counters Maccotta. “We still see a lot of demand and having the vertical competence is putting SAP at a competitive advantage.”

“In order to secure your portion you have to execute better and stay closer to your customer”

April 9, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Much tilling without harvest

by Executive Staff April 9, 2009
written by Executive Staff

Last year food was big news as prices soared globally by 54.9 percent and associated riots erupted in 60 countries. In the Arab world alone the shortage in food sufficiency was estimated at $18 billion by the Arab Authority for Agricultural Investment and Development (AAAID). In the Gulf countries, dependent to the tune of $12 billion a year on imports and with agricultural water consumption at unsustainable levels, the issue took on grave importance. State and private investors promptly started eyeing up arable land in Africa and Asia to secure food for a region that is expected to increase import dependency to 60 percent by 2010, according to the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).

But while food prices and commodities have reduced in the wake of lower oil prices and the global financial crisis, the issue of food security has not gone away. However, it has yet to be seen whether all the touted agribusiness projects will take off as Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) and private investors tighten their belts in the face of the global economic slowdown.

The big issues

The Arab world’s population ballooned 121.9 percent between 1975-2005, while over a similar period, 1980-2004, the region’s food grain and meat production increased by 93 percent.

The shortfall was not overly concerning given access to the free market and that staples such as wheat and rice were fair cheap, at least affordable enough for governments to subsidize. Additionally, countries such as Saudi Arabia, Syria and Iraq were involved in large-scale agricultural projects to boost domestic production.

Saudi Arabia, for instance, spent a staggering $85 billion on agricultural development between 1984-2000, according to estimates by Elie Elhadj in The Middle East Review of International Affairs.

But the cost of such investment has gone beyond budgetary concerns. It is worth noting that while Saudi Arabia was paying up to $500 per ton for domestically produced wheat — when international market rates were around $120 —  to maintain local agriculture some 300 billion cubic meters of water was used between 1980-1999, two-thirds of it non-renewable, says the Ministry of Agriculture and Water. Such a gigantic amount of water was needed to grow produce in the kingdom’s arid climate, which is two to three times more water than required in a temperate climate.

After investing an estimated $16 billion to $18.7 billion over the last 30 years on its wheat program, according to BMI, last year Riyadh decided to phase out production due to water shortages. The costs versus the benefits were no longer sustainable, having been self-sufficient in wheat since the 1980s when production hit 4 million tons per year, Saudi Arabia is now a net importer and as of 2016 it will be totally dependent on imports. Furthermore, with Saudi Arabia joining the WTO, the kingdom has to abide by the organization’s requirement to reduce state support for agriculture to 13.3 percent over the next decade. This will have other knock on effects, such as on the 12 percent of the workforce involved in a sector that accounts for just 3.3 percent of GDP.

The region is losing an estimated one million hectares of arable land each year to salinity

Saudi Arabia is not the only country re-thinking its agriculture policies, with the region losing an estimated one million hectares of arable land each year to salinity, according to Dr. Shoaib Ismail, a halophyte agronomist at the International Center for Biosaline Research (ICBR) in Dubai.

“Twenty years ago there was good quality water everywhere. Now there is one-third seawater concentration in the groundwater and salinity is even higher in other places. Mismanagement has led to more salinity,” said Ismail. “Some 85 percent of water usage in the GCC is for agriculture, the highest in the world. In that sense, the question arises, how feasible is agriculture over here?”

The short answer is that it isn’t. Even producing processed foodstuffs for domestic consumption and export requires water, what has been called the “export of virtual water” and it may have to be re-thought given looming water constraints.

One solution is to use halophytes, plants that grow under high saline conditions, as opposed to glycophytes, non-salt loving plants, an alternative with which the ICBR is involved. But while halophytes could be used to replace more water intensive plants and trees, those plants would not produce adequate amounts of food. It is in landscaping, which accounts for 18 percent of water use in the UAE, that plants and non-conventional grasses can be advantageous, according to Ismail.

Oman is developing a salinity plan and it has invested in a project to clean water from the oil industry, because for every barrel of oil pumped out of the ground seven barrels of water are used. The UAE has also developed a ‘Master Development Plan’ to assess water usage and improve efficiency, such as changing irrigation systems, phasing out subsidies and expanding water pricing to include agriculture and industry.

Desalinization is another touted panacea for the region’s water concerns, but costing between $0.81-$1 per cubic meter, desalinized water is too expensive for agricultural use.

“Building new desalination plants is not the solution, as this warms up the sea and affects marine life,” said Ismail. It also increases the sea’s salinity.

Rich countries trying to secure land overseas risk creating a ‘Neo-Colonial’ System

Eyeing pastures new

With wheat prices rising 83 percent last year and other staples doubling in price, governments started eating into their reserves to placate populations which were spending ever-larger proportions of their income on food.

In Pakistan, the NGO Oxfam reported that, due to food inflation, the number of poor has risen from 60 million to 77 million since 2007, while in the Arab world the AAAID predicted some 35 million people were falling into poverty due to high food costs. As the region has an overwhelmingly young population and high population growth, food security is paramount.

For the GCC, the surge in food prices didn’t push people under the poverty line, but it was a contributor to inflationary pressures. And with the population expected to double by 2038 to 60 million people, demand for food will continue to grow at a rapid pace. Saudi Arabia, the Gulf’s most populated country, already imports some $5 billion per year of food and beverage items, according to BMI, and that will figure will spike in years to come.

“Food security is officially defined not just as a shortage, but also looking at availability and affordability,” said George Attala, a principal at Booz Allen Hamilton. “There are a number of ways to ensure supply is always available. One is try and diversify sources, not all wheat from say, Ukraine. Another is look at internal networks, such as imports through more than one port. A third way is storage capacity, of four to six months, while the fourth is to get into contract farming, but that is not always the best solution.”

Essentially, the Middle East is left with two choices. “The region has to import. The question is, invest abroad or rely on the free market?” said Dr Eckart Woertz, program manager in economics at the Gulf Research Center in Dubai.

Last year, Arab states appeared to be opting for the first choice in the face of high food prices, with government missions from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Egypt and Libya visiting Pakistan, Ethiopia, Cambodia, Uganda, Angola, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Thailand and the Philippines to discuss the possibilities of buying up arable land to cultivate. The private sector also got in on the act, with the likes of the Emirates Investment Group, Abraaj Capital, Al Qudra Holding and the Bin Laden Group reportedly acquiring land in Sudan and Pakistan.

But such policies are not always popular and they are also not necessarily dependable in the long run.

“For the GCC it is a ‘pros and cons’ situation. In the short term it is profitable to buy or lease land, but it also depends on the geopolitical situation. A country may be a friend today, but might not be tomorrow, so it is a dependency issue,” said Ismail.

Last year, the FAO warned that rich countries trying to secure land overseas risked creating a “neo-colonial” system. The concerns were related to Gulf investments in Sudan where only indigenous water and land were used, whereas fertilizer, seeds, equipment and labor came from abroad. It was a similar story in Pakistan.

As Woertz remarked, “the negative case is bribe an African official, then expel locals and pastoralists, so no benefit for the local population at all. There is political baggage.” Furthermore, he added, “the GCC doesn’t have a good track record of labor rights or the environment and these need to be taken into consideration.”

And while the countries being courted may be interested in foreign investment, they also have to feed their own populations. Sudan, for instance, has an estimated 200 million acres of fertile land, yet only 20 percent is being utilized. However, despite 160 million acres of available arable land, the country is importing two millions tons of wheat per year and five million people are dependent on food aid. Similarly, Pakistan is facing problems in feeding its population, as well as losing groundwater to salinity.

But although there are many reports on plans to buy land, there has been minimal information coming forth about these projects, with “transparency limited to media accounts,” said Woertz. “They announce it — billion dollar deals — but it is unclear whether it has taken off and how the private sector has been brought in.”

An additional factor is that discussions to acquire land overseas were began when oil and food prices were higher. “The urgency is not there now and there is less money to throw around,” said Woertz. “The SWFs lost money in the markets and have less revenues, so [acquiring land abroad] may not be such a widespread phenomenon as made out.”

April 9, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Park sales to pump service

by Executive Staff April 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

The UAE automobile sector saw sales plunge by up to 45 percent in the first two months of the year compared to 2008, a remarkable downturn from the years of double-digit growth when the $3.6 billion sector was one of the fastest growing in the world.

“The end of the third quarter 2008 was vastly different from the fourth for manufacturers,” said Mike Devereux, president of GM Middle East. “This year we are looking at a decrease overall, with the same daily sales rates since December to now.”

But while the economic slowdown has started to bite, the sector is not sitting on the sidelines until a recovery starts. It has resorted to a change in financing strategy and a greater focus on services to shift units as access to credit tightens and consumer preferences change.

“The financial crisis has certainly affected automotive sales in the UAE, with banks applying more restrictions on financing. And since nearly 80 percent of the UAE’s automotive sales are dependent on financing, this is more evident locally,” said Waldo Galan, managing director of Ford Middle East. Ford, Lincoln and Mercury sales grew 35 percent last year.

As a result of tighter lending, manufacturers and dealers are teaming up with banks to offer zero percent interest on car purchases and making credit more readily available to customers. The most notable change in sales strategy has been the widespread introduction of leasing, a technique dealers had formerly eschewed as car prices were low and customers preferred to buy.

“Financing is a problem so schemes have to be more tactically focused. Screaming the price from the rooftops is not what it’s about, but customer issues. The change is more tactical and less general as there is too much on people’s minds,” Devereux pointed out, adding that: “Lots of people want vehicles but need financing, so we’re focusing on a partnership with the National Commercial Bank (NCB) in Saudi Arabia and in the UAE a car leasing scheme.”

In with the new but not out with old

While enticing customers into showrooms is one concern for the manufacturers, so is keeping dealerships afloat, having ordered vehicles months in advance that can now not be sold or re-exported elsewhere. This has been further compounded by 2009’s models now being on sale, yet there is excess stock of last year’s lines.

“Credit, wholesale finance and bank loans are difficult for dealers. Stock levels for dealers mean reduced working capital so less money in the inventory,” said Devereux. “We will winnow down our inventory and import much less cars.”

And while there is an excess of unsold cars, manufacturers are hesitant to offload vehicles in fleet deals and government tenders.

“We’re trying not to chase unprofitable fleet tenders that we would have done before, as there is little to no margin,” said Devereux. “We are now focusing on the retail business, with 65 percent retail and 35 percent fleet.”

Consumer preferences are also expected to shift towards more competitive fuel efficiency, fewer SUVs and more crossovers.

“While demand for luxury vehicles would possibly see a reduction, quality and value would still remain on top of the consumer’s list,” said Galan. “We believe that consumers will act more out of a rational mindset and look for quality and value for money rather than the emotional drive.”

After sales is a another area manufacturers and dealers are focusing on as sales stagnate — a sector valued in the Middle East at some $11 billion, while the UAE tire trade is valued at $1.1 billion and slated to grow this year.

“There is a big focus now on services, which will be a stable haven in a downturn. Most dealers here are under invested in service capacity and the number of vehicles has increased so quickly,” said Devereux. “There is a need to invest in new services as vehicles are coming into prime servicing years after 2-3 years since purchase.”

While manufacturers continue to monitor the local environment, they are optimistic that revenues will go up next year as supply and demand align, even though it might not be the double-digit figures of the boom years.

“There is a big focus now on services, which will be a stable haven in a downturn”

April 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Private equity – Fat times thin quick

by Executive Staff April 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

Unlike buying a few shares in a public company, private equity (PE) investment is a commitment that cannot be taken lightly. That is perhaps why most experts believe some two-thirds of institutional PE investors are on the sidelines waiting for better days. Who can blame them? Just like any other asset class in the region, PE is still licking its wounds after the beating that it took from the public markets, not to mention the de-leveraging costs that PE firms and portfolio companies across the region continue to shoulder as they brace themselves for a dismal year to come. Accordingly, it’s little wonder that most institutional investors who are willing to deploy money would rather consider more liquid investment options than further investment in PE, even at current market valuations.

“The nature of the private equity funds, reputed for their long term investment horizon, is not an attractive attribute for today’s investors who value liquidity,” says Rami Bazzi, senior executive officer at Injazat Capital.

The ensuing atmosphere in the region has become one of understanding between firms and limited partners (LPs) about capital commitments that were expected to be called over the past six months or in the foreseeable future.

“We told our LPs in November [2008] ‘be comfortable and relax… we are not going to be making any capital calls before we talk to you first because we don’t want to put you in an embarrassing situation of making a capital call that you can’t meet,’” says Ammar Al Khudairy, managing director & CEO of Amwal Al Khaleej Investment Co. Ironically, much of the stress on PE firms to make capital calls and on LPs to meet them has been lifted due to the systemic effects of the economic downturn.

“LPs would have defaulted initially [had capital been called], but deal making has reduced considerably considering the situation with LPs. At the same time, PE funds would not want to be at risk of signing a deal for which the funding may not come through thus jeopardizing the entire fund itself,” says Tamer Bazzari, deputy CEO of Rasmala.

To call or not to call

Nonetheless, it has already been around six months since this ‘period of understanding’ began. Since then, most PE firms have managed to hold off on making capital calls, but others have had no choice but to make that untimely call.

“At least one group has told us in January that they had frozen investment and made a capital call and only came up with 90 percent of the call. With regards to the other 10 percent, the investor just said ‘we can’t do it,’” says Benjamin Newland, partner at King and Spalding, a multinational law firm that consults in the regional PE market. The phenomenon of defaulting is indicative of a wider problem in the PE sector.

“There is going to be a ‘point of pain’ going forward for the PE industry, which is LPs being unable to fulfill their capital call obligations because of their own liquidity issues,” says Yahya Jalil, senior executive officer and head of private equity at The National Investor.

Robert Hall, head of transaction services Middle East & South Asia at KPMG, adds that “some LPs will continue to provide cash and there will be others who will refuse to make further capital calls and legal action will be taken against those.”

Having to deal with the liquidity issues of LPs is undoubtedly going to be a battle that will be waged until the end of this downturn. Nevertheless, PE firms will have to make nice with LPs whether they like it or not because, at the end of the day, firms will have to coax them into investing in an intrinsically illiquid sector at a time when cash is king.

“In an asset allocation waterfall where fixed income instruments receive most of the money… PE happens to be at the end of the asset allocation priority. Very clearly, not many LPs want to take additional risk in order to generate additional returns, when normal levels of return… are at risk,” says Bazzari. “Investors are seeking liquid investments to enable them to re-allocate when needed, a luxury private equity investments do not normally provide,” he continues.

Even institutional investors that have already committed to the PE sector will by default commit less money to the sector. “If a family conglomerate or a large institution has a target allocation for PE which is eight to 10 percent, and the value of their public portfolio shrinks, that eight to 10 percent will also shrink into a smaller base for PE with much fewer dollars [sic],” says Jalil.

In reality the current gap between the interests of general partners (GPs) and LPs was a long time in the making and despite the fact that there will be much friction in the next cycle, this is not necessarily a bad thing. PE in the region has to some extent been a victim of its own success, especially in the last three years. According to research conducted by Zawya Private Equity Monitor (ZPEM) and the Gulf Venture Capital Association (GVCA) of the total investments made in the PE sector over the last decade, approximately 86 percent were made in the last three years (2006 to 2008), with approximately 39 percent and 27 percent made in 2007 and 2008, respectively. While 27 percent in 2008 is still an admirable figure in terms of growth, it is symptomatic of a downward trend that is now manifesting itself in the industry.

Private equity activity in the MENA region has declined in 2008, both in total size and in number — 31 percent and 22 percent, respectively — according to ZPEM and the GVCA. Growing at such break-neck speeds — a CAGR of 48 percent in the past three years — has resulted in GPs charging almost exorbitant management fees and carrying commissions, while LPs were fishing for multiples that were out of sync with what the market could sustain in the medium to long term.

But as investment appetite has all but dried up, GPs are realizing that they can no longer afford to maintain a predominately opportunistic attitude towards their investors.

“Investors and LPs will be looking for a greater level of alignment of interests which will come in several respects. LPs will require GPs to have more ‘skill in the game’ and more of their own money alongside that of LPs, not just to be asset managers but also to have principle investments,” says Hisham El-Khazindar, managing director and co-founder of Citadel Capital. “There is going to be some pressure on management fees, particularly for the larger funds, as investors ask for the management fees to come down and harder return on investment (ROI) hurdles before PE firms are allowed to carry.”

As far as carries are concerned, the more intertwined the interests of funds and investors become, the less this becomes an issue.

“I don’t think anyone will be negotiating carries now because everyone realizes that there is a full alignment of interests,” says Al Khudairy. In the second quater of 2009 the PE industry will have to reconcile with the idea that unless mutual interests converge, many GPs could find themselves looking for a new profession.

April 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Executive Insights

Should investors enter the dragon or greet the elephant?

by Rehan Syed April 3, 2009
written by Rehan Syed

As global investors we face a dilemma — whether to make the next round of investment in the once solid developed markets or always fragile but promising emerging markets. Conventional wisdom argues that developed nations historically lead the emerging world out of recessions. Is this time any different? While a return to economic stability in the developed world is a prerequisite, the burden of driving growth will fall more than ever on the shoulders of the big new emerging markets of the ‘dragon’ China and the ‘elephant’ India. In the next few years, China will likely overtake Japan to become the world’s second largest economy.

A rare and unpredictable year for China

While ‘tiger’ often suffixes China, and ox metaphors are du jour, our edgier ‘dragon’ underscores the unpredictability of 2009’s economic outcome, pivoting around a heroic fiscal stimulus plan and China’s large collateral impact on other emerging markets. A feared Chinese hard landing, defined as sub five percent real GDP growth, will no doubt have a ripple effect, since over half of Chinese trade is with other emerging markets. Another reason to be edgy on China this year is potential social unrest since 20 million migrant workers are estimated to have lost jobs in the current crisis, often returning to villages where their land has been repossessed for development. Also, China faces a rare triple anniversary of controversies, notably the 10th anniversary of Falun Gong’s banning, the 20th of the Tiananmen uprising and the 50th of the Tibetan uprising, including the Dalai Lama’s escape to India. While less melodramatic, this year will also be eventful for India given its much-anticipated mid-year national election.

Weak outlooks?

In 2009 we expect China and India will grow about 5.5 percent and five percent, respectively, which is more pessimistic than the current consensus view of 7.7 percent and six percent. This is still well ahead of world GDP, which is likely to shrink one percent in 2009, thus partially offsetting the US and EU drag of about -2.5 percent in 2009, before rebounding to 2.5 percent in 2010. The stated government growth targets for 2009 are lofty at eight percent for China and seven percent for India, both unrealistic and with more downside risk for India.
In the past year, the equity markets of both have crashed and are now at historical valuation lows. While global stocks, as measured by the MSCI World index, were down a stiff 42 percent in 2008, India swooned 52 percent, China A-Shares crashed 65 percent and China H-shares were off a relatively better 51 percent. Year to date, China A- shares are up strongly but H-shares are about flat and India is down seven percent. Both Indian and Chinese H- Share markets trade at almost trough valuations with price- earnings ratios below 10 times.

From these depressed valuation levels, which of the two will fare better in the recession and eventual recovery, China or India? Beyond the obvious disparity of centralized vs. federalized governance structure, there are critical differences between the two — in terms of domestic consumer spending, exposure to the overstretched US consumer, foreign exchange reserves, trade balance, fiscal deficit and, most importantly, the degree of stimulus spending. The interplay of these is important but difficult to forecast and complexity is compounded by the lack of transparency, especially in oft-murky Chinese statistics.

Recent data is dreadful, but more so for China

After an exceptional run of nine to 10 percent real GDP growth for the past quarter century, which peaked at 13 percent growth in 2007, Chinese growth is sputtering. The major reasons for this are exhaustion of the export driven growth model compounded by a credit crunch, which squeezed trade finance, tail-off in capital investment, inventory destocking and a continuation of the real estate slump. Other metrics that confirm this steep fall in economic activity include electricity consumption, a reliable proxy for industrial production, which was -4 percent in recent months versus 12 to 15 percent growth in recent years, far worse than in the prior downturns of 1998 and 2001. This decline is partly due to inventory destocking, but could have been worse had it not been for improved inventory management, which has resulted in inventory stock of 35 to 40 percent of GDP versus well above 50 percent in prior downturns. Finally, export growth, which was running at 20 percent or more in recent years, is down about 25 percent this year and would have been worse had China not diversified away from the US, which was over 30 percent of exports a year ago and is now below 20 percent.

On the other hand, India has also slowed from a peak of 9.5 percent real GDP growth in 2007 to 5.5 percent, with exports down 15 percent in recent months. However, it is less pressured than China because of its less cyclical economic structure, with much heavier services mix and less export dependence on the US and EU. India’s exports are less cyclical, since services are about 35 percent of exports and least-cyclical IT services are 40 to 45 percent of service exports. Finally, Indian exports, which have tripled in the past five years, are now more competitive due to a sharp 25 percent recent fall in the currency relative to both US dollars and China’s yen. While China might be tempted to dangerously devalue as they did in 1994, they will be held back by political pressure from its vital trade partner, the US. In fact, we are likely to see continued appreciation if growth rebounds, albeit at a reduced pace versus the past three years.

Stimulus is far greater in China and could rise

China has launched a more aggressive stimulus policy than India and most other emerging markets. While it has grandiosely announced plans to spend $586 billion over two years, which equates to seven percent of GDP per year, some analysts have tarred it as an inflated plan that includes a rehash of previously committed spending. Even if the real spend is only half that figure, it still exceeds India’s paltry one percent of GDP. The equity markets have already priced in these announcements but we expect there could be more stimulus to come from China since the current announcements result in a deficit of ‘only’ 2.6 percent in 2009, lower than India’s — and America’s — elephantine annual fiscal deficit of about 10 percent. If GDP growth disappoints, we expect additional stimulus deficit spending in China, exceeding the governments’ current goal of limiting it to three percent of GDP. Given India’s already-high deficit, it has very limited room for additional stimulus, hence the higher downside risk.

Key structural differences will endure

As the table [on the previous page] shows, there are vast differences between the two countries’ economic attributes, which hint at continued growth opportunities well past the current turmoil. China is poor with GDP per capita of about $3,300 and about one third of its 1.4 billion population living on less than $2 per day, while India is worse off with GDP per capita of about $1,000 and over two thirds of its 1.2 billion people get by on a $2 daily budget. India’s population density is substantially higher and getting worse with an annual growth of 1.2 percent per year, double China’s 0.6 percent per year. Over the next couple of decades, this will result in a gray China and a youthful India, a demographic dividend that will translate into productivity only if India improves its lagging primary education system, especially in the rural areas where the bulk of the population resides. Finally, India is less cyclical because its GDP is about two-thirds domestic consumer spending driven, versus only about a third for China. China’s core challenge in the near future is to shift the economy from being manufacturing and export driven to being more like India, with higher services and domestic consumption.

Average into China now, await lower Indian entry point

Waiting for a turn in macroeconomic data is too late since equity markets will attempt to lead by about six months. In China, while news flow might worsen in the next month or two, some early indicators point to the fiscal stimulus working, such as bank loan growth, which is up strongly recently. While one statistic does not make a trend, oversold markets could result in large upside moves. We favor the H-share route given they trade at a wide discount to A-shares and have better transparency in these murky times. Since bottom picking seldom works, we advocate averaging in over the next six months, accumulating on dips and accelerating if the HSCEI index retests October lows of 5,000, especially if you have at least a five-year horizon to mitigate market risk. If you think that is an awfully long horizon, keep in mind that once-emerging Japan equities still trade 75 percent below their 1989 peak. Also, diversify and allocate your portfolio wisely, since Chinese equities are only about seven percent global stock market capitalization and India’s even less at two percent.

With India, saunter slowly like the elephant, and start to build positions in the mid-to-late second quarter around the national elections, which will likely have major impact on investor sentiment. During the last major election of 2004, an unfavorable outcome resulted in a 20 percent market drop within two months and we would buy into any similar dislocation. Since fiscal pump priming is limited by the deficit-laden nature of the budget and the high 72 percent debt to GDP ratio, a favorable election outcome will be defined as a stable reformist government given the fractious political landscape. Such stability is key to macroeconomic reform, especially financial services reform and privatization of inefficient national assets, which are critical to unlock economic potential.
Borrowing from a former president of the US — the country where this recession began — the Chinese use two brush strokes to write the word ‘crisis’: one brush stroke stands for danger, the other for opportunity. In this crisis, be aware of the danger, but recognize the opportunity, as a lot of negative news is being priced into the markets.

Rehan Syed is the head of portfolio management at the ABN AMRO Private Bank in Dubai. The opinions expressed here are personal and not necessarily those of his employer

April 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance

UAE – Dubai bails

by Executive Staff April 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

Earlier this year when Abu Dhabi capitalized five of its own banks, panic spread throughout the Dubai banking sector. Waiting with baited breath, bankers in the ailing emirate anticipated action by the federal or local government to rescue Dubai’s banking sector. Finally, at the end of February, the Dubai government issued a $20 billion long-term bond program, selling the first half of the bond to the UAE Central Bank (CBUAE). Central Bank Governor Sultan Nasser Bin Al Suwaidi said he hopes to bridge the banking sector’s reported $30 billion gap between bank deposits and loans and beef-up the advances- to-deposit ratio in collaboration with the Ministry of Finance. While many referred to this bond program as a ‘bailout,’ the government labeled the move a ‘stimulus plan’ for the banking sector and economy as a whole. More important, however, is the message the Dubai sovereign sent out via this latest initiative: Dubai is just as capable as its sibling emirates. Economy minister Sultan Bin Saeed Al Mansouri said he believes that the government’s latest measures should be adequate to hold up the UAE economy for the next nine months.

Road to recovery
Since the global financial turmoil began ravaging the UAE economy in the fourth quarter of 2008, many steps have been taken to ease market pressures and boost liquidity, beginning with the central bank’s $32.67 billion emergency funding facilities, followed by Abu Dhabi’s capital injection of $4.4 billion into five of its banks and now with the latest Dubai sovereign’s $20 billion bond issuance. Raj Madha, director of equity research at EFG- Hermes in Dubai, says after the Abu Dhabi bank capitalizations, “the Dubai banks were a little left out in the cold. This [bond issuance] goes some way to addressing that imbalance.”
Moody’s Middle East analyst John Tofarides reiterates the program’s benefits stating: “the banks indirectly benefit from this bond issue as federal support helps to recoup confidence in the system.” The bond issuance “alleviates potential pressures to Dubai banks for taking up loans that cannot be internationally financed as a result of dried market funding conditions,” he adds.
Robert Thursfield, director in the financial institutions group at Fitch Ratings UAE, notes it is “unclear how much, if any, of the [bond] will be used to support the banks. If some is allocated to the banking sector, then a recapitalization as per the one in Abu Dhabi could occur.” While the picture is still murky as to what the direct implications will be on Dubai banks, these days any action is good action.
Last month, Al Suwaidi emphasized the need for banks and other financial institutions to pay off their outstanding international debts, “with 100 percent reliance on local funding… At the moment, the UAE banking system is localizing liabilities of banks; that is, getting rid of foreign inter-bank deposits. Also, it is repaying syndicated loans, medium-term notes and European commercial paper to reduce risk of non-renewal of such liabilities at the wrong time.”
Inter-bank rates have been slashed across the GCC, with Madha noting that “lower inter-bank rates give headroom for profitability pricing risk.” EFG-Hermes data suggests, continues Madha, that three-month inter-bank rates “fell to a low of 1.88 percent. I think the greater issue is the perceived levels of risk — and these are still high — given pressure on labor markets, tourism, financial services and construction.”
To aid the recovery, the central bank also plans to cut interest rates by the second quarter of this year. Al Suwaidi mentioned that the CBUAE intended to ostracize the country’s banking sector from the global arena in order to protect the system against any ensuing international crises, but he insisted this would not include any rumored actions related to de-pegging the dirham from the US dollar.
Despite the latest moves by the federal and local sovereign entities, renowned ratings agency Standard & Poor’s recently announced plans to review numerous institutions for downgrade across Dubai, including four Dubai-based banks. The rationale behind the downgrade is due to the continued deterioration in the Dubai real estate market and its serious effects on local banks, as well as the overall weakening economy. The banks nominated for ratings review are Mashreqbank, Dubai Islamic Bank, as well as Emirates Bank International and National Bank of Dubai — now collectively known as Emirates NBD — due to residual debt prior to their merger.
Experts and business leaders alike find the new bond program a positive development for Dubai banks. Moreover it is “a step towards avoiding any unpleasant surprises,” says Tofarides. Thursfield trusts that this year “will be very challenging for the banks” and is confident that “the challenges will persist into 2010.” With tightened liquidity, delinquencies on loan portfolios, systemic risks, depleting deposits and much more, banks in the UAE undoubtedly have a grueling year ahead of them.

April 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Executive Insights

The future is online

by Gabriel Chahine & Jayant Bhargava April 3, 2009
written by Gabriel Chahine & Jayant Bhargava

Reading newspapers, watching television and listening to the radio may no longer be preferred options for consuming media. Mobile handsets and computers are gaining importance as means to access mass media, especially with younger audiences. Media usage has fragmented and many more advertising platforms now exist. New media will gather a 19 percent share of global advertising by 2011. These platforms enable a greater precision in targeting and accountability, while allowing for interactivity and innovation. During the current economic climate, new media has a clear advantage.

This has profound implications for traditional media players. Their distribution channels are controlled by a new breed of competitors. The Internet gorillas dominate online traffic, whereas telecommunication companies control the touch-points with mobile media consumers. New formats, such as paid search, dominated by Internet players are eating into their bread and butter. The new media game involves a dynamic, complex and interconnected ecosystem in which ad agencies, telecommunications, media, Internet and technology players depend on one another to thrive. But it is also a brutal competitive arena, rapidly distinguishing winners from losers.

In the MENA region, the game is just beginning. New media accounts for less than two percent of ad spend. Unlike developed countries, delivering content over mobile forms the primary new media revenue source. Low Internet penetration, availability of digital Arabic content and advertising capabilities remain key challenges. Consumers are displaying similar preferences as those in developed countries. Young people make up a relatively high percentage of the population. Overall, the regional new media market is fertile with leaders yet to be established.

Are the rules still the same?

As always, consumers define the rules. The consumer today has more control and choice. Consumption is no longer passive. Consumption is becoming a norm. So yes, the rules are changing. This is transforming the recipe for building a successful digital media brand. The challenge is not limited to real-time consumption of content. Editors need to engage in two-way communication allowing user participation. Building a digital community within the context of a brand is essential. Ability to leverage technology and develop partnerships is more important than ever.

The youth segment rarely uses traditional platforms. Hearst, recognizing this trend, transformed Elle Girl into an online-only brand. Other segments — such as leisure male, female socialites and professionals — are expected to follow suit, more so when today’s youth transition into these segments. For now it is crucial to leverage the loyalty of traditional assets to create equity on digital platforms, before users choose a different digital brand for the same content needs. Marketers are demanding new models of interactions with agencies. The traditional models lack the required speed-to-market and ability to create a dialogue with consumers. A recent cross-industry study in the US confirmed that advertisers believe closer and more collaborative partnerships with media companies will be important to their marketing initiatives.

Media companies have the opportunity to take on responsibilities that were once the exclusive preserve of ad agencies. Ninety-one percent of media companies surveyed already provide some kind of advertising service such as campaign development and branded content creation.

In the US, newspapers took 127 years to reach $20 billion in ad revenues; online media have garnered that amount in just 13 years. Regionally, advertising investment per user is two dollars, compared with $59 in the US or the global average of $27. Regional offerings are suboptimal and do not cover the wide spectrum of needs. Popular local sites lack qualities essential for advertisers. The successful traditional brands are not well represented on digital platforms. International players are not focusing on the region, yet they dominate the traffic, although not by intent or design. Today’s opportunities may well be taken and guarded by the time the market becomes lucrative. Fortunately, paid search is not expected to be the primary format. A targeted local offering has the potential to not only capture a prominent share but also to play a critical role in creating the market.

What strategies are media players adopting?

Take existing assets online — it is key to enable users to consume and participate with their favorite content at the time of their convenience and in the form they prefer.

Build new media brands — new media provides an efficient way to target segments not covered by traditional formats. It also enables companies to aggregate content from existing titles to provide a differentiated experience. For instance, Conde Nast created menstyle.com by combining GQ and Details magazines.

Build a digital content business — new media provides a unique platform to monetize the long tail. The large libraries, which do not find a place on TV grids or magazine pages, can be monetized easily.

Build a media portal — media players could integrate traffic-generating applications, like e-mail and marketplace, into their content propositions. To illustrate, the strategic merger of Time Warner with AOL accelerated the digital transformation of Time Warner. Today, AOL is syndicating content not only from Time Warner, but also from other media sources.

Who will win the ‘New Media’ game?

Each player has established a sweet spot along the digital value chain and is devising strategies to lead the game. Business models are constantly evolving and their sustainability is yet to be established. Relative values of traffic generation and aggregation, content and customer intelligence will be key in defining the leader. But one thing is certain, no player can win alone. Collaboration is king. The ability to forge the right partnership at the right terms and at the right time will define the winner.

Gabriel Chahine is partner and Jayant Bhargava senior associate at Booz & Company

April 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance

Global economic crisis – A six-month tally of woe

by Executive Staff April 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

In October 2008, Alan Greenspan, the 1987 to 2006 chairman of the US Federal Reserve, testified before congressional leaders in Washington saying “I was shocked when the system broke down, my ideology and model that I always believed in proved me wrong.” He hastened to add that, “the crisis will pass” and that the then proposed $700 billion rescue package “is adequate to serve the needs.” In December 2008, he went on to say that “the global stock market value wiped out this year is $30 trillion, but human nature being what it is, we can count on a market reversal within six months to a year.”

Six months into the crisis, economic reality defies Mr. Greenspan’s assessments and predictions. The lost value in stocks has reached $50 trillion — nearly double his estimate and almost as much as last year’s world global output that is estimated to be $55 trillion.
In the meantime, the initial US rescue package was augmented by one trillion dollars this February, making the current US operation to save its economy more than 10 times bigger in real terms than the Marshall Plan of the late 1940s, which helped the European continent recover from a devastating war by increasing industrial production by 35 percent and restoring agricultural production to its pre-war levels in just four years.

A crisis like no other
This time it may take longer than four years for the world economy to get back to what it was before the crisis, as expectations for recovery are deteriorating by the day. Last November, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicted a slow down of the global output growth rate to two percent in 2009, from an average annual growth of five percent in the preceding years. In January, it revised this estimate to “possibly negative.” In economics, it is customary to qualify pessimistic expectations. Last December, the World Bank forecast a positive global growth of one percent, but in March that was revised to negative growth of possibly “up to two percent.” The Bank also expects that as a result of the crisis, global poverty will increase by 100 million, while the International Labor Organization foresees an increase in global unemployment by 50 million.
The ideology that Mr. Greenspan referred to is by now well known. It was practiced in its purest form, especially by the US and the UK. Since 1979, the year President Ronald Reagan was elected in the US and Margaret Thatcher in the UK. It was based on three pillars:
First, too much faith in unregulated markets — and there is a fundamental difference between ‘free markets’ and ‘markets’. Second, too much reliance on interest rates alone to manage the whole economy — at the expense of sensible fiscal policy, especially in the area of social services. Third, too much of a belief that central banks can and should avoid recessions happening on the watch of the government of the day — in defiance of the expected independence of central banks. This led to excessive leverage (debt creation) by financial institutions and unrealistic borrowing by households for housing (mortgages) and current consumption (read: credit cards).
Of course, elected politicians in democracies cannot have it their way unless the electorate is on their side. Both the UK and US have unquestionable democratic processes and educated voters in democracies tend to follow — with spasmodic deviations — what they believe is best for their own interests. The rhetoric that followed the so-called ‘neoconservative’ ideological revolution since the 1980s did just that: it used an array of populist arguments that made the majority of the electorate believe that free markets can best serve their interests and that economic insecurity can become a thing of the past.
Policies supporting this ideology followed suit. Firstly, shares of privatized companies in the UK were offered at low prices and appealed both to the short- sighted and the long-sighted. The short-sighted bought shares to make a quick profit by reselling them. The long- sighted bought them to start building a bigger nest egg as it was felt that returns on investments in stock markets were bound to increase fast.
Second, by offering subprime mortgages that have a high risk of default — one of the culprits of the crisis — house ownership increased (good for the citizens), corporate profits boomed, especially in the construction sector and the financial markets (good for economic growth), while the pressure on governments to fund low- cost social housing decreased (good for the public debt). What could be more appealing than this ‘triple win’?
Third, recommendations for securing the financial stability of the elderly overstated the growth and security of financial investments. Voters were aware that they had smaller families than their parents and that there would be fewer future workers to support their own pensions. In the meantime, they were facing increasing payroll taxes in the form of pension contributions, requirements for staying on longer at work and decreasing levels of pensions. Privately funded pensions based on returns on individual savings accounts invested in financial markets were marketed as another winning alternative and as a fair one. They were expected to provide higher pensions due to the then state-provided social insurance. And their ideological appeal was significant: those who earned and saved more would have a bigger pension than those who earned less — those with less were assumed to be lazy rather than unfortunate.

The model of greed
The rhetoric included many other arguments, but let’s mention just one more. In an interconnected, globalized economy it does not make much difference who saves and who consumes as long as the whole thing balances out. In such a world, over-spending by consumers in some countries — such as the US and the UK — can be the antidote to the thriftiness of other countries, notably China.
All in all, it was an ideology based on what is now widely termed as ‘greed’, though the word seems to be equally, and incorrectly, used both for workers and households who justifiably aspire to a better life in the already high income economies, as well as for financial executives and the 1,300 billionaires that have been created in the last couple of decades. In the words of economist Paul Krugman, the most recent Nobel laureate, it was the ideology of “private good, public bad” that prevented the development of sensible regulation for the expanding financial sector. Lack of regulation created asset inflation over time, which was deflated instantly after the onset of the crisis. The total 2008 financial losses were 40 percent for UK’s FTSE, 45 percent for the European FTSEurofirst, 42 percent for Japan’s Nikkei, 48 percent for Hong Kong’s Hang Seng, 39 percent for the New York’s S&P and 65 percent for China’s stock market.
None of this is surprising. Many people talked about the looming crisis, but strong arguments are not always enough to overcome strong political powers. Some of those in power did listen. For example, during the East Asian financial crisis in 1997, the prescribed rescue packages were criticized for being too based on ideological thinking — some called it the ‘Washington Consensus’. They said it put too much emphasis on fiscal austerity, raising interest rates and privatization. Furthermore, they said, “let the banks fail.” Today, Western economies follow the opposite track. Their recovery plan is based on expansionary fiscal policies, low interest rates and rescuing private companies and banks.
Similarly, soon after the 1997 crisis, the aforementioned Krugman became one of the many critics of the risk management model that replaced the role of regulation in the financial markets and eventually, and predictably, failed to ensure that the inrush of capital created in the financial markets was prudently invested. In 1999, Peter Warburton, a UK economist, published a 350- page book that focused on how the central banks were imperiling the world’s economy. The book’s message is obvious from its title, “Debt and Delusion.” In 2001, Joseph Stiglitz, a US economist who got a 2001 Nobel Prize, explicitly advised the Bank of Iceland what it had to do to avoid becoming the “champion victim” of the crisis. As recently as 2006, Nuriel Roubini, another US economist, earned a similarly unenviable title, “the prophet of doom,” after a lecture he delivered to an uninterested IMF, the international organization in charge of overseeing the global financial system.
Despite the warnings, the ideology crossed political boundaries. The Labor Party in the UK, referred to as “New Labor” after it took power over from the successive conservative administrations between 1979 and 1997, pledged to decrease child poverty by half to 1.7 million children by 2010 and to eradicate it by 2020. It is now estimated that 2.3 million children will still be in poverty in 2010, a discrepancy of 35 percent from the stated target, due to a financing gap of $6.15 billion a year. Let’s put these numbers in context. First, without any new policies to help low-income families — a likely scenario amidst the current crisis — child poverty could rise to 3.1 million by 2020, a number similar to the number of poor children in 1999 when the pledge was made. Second, the Royal Bank of Scotland paid nearly $5.87 billion in bonuses in 2007 and posted $35 billion losses in 2008, the largest corporate loss in the history of the UK. Third, the value of employees’ private pension funds dropped by nearly a third from $810 billion to $579 billion between October 2007 and October 2008. In the US, $2 trillion was wiped out in equity value from 401(k) and individual retirement accounts in the two months following the start of the crisis, nearly half the holdings in those plans.
The time has come to listen. This is already happening. In February, the new US administration under President Barack Obama added $1 trillion to what Mr. Greenspan thought was adequate to rescue the economy. Whether this will be sufficient, and how it will be spent in practice remains to be seen. For example, the faltering American Insurance Group (AIG), once the leading insurer in the world, is to receive $170 billion in rescue funds, but still faces hazards in its $1.6 trillion portfolio of complex derivatives.
This month, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown declared that he takes “full responsibility” for his role in the banking failures that led to the global recession. In the meantime, housing waiting lists have reached record levels, having increased by 55 percent compared to five years ago and they are expected to double by 2011. Some of this increase will be, of course, the result of repossessions and increasing unemployment as well as lower construction activity. However, much is also due to the shortage of social housing, whose availability decreased over time.

The economic gear shift
Probably nothing constitutes a more dramatic admission of change than the criticism of the now opposition conservative shadow housing minister saying, “The [Labor] government’s record on social housing is embarrassing — the average annual number of social rent properties delivered has halved since 1997.” The other main opposition party in the UK, the Liberal Democrats, is no more polite. “The government allowed the bubble in the housing market to get out of hand for many years. We are now seeing the results of that bubble bursting,” they said. Now the government’s target is to build 240,000 new homes each year until 2016, while Gordon Brown admitted that “the economic downturn marks the end of the era of laissez-faire government.”
One cannot but welcome a more balanced approach to managing the economy. The days of the glorification of financial markets as a magic creator of wealth have come to an end. Financial markets are not an end in themselves, but a means that enables the real economy to be more productive. Along with the individual efforts of the US, the UK and other high-income and developing economies, the UN set up a commission of experts chaired by Joseph Stiglitz to put forward “credible and feasible proposals for reforming the international monetary and financial system in the best interest of the international community.” There is also increasing recognition of the importance of multilateralism. Both the IMF and the World Bank are currently looking into governance structures that would increase their effectiveness.
Luckily, the attempt to create a one-sided global ideology failed. Hopefully, the attempt to find shared global solutions will succeed.

PROFESSOR ZAFIRIS TZANNATOS is a Beirut-based economist and was previously advisor to the World Bank and chair of the economics
department at the American University of Beirut

April 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 474
  • 475
  • 476
  • 477
  • 478
  • …
  • 696

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    Executive Magazine
    • ISSUES
      • Current Issue
      • Past issues
    • BUSINESS
    • ECONOMICS & POLICY
    • OPINION
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • EXECUTIVE TALKS
    • MOVEMENTS
      • Change the image
      • Cannes lions
      • Transparency & accountability
      • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
      • Say No to Corruption
      • The Lebanon media development initiative
      • LPSN Policy Asks
      • Advocating the preservation of deposits
    • JOIN US
      • Join our movement
      • Attend our events
      • Receive updates
      • Connect with us
    • DONATE