• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
Levant

Lebanon – The orient’s goldsmith

by Executive Staff January 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

The story of gold in Lebanon is one tainted with war, bloodshed and massive population exodus. According to Boghos Kurdian, president of the Lebanese Syndicate of Goldsmiths and Jewelers, jewelry production was historically limited to traditional pieces in gold, including bracelets, necklaces and earrings. During the First World War, the systematic deportation and annihilation of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire forced the population away from its hometowns and into Syria and Lebanon. Many Armenians, known to be skilled craftsmen, chose Lebanon as their new home and introduced the art of jewelry, altering the face of local production. “The metamorphosis of the jewelry industry was nonetheless gradual and witnessed another phase in its evolution after the 1950s,” added Kurdian. “The Syrian state nationalization [in the 1860s] of all industries forced Syrian jewelers to immigrate to Lebanon and today many families dominating the sector share Syrian roots,” said the head of the syndicate.

Pre-war peak
Before the civil war, Lebanese jewelry was as its height. “Jewelry was distributed from Lebanon to the region, as well as to Africa. It was an international scene for the gold trade, one comparable to Dubai today,” underlined Berge Arabian, member of the Swiss Business Council – Lebanon. The price of gold traded in Beirut reflected on international markets, with the Lebanese capital often receiving plane-loads of gold from Soviet Russia, added Arabian.
The jeweler explained that Lebanon had more recently established close ties with Switzerland, which bought Lebanese finished products as well as scrap precious metal. However, with the beginning of the civil war, commercial relations ebbed as chaos took over the streets of Beirut.
“Today, Lebanon still exports scrap gold to Switzerland. Usually scrap gold is exported and exchanged against gold ingots, against a premium fee for processing,” pointed out Kurdian.
According to Mohamed Chamsedine from the research house Informational International, Lebanese exports to Switzerland accounted for $187.3 million in 2004, $125 million in 2005 and $451 million in 2006, though in the last two years figures have been decreasing: to $308 million in 2007 and $264.6 million in the first eight months of 2008. Kurdian believes, however, that the export jewelry figure to Switzerland is actually higher as many Lebanese jewelers fail to disclose the real value of items exported. “Jewelers are neither compelled to register with the chamber of commerce or required to present a certificate of origin, a process which previously provided us with more accurate estimates in terms of the value of goods exported,” Kurdian said.
He also signaled that Lebanon had been witnessing of late an increase in export levels, in terms of finished jewelry items. “Lebanon is not only exporting scrap gold anymore but fine jewelry pieces as well,” he added. Swiss- Lebanese relations have been sewn over the years by prominent Lebanese jewelers who have set up shop in Geneva, Europe’s luxury hub. Names such as Mouawad, De Grisogono and Chatila adorn luxury boutiques of the Helvetic capital, whether at the Noga Hilton on the posh Quai du Mont Blanc or the elegant Rue du Rhône.
“Today, exports to Switzerland of jewelry pieces are constituted mostly of private exports by Lebanese boutique owners located in Geneva, with a small percentage going to international buyers as well as special orders,” explained Kurdian. In terms of items sold to Switzerland, the head of the syndicate insists that no regular gold items are exported but mostly large parures or jewelry sets decked with diamonds or precious stones, often worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. “Saudi nationals owning stores in Geneva are among some of the international clients of Lebanese artisans,” underlines Kurdian. Other items, such as watches, are re-exported to Switzerland after they have been set with diamonds and precious stones in Lebanon.

Land of the craftsman
“The quality of craftsmanship in the Land of the Cedars is unbeatable when it comes to price quality ratio and Lebanese artisans are sought after for their talent in stone setting,” said Kurdian. “Although they might be more expensive than Thai or Chinese craftsmen, they tend to produce items of superior quality, while being still more affordable then European artisans.” He added that the tight quality control imposed by Switzerland on imported products has allowed the Swiss industry to preserve its reputation and standards as well as forced Lebanese producers to improve their designs. Swiss demand for jewelry also differs from other countries in the region as it has witnessed a growing interest in diamonds and platinum.
Potential problems for the jewelry industry in Lebanon come principally from the new Asian competition. “Some Lebanese jewelers have established factories in Thailand and taught artisans the trade. Today, these new craftsman are sought after by the West. However, one main forte for Lebanese jewelers is their talent for design innovation, which can’t be matched by Asian artisans,” concluded Kurdian.

January 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance

IPO Watch – Close to nothing

by Executive Staff January 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

It’s been a long, barren fall season for the IPO market in the MENA region. If December is any indication, the drought in the market is expected to carry through to the first quarter of 2009. Only three IPOs managed to raise a paltry $14.54 million in the fourth quarter of 2008, compared to 17 IPOs with a value of $7.55 billion in the forth quarter of 2007. As of mid-December, 53 regional IPOs have raised $13.24 billion in 2008, a nine percent drop compared to $14.42 billion raised by 69 firms in the same period of 2007. The only successful IPO to debut in the forth quarter was Syria’s Bank Al Sharq, which raised $9.78 million. The floatation, managed by Bemo Saudi Fransi was 438.24 percent oversubscribed. But Syria’s attempt to break the IPO slump ultimately failed and the slump-o-meter registered zero IPO announcements in December. However, analysts say the number of IPOs scheduled to be launched in the first and second quarters of 2009 will once again make the region a fertile ground for IPOs. According to data from Zawya, the number of IPOs planned for the first half of 2009 reached 38 as of mid- December. Ten IPOs are to be launched in the first quarter and 28 in the second quarter, with a potential value of between $10 billion and $25 billion. Add to this the rumored IPO of real estate developer Nakheel, which plans to launch $15 billion in 2009, and the IPO hiatus may really come to an end. If successful, Nakheel will become the largest publicly traded real estate company in the region — even larger than Emaar.


The pipeline
What does 2009 hold for the IPO market? As it stands now — and this may change drastically in the coming months — Saudi Arabia, the region’s largest economy, will be the host of four companies with plans to launch in the first quarter. The agriculture and food firm, Al Akhawain, will offer 30 percent of its shares to the public seeking to raise $26.66 million. The travel and tourism company, Herfy Food Services, a fast food subsidiary of Savola Group, will be offering 30 percent of its shares. The company did not disclose the amount it wants to raise, but it will offer around 3 million shares. Aujan Industries said it will also go public, offering 30 percent of its shares with the offer size ranging between $160 million and $213 million. The multi-line conglomerate, Mohammed Abdul Aziz Al Rajhi and Sons, will also sell 30 percent of its shares in the first quarter, without specifying the amount to be raised.
Moving to Qatar, three companies will be going public in the first quarter of 2009. Al-Mazaya Holding Company seeks to raise around $137 million by offering 50 percent or 50 million shares priced at $2.75 to the public. The Qatar- Bahrain Takaful Insurance Co. said it will offer 60 percent of its shares to the public in the first quarter of 2009, without providing the size of the offer. The telecom powerhouse Vodafone Qatar will offer 55 percent of its shares to the public. Forty percent will be offered to retail investors while an additional 15 percent will be allocated to institutional investors.
Bahrain’s second largest mobile operator, Zain Bahrain — a subsidiary of Kuwait’s Zain — had previously delayed its IPO. However, it has now confirmed that it will offer portions of its shares in the first quarter of 2009. Although it is not clear how much the company wants to raise, media reports put Zain Bahrain’s share offer on the LSE at around $4 billion. The region’s first fully integrated real estate and construction solutions provider, Naseej, is seeking to raise around $265.3 million by offering 40 percent of its shares in the first quarter of 2009. Regardless of the market upheaval on the KSE, Kuwait National Airlines went ahead with listing its shares on the Kuwait Stock Exchange on December 15. The company had raised $1.82 billion in an IPO in 2006 for Wataniya Airways, which will launch in February 2009.
Moving to North Africa, Tunisia’s telecom and IT company, Servicom, will be launching its IPO in the first quarter of 2009, seeking to raise $2.5 million.
And last but not least, the UAE, whose economy has been battered by the impact of the global financial crisis and the credit crunch, announced zero IPOs in the first quarter of 2009.

To hang back or not to hang back?
Like the broader regional markets, which experienced wild volatility in the last quarter of 2008, IPOs suffered from investor panic as the financial crisis enveloped more firms and economists began to speak more about corrections, whether in the real estate or financial sectors. Issuers and investors alike are hanging back from taking the plunge into IPOs until there is more clarity and stability in the stock market. Is this a wise move?
There are some observers who believe that local business leaders and governments should take advantage of this global economic downturn and invest in strategic projects and companies that are now well below their book value. The investment plan should start with regional investment opportunities first and as a last resort it should consider investments abroad.
Several research houses have re-iterated their conclusion that the fundamentals of the region’s economies and capital markets are strong. And if anything, the recent volatility in the markets has helped in bringing down the price of listed shares to their normal or viable levels. And now would be an ideal time to start an investment portfolio in the region or add to an existing one.
Is it time to hang back and wait for the stability to return or is it time to snap up some good opportunities/investment? The answer to this question will reveal itself in the first quarter of 2009 and with it — possibly — the return of a vibrant IPO market.

January 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance

Lebanon – Revenue remits

by Executive Staff January 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

As commercial banks in Lebanon reported an astonishing 9- month growth of 44 percent in 2008 and customer deposits increased by $7.5 billion in the first 10 months, it looked like the banking sector was not affected by the global financial crisis. But as time passes, inescapable challenges are beginning to emerge. “The Lebanese economy could be affected by what happens to the economies of the region,” said Lebanese Finance Minister Mohamad Shatah. The Lebanese economy will undoubtedly be affected by the ongoing global financial crisis, however, the question remains as to how these effects will take shape and to what extent they will impact the banking sector and economy at large. While some are saying Lebanon has benefited from the global turmoil, others are more cautious and waiting for the inevitable effects of the crisis to hit home. CEO of Standard Chartered Bank, Foong Pik Yee, asserts that, “It would be complacent to expect the economy of Lebanon to remain unaffected by the global slowdown, however this will be relatively unnoticed compared to the severe impact suffered by Western economies and also being noticed by Asia and some countries in the GCC.” The majority of observers seem to believe that the financial calamity affecting millions of Lebanese expatriates in the Gulf, the US, Europe and elsewhere, will reduce the amount of foreign remittances to Lebanon.


The money sent home
In 2008, the remittances that poured into Lebanon reached $6 billion, “constituting an increase of four percent from $5.57 [billion] in 2007, and compared to $5.2 [billion] in 2006 and $4.9 [billion] in 2005,” stated Byblos Bank. The finance house claims that Lebanon was the 18th largest recipient of remittances in the world, coming immediately behind Indonesia, Morocco and Pakistan. Lebanon came in ahead of Serbia & Montenegro, Vietnam and Ukraine. Foreign remittances to Lebanon made up 17.4 percent of total remittances to the MENA region in 2008. According to the World Bank, estimated expatriate remittances to Lebanon in 2007 were equal to 24.4 percent of the country’s GDP — making it the fifth highest ratio in the world. Due to the global financial crisis, the influx of foreign remittances into Lebanon began to slow during the third quarter of 2008. As remittances were a major contributor to the banking sector’s sound performance in 2008, the new year “might not be as good as 2008, in view of the global recessionary environment and its potential impact on Lebanese remittances that constitute a major support for Lebanon’s economy and financial system,” noted Dr. Marwan Barakat, head of the research department at Bank Audi – Audi Saradar Group. On the bright side, the worst-case scenario, he says, is that remittances in 2009 will continue to make up more than 20 percent of Lebanon’s GDP. The World Bank, however, stated that inflows of foreign remittances “are expected to regress by 6.7 percent in 2009 in a base case scenario and to drop by 13.2 percent in a worst case scenario.” While remittances may slightly decelerate in 2009, the Lebanese banking sector is still awash with liquidity.
Lebanese commercial banks possess a high level of liquidity in foreign currency, “making them able to roll over and buy new government paper in both local and foreign currency,” said Moody’s Investors Service. The foreign currency reserves at Banque du Liban jumped 57 percent in the first nine months of 2008, totaling $15.3 billion. This increase in foreign currency is largely due to the massive inflow of funds into Lebanese banks by the sizable Lebanese diaspora abroad, who consider the banks as sound financial sanctuaries. The boost in foreign currency reserves is also due to the central bank’s purchasing of $1 billion in US dollars in October 2008 and an additional $900 million in November. Nassib Ghobril, head of economic research and analysis department at Byblos Bank, believes that another challenge for Lebanese banks “is to see how much the inflow of deposits can continue given the growth slowdown in the Gulf and in major countries where Lebanese expatriates are.” With its best financial year in history, the Lebanese banking sector and economy at large naturally await an imminent slowdown.
Moody’s warned that because of the ongoing international financial crisis, Lebanon’s economy is expected to be negatively impacted “as external demand falls and inward investment and remittances decline, with remittance inflows from Lebanese workers in the Gulf already reported to be falling.” Auguste Tano Kouame, the World Bank’s lead economist for the Middle East and North Africa, asserts that Lebanon will definitely experience a decline in economic activity, which will consecutively affect the financial magnitude of the nation’s banking sector. According to Kouame, “The impact of the crisis in Lebanon is going to start first in the real economy, then move to the banking sector — unlike what happened in the United States, Europe and the Gulf region where the stock market was first hit — because Lebanon’s economy is mostly dependent on tourism receipts, remittances and on exports to some extent.” Principally, economic success heavily depends on the political situation in 2009.

Don’t rock to boat
Pik Yee found that, “overall, the key issue and concern for Lebanon remains political stability.” Everyone is keeping their fingers crossed that the approaching parliamentary elections in May 2009 will run smoothly. Moody’s contended that “a return to serious political turmoil would quickly set back the economy and could lead to a withdrawal of bank deposits, although these have been highly resistant to political shocks in the past”.
In brief, confidence levels in the Lebanese banking sector are “strong, despite the global turmoil,” mentioned Barakat. Due to the conservative regulatory and supervisory policies by the central bank, inflows of remittances and high liquidity, the Lebanese banking sector is poised to perform well — if even at a slower rate than last year — in 2009. While the Institute of International Finance (IIF) expects Lebanon’s GDP growth to decrease to 3.5 percent in 2009 from 5.5 percent in 2008, the World Bank estimates the country’s economic growth for 2008 to be at 5.5 percent and 4 percent in 2009. With the incessant regional effects of the global financial crisis on the horizon, IIF forecasts are the most realistic. Despite the upcoming, unavoidable economic slowdown, Lebanese banks are positioned to perform well.

January 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance

Investment – Past the wreckage

by Executive Staff January 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

What do you say to an investor who has just seen a significant chunk of his equity investment drain away this year? “It’s true that the best time to invest in the market is the worst time to raise funds,” said Joe Kawkabani, head of equity asset management at Algebra Capital, which recently launched a new fund with Franklin Templeton Investments.

Only a sixth of the funds tracked by Zawya are in the green this year, with an overwhelming majority sinking in red ink. Yet the appetite of investment fund managers to source new funding has not disappeared. In November 2008, Holland’s ING Investment Bank launched ING Invest Middle East and North Africa Fund, at a time when some of the region’s most liquid markets were down by more than 60 percent.
“We aim to have assets under management of between $500 million and $1 billion,” said Fadi Al Said, head of equity for the Middle East at ING Investment Management, although he admits that most of the funds will come in early 2009 as some clients put a freeze on investments through the end of 2008.
Clearly, these are not ordinary corrections in the regional stock market and it is not surprising that even most moneyed investors are counting their losses and licking their wounds. “There is a wait-and-see approach as nobody wants to catch a falling dagger,” says Kawkabani. “Investors want to cross the big psychological barrier of this year [2008] before taking decisions.”
Led by global markets, investor sentiment in the region has collapsed, writes Credit Suisse in a gloomy report on the crisis that has engulfed regional markets. “Driven initially by foreign institutional investors deleveraging, local entities have also unwound positions. Retail investors have also joined the wave but as in previous occasions, they have lagged behind and suffered from margins calls and a depleting capital base.” There is also anecdotal evidence of capitulation across the GCC markets as investors unwind their levered positions and succumb to the consensus that earnings will weaken substantially next year, says Tarek Fadlallah, executive director at Nomura Investment Bank, in his recent report ‘Nowhere to Hide’. “The GCC markets have lost a combined trillion dollars in market capitalization from their individual peaks and aggregate valuations have become more alluring,” he noted.
Despite the market’s travails, we may be close to a bottom. Certainly some fund managers are taking the long view. “The MENA region is expected to grow at a strong pace in the coming years due to the rise in massive infrastructure spending and the emergence of business sectors, such as logistics, banking, construction, petrochemicals and fertilizers,” says Kawkabani.
Meanwhile, Kuwait’s Global Investment House has secured licenses to launch three new funds, while hedge fund manager Brevan Howard Offshore Management has listed two funds on Nasdaq Dubai exchange, showing that many investment houses are braving the storm and not allowing current market sentiment to derail their long-term plans. As Fadallah wrote, “Market excesses correct — eventually and always. It’s not doom and gloom, just a new paradigm.”

Yadullah Ijtehadi is the managing editor of Zawya.com

January 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Comment

Free markets – Liberty’s loss

by Michael Young January 3, 2009
written by Michael Young

Two-thousand and eight was not the best of years for capitalist culture. The world financial system took a substantial hit starting in October, there is widespread fear that this will lead to a lengthy recession and government intervention in troubled economies has become not only publicly acceptable, but actively encouraged by many. The free market is more often these days viewed as a fount of greed than as a mechanism for the efficient regulation of human relations.

As for that other facet of capitalist culture, liberty — whether political, cultural, social, or otherwise — it has been knocked well down the agenda in inter-state relations. That can be put at the door of the Bush administration’s failure to move much beyond rhetoric in its so-called “freedom agenda” for the Middle East, but more broadly because of the widespread skepticism the administration elicited. The world is happy to see George W. Bush go and therefore everything he was associated with seems to be fair game for dismissal — the baby with the bath water.
That’s a pity, because while the Bush administration largely came up short in its support for democracy, and while the abysmal postwar planning in Iraq virtually ensured the United States would not soon attempt again to put dictators on the spot, for the first time in decades the ideas of liberty and democracy were actually being discussed. Bush may have ended his term in office by supporting the old despotisms of the Middle East, but he did remove a mass murderer from power in Iraq and replace it with something far more pluralistic. In Lebanon he did, along with France, push for a Syrian military withdrawal that ended 29 years of hegemony by Damascus — wherever the present uncertain aftermath leads.
All the signs are that the new Obama administration in the US, while its differences with Bush when it comes to the Middle East may be less flagrant than many were led to believe, will be even less concerned about placing democracy and human rights at the center of its regional policy. Many of those in the next administration served under President Bill Clinton, whose wife Hillary will be secretary of state, and if the Clinton years were any indication, we may see an administration devoted to the status quo regarding liberty.
When it comes to the markets, things are likely to be rather different. Thanks to their majorities in both houses of Congress, the Democrats have an open highway when it comes to state intervention in economic affairs, and now a rationale for doing so as the markets buckle. The Republicans were no slouches in expanding the federal government’s powers over the economy, or over the lives of many Americans in the so-called “war on terror”, but the Democrats are supported by constituencies that will make economic intervention far more likely and extensive.
While these two developments — a greater ability to play with free markets and declining interest in the promotion of liberty — are worrisome, they are also taking place in a very different context than when Bush entered office eight years ago. The talk in the past two months on Western governments having effectively “nationalized” their financial sectors by buying stakes in troubled companies, or injecting them with capital, is laughable. Ultimately, the success or failure of this policy will be judged by market forces, by whether these interventions are deemed efficient by the societies involved and by whether salvation’s price was worth the payback. In all likelihood, regulatory frameworks will be tightened across the board, but the aim will be to avoid persistent interventions since few states can afford massive bailouts. The real question in the coming year will not so much be whether the free market is discredited — it will not be — but whether states can impose the proper balance between allowing markets to function efficiently and what their societies will demand from them when it comes to stabilizing the markets. The fear is that too much intervention demanded may undermine free markets.
More uncertain is the fate of liberty in the near future, particularly political liberty. When it comes to that issue, both the US and Europe remain wary of challenging their allies or business partners on matters of democracy or human rights. In the Middle East in particular, the Bush administration’s “freedom agenda” all but collapsed after 2005, as Washington was compelled to rely on alliances with leading Arab autocracies to contain Iran and to stabilize the situation in Iraq. Ten years after the start of the Barcelona process the Europeans essentially admitted, in 2005, that the democratization facet of the project had failed among their southern and eastern Mediterranean partners. The EU was forced to admit that economic liberalization in no way guaranteed more political openness.
With those failures in mind, the likelihood in 2009 is that liberal democracies will push ‘liberty’ to the background. As they work to find the right dosage to rejuvenate free markets, expect much less interest from the US and Europe when it comes to bolstering free societies.

Michael Young

January 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Comment

Shoes, footprints and carbon tax

by Peter Speetjens January 3, 2009
written by Peter Speetjens

December 2008 was dominated by shoes and footprints. At an anti-government protest in the Icelandic capital of Reykjavik, Sirry Hjaltested said that her grocery bills had gone up by half in recent months. She blamed the country’s bankers for the ruined economy. “If I met a banker,” she told the Economist, “I’d kick his ass so hard, [that] my shoes would be stuck inside.”
From now on George W. Bush’s Iraqi footprint may be measured by another man’s shoes. As a ‘goodbye present’ in the name of the Iraqi people, TV-journalist Muntadar al- Zaidi hurled his footwear at the outgoing US President who, it must be said, dodged the attack perfectly.
Still, as the pair of size-tens was sent flying during a live press conference, its impact is likely to be felt for years to come. The shoes were an instant hit with US comedians and talk show hosts, while the Internet’s merciless all-seeing eye, Youtube, claimed over 5 million viewers within days. EU leaders and President-elect Barack Obama may have giggled in private upon seeing the incident, yet in public were occupied with quite a different kind of footprint.
The EU adopted a plan to fight global warming by reducing its 2020 CO2 emission levels by 20 percent compared to its 1990 carbon footprint. As so often with these grand scenarios for the earth’s well-being, satisfied politicians are quick to pat themselves and each other on the back, while environmentalists call the result a “sell-out.”
“These are the most ambitious plans in the world” and “we mean business,” the triumphant European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso told the press, while French President Nicolas Sarkozy termed the deal “historic.” Organizations such as Greenpeace and the WWF had a slightly different view. According to them, it was “a black day” that saw leaders choose “private profits over the will of European citizens and the future of their children,” as European industries get free emissions permits when facing a five percent cost increase.
On the other side of the Atlantic, US Presidential elect Barack Obama presented the political team that in the coming years is to formulate a sound energy and environmental policy. Obama set the stakes high. Acknowledging that past US governments, both Democrat and Republican, have failed to live up to expectations, “this time must be different,” he proclaimed. “This [fighting global warming] will be a leading priority of my presidency and a defining test of our time. We cannot accept complacency nor any more broken promises.”
His most promising appointment is no doubt Dr. Steven Chu as energy secretary. A 1997 Nobel Prize Winner, Chu is Professor of Physics at the University of California, where he has pushed academics and industry scientists to work on biofuel and solar energy technologies. Unlike a major part of the US Republicans, Chu believes that a decrease in burning fossil fuels is essential to combat global warming.
Although few people will disagree that Chu seems the man for the job, it remains to be seen if he and Obama can make a major impact. It is no exaggeration to state that the environment is but the latest victim of the global financial crisis and economic downturn. With profits falling and jobs vanishing, who needs an extra burden and who is willing to lose votes over a far-away Arctic meltdown?
And yet, the Americans and others have got some work ahead when it comes to reducing their carbon footprint. While the world average carbon output amounts to about four tons, the Americans emit 20 tons per person. As a political solution is not on the horizon any time soon, some people may opt to at least reduce their own footprint. That, however, may be easier said than done.
Last June, MIT professor of Mechanical Engineering, Timothy Gutowski, asked his students to compare the energy consumption of people in different socio-economic classes. A total of 18 different lifestyles were chosen ranging from vegetarian students to professional golfers. Interestingly, the researchers found that even Americans with the lowest energy usage, including a homeless person, a five-year-old child and a Buddhist monk, still had a carbon footprint twice the size of the average global citizen. This is because the services provided for every American, including infrastructure and public services, guarantee a minimum that no American can drop below.
However, the research found that as income rises so do emissions. Bill Gates, who was taken as a case study, had an estimated carbon footprint of about 10,000 times the American average, as he flies around the globe in his private jet. The study concluded that voluntary reductions by most people are unlikely to make much of an impact, yet considerably more can be done by the wealthy. Gutowski suggested that the best way to lower footprints is to tax carbon use.
Now there’s a shoe for the American president.

Peter Speetjens is a Beirut-based journalist

January 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Comment

How the West was humbled

by Paul Cochrane January 3, 2009
written by Paul Cochrane

The double whammy of the subprime market crisis followed by the deepening financial crisis has seen a remarkable change in fortunes among the vanguard of economic power. Recall British Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s visit to the Gulf in November to essentially beg for money to help shore up Britain’s ailing industry.

Not even a year ago, such a trip by the leader of one of the world’s leading financial centers — and accompanied by 27 senior business executives — would have been unthinkable. Rather the trip would have been about cementing economic relations, making some speeches about the value of the free market, a veiled reference to democracy and the hopeful flogging of British goods, services, and weapons.
But these are different, more difficult times and pride is making an exit, replaced with knitted brows and forced smiles of gratitude — if the money is made available.
And perhaps rather unsurprisingly, there are elements among this increasingly dishevelled elite that are not happy about this change, particularly when it comes to non- Western entities buying up landmark buildings and sizeable assets in Europe and the USA. The British popular press is a glaring example, which appears unable to accept the shifts in economic power, with regular commentaries and articles bemoaning such ‘humiliation’ on the world stage. Gulf sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) have come under particular criticism over the past year and a half, due largely to knee-jerk jingoism of the sensationalist kind. Take this example from an editorial in The Daily Express in November: “There is mounting concern about individuals and sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East that are buying into key British businesses… Now they are buying out our assets, our country, with our own money. It is a sad, sickening prospect.” That a change in fortunes affects the psyche of a former world power is somewhat understandable, though there is little need to bite the hand that feeds you. But such resentment has been around for quite some time and recent changes are no exception. One notable factor in this new alignment of the financial stars is how pragmatic political leaders are in comparison to popular sentiment. Just think back a few years to Dubai Ports World’s attempt to acquire the rights to run American sea ports. The Bush administration was all for it, whereas US media made a mountain out of a mole hill. Newspaper cartoons depicted terrorists hidden inside containers, Arabs dressed in jelabas turning a blind eye to dubious cargos sailing past the Statue of Liberty and all the old, staid Orientalist clichés were dragged out. They seemed to confirm what the Arab world has long suspected, that Americans and the West view Arabs as untrustworthy and as potential terrorists. The Dubai Ports episode was a particularly virulent case and the emirate did well to back out quietly without making a fuss. The spate of SWFs buying up assets and icons over the past year is being taken in a rather different light, but is nonetheless seemingly dependent on the acquisition. After all, Manchester City’s supporters couldn’t have been more enthusiastic about the Abu Dhabi United Group for Development and Investment purchase of their soccer team this year. But when it came to Abu Dhabi’s SWF pumping some $7.5 billion into Citigroup and Kuwait investing in Merrill Lynch a year ago, up went the cry of the barbarians at the gates and concern over vested political interests. As if Western multinationals, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) or the World Bank don’t have vested political interests everywhere they operate! But as with jingoistic attitudes having to change, so it looks as if the West’s dominance of the IMF may also have to adapt to the fallout from the financial crisis. The fund is looking to the Gulf’s finances — with oil producing countries generating some $1 trillion over the past few years from high oil prices — to help the IMF’s bail out packages. In return, Gulf countries will want more than just a seat at the IMF’s table; they will want to have an actual role in the fund’s decisions. As Brown said in Abu Dhabi, “I very much accept the argument that countries which do contribute in this way should have a greater say in the overall governance of the IMF.” Whether this will happen, and to what degree, will have to wait until the next meeting in April. And as for the Gulf helping to shore up British business — despite the reservations of the popular press — Brown’s visit helped to land $1.5 billion in deals, while Barclays Bank bypassed a handout from the British Treasury through a $11 billon stake from the Abu Dhabi royal family. The times are changing and hopefully so will attitudes as the axis of financial power starts to shift.

PAUL COCHRANE is a Beirut-based journalist

January 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Editorial

The new beast of burden

by Yasser Akkaoui January 1, 2009
written by Yasser Akkaoui

It’s easy to do well in a boom, when the money runs almost as freely as champagne, and when investors feather their nests with the profits of successful speculation. This was never more so the case than in the GCC, where oil money transformed the local capital markets into the biggest bull on the Arabian block.

After the booming bull has come the bear of bust. It is a bitter pill to swallow, especially when it has not been our fault. The inescapable truth is that business cards from the world’s blue chip banks and finance houses have lost their luster — rogue hedge fund investor Bernard Madoff saw to that when his $50 billion scam wiped out the asset portfolios of some of America’s most powerful investors. A well-cut suit, a Harvard MBA and a Manhattan employer are no longer enough to get people to part with their money.

For the time being at least.

All of this means that in 2009, a year in which we can expect the champagne to dry up, CEOs will have to prove their mettle by showing their respective boards that they can step up to the plate and deliver real solutions in this era of change — for there will be massive change and we are not just talking about the global recession. The whole financial dynamic has shifted, as has the flow of global investment.

We were once told that every dollar would return to the US, but now the dollar is leaving America and taking up extended residence in China, in Russia, in India and in Brazil. No one saw it coming, but the flaws in the US free trade agreement are coming back to haunt the architects of its design.

The implications of all this need to be taken on board. CEOs will have to reacquaint themselves with the basics of macroeconomics and devise micro-strategies to maintain their companies’ competitive edge. And they must do this within the parameters of good corporate governance, sticking to their mission and managing ethically.

January 1, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Financial Indicators

Global economic data

by Executive Staff January 1, 2009
written by Executive Staff

Thinkforce

Researchers per thousand employed, full-time equivalent, 2004 or latest available year

Researchers are professionals engaged in the conception and creation of new knowledge, products, processes, methods and systems, spanning civil, military and business interests. Latest figures show nearly four million R&D professionals in the OECD area, of which about two-thirds are in the business sector. That makes about seven researchers per thousand employees in the OECD area, compared with 5.8 per thousand in 1992 for instance. The number of researchers has increased over the last two decades. Finland, Japan, New Zealand and Sweden have the highest number of research workers per thousand persons employed. Outside the OECD, China has also seen growth, but at 1.2/1000 in 2004, remains relatively low.

Women in parliament

OECD countries, 2006

Women political leaders are a rarity in OECD countries, but did you know that men still vastly outnumber women in all the world’s parliaments? Nor can country differences in wealth explain much, for as a neat little OECD booklet called ‘Women and Men’ points out, women hold close to half the seats in Rwanda and Sweden and about a third in the Nordic countries, Cuba, Costa Rica and Argentina. In nine OECD countries at least a third of parliamentary seats are held by women. The Nordic countries and the Netherlands stand out, with more than 35%. In most OECD countries, though, women hold under a quarter, with 15% or less in Italy, Japan and the US.

Educating medics

Number of medical graduates per 1000 physicians, 1985 to 2005

Ageing will boost demand for health care, but as health care professionals are ageing, how can that demand be met? Even with no growth in demand for doctors, retraining of new medics is needed to replace those leaving or taking a break from the profession. That retraining requirement rises sharply when there is some growth in demand for staff, say, as people get older. However, medical graduation rates have been declining over the past 20 years, as the latest OECD Health Data 2007 shows. The average graduation rate for doctors was about 34 per 1000 practicing doctors across the OECD area in 2005. This is too low to meet the expected increase in demand, and raising pressure to bring in doctors from poorer countries where they are badly needed.

Public debt

As a percentage of GDP, 2006

In the 1990s a general government debt of 60% of GDP was one of a handful of targets European governments selected as preparation for economic and monetary union, and eventually the euro. As well as central government, it includes debt of local and regional governments, for instance. General government debt had eased in many countries, but, has risen again in several countries on the back of higher global interest rates. The euro area average stood at 76% in 2006, with Italy’s at over 100% of GDP, and no less than seven of the euro 12 easily overshooting the original 60% mark, including Germany and France. It is interesting to note that these countries have also had unspectacular growth. Fast-growing countries such as Ireland and Luxembourg, as well as Korea, were among those countries with the lowest government debt. US debt stood slightly above 60%.

January 1, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Banking & Finance

Money Matters by BLOMINVEST Bank

by Executive Staff January 1, 2009
written by Executive Staff

Regional stock market indices

Regional currency rates

$1.9B for Cleveland Clinic in Abu Dhabi

The Cleveland Clinic project on Abu Dhabi’s Sowwah island has been granted to a joint venture between the local Arabtec Construction and Greece’s Aktor. The design and construction contract has been estimated at AED7 billion ($1.9 billion). The new project will include a 360-bed hospital and a 324-room clinic. The total area of the project will be 417,000 square meters and will include parking space for more than 3,000 cars.  The clinic is scheduled to open in 2011. Local developer Aldar Properties is managing the construction on behalf of the government-controlled Mubadala Development Company and the consultant is UK’s Driver Consult.

Emaar awarded $100M Cairo project

Emaar’s Egyptian subsidiary, Emaar Misr has won a contract to develop and project manage a 2.2 million square meter social housing project on the Cairo-Suez road. With homes of 70 to 90 square meters, the city is planned to have the largest possible number of residential units in a given area. The project will also create job opportunities in line with the socio-economic growth objectives of Egypt. The new project will be called the Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Residential City after the president of the UAE.

Iraq to cut budget spending in 2009

Since oil revenues constitute around 94% of Iraq’s budget receipts, Iraqi Finance Minister Bader Jabr Solagh is considering more cuts in budget spending in 2009 as oil prices are expected to fall further. The budget was prepared on the basis of oil  prices at $50 per barrel with exports reaching 2 million barrels per day. Moreover, the plan will allocate $15 billion for investments and $2 billion for reconstruction of the oil industry. In addition, $8 billion will be reserved for security and another $650 million will be allocated for water distribution projects. In total, this will lead to a forecasted budget deficit of $15 billion in the coming year. On a parallel front, Iraqi finance minister pleaded with the Chinese government to write off the remaining Iraqi debts worth $8.5 billion as a goodwill gesture to support the Iraqi people and government. In a related note, General Electric Co. (GE) signed a $3 billion deal with Iraq in order to help them increase the country’s power generation capacity by some 7,000 megawatts, in an effort to reach the goal of around 13,000 megawatts.

January 1, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 488
  • 489
  • 490
  • 491
  • 492
  • …
  • 685

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

[contact-form-7 id=”27812″ title=”FooterSubscription”]

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE