• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
GCC

Trimming the fat

by Executive Staff January 1, 2009
written by Executive Staff

When ahead of the game in the world of business, no one is really concerned with how much was spent to get there, let alone on whom. More often than not, people are content to jump on board and ride the proverbial train until the last stop. That may have been the case prior to the onset of the current global recession. But today, companies in the region have to equate their positions and organizational structures with the current economic environment in order to remain competitive in the absence of better times. “When there is a storm outside you go back home, lock yourself in and discuss what you are going to do until the storm blows over and the rainbow comes back,” remarked Panos Manolopoulos, managing partner Middle East/CPS global practice leader at Stanton Chase International Executive Search Consultants.

Right now, that rainbow still seems a long way off, as companies across the region begin to restructure their businesses in order to deal with the decreasing growth rates expected in 2009 and beyond. Naturally, this trimming down process has begun with casting off excess labor costs associated with times of growth, especially large executive pay packages. “There has been a lot of over-hiring which has happened in order to be able to recruit and get [executive staff] on-board,” explained Debabrat Mishra, principal & consulting business leader Middle East at Hewitt Associates. “This has resulted in a lot of [executive] overcompensation which is getting corrected right now.” Accordingly, companies in the region are beginning to realize that there is no easy way to restructure their businesses after years of promising growth, however reluctant they may be to admit it. A former senior executive who was recently laid off at the government-owned real estate company Dubai Properties in the UAE said that most departments were being downsized by “as much as 60% across the board.” Recently Dubai Properties announced that they would release a statement addressing the subject of redundancies, but they later recanted on that intention.

However dim the prospects for executive compensation in the region might be in times of a global recession, there are still plenty of silver linings in the ominous clouds compared to many developed economies. “There are people being let go in Europe, the UK and North America who are going to think, ‘Well, the Middle East still offers the opportunity to get a decent job and maybe now is the time to think about going down there,’” said Richard Lamptey, principal and head of executive remuneration consulting Middle East at Mercer. “The Middle East, generally, will be less affected by the global economic downturn than some of the Western economies and I think it will change perceptions about the opportunities that are available down here,” added Peter Christie, director of executive reward for Hay Group in the Middle East.

Moreover, the nature of economies in the GCC as tax havens continues to provide an attractive setting for experienced executives to come to the region. According to the Hay Group, net disposable income (gross pay adjusted for taxes and cost of living) for executives in the Middle East ranks amongst the highest in the world, with five of the six GCC countries ranking in the top 10 and four new entrants in the top 20. “When you look at net disposable income… that shows very clearly that executive pay in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE are at the top of the pile and that is because of the very favorable tax rate,” said Christie.

Total compensation for executives in the region, however, remains lower than the rest of the world. The main reason is that the region still lacks meaningful long-term incentives for executives. Without these incentives, executive compensation in the region persists in being strongly underpinned by large allowances offered in compensation for the increasing cost of living and the opportunity cost of relocating to the region. “The fundamental difference between the way that executives are paid in the Middle East and the way that they are paid in Western economies… is that the balance here is towards base salary and substantial allowances, which are generally free of taxation, and discretionary bonuses which may or may not be quite large,” commented Lamptey.

The opportunity for executives to be well compensated in the region remains linked to the outcome of the ongoing economic downturn. The inherent growth potential of the region coupled with the lack of highly talented individuals still presents a labor market that is relatively easier to perforate than many of the world’s economies. “Despite what most people say, the Middle East and especially the GCC lack talented people and hence there is a very big need to attract good talent,” said Manolopoulos. Consequently, the lack of qualified executive candidates will continue to push executive salaries upwards, albeit in a fashion that is more fitted to the current economic scenario. As Pon Pitchai, reward manager at a large regional real estate developer concluded, “We have not reached the zenith of executive pay and there is ample room for increasing executive compensation.” Considering the hundreds of recent layoffs in the real estate industry, these are encouraging words — executives that can still expect to be plentifully rewarded, as long as they can keep their jobs.

January 1, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Real Estate

UAE – Realty reform

by Executive Staff January 1, 2009
written by Executive Staff

The UAE government has long been active in setting laws and regulations to improve the transparency of its real estate market and ensure long-term growth. Since the global financial crisis began, these attempts were further amplified by issuing new laws, intervening in the market by controlling future supply and by injecting liquidity into the banking sector to promote lending. “Every strong government provides its market with an ability to bounce back in difficult times and the UAE has shown over the last four decades its resilience and ambition in making [the country] one of the most buoyant economies in the world,” said Hayan Merchant, CEO of Ruwaad Holdings LLC.

On November 9, 2008, Dubai’s government formed a high- level committee consisting of a few private developers and Dubai-based master developers, including Emaar Properties, Nakheel and Dubai Properties, who jointly control around 70% of the property supply in Dubai. The committee aims to tackle the impact of the current financial crisis on the UAE’s real estate market, while looking into various options to restore confidence. Additionally, it was announced that no new projects can be launched without the committee’s approval, however, none of the already- launched projects will be called off.
The global financial crisis has hit the banking sector and rippled into the UAE real estate market. Some banks and mortgage lenders have considerably cut down or even stopped their real estate lending. For example, Amlak suspended new mortgage loans and NBD stopped lending to expat employees of real estate firms, fearing loan defaults. In response, the government in October began injecting $19 billion into UAE banks to overcome this liquidity squeeze. Additionally, the central bank has set up around $13.5 billion in an emergency credit fund for homeowners, investors and developers. It has also discussed proposals for introducing financial instruments to boost liquidity and insure the continuity of real estate loans.

New laws

Reforms of the real estate sector’s regulations started in July 2007, when a Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) was established in Dubai to set policies and to create awareness of rights and responsibilities in the property sector.
The Strata Law was issued and came into effect on March 31, 2008. It defines the responsibility of property owners and developers in the management of common areas in multi- owner developments, like gated communities and apartment buildings.

The interim registration law came into effect on August 31, decreeing that any ownership change of off-plan properties in Dubai will be invalid if not registered in RERA’s Interim Register, with all registered sales transferred to the Land Department Register. Additionally, transactions made before the law came into effect will not be exempted, as they were to have been registered within 60 days of the law enactment. “While this may cause a slowdown for off-plan buying, it will be very beneficial in the long term to stabilize the market and put off flippers and speculators,” said Mohamed Al Zarah, CEO of Great Properties.
Moreover, the new Dubai Property Court was established in September. It is expected to reduce the workload of RERA, which since its establishment has been swamped by property cases, including for project delays and noncompliance with a property developer’s initial description.

The new mortgage law, which came into effect on October 30, states that mortgages will not be valid if they are not registered at the Dubai Land Department or the new Interim Real Estate Register, and it includes all procedures concerning a mortgage and its legal effects on stakeholders. Additionally, it includes execution procedures for the mortgaged property and proper conduct between the bank and the borrower.

Abu Dhabi is following suit by finalizing a new law to regulate its property market and to put an end to dangerous speculation. Also, there are plans in the Emirates’ capital to introduce similar real estate laws that Dubai has earlier issued — like the strata, broker and escrow laws — in order to assure investors that they are investing in a safe environment with a solid legal structure.

“Thanks to measures taken by the authorities and the initial strength of the market, I firmly believe that the UAE will overcome this crisis,” said Jean Pierre Nammour, managing director of Al Nahda Real Estate. With these regulations, the UAE in general and Dubai in specific, are trying to move from a speculative to a more mature property market, without facing a sharp real estate crash. Though progress has been made, the road is yet long: new laws are being drafted, such as the ‘company law,’ the new banking credit law and a new foreign investment law, to further improve the investment environment in the country.

January 1, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Financial Indicators

Regional equity markets

by Executive Staff December 8, 2008
written by Executive Staff

Beirut SE: BLOM  (1 year)

Current Year High: 1,629.74  Current Year Low: 822.17

The Beirut Stock Exchange (BSE) is a relatively small market with only 26 listed stocks, 3 funds and a market cap of $8.7 billion as of November 25, 2007. Like any Arab market, the BSE is greatly affected by its surroundings and has been subject to many fluctuations. The BLOM Stock Index (BSI), BSE’s main indicator, began the year at a level of 1,488, following an upward trend. After the Doha agreement in May, the BSI rose significantly to peak on July 7th at an all-time high of 2,119. It then started to decline due to the political bickering and the worsening global economic climate. The BSI recorded a year-low on November 25, 2008, when it closed at 1,201. Solidere, the real estate giant, accounts for the bulk of traded value, in addition to the biggest banks in the country, such as BLOM, Audi and Byblos. On a year-to-date basis, the top performers were Bank of Beirut, RYMCO and Société Libanaise des Ciments Blancs (N), that grew by 41%, 37% and 35% respectively. Conversely, the worst performers were BLC (Bank Libanaise pour le Commerce), Holcim and Audi GDR with a reduction in price of 76%, 28% and 25%.

Amman SE  (1 year)

Current Year High: 5,043.72  Current Year Low: 2,561.30

The Amman Stock Exchange, established in 1999, has been growing significantly in the past few years, mainly because of Gulf investments in the country, leading the market cap to reach $32.2 billion. Total volume traded during the period extending from January 2nd to November 25th surpassed 4.9 billion shares worth over $26.4 billion. The year 2008 started on a rise, increasing the ASE index from 3,764 on January 2, to reach its peak at 5,043 on June 19th. However, this did not last, as the ASE index began to decline and closed at 2,597.8 on November 25th, recording a year to date decrease of 30.99%. Of the 245 companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange, the financial sector accounts for the majority of the volume traded, while the industrial and the services sectors follow. TIT, MEDI and Al Ahlia are the top three performers with a year-to-date growth of 316.67%, 238.77% and 140.23% respectively. On the other hand, the worst three performers were Comp. Transports, Beitna and Optimiza that witnessed a price drop of 76.52%, 66.97% and 65.67% respectively, compared to their prices recorded at the beginning of the year.

Abu Dhabi SM  (1 year)

Current Year High: 5,148.49  Current Year Low: 2,701.65

The Abu Dhabi Stock Exchange lists 63 companies with a market capitalization of $68.35 billion. The market did not experience significant trades during the first two months of 2008. However, the market activity started to improve mid-March, boosting the ADSM Index to its year-to-date high of 5,158. Following the drop in oil prices, the market began to deteriorate leading the ADSM Index to reach its year-to-date low of 2,697 in mid-November, thus recording a year-to-date decline of 41%. Trades from the start of the year recorded a volume of 48.62 million shares and a value of $62.3 billion, with a daily average turnover of $271.9 million. Asmak and Methag Lil Takaful were top gainers during this period, recording price increases of 400% and 212% respectively. Gulf Medical Projects Company was also among the best performers with a 196% rise in its price. On the other hand, Ras el Khaimah Properties, Waha Capital and Dana Gas were the worst performers as they lost 73%, 69% and 69% of their respective values.

Dubai FM  (1 year)

Current Year High: 6,391.87  Current Year Low: 1,814.90

The Dubai Financial Market (DFM) was launched in January 2004 and includes 54 listed companies with a market capitalization of $41.71 billion. The activity on the Dubai exchange maintained the norm throughout the first five months of 2008, recording a year-to-date high of 6,314 in the month of February. It then started to decline negatively as it was affected by the global financial crisis. The main factor behind the decrease in the market was the significant drop in prices of real estate and banking stocks. Consequently, the Dubai Financial Market Index slumped to reach its lowest value of 1,809 by mid-November, scoring a significant year-to-date drop of 69%. The total volume and value traded during this period reached 72.62 million shares and $81.07 billion, representing a daily average turnover of $355.8 million. GGICO was the best performer realizing an increase in price of 58%. NGI and Tameen followed recording an increase of 51% and 38% respectively. On the other hand, Tamweel, Emaar Group, DFM and Amlak Finance were the worst performers to date recording a major decrease in their prices by 85%, 82%, 81% and 80% respectively.

Kuwait SE  (1 year)

Current Year High: 15,654.80            Current Year Low: 8,552.70

The Kuwaiti stock exchange index witnessed a 30% decline from 12,800 at the beginning of the year to close at 8,683 on November 25, 2008. The high of 15,667 was registered on 24 June during the peak of oil prices and the low of 8,459 was attained on 17 November in the midst of the current global financial and economical crisis that saw a weekly temporary trading freeze on the KSE. The total volume of stocks traded reached 75.711 billion with a value of $126.405 billion, thus recording a daily average value of $566.841 million. The KSE lists 97 companies in different sectors ranging from banking, investment, insurance and other industrial and service related companies. The total market capital of these companies is equivalent to $122.961 billion. Some of the best performers of the Kuwaiti index were Al Soor company, AREF Energy and Hits Telecom Holding company recording a 200%, 191%, and 129% respectively. Whereas Burgan Group, DAMAC, and IIG recorded 77%, 76%, and 76% losses on a year-to-date basis.

Saudi Arabia SE  (1 year)

Current Year High: 11,895.47            Current Year Low: 4,264.52

The Saudi Arabian Stock Market (Saudi SE) is the largest market in the Arab world with 126 listed companies having a market cap of $229 billion. The Saudi SE has been the most affected by the global financial turmoil. Saudi Arabia is the biggest exporter of oil in the gulf region and its economy is predominantly affected by oil prices. Therefore, with the surge in oil prices by the end of June, the Saudi Arabian market remained at a peak level throughout the first half of the year recording 11,895. The Saudi SE began to plunge thereafter to record a year low of 4,223 on the 23rd of November. By the 25th of November, the Saudi SE index lost 58.58% of its value led by the SAICO Saudi company that saw a decline of 88% in its price. Anaam dropped 86% and Al Ahlia Insurance decreased 86%. Moreover, out of the 126 listed stocks, only 5 companies registered an increase in their prices, led by UCA that gained 80% and Development Bank that increased 12.5% from the beginning of the year.

Muscat SM  (1 year)

Current Year High: 12,109.10            Current Year Low: 5,846.19

The Muscat Stock Market closed at 6,125 on November 25, down 33.27% from year start. The index registered a year-to-date high of 12,164 in mid-May when oil prices were equal to $147 per barrel. The index’s year to date low was 5,815 as a result of the global financial crisis. A volume of 4.014 billion stocks were traded with a total value of $8.487 billion and an average daily turnover of $36.896 million up to November 25. Some 128 companies in various sectors are listed with a total market cap of $16.366 billion. NDP, OMPC and Financial Corporation were among the best performers throughout the year recording an increase of 223%, 112% and 101% respectively, while Al Batinah International, AJS and OUIC registered 71%, 70% and 66% price reductions.

Bahrain SE  (1 year)

Current Year High: 2,902.68  Current Year Low: 1,947.55

The Bahraini Market, similar to all oil-exporting countries, witnessed a stable performance in the first six months of 2008 and recorded a year-high 2,898 on the 16th of June. However, with the beginning of the global recession, and the drop in oil prices, the Bahraini index began a downward trend that reached a year to date low of 1,947 recorded on November 25, with a year to date decrease of 29%. Relative to the country’s small size, the Bahrain SE has a market capitalization of $22 billion and the Bahraini Stock market lists 42 companies, of which 15 stocks gained in price and 25 shrunk during this year. BFLC, Banader and NHC were the top gainers with growth rates of 55.6%, 40.8% and 36.6% respectively. On the other hand, the worst performers were ABC, GFH and Global with a year-to-date decrease of 66.64%, 52.06% and 50.81% respectively.

Doha SM: Qatar  (1 year)

Current Year High: 12,627.32            Current Year Low: 5,504.53

The Doha Stock market that started trading in January 2000, holds 43 listed companies with a market capitalization of $63.92 billion. Trades on the Doha market witnessed slight fluctuations at the beginning of 2008 until March. Afterwards, the demand on stocks started to rise leading the DSM Index to peak at 12,636.24 by the end of May. The market began to decline later, realizing minor improvements in September to finish with a year-to-date low of 5,504 on the 25th of November and a year-to-date decrease of 42%. The total volume of trades during the year attained 3.5 million shares worth $44.867 billion with a daily average turnover of $193.39 million. Islamic Broker was the best performer to date with a rise in its price of 217%, followed by Mannai Corporation and Ezdan with an increase of 50% and 48.65%, respectively. As for worst performers, Makhazin came in first place with its price falling by 70.65%, whereas QIIC and Care Holding came in second and third places recording a decrease of 64.76% and 61.52%.

Tunis SE  (1 year)

Current Year High: 3,418.13  Current Year Low: 2,579.60

The Tunisian market, launched in 1998, has been the most resilient market against the financial crisis, as the Tunis Stock Exchange (Tunindex) was one of the few markets in the world and the only one in the Arab world to register a positive year-to-date change of 14.20%. The Tunis SE kept an upward sloping trend throughout the first 9 months of the year to register a yearly high of 3,418 on September 9 and gradually decreased to close at 2,994 on November 25. Out of the 51 listed shares on Tunindex with market weighted capitalization of $6 billion, 27 went down and 24 went up. The best performers have been Astree Assurances that went up by 168%, STAR was up by 156% and ASSAD by 143%. On the other hand, the worst performers were the pipeline company SOTRAPIL that went down by 55% and the two Tunisian telecom companies SOTETEL and SPDIT-SICAP both dropping 46% and 34% respectively.

Casablanca SE All Shares  (1 year)

Current Year High: 14,925.99            Current Year Low: 10,969.06

The Casablanca Stock Exchange (Casa All) recorded a year-to-date level of -14.26% on November 25, a percentage that is regarded as fair given the heavy losses on other exchanges. To date, the Casablanca SE has been relatively able to withstand against the global financial crisis in comparison with other countries in the region. The market maintained a constant level until mid-August, after which it decreased towards its year low of 10,742 in the last week of October. From year’s start, the Casablanca SE underwent a volume of 124.8 million shares with a total value of $9.4 billion. Out of the 77 listed companies with a market capitalization of $62 billion, 11 went up, led by Cosumar with an increase of 32%, and Afriquia Gaz, that also rose by 29%. On the other hand, 66 stocks went down, lead by the IT company Microdata with a decrease of 59%, followed by the electronic banking provider HPS that fell 58.90% and the Insurance firm La Maroccaine Vie, that dropped 55%.

Cairo SE: Hermes  (1 year)

Current Year High: 11,935.67            Current Year Low: 3,686.35

The CASE 30, one of the major indexes in Egypt that started in 1998, has by the 25th of November lost more than 63% of its value. The index registered a year high of 11,935 on May 4 2008 and since then took a downward trend to record a year low 3,686 on the 24th of November. In the 224 days of trading to date, 19.96 billion shares exchanged hands at a value of $70.41 billion. Out of the 185 listed shares that have a market capitalization of $53 billion, 146 have decreased, 28 increased and 11 were steady. The real estate sector was the most influenced by the current global financial crisis where SODIC Co. lost the most with 82.25%, the Canal Shipping Agencies Company and Alexandria Containers & Goods also retreated 81.63% and 81.40% respectively. Among the best performers, the entertainment sector grew the most; Semiramis Intercontinental Cairo, grew 1,016.25% followed by the industrial sector with UEFM increasing by 172% and Egypt poultry increased by 122.23%.

December 8, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Banking

Running realty’s gauntlet

by Executive Staff December 8, 2008
written by Executive Staff

Before the global financial crisis hit home, the main priority for banks in the UAE was how to decrease inflation rates. Another top concern in 2008 was dealing with the flood of liquidity streaming into the market, as well as currency speculation. But then, at the end of the second quarter, liquidity started to dry up, and immediately after the financial crisis climaxed in September banks became reluctant to give out loans as liquidity was so scarce. By the end of 2008, banks across the United Arab Emirates will have borrowed a minimum of AED70 billion ($19 billion) from the government. As of the beginning of November, banks had already received 80% of this liquidity package. Such a move aims to — most importantly — provide liquidity to the sector, in addition to easing tight lending requirements amid the continuing global financial crisis. Raj Madha, director of equity research at EFG-Hermes, thinks that the government “has been doing quite a good job” via pumping liquidity into the banking system and thus has been “very successful in bringing down interest rates.” Standard & Poor’s (S&P’s) announced in a recent report that the tightening liquidity conditions in the UAE are “only tangentially related to the global credit crunch and are being driven mainly by a host of country-specific factors, including speculative investor activity surrounding the UAE dirham’s peg to the US dollar, rapid domestic growth in recent years and concerns over the real estate sector.” Even though banks in the UAE have been growing at 40-50% per annum in the last two to three years, this will “inevitably slow,” said Eirvin Knox, chief executive officer of the Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, to  Bloomberg newswire.

With the country’s economy heavily based on development projects, the market will inescapably witness a slow down as projects will be more difficult to finance and loans harder — and more expensive — to acquire. And if liquidity dries up again, “funding future projects will, however, become more difficult, thereby affecting the UAE economy’s hitherto extraordinary growth,” according to S&P’s. But, a simmering in growth “would not necessarily be a bad thing,” argued S&P’s, “as it could alleviate infrastructure and resource bottlenecks that had been stoking inflationary pressures, as well as reduce the risk of a significant oversupply in the real estate market.”

As the UAE real estate index had declined by 46% in July 2008, banks have also been affected by some of the property market’s concerns. S&P’s stated that by the middle of this year, the UAE’s direct exposure held somewhere between 15-20% of their total loans and 80% of their adjusted total equity. Overall, a colossal decline in real estate prices would, undoubtedly, negatively affect the banking sector, via direct exposures and indirectly through the depleted value of the collateral taken.

Solid vaults

All in all, domestic banks in the UAE show robust financial profiles distinguished by high profitability, good asset quality and strong capitalization. Third quarter results have been, in general, “strong” according to Madha. Despite the significant write-downs that took place, they were not as big as expected. “They are having to change their lending criteria, but that is what you would expect in a rescue environment,” he said. Regarding short-term stability in the immediate aftermath of the global financial crisis, UAE banks have stabilized thus far.

Since year-on-year growth has been rather remarkable in the UAE, “the thirst for credit has been substantial,” noted S&P’s. But while a part of this has been quenched by external borrowing, the local banking sector has satisfied most of the credit needs. S&P’s contended that loans granted by UAE banks have expanded annually by an average of 35% in the past four years. Following Qatar, “this is the fastest rate of loan growth observed in the Gulf.” The pace of growth, underlined S&P’s, “even accelerated in the first half of 2008 (to about 50% annual increase), boosted by massive borrowings from government and government-related entities to expand their business domestically and internationally.” Although customer deposits also grew rather briskly, they could not keep up with the excessive growth in lending. Thus, by the end of June 2008, the loan-to-deposit ratio exceeded 100% for the entire banking sector. Now, with an ongoing era of uncertainty, banks must keep their eyes open to any and all possible solutions to these new long-term problems.

The temptation for mergers and acquisitions has thus never been more appetizing for those banks suffering from the crisis. Mashreqbank, the UAE’s largest private bank, has said it is only open to a merger if “one plus one equals three” — i.e. if both parties involved will benefit from the activity — said the bank’s chairman, Abdul Aziz Al-Ghurair.  The CEO of the National Bank of Abu Dhabi, Michael Tomlin, has also said the bank would welcome a merger, emphasizing that “we need to be bigger to compete effectively on the global stage.” With over 50 banks throughout the Emirates, financial institutions have had little impetus to merge until the recent global crisis. Right now, the majority of bankers are keeping mum about the possible need for mergers and acquisitions. No one wants to be kicked while they are down and voicing a desire to merge or be acquired is viewed as a sign of weakness. In November, Sultan bin Nasser Al Suwaidi, governor of the UAE Central Bank, said the bank would support any mergers and acquisitions if that would help soften the blow of the international financial crisis on the local economy. Madha, however, does not see any advantages to mergers and acquisitions, feeling that it “would take up a lot of airtime and a lot of management time. You want management to be focused on liquidity issues and managing risk, not busy with M&A activity.” For the time being, banks are displaying more interest in expanding abroad than integrating domestically, but in the long run, integration could be something to consider.

Forecasts

In the medium term, the UAE banking sector faces a few challenges in terms of future growth and profitability. In the coming period wholesale funding will be harder to attract, and cost more. S&P’s forecasted “a potential moderate deterioration in asset quality in the medium term. On the liabilities side, banks are expected to step up their competition to attract additional customer deposits to fund their growth and keep their liquidity at satisfactory levels.” The ratings agency expects UAE banks “to continue to re-price lending risk, which should act as a significant buffer to overall profitability.” Madha highlighted that loans for share purchases — potentially a derivative exposure — will be a chief concern for Emirati banks in 2009. Another major issue will obviously be provisioning, said Madha, “and that will depend on how the labor markets do, and again, the labor markets are not as solid as they have been in the past. We’re certainly seeing a reality check in the labor markets at the moment.” A further principal obstacle, asserted Madha, is the continuing lack of visibility in the system. “The fact that there is effectively no communication between the government and analysts — I see it as significant risks,” he said.

For the future, Madha is concerned with long-term stability in the banking sector. He feels this will heavily depend on the performance of the real estate market in the UAE: “if the property sector holds up, then the banking sector should be fine.” Al Suwaidi, however, firmly holds that the UAE’s banking sector is strong enough to deal with any corrections in the real estate market. Keep your fingers crossed for the banking sector, because the real estate market seems to be facing some serious downturns in 2009. Overall, next year banks in the UAE will continue to try to stabilize whilst facing numerous challenges.

December 8, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Real estate

Gains wane

by Executive Staff December 8, 2008
written by Executive Staff

While the boom in North African real estate continued through most of 2008, a downturn in global financial markets could put the brakes on the burgeoning sector in 2009. Algeria’s unstable security situation and fickle political climate continued to scare off investors and any significant growth in the sector over the past year, but Tunisia and Morocco pushed forward with ambitious state-sponsored public housing projects, as foreign investment flows helped finance the development of tourism projects, upscale properties and numerous mega resorts.

Analysts have predicted that the financial crisis will have little direct influence over the Tunisian and Moroccan economies. However, as the crisis worsens, regional real estate insiders are calculating the indirect influence they may see in the coming years, as these countries’ economic dependence on affected economies like those in Western Europe becomes a greater liability.

For instance, Tunisia and Morocco, like so many other developing economies in the globalized world, have come to rely heavily on the economic boost that remittances from workers living abroad send home. Out of the estimated $5 billion that is sent to Morocco in remittances, as much as 86% is invested in real estate. Now, as layoffs increase in developed economies and consumption trends dip to dangerous new lows, remittances to developing economies will sharply decline as the Moroccans and Tunisians living abroad tighten their belts.

Land of the second home

In addition, Tunisia and Morocco have had great success in marketing to second-home buyers in Western Europe and other regions. Offering lower real estate prices than the northern Mediterranean countries, year-round sunshine and hundreds of miles of undeveloped Atlantic and Mediterranean coastlines, both countries have became seductive destinations for Europeans interested in a vacation home or secondary residence. The region’s real estate boom, which most agree began in 2006, was further reinforced by the recent arrival of new low-cost airline carriers like Ryanair and Jet4You, which increased routes between exotic North African cities and European capitals and offered more competitive prices on fares. Analysts expect a sharp decline in demand for second-homes and vacation properties in these countries as financial conditions abroad grow worse.

As for the domestic real estate market, Tunisia’s outlook is bright for the following year with local demand largely met. Though many locals may complain of rising prices, the government implemented a strategy to promote national home ownership by preventing foreigners from participating in the property market until national ownership reached approximately 80%. Tunisia currently has the highest home ownership rate in Africa and one of the highest in the world. Morocco, on the other hand, with its much larger territory and whose population is nearly three times that of Tunisia, suffers from an ongoing housing deficit for which Housing Minister Taoufiq Hejira is finding no easy solutions. The development of the kingdom’s upscale market and tourism industry have by all means proved an economic windfall, but climbing prices of residential real estate in many areas have now reached peaks that are well beyond the reach of most Moroccans.

Due to a somewhat late entry on the international property market scene, Tunisia remains much less well-known than Morocco as a real estate investment destination, with an up-and-coming property market that is just beginning to attract a great deal of attention from investors in Europe, Asia, and the Gulf. In 2005, new legislation made it easier for foreigners to purchase property in areas designated for “economic and tourist activities.” Prices in Tunisia are still low, especially compared to some regions of Morocco (namely the much hyped Marrakech, a longstanding staple on the jet-set scene), where thirty years of foreigners buying villas have raised real estate prices to European levels. If prices continue to rise and they begin to lose their competitiveness with areas like southern Spain, buyers will choose properties in markets north of the Mediterranean, which have vastly superior infrastructures and identical climactic conditions.

The Moroccan administration is firmly in favor of economic liberalization and Hejira has proclaimed the state’s intention to completely withdraw from real estate development within five or ten years, entrusting the industry entirely to the private sector. But the administration continues to demonstrate a willingness to step in when necessary, making new land available at strategic moments in order to combat real estate speculation and sponsoring the development of 170 new urban zones. The proliferation of shantytowns is a painful and highly visible reminder that a healthy rate of economic growth and low inflation are not changing the kingdom’s high rates of poverty and unemployment as quickly as many would hope.

Social housing is currently a top priority for the public sector, which it is trying to pass on to the private sector. The Ministry’s ambitious plan to provide 130,000 social housing units by 2012 seemed like the ideal way to resolve the housing deficit (annual demand is officially estimated at 30,000 – 40,000 units). But while private-public partnerships formed the backbone of the state’s strategy to meet demand, the private sector has become more reluctant recently to invest in this bracket of housing, in spite of tax breaks and land incentives offered by the state. Social housing units, which must be priced at around 200,000 MAD ($23,000) to meet buyers’ capacity, are less and less economically feasible, since rises in construction and land costs over the past year have practically erased the profit margin for private developers.

Samir Benmakhlouf, President of Century 21 Morocco, thinks that domestic demand could carry the real estate market through the turbulence of the crisis period. When asked if the real estate boom could be over, he replied: “The demand is still there and the demand is much bigger than the supply. There is a readjustment period that we have to go through, but we still have a lot to build. We still have a more than one million housing unit deficit. The demand is very big and the opportunity is still very big. However there is a stagnation that is causing a lot of people to think twice about coming to the sector.” As he pointed out, a period of stagnation could actually prove beneficial to the market over time: the sector’s rapid growth and the promise of huge profits led to a great deal of speculation and under-the-table deals that have plagued the sector’s development and inflated prices. A period of calm will allow professionals to regain control of the sector and weed out some of the greed and corruption. Also, a stagnation of property prices is already boosting the rental market, which is sorely in need of a transition from the informal to the formal economy and whose development would help address the country’s massive housing deficit.

The rise of the rental

Benmakhlouf pointed to rising interest and profitability in the overlooked and underdeveloped rental market saying, “Our network has been receiving a lot of people throughout this crisis; we’re actually making record revenue throughout this stagnation period — record transactions, because a lot of them are rental, when people cannot afford to buy, they rent, there is a trend now to go towards rental.” Reports indicate that the state will soon pass legislation protecting owners rights and extending their control over property, which will boost the rental market, as owners currently cannot evict tenants who fail to pay rent. Benmakhlouf added, “If you look at cosmopolitan cities around the world, you find that two-thirds are rented and one-third is owned by the person who is living there. In Morocco it is the opposite, right now its one-third renters and two-thirds owners, but we are moving towards the rental market.”

Mega-projects in the course of development by Gulf companies Emaar, Al Qudra Holding, Sama Dubai, Qatar Real Estate Partners and others will also support the sector’s sustained growth in Morocco and Tunisia in 2009. Since 2003, climbing oil prices created an excess liquidity in the Middle East that oil-fueled investors, mainly sovereign funds and wealthy families, have used to make record levels of global investments. Pursuing a forward-thinking strategy of diversifying their economies away from dependence on oil exports, these regional investors, equipped with a petrodollar windfall in excess of $2 trillion, invested heavily in the North African region. Tunisia and Morocco, thanks to sustained political stability, solid economic outlook and carefully crafted investor-friendly environment, received the bulk of the region’s megaprojects, most of which have been channeled into tourism-related developments and luxury residential real estate.

These projects also have a modernizing influence that will pay off over the next decade in terms of job creation, urban renewal and the transformation of unused plots of land into hubs of tourism and industry. Projects in Tunisia such as Tunis Sports City and Mediterranean Gate ‘Century’ City, both funded by Dubai investment at $25 billion and $5 billion, will feature golf courses, state-of-the-art sports academies, marinas, luxury hotels and thousands of residential units.

In Morocco, the renovation of the Rabat-Sale Bouregreg River, currently nearing completion, is considered an axis of the kingdom’s strategy to update its social and economic conditions, starting with the capital city. The project, which is being carried out in partnership with the United Arab Emirates, includes a tramway, a port on the Atlantic, a marina and a facelift to monuments and historical features of Morocco’s administrative center. And while Casablanca, the economic capital of Morocco, is still waiting for a comprehensive urban renewal program, it is at least experiencing a boom in commercial real estate. Two thousand and eight saw the breaking of ground on the Morocco Mall project, which will be the largest mall in Africa, featuring an Imax theater and over 200 name-brand stores.

Several large-scale infrastructural works are underway in Tunisia and Morocco, as both countries update their airports to increase capacity for tourism and modernize their train transport system. Tunisia awarded a contract to build its seventh international airport at Enfidha to the Turkish holding company Tepe Aksen Ventisres (TAV) in 2007 and plans to award a contract to build a deep water port in the same region. In November 2008, Morocco received a 625 million euro ($804.6 million) loan from France to fund a high-speed TGV route between Casablanca and Tangiers. Although much remains to be done, particularly in the areas of public transport and urban planning, investments in national infrastructure prove that Morocco and Tunisia, often known for corruption and misuse of public funds, are very serious about achieving a goal-oriented long-term sustainable economic development.

December 8, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Real estate

Realty reform

by Executive Staff December 8, 2008
written by Executive Staff

The UAE government has long been active in setting laws and regulations to improve the transparency of its real estate market and ensure long-term growth. Since the global financial crisis began, these attempts were further amplified by issuing new laws, intervening in the market by controlling future supply and by injecting liquidity into the banking sector to promote lending. “Every strong government provides its market with an ability to bounce back in difficult times and the UAE has shown over the last four decades its resilience and ambition in making [the country] one of the most buoyant economies in the world,” said Hayan Merchant, CEO of Ruwaad Holdings LLC.

On November 9, 2008, Dubai’s government formed a high-level committee consisting of a few private developers and Dubai-based master developers, including Emaar Properties, Nakheel and Dubai Properties, who jointly control around 70% of the property supply in Dubai. The committee aims to tackle the impact of the current financial crisis on the UAE’s real estate market, while looking into various options to restore confidence. Additionally, it was announced that no new projects can be launched without the committee’s approval, however, none of the already-launched projects will be called off.

The global financial crisis has hit the banking sector and rippled into the UAE real estate market. Some banks and mortgage lenders have considerably cut down or even stopped their real estate lending. For example, Amlak suspended new mortgage loans and NBD stopped lending to expat employees of real estate firms, fearing loan defaults. In response, the government in October began injecting $19 billion into UAE banks to overcome this liquidity squeeze. Additionally, the central bank has set up around $13.5 billion in an emergency credit fund for homeowners, investors and developers. It has also discussed proposals for introducing financial instruments to boost liquidity and insure the continuity of real estate loans.

New laws

Reforms of the real estate sector’s regulations started in July 2007, when a Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) was established in Dubai to set policies and to create awareness of rights and responsibilities in the property sector.

The Strata Law was issued and came into effect on March 31, 2008. It defines the responsibility of property owners and developers in the management of common areas in multi-owner developments, like gated communities and apartment buildings.

The interim registration law came into effect on August 31, decreeing that any ownership change of off-plan properties in Dubai will be invalid if not registered in RERA’s Interim Register, with all registered sales transferred to the Land Department Register. Additionally, transactions made before the law came into effect will not be exempted, as they were to have been registered within 60 days of the law enactment. “While this may cause a slowdown for off-plan buying, it will be very beneficial in the long term to stabilize the market and put off flippers and speculators,” said Mohamed Al Zarah, CEO of Great Properties.

Moreover, the new Dubai Property Court was established in September. It is expected to reduce the workload of RERA, which since its establishment has been swamped by property cases, including for project delays and noncompliance with a property developer’s initial description.

The new mortgage law, which came into effect on October 30, states that mortgages will not be valid if they are not registered at the Dubai Land Department or the new Interim Real Estate Register, and it includes all procedures concerning a mortgage and its legal effects on stakeholders. Additionally, it includes execution procedures for the mortgaged property and proper conduct between the bank and the borrower.

Abu Dhabi is following suit by finalizing a new law to regulate its property market and to put an end to dangerous speculation. Also, there are plans in the Emirates’ capital to introduce similar real estate laws that Dubai has earlier issued — like the strata, broker and escrow laws — in order to assure investors that they are investing in a safe environment with a solid legal structure.

“Thanks to measures taken by the authorities and the initial strength of the market, I firmly believe that the UAE will overcome this crisis,” said Jean Pierre Nammour, managing director of Al Nahda Real Estate. With these regulations, the UAE in general and Dubai in specific, are trying to move from a speculative to a more mature property market, without facing a sharp real estate crash. Though progress has been made, the road is yet long: new laws are being drafted, such as the ‘company law,’ the new banking credit law and a new foreign investment law, to further improve the investment environment in the country.

December 8, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Comment

All roads lead to India

by Norbert Schiller December 8, 2008
written by Norbert Schiller

Many years ago, an Indian friend of mine living in Dubai said to me, “If you want to send a plane to anywhere in the world, including the North Pole, and are worried that you won’t have enough passengers, land in Delhi and I promise you that the plane will take off without one empty seat.” He was correct. There are very few places in this world where there is not a large thriving Indian community. From the South Seas to Africa, Indians have this uncanny ability to adapt to just about any situation and succeed. At the same time, they are one of the few communities that, no matter where they go, manage to keep their cultural identity and ultimately aspire to return home.

This past month I covered the India Economic Summit 2008 in New Delhi. The summit has been an annual event for the past 24 years and brings together the country’s brightest and most influential political and business leaders from all strata of society — from the multi-billionaire entrepreneur Vijay Mallay, whose portfolio includes everything from air transport to beer and tourism developments, to J. Vasudev, sadhguru and founder of the Isha Foundation. The summit also attracted a few influential foreign personalities, most notably former US Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger and former US Secretary of Defense, William Cohen.

Unfortunately, the timing of the summit this year could not have been worse. Instead of focusing on ways to improve the lives of India’s billion-plus population, most of whom live at or below the poverty line, business and political leaders spent the better part of four days discussing the world’s financial crisis and how to minimize its impact on the region. There were, however, a few local Indian politicians who wanted to distance themselves from the ‘global agenda’ and to use the summit as a political platform, possibly because of the upcoming parliamentary elections, to focus on the plight of India’s poor.

There is no country in the world where the rich and poor are so diametrically opposed and where the divisions in society run so deep. The caste system was officially abolished years ago, but the imprint it has left will most likely last for generations to come. For the average Indian, the solution is not in finding ways to bail out the financial system. Their priorities are more basic: having enough food on the table, educating the children and obtaining proper healthcare. One Indian politician at the summit so rightly put it that, “they had nothing to do with creating the financial crisis in the first place, so why should they be burdened by it?”

After spending almost a week with India’s rich and famous, I set out to discover the other side of the country. While traveling along the road, it’s not difficult to see why some of India’s local parliamentarians attending the summit were keen on using the event as a platform for their campaigns. Everywhere you turn there is grinding poverty. It’s also not difficult to understand why so many Indians have left their country to settle elsewhere. In the past, Indians began settling in Africa and parts of Asia because that was where the trade routes took them. Today, many end up in the Arab Gulf countries as laborers working long hours for a little more pay than they would receive at home.

While staying at a small hotel in Agra, I got to talking with an elderly waiter about travel and where I had grown up. It turned out that the waiter had been quite the entrepreneurial traveler of his time. When I spoke about my time growing up in California and Europe he began to reminisce about his years in the States and how he ended up there after being invited by one of his students, who had been a Peace Corps volunteer in India back in the 1960s. He told me how he moved from job to job until he opened his first travel agency. After the first year he sold the agency and then with the money started another travel agency. Over the course of 15 years he opened and sold 15 travel agencies and then, after having had enough of being an entrepreneur, set out into the world, a traveler once again.

I asked him why he was working now as a waiter in the hotel; he told me that there was really nothing for him to do in India and the one thing he liked to do was be among travelers and reminisce. “Besides,” he said, “ultimately you go home.”

Norbert schiller is a Dubai-based photo-journalist and writer

December 8, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Real estate

Dubai‘s foundations mature

by Iseeb Rehman December 3, 2008
written by Iseeb Rehman

The decline in global property prices has started to seep into Dubai, although it’s arguable that this is a short- term correction born as a direct result of the world credit crisis and the speculative nature of investors. No one can deny the fundamental strengths of Dubai in terms of tourism, trade, real estate investment and as a potential financial power house of the Middle East.

The knock-on effect has been the pace of off-plan sales, which have inevitably slowed in recent weeks, although property that is completed or close to handover is still very much in demand and interestingly has seen minimal impact in pricing. Statistically the ratio of investors to end-users was originally 60:40. We have witnessed a turnaround, which is positive for the market as now we are seeing real buyers enter the market and purchasing for personal use.
The UAE market as we see it today is simply in a lull period. However, Dubai as we know is a global fusion metropolis. The current global economic crisis could yet become a bonus to the UAE, which can offer alternative support to investors as its banks are safe, liquidity is available and personal debt (in global terms) is at a minimum level. This is supported by the fact that Abu Dhabi is the federal capital of the UAE and Dubai is central to the continued success of the country.
Current investment opportunities in Dubai are appealing and I predict that in six months to one year prices will have stabilized at 2006 and 2007 values. In addition, the range of legislation implemented over the last year by RERA and the Land Department has provided transparency and stability to the market, which in turn will become attractive to international institutions when rebuilding their balance sheets. Dubai, in short, is in a period of transition where it has begun as an infant market and is developing to be both a professional and established one, as is everything else that is growing with it.
Of course, there are several specific factors that have helped shield Dubai from global market turmoil. For one, Dubai has firmly established itself as a highly marketable global brand, with its potential to maximize the business value of investors being among its biggest brand attractions. One hundred percent foreign ownership, zero personal and corporate taxation, state-of-the-art infrastructure, fast employee visa processing, full repatriation of capital — these are just a few popular incentives that define the conducive investment landscape of the emirate. Its massive investments to develop its air, sea and land transport facilities, which have transformed Dubai into one of the most highly accessible destinations in the world, have also helped accelerate Dubai’s reputation across global markets. With a strong transport sector, Dubai continues to drive more business and investment traffic into the emirate.
The combination of widespread infrastructure development, strategic location and proactive government policies has likewise cultivated a unique environment that breeds creativity, ingenuity, professional excellence and high technology — all of which are associated with the Dubai brand.
The message is thus clear: Dubai is a mature, yet highly dynamic investment destination. Mature, because Dubai has successfully incorporated key measures that ensure sustainability and long-term growth, e.g. gradually removing speculators from the real estate market and replacing them with longer-term investors and end-users. Ultimately, it is its dynamism reinforced by its resilient character and mature outlook that continues to enable Dubai to harness growth opportunities as they come, regardless of the circumstances.

Iseeb Rehman is managing director of Sherwoods Independent Property Consultants.

December 3, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economy & Finance

MENA – 2009 to tally the toll

by Executive Staff December 3, 2008
written by Executive Staff

The year 2008 will forever be remembered for bringing the global financial system to the brink of total collapse. “When I predicted earlier this year that we were facing the worst financial crisis since the 1930s, I did not anticipate that conditions would deteriorate so badly,” said George Soros, the billionaire American financial speculator, aptly capturing the scale of the global financial crisis in the New York Review of Books. Soros went on to warn that, “a deep recession is now inevitable and the possibility of a depression cannot be ruled out.” Thus, globally 2009 will be dominated by the repercussions of the financial crisis.

How the global financial crisis will impact the Middle East is still unclear and analysts expect the full implications to slowly emerge over the next year. Already there has been a dramatic drop in the price of oil, real estate in the GCC has been shaken, investor confidence rocked and stock markets in the region have shown a volatility similar to those in the major financial centers throughout the globe. Yet, concomitantly the Middle East has so far appeared to have navigated itself away from the most severe aspects of the financial crisis, as seen in the West. The economic fundamentals of the GCC are seen by analysts to be strong and able to withhold the continued onslaught from the outside.
As vice-president of MENA Capital Ziad Maalouf explained, “The banks have strong fundamentals in the GCC because the governments are behind them with their huge reserves and have shown in the crisis that they are willing to act to support the banks if need be. In the UAE we have already seen this [the central bank of the UAE introduced a $14 billion liquidity support facility].” In addition, the GCC governments have given a 100% guarantee on all bank deposits. The economic fundamentals in the Gulf became so strong primarily because of the huge surpluses obtained over the last few years due to record oil prices. Thus, stated Faisal Hasan, head of research at Global Investment House, “The governments of the region have saved 70% of their surplus oil revenues over the past five years and sovereign wealth funds in the MENA region have over $1.5 trillion at their disposal.”

Those with oil and those without
The current account surpluses of oil exporting countries are expected to reach 25% of GDP in 2008, according to the IMF. Thus, the economic fundamentals of the GCC are expected to be strong enough for growth to continue in 2009. For non-oil exporting countries next year is going to be very difficult. Amjad Ahmed, CEO of Investment and Merchant Banking at NBK Capital, said that Egypt and Turkey in particular are going to have a hard time as both these countries’ growths have relied on the inflows of foreign direct investment from the GCC and with the financial crisis, “FDI from the Gulf will be significantly reduced.”
The GCC states, while having the surplus liquidity to overcome the crisis, still had to face significant impacts on their economies. “Gulf stock markets have shed $160 billion of their total value during the first couple of weeks of the financial crisis, the Saudi All Share Index fell 17% and the Dubai Stock Market posted a 22.5% loss … several Arab sovereign funds incurred substantial losses as well on their worldwide portfolios,” said Fadlo Choueiri, head of research at Credit Libanais.
Exactly how much was lost by these SWFs is, unfortunately, guess work because of a complete lack of transparency. Jad Chaaban, acting president of the Lebanese Economic Association, warned that, “There are a lot of rumors that major sovereign funds [from the region] lost major amounts of cash in the US, but we don’t have numbers. But it has impacted the risk perception of investors.” This lack of transparency should be a cause for concern as it was a deficiency in transparency and regulation that caused the global financial near-meltdown.
While the economic fundamentals have been important in convincing investors and analysts that the GCC will be able to weather the financial hurricane, timing has also been essential in keeping the worst affects of the crisis at bay. As Ziad Abou Jamra, director of the Trading Desk at FIDUS, explained, “Lending standards were just starting to deteriorate in the GCC area when the crisis started overseas, which created a timely opportunity for GCC banks to adjust and halt all risky lending. US banks, on the other hand, were giving out loans with zero down payments, no documentation, and zero interest rates for the first two years [i.e. subprime loans].” Further to this, Hasan claimed, there was “weaker integration of MENA’s financial sector with those of the US and Europe. There were also improvements in MENA’s financial fundamentals over the last decade, including better fiscal and monetary management, more open regimes with more flexible exchange rates, and better debt and financial management that has reduced exposure to international capital markets.”
The independence of the GCC from the international financial system is contested. Choueiri said that there has been increased integration of the region into the world economy, “evidenced by some 89.18% correlation between the GCC 200 index and the Dow Jones Industrial Average during the period between September 7 and October 20,” adding “it is inevitable for government authorities in the region to implement stiffer regulation on banks and sovereign funds.”
The most significant implication of the 2008 global financial crisis on the region is likely the substantial hits that many individual investors took as, according to Ahmed, “their investment portfolios left them exposed to what happened in Europe and the US.”
It will not be until sometime next year that the extent to which individual investors in the GCC have been affected will be clear, but sentiment in the market suggests it was significant. What is maybe more significant is the advice that brokers are giving their clients, which is being repeated across the region and the globe. “We are telling our clients to liquidate some of their investments and move to safer types of products and we have re-initiated two structures that give more protection to our clients. So we are trying to protect our clients by investing in these structures instead of going straight into the market,” Ezzedine said.
It appears that 2009 will be a hard year for capitalists in the region. “Cash is scarce, many high net worth individuals lost substantial sums of money, the financial crisis has hit the ability to fundraise for Private Equity firms such as ours in the region,” said Gilles de Clerck, senior manager of Capital Trust.

The Lebanese great escape?
In Lebanon, 2008 will be remembered as the year of Riad Salameh, governor of the Banque du Lebanon, the country’s central bank. Many people in the sector believe he helped Lebanon escape the financial crisis’ worst effects. Ezzedine said that “Lebanese banking will not be affected [by the global financial crisis] because we do traditional banking in Lebanon, which means none of the Lebanese banks were allowed to invest in any of those derivatives that caused the crisis. This was because Riad Salameh saw this crisis occurring because of the over-leverage of properties and he saw the cycles and possibilities of a bubble bursting that would affect the whole financial system.”
Thus, miraculously, the financial crisis even brought an improvement to Lebanon’s economic situation. According to

Oil
Oil prices reached a record $147.27 per barrel on July 11 of this year and, according to the IMF, oil and gas exports will amount to an estimated $1.1 trillion in 2008, up from $700 billion in 2007. Analysts are putting this record price down to massive speculation on oil and the subsequent drop to $51, at the time Executive went to print, appears to confirm this view. “These speculators were buying every small dip in prices and the rally continued, which eventually led to the final blow off and $148-per-barrel prices. This latest drop in oil prices will definitely be a big negative for speculation in the region (lower liquidity) and will definitely lead to lower GDP growth levels,” said Ziad Abou Jamra, director of the trading desk at FIDUS. However, while speculation was no doubt a major cause of declining prices, the global financial crisis is now also causing a serious hemorrhage in demand. The uncertainty over what will happen to oil in 2009 has even led Goldman Sachs to close their recommendations for oil. Future markets expect oil to average $102 a barrel during 2009- 2013 on a cumulative basis, giving the region a projected fiscal revenue of $5.6 trillion over the five-year period, compared to $1.8 trillion during 2003-2007.
Sentiment among analysts in the region regarding the oil price is relatively upbeat, despite the uncertainty. As Faisal Hasan, head of research at Global Investment House, stated, “Trade balances and balance of payments are likely to remain positive… The sharp decline in oil prices will reduce the consolidated external current account surplus of the GCC countries by almost half, but still it will remain positive.” Most analysts in the region are remaining confident mainly because they believe that for most of 2008 oil was overpriced and they expect oil prices to stabilize at $60-70 per barrel next year, which will still be above the average $47 per barrel needed for the GCC to achieve a fiscal balance. Amjad Ahmed, CEO of Investment and Merchant Banking for NBK Capital, said that although the market is fluctuating a lot, “growth in India and China will ensure that oil is maintained at the $60-70 mark.”
Nonetheless, the continued dive in oil prices is not promising and the decision by Goldman Sachs to close their recommendations for oil pricing illustrates the uncertainty in the market. This is further accentuated by the fact that the continued slide in oil prices has occurred in the context of two production cuts by OPEC, Fadlo Choueiri, head of research for Credit Libanais, pointed out. However, Abou Jamra countered that, “speculators loved buying oil at around $150 and now they hate it at around $50. Betting against speculators is usually a winning proposition.”

Antoun Samya, a research analyst at BLOMINVEST, there has been an inflow of $8 billion into Lebanese banks from Arabs and expatriate Lebanese. “Lebanon is currently seen as a safe haven by high net worth individuals,” Samya said. However, negative impacts of the crisis in Lebanon are expected to be felt in 2009, despite the IMF estimating growth to reach 5% in real GDP. In Ezzedine’s view, “negative impacts have begun to appear and on the real estate side, some projects have been slowed down… also a slowdown in remittances from abroad will occur.”

2009: Wait and see
The economic fundamentals of the GCC are facing their biggest test yet and 2009 will be a year of continued questioning of these fundamentals. Analysts are quietly confident that there is enough liquidity in the region to escape any severe economic crisis in the GCC, but simultaneously there is nervousness as the full implications of the crisis in the region are still unclear. Oil prices continued their decline to the crucial $50 mark and the existing confidence is fragile. The coming year will be a long one and the start of an even longer recovery period for the global financial system. The age of conspicuous consumption is over.

December 3, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Capitalist Culture

Economic crisis – Fair-weather finance

by Michael Young December 3, 2008
written by Michael Young

In mid-November, with the US presidential election settled, congressional Democrats tried to push their advantage. They proposed massive government intervention to bail out the ailing American auto industry. Senate Republicans and outgoing President George W. Bush said no, the proposal was shelved. However, come January, Democrats will control both houses of Congress, allowing them to again table what is arguably the most burning global issue today: Is the global capitalist system working, or are we entering a period when massive government interference in the markets is inevitable?
The financial crisis, which is segueing into a global recession, has provoked heated discussion over the free market. As powerful financial institutions began to totter, defenders of state intervention said massive injections of government funds alone could halt the meltdown of the world’s financial order. They provided as evidence the panic that overcame stock markets when Lehman Brothers was allowed to go under, and argued that only more regulation could avert further disaster. This may have been a far cry from socialism; however, as the US administration and other governments embraced that logic, suddenly quite a few states found themselves with stakes in very sick companies.
Conversely, free market ideologs, most prominently libertarians, said governments were doing exactly the opposite of what they should do. The problem was not the free market, they posited, it was not the need for more regulation; the problem was that governments were not permitting markets to correct themselves by allowing poorly run financial institutions to collapse. Defending capitalism, they underlined, did not mean defending bad management of capitalist enterprises. In fact the opposite was true.
Andrew Davis, of the US Libertarian Party, forcefully made that argument: “Businessmen are bad for capitalism when they use the government as life support for failing ventures. Instead of letting other companies absorb these failing businesses, CEOs and government bailouts have distorted the natural forces of capitalism and prevented the necessary — and effective — economic turnaround that only comes through an unfettered free market.”
In theory the libertarians were right: It made no sense to blame free markets when governments were doing everything possible to prevent the markets from filtering bad companies. Where the libertarians came up short, however, was in failing to recognize that the crisis was essentially a political one. No government, and that included the supposedly free-market Bush administration, could allow major companies to fall like houses of cards, since the public’s response to this could have been cataclysmic.
And that’s not mentioning that self-correcting mechanisms in the market would have probably taken years to be effective and bring about some kind of new equilibrium. In the meantime, unemployment would have gone up dramatically, undermining economic confidence.
But where politics intervenes, sound policy becomes a luxury. That’s why the interventionists are wrong in seeing more government writ as an economic solution. It’s also why the way the debate is taking place today is worrisome. We should not be trying to determine whether capitalism is worth defending. As Matt Welch, the editor of the American libertarian magazine Reason, recently wrote: “After the collapse of communism and the attendant discrediting of Marxian economic models, the industrialized world more or less settled on democratic capitalism as the best available option for countries to grow and prosper. Old Europe slashed government involvement in industry, New Europe rode mass privatization to massive growth, East Asian countries went from emerging market ‘tigers’ to full-fledged market economies, and China used markets to yank hundreds of millions up from poverty. One could perhaps be forgiven for thinking the 20th century’s great economic argument had been settled.”
The discussion shouldn’t be whether capitalism works (of course it does), but how it can be made to work most efficiently, thus most freely, without pushing governments into situations where they need to spend hundreds of billions of taxpayers’ dollars to bail out companies. Should that mean more regulation? Perhaps some regulation is necessary, but the more governments regulate, the more inefficient economies become and the greater the costs to societies. The short-term panic should not in any way represent a blank check to stifle markets down the road.
Unfortunately, that seems to be precisely the direction in which governments, particularly the US government, are heading. When states intervene to save one economic sector, they cannot very well abandon others. Then political calculations kick in to muddy the waters further. That’s why the discussion of the free market’s merits is a red herring. The real issue is how consistently free-market ways can be applied so that the very notion of a ‘free market’ actually retains some meaning.

Michael Young

December 3, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 490
  • 491
  • 492
  • 493
  • 494
  • …
  • 686

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    Executive Magazine
    • ISSUES
      • Current Issue
      • Past issues
    • BUSINESS
    • ECONOMICS & POLICY
    • OPINION
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • EXECUTIVE TALKS
    • MOVEMENTS
      • Change the image
      • Cannes lions
      • Transparency & accountability
      • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
      • Say No to Corruption
      • The Lebanon media development initiative
      • LPSN Policy Asks
      • Advocating the preservation of deposits
    • JOIN US
      • Join our movement
      • Attend our events
      • Receive updates
      • Connect with us
    • DONATE