• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
Consumer Society

Off-roading with Porsche New SUV a dream

by Executive Staff March 1, 2007
written by Executive Staff

Chiclana de la Frontera, SPAIN: One of the perks of working in journalism is going on the occasional press trip. There is an essential quid pro quo to all these arrangements—the client wants to either reward or woo the media—but it is always wrapped in such an elegant package, one forgets that it is all part of a multi-million dollar marketing strategy. The bigger and sexier the product, the bigger the kick for the journalist—and they don’t get much bigger or sexier than Porsche, who last month, once again invited Executive, this time to Spain to test drive the second generation Cayenne, Porsche’s revolutionary SUV. It’s a car which I unabashedly call the family Porsche, a moniker that in no way takes any of the edge or luster off the reputation of this legendary marque. That just means you can let your wife drive it.

The Porsche Cayenne was launched in 2003. In Lebanon, it was unveiled amid much hullabaloo at the Beirut Hippodrome, where, fittingly for such a thoroughbred, the vehicle was put through its paces to demonstrate its off-road capabilities.

It didn’t disappoint. Here for the first time was a company, known for it famous sports coupes, venturing into SUV territory, the traditional preserve of the Americans, Japanese, and of course, the British. But ennui, in Lebanon at least, had set in: the Range Rover had become a cliché, the boxy American SUVs were just a too sauvage for madam and the Japanese models, while very efficient, just weren’t sexy enough.

Enter the aristocrats of Europe, who had identified a niche for an SUV with the all the trappings of the world’s most luxurious European brands—Mercedes, Audi, Volvo and Porsche. They all transformed the SUV into the epitome of urban cool, but only Porsche had the outstanding racing pedigree to give its creation added pizzazz.

Wildly popular in Lebanon

The numbers speak for themselves. Globally, Porsche has sold more than 150,000 units. A few years back, I walked out of a London pub in Belgravia to be faced with four identical black Cayennes parked on the same residential street. It wasn’t the beer. The car was, and still is, the must-have for those lucky enough to afford one. And no one gave a damn if the neighbors had one too. In Lebanon, the Cayenne accounts for over 50% of Porsche’s sales.

The new Cayenne was available globally on February 24. The entry level Sports Utility model is now powered by a 290 bhp six-cylinder engine that has increased in size from 3.2 to 3.6 liters and which now offers an increase in maximum output over the former V6 by no less than 40 bhp. Next up comes the Cayenne S, featuring a natural-aspiration V8 power unit, up by 0.3 liters to 4.8 liters and with a maximum output of 385 bhp, 45 bhp more than before. The über-Cayenne is the eight-cylinder turbocharged beast, pushing out 500 bhp, 50 bhp more than its predecessor. Finally, the new direct gasoline injection has made the Cayenne more fuel efficient—15% more according to Porsche—and faster. The Cayenne Turbo can do 0-100 in 5.1 seconds.

Back in Spain, the elements have served to disrupt the days proceeding. Excessive rain has meant that we can’t try out the car’s supposedly fabulous off-road potential. I don’t mind. The 4×4 facility is an option that I know is there, but most consumers buy cars to drive them and their families from point A to point B and 99% of the time this is done on tarmac, notorious Lebanese tarmac in my case. I must be one of the few international guests here who actually want to see how this beauty performs on the road in the rain.

There are no complaints. The new technological developments are very exciting and will please those who look for safety as well as performance. Porsche’s Stability Management ensures the car reacts even faster when applying the brakes. This prevents the Cayenne from developing potentially dangerous pendulum action (such as when towing), and optimizes the brake effect on loose ground. The new models also come with a rollover sensor, which, in an emergency, triggers both the belt latch tensioners and curtain airbags—there are six other regular airbags by the way—thus reducing the risk of injury for occupants in a rollover.

The Cayenne has certainly not rolled over on its shareholders. Porsche continued to show growth in 2006, a performance Porsche claims has been due to the “ongoing improvement of Porsche’s model mix.” However, the significant jump in the group’s pre-tax profits to 2.11 billion euro is mainly attributable to the sale of auto-roof manufacturers CTS Fahrzeug-Dachsysteme (80.7 million euro), profits earned through the company’s share in Volkswagen AG (203 million euro), and “three-digit million-euro range” proceeds from stock price hedging transactions linked to the acquisition of a share in Volkswagen. The company expects the next major thrust in growth in 2009, with the launch of the new four-door Sports Coupe.

Sales figures are up

Figures in the first four months of the current year of business (which began on August 1, 2006) show that Porsche’s trajectory as a manufacturer of sporty premium cars is continuing upward. Revenue in this period is up 0.7% to 2.05 billion euro; sales show an increase by 0.4% to 25,850 units sold—including 10,350 units of the Porsche 911, with growth in this model series amounting to 8.5%. In the same four months, the Boxster and Cayman are up 53.7%, having sold 7,750 units. Reflecting the end of its first generation lifecycle, the Cayenne was down by 29.2% to 7,740 units but these figures are bound to improve with the launch of the new range.

Staying with the boardroom, Porsche’s main Zuffenhausen plant in built a total of 36,504 units of the Porsche 911—more than ever before. The Leipzig Plant built 35,128 units of the Cayenne and 290 units of the Carrera GT, which reached the end of its production as planned in May 2006. Including 30,000-plus Boxsters assembled in Finland, production increased to a total of 102,602 units, up 12.8% over the previous year. Porsche sales in Germany are up 12.4% to 3,950 units and in the rest of the world by an even more significant 15.3% to 12,590 cars. However, sales in North America are down 17.6% to 9,310 units. Porsche hopes that what it calls “young but fast-growing markets” such as Russia (16 dealerships to date) and China (20 dealerships) will contribute to the overall sales volume.

But who cares about all this when one is behind the wheel or should I say the real business end of the business? One of the most enjoyable things about being hosted by professionals is, well, their professionalism. One evening I wanted to go for a drive alone, not as part of the media pack that marauds Spanish roads during the day (don’t get me wrong—these are fun and it’s great to be with fellow journalists from the four corners of the globe) and so I was handed the keys of the new Cayenne Turbo and headed down to Cadiz. The car simply reeks of luxury—the Napa leather seats are virtually sportscar-like—so there I was snug as the proverbial bug. The new Panorama roof system was open and the BOSE Surround Sound System delivered 350 flawless watts of classic Rolling Stones. Maybe it should have been the Gypsy Kings, but who cared?

Here among the sleepy streets, I was lost in the twin pleasures of driving sheer luxury amid the history of Europe. I remembered that Cadiz was also where, in a 16th century sea battle, Sir Francis Drake inflicted such a damaging raid on the Spanish fleet, he was said to have burned the King of Spain’s beard.

Today, the new generation of Cayennes can lay claim to an equally hot performance.

In Germany, the basic model costs 51,735 euros, the more powerful S version costs 66,610 euros and the premium Cayenne Turbo costs 108,617 euros (including sales tax).

March 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Media Special

Rewarding creativity Regional ad awards handed out in Lebanon – Q&A

by Executive Staff March 1, 2007
written by Executive Staff

Christian Cappe, CEO of the MENA Cristal Awards, president of the 2C Associés and general director of the Meribel Festival de la Publicité, struggled with local political developments to bring the awards show to Lebanon. But the organizers’ tenacity came through, and the ceremony honored the region’s best and more creative minds. Executive caught up with Cappe while he was in Lebanon.

E Describe your involvement with the MENA Cristal awards and the Meribel Festival. What inspired you to create a festival in the MENA region?

The Meribel Ad Festival was created in 2001 and for its first “edition” welcomed 300 delegates. In 2006, we received 850 delegates. This means the staff and I do our best to promote the event, searching new ideas on development and supporting networking between advertisers, clients and producers.

The MENA Cristal Awards was launched in 2005 with the aim of introducing an ambitious competition unprecedented in the Middle East and North Africa, the aim of which was to celebrate creativity in the region. Recreating the success of the Meribel Ad Festival in Europe, the MENA Cristal rewards the best works of the region with the famous “Cristal.” I really believe in this industry and my involvement is total.

E How would you describe the creative and advertising scene in the Middle East?

As Jacques Séguéla, vice president and worldwide chief creative officer of Havas Group and president of the MENA Jury said during the closing ceremony, “the level of creativity in the Middle East was very high this year, and comparable with what we can see in Europe at the moment.” It means that the standard of creativity in the area is improving faster but always keeping what is essential in the cultural identity.

E Do you see a large difference in style, caliber, etc. between entries for MENA Cristal and Meribel? Are there any regional trends that you find particularly interesting?

There is not such a difference between both events in terms of creativity and originality. The MENA region is emerging and proving to the world its capability and credibility in the industry. All the regional trends are being used in an intelligent and original way.

E Were there any entries you found particularly striking?

As organizers, we emphasize advertising and we must respect the necessary neutrality. Only the jury can judge creativity. Jacques Séguéla himself proposed to reward “Nedjma Couverture,” saying that this concept was the future: Interactivity between consumers and clients. So, the creative jury rewarded creativity, in particular the wonderful “Animals” by Saatchi & Saatchi Levant Beirut for the Ministry of Social Affairs, which won the Grand Cristal in the Film Cristal competition.

On the other hand, the Production Jury rewarded the excellence of the production of “In Games” by Grey Worldwide Beirut and City Films for the Asian Games Organizing Committee. This production was comparable to the very highest international standards.

E Did you face any problems in holding the awards in Lebanon, due to the current situation?

To be honest, of course. One of our biggest fears was the cancellation of lots of the delegates but this did not happen; in fact the response was fantastic. We could feel something indescribable. You have to live these emotions to understand. It was a hard mission but with the incredible support of the people from Lebanon and the region, we finally decided to carry on and hold it, whatever happened. I think it was the good decision. In addition, lots of the CEOs, chairmen, COOs of the biggest networks, big clients and producers were in Mzaar Kfardebian. They were happy to support the event and were amazed by the great atmosphere, the high-standard of the conferences and the quality of the winners. If I had to redo it, I would do it immediately.

E The Meribel Ad Festival is held every year in the same location in the French Alps. Will the MENA Cristal awards also adopt a permanent home? Would Lebanon be a likely candidate?

I would like to say yes. The locale of Mzaar Kfardebian is great and I do really hope the political situation will allow us to organize the next one in Lebanon. To be honest, it was quite complicated to do it this year, but the ski resort concept is magical and I am confident in the future. I believe in the MENA Cristal Awards and I believe in Lebanon.

E How have the MENA Cristal awards changed from the first
to second edition? What are some of your goals for next year,
or five years from now?

We consulted with the agencies, clients, production houses and the media to improve the quality from the first ad festival of the MENA region. The result was more competitions: Film Cristal, Outdoor Cristal, Magazine Cristal, Daily Press Cristal, Radio Cristal, Pluri Media Cristal, Cyber Cristal, and Marketing Services Cristal as well as the International Production Cristal to celebrate the work of production houses and technical industries. Our efforts were appreciated and we had the full support of those professionals who want to be involved in this initiative and who want us to develop this competition.

Furthermore, the year the MENA Jury was bigger, with 16 members representing important advertising networks and companies in the MENA area, and headed by Jacques Séguéla, a European with huge experience. For the sake of credibility and transparency, the votes cast in secret and even the jury didn’t know the winners until the ceremonies awards in Mzaar Kfardebian.

E Would you consider this year’s edition to have been a success?

Without hesitation, yes! We were the first ad festival of the year in the MENA region and we had transparency, a quality jury, great winners and exciting peripheral events. Also the fact that we [Séguéla, Dani Richa, President of the IAA Lebanon Chapter and Cappe] were received by Emile Lahoud, president of the republic and Fuad Seniora, prime minister, was a huge honor and great recognition for us.

March 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Editorial

Keeping the baby and the Baath water

by Yasser Akkaoui March 1, 2007
written by Yasser Akkaoui

In 2005, the US and its allies, would have liked, by putting as much pressure on Bashar Al Assad, an internally-inspired regime change in Syria. Part of this strategy was the passing of UN resolution 1559, the architects of which were France, Saudi Arabia, the US and, exerting as much influence as they could, their allies in Lebanon.

But then Hariri was killed and Lebanon was (and still is) subjected to a sporadic campaign of instability and violence, creating uncertainty and confusion among its people.

Plan A therefore went the way of the St. Georges blast and the consensus was that a coalition of the willing, including Saudi Arabia, was drafting a Plan B to seemlessly remove the Baathists with little chance of an Iraq-style scenario developing.

But are they? While many see Syria only as a pariah state that has traditionally helped terrorists and extremists of every stripe set up an office here or launch an operation there, it might surprise many to learn that the regime has embarked full-throttle on a program of economic, judicial, banking and commercial reform.

One of the lesser members of the axis of evil has in fact styled itself as an axis of major investment. Banking licenses—both commercial and Islamic—are being issued with relative abandon and capital markets created. Real estate development is charging ahead with the likes of Emmar and Damac pouring money into mega-projects in the capital Damascus and elsewhere in Syria. Even adventurous Europeans are speculating on Damascene properties.

Yes, business plans for Syria are finding access to capital. Today’s investor community is simply not satisfied with a 10-15% return. The regional developer, financier or speculator will settle for nothing less than 25%, and it’s places like Syria—and Sudan and Kurdistan for that matter—that offer this.

Perhaps Bashar al-Assad believes that a growing economy with heavy regional investment may just be his get-out-of- jail-free card, or perhaps the investors are simply looking to get in on the ground floor with government incentives still on offer. They know their time will come, whoever is in power.

Either way, the money—and the promise of more— appears to be keeping the younger Assad afloat in some fairly choppy seas.

March 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Consumer Society

Ikea franchise unlikely in Lebanon

by Executive Staff March 1, 2007
written by Executive Staff

Ikea has more than 250 stores in 34 countries, with over 310 million people visiting the low-cost home products retailer every year.

In Britain, according to one estimate, almost twice as many people visit an Ikea store on Sundays as attend church.

Not one percentile of Ikea’s annual visitor figures is likely to come from Lebanon anytime soon however, or indeed are Lebanese likely to read one of the 130 million copies of Ikea’s catalogue that were distributed last year. Neither is attendance at Lebanese places of worship likely to be rivaled by people opting to unpack and reassemble one of Ikea’s DIY wardrobes.

But why not? After all, the Swedish-created Ikea has had a presence in the Middle East since 1983 in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait in 1984, Dubai in 1991, and in Israel since 2001. In all locations the store has been a veritable hit, with enough demand in the UAE open a store in Abu Dhabi.

“We would love to be all over the world, and are growing with 20 new stores yearly,” said Charlotte Lindgren, Ikea’s corporate PR and media relations officer.

Stores are opening in China, two a year in Russia, and Japan is Ikea’s latest market.

So what’s wrong with Lebanon as a new store location? Firstly, it costs around $100 million to open one of Ikea’s aircraft hanger size stores, according to Lindgren, and involves a great deal of investment from not only Ikea but also franchisees—a price tag that would be equivalent to some of Lebanon’s larger shopping malls.

And secondly, just like there are no stores in South America or Africa, Lebanon arguably lacks enough people with the appropriate purchasing power necessary to make an Ikea store viable. Products would also have to be imported from Europe, and with the high rate of the euro right now could dampen Ikea’s competitiveness.

Equally, Lebanon does not have the expatriate population of the Gulf that needs to furnish new apartments on a regular basis as people come and go.

Although there would undoubtedly be a Lebanese market for Ikea’s designs, the Lebanese penchant for more traditional furnishings, such as handmade furniture and the ubiquitous Louis XVI style, would be an additional marketing obstacle.

And let us not even go into the state of the Lebanese economy, the political situation, and all the rest that is keeping foreign investors at an arms length.

But perhaps, and it is a big perhaps, some enterprising Lebanese might figure out a formula that could work here. After all, according to some sources, a Lebanese franchiser in Kaslik was interested several years ago in setting up an Ikea outlet.

The idea clearly remained a pipe dream however, and for the foreseeable future it would seem that Lebanese shoppers are to be confined to the traditional outlets, Khoury Home or BHV to supply furnishing needs.

March 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Capitalist Culture

The intifada will be televised

by Michael Young March 1, 2007
written by Michael Young

Going back some 30 years, many Lebanese will recall that their civil war, which began in 1975, was mostly understandable to them through three mediums: newspapers, radio, and the more immediate experience of gunmen fighting in their streets. Television was far behind when it came to informing the public, or shaping its views.

There was a great leap forward in the mid-1980s, when the Lebanese Forces created the Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation. The television station not only allowed the militia to control an influential information platform when no one else did; it also (for those days) offered good entertainment, increasing the station’s popularity. It was a brilliant political gambit; but, most importantly, it was a brilliant financial one too. LBC brought much money to the Lebanese Forces, until the Hariri government’s new law on the audio-visual media in 1994 and the arrest of Samir Geagea formally took the station out of the former militia’s orbit.

Images equal political power

The audio-visual media law represented belated recognition of the political power inherent in owning a mass media outlet. The law effectively divvied up of the audio-visual landscape between major political leaders or institutions, who were granted directly or indirectly the means to get their message across. Prime Minister Rafik Hariri had his Future station, while Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri established NBN. Powerful politicians who didn’t own stations of their own invested in existing outlets, or maintained influence over stations owned by family members, such as Michel Murr in the MTV station controlled by his brother. The official Télé-Liban was gradually downgraded, though not eliminated, because President Emile Lahoud wanted his station.

In fact, Lebanon was going through two processes—both revolutionary in the Middle East: its leaders were embracing a potent new political medium, whose power was greatly enhanced by the expansion of Arab satellite broadcasting in the late 1990s; and they were doing so through private ventures. It was hardly ideal capitalism, since the audio-visual media law was oligopolistic, but it was vaguely capitalism nonetheless. And for all its faults, the audio-visual media sector was far more stimulating than what was on display in most other Arab countries.

But it was not democratic. The most remarkable example of television’s political potential came in 2002. In the Metn by-election that followed the death of parliamentarian Albert Mukheiber, MTV played a central role in mobilizing the then-opposition against a candidate backed by Lahoud and by Interior Minister Elias Murr. The election was a family affair, since MTV was used to support the candidacy of Gabriel Murr, against his niece Myrna, who was backed by Michel Murr, at the time Gabriel’s foe. But beyond that, the by-election was a referendum on the power of Syria and its allies in Lebanon. In voting for Gabriel Murr, many Metn voters were really voting against the Syrian-dominated order. MTV played the role of unifier between the diverse groups that formed the opposition coalition.

Taking mass media seriously

Gabriel Murr won the election, but this was reversed under political pressure. Murr’s victory was a red line that could not stand. The government’s harsh backlash showed how seriously it took the incident—or at least that part of the government allied with Lahoud, which saw Myrna Murr’s defeat as a personal affront. MTV was closed down, never to be reopened. There were obvious limits to what free media meant.

During the 2005 “Independence Intifada,” television stations again played a mobilizing function. That said, the old parameters of what was acceptable were basically respected. The audio-visual media were by and large conciliatory, reflecting the calculations of the members of a political class who did not want to break off contacts with each other. It was not until last year, following the summer war between Hizbullah and Israel, that media became more divisive—dangerously so.

The downside of privatization of the audio-visual media is that stations have become weapons in Lebanon’s internecine conflicts. During the rioting on Thursday, January 25, both Hizbullah’s Al-Manar and the pro-Hariri Future station fueled the worsening crisis. The essence of media liberty, no matter how imperfect, is to remain as objective as possible; or at least to avert violence. However, for Lebanon’s stations to become mere propaganda organs is precisely what capitalist culture in media, but also Lebanon’s best instincts of sectarian compromise, are supposed to avoid.

Michael Young

March 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lebanon

Bias in the air – Lebanon’s political media

by Executive Staff March 1, 2007
written by Executive Staff

The politics that have become so divisive on the Lebanese streets have reached the nation’s TV screens, prompting Lebanon’s media council chief Abdel-Hadi Mahfouz to blame certain channels for stoking sectarianism and engaging in political insults. “Media institutions are strongly asked to ease tensions and avoid transmitting news that might lead to strife,” he urged.

Lebanon has been plunged into a power struggle for three months now, ever since the Hizbullah-led opposition, mainly comprised of Michel Aoun’s Free Patriotic Movement, pitched their tents in downtown Beirut to call for the overthrow of the pro-Western government of Prime Minister Fuad Seniora.

Over the past five weeks the situation has become increasingly tense, following clashes between pro- and anti-government supporters that have left at least seven dead and 190 wounded. Purchases of automatic weapons have also reportedly risen, and in early February the government seized a cache of arms intended for Hizbullah, raising concerns that the sectarian conflict of Lebanon’s 15-year civil war, which ended in 1990, could return.

The two camps

Lebanese TV channels are split between the two respective camps: among major networks, Hizbullah-backed Al Manar TV, the National Broadcasting Network (NBN) and New TV are all pro-opposition, while Future TV and the Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation (LBC) are pro-government.

Although there are more channels critical of the government than pro, in terms of viewership LBC and Future have the lion’s share. The disparity could be minimized, furthermore, if pro-government Murr TV (MTV), which was kicked off the air by the former government in 2002 for criticizing Syria, returns to Lebanese screens.

“Every Lebanese TV channel has a propaganda leaning,” said Habib Battah, managing editor of the Beirut-based Midle East Broadcasters Journal. “Some try to be balanced, but all have their agendas. It’s pretty clear from the content they produce.”

Lebanon’s media has long reflected the country’s political and religious divisions, but sectarianism has become more pronounced following the war between Hizbullah and Israel last year.

“The interesting thing is during the July war the same footage was used on many channels, supporting Hizbullah. So sectarianism has gotten more derisive, more apparent,” said Battah.

Nabil Dajani, a communications professor at the American University of Beirut, agreed that the media are deliberately inflaming sectarianism, but he believes the blame should not lie solely with media outlets.

“You can’t only blame the media—who is behind the media? Politicians. And it’s the government’s fault for allowing the media to get away with it. There is an audiovisual law that prohibits sectarianism, but this government is delinquent and doesn’t step in,” he said.

Propaganda clips

Sectarianism and the trading of political insults are most apparent in news coverage and on talk shows. “An important event or speech will be covered by one set of media, but not by the opposing channels,” observed Battah.

One example was the demonstration on February 14, 2007, attended by hundreds of thousands of Lebanese to mark the second anniversary of the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. Opposition channels gave sparing coverage of the event, while pro-government channels LBC and Future TV gave extensive live coverage. “The media will also use clips taking (political) speeches out of context,” added Battah.

Future TV, owned by Saad Hariri, a member of parliament and the son of the slain former prime minister, and Hizbullah’s Al Manar TV are regarded by Lebanese media observers as particularly sectarian.

“There is intense rivalry between Future and Al Manar, from guests on talk shows to promo propaganda clips,” said Battah.

However, Nadim Munla, chairman and general manager of Future TV, disagreed that the channel is fuelling sectarianism in Lebanon.

“Lebanon is not going through normal times, so to assume or imply international criteria on Lebanese media during abnormal times is unfair,” he said in response to the Media Council’s recent statements. “All of Hassan Nasrallah’s speeches are live on Future, and we have a daily show that sums up all the news channels in Lebanon,” he added.

Moreover, Munla thinks the media council is “hypocritical” to call on TV channels to curb sectarianism, saying the council needs to start with themselves before pointing fingers, as many of its members are involved in the local newspaper market.

“They are political appointees. It is not impartial so I don’t want a lecture on how to do business,” he said.

Nonetheless, he also stated that the media should be at the forefront of change in Lebanon. Indeed, many channels are airing segments aimed at discouraging sectarianism and violence. One such montage on Al Manar showed a clock ticking back from 2007 to 1975, the year the civil war started. Attached to the clock were images from the recent clashes as well as archive footage, ending with the message “Let’s not go back” in Arabic.

A series of adverts encouraging unity around the idea of “I Love Life” have been aired on the pro-government channels, though the organizers of the campaign have stressed that they are an independent civil society gathering. Tensions are not expected to ease any time soon though, with Future TV to launch a 24-hour news channel and Michel Aoun’s party to launch Orange TV (OTV) later this year.

To the Future

Future TV expects to launch its new channel in the next eight to 10 weeks, “unless there are more unseen events,” said Munla.

The new channel is part of a major restructuring at Future, with new content on the entertainment channel and sales directed more at the Gulf region.

“The last pillar of change was to introduce a 24-hour news channel, the main reason being that in the last two years, we allocated more time to cover the news and current affairs,” said Munla.

He said the channel had regularly violated the time allocated to news, which is supposed to be limited to 20% of broadcast time, due to Lebanon’s turbulent politics.

“That affected our viewing base, and adversely affected our entertainment channel, so we will have a 24-hour news channel,” he added.

The new $10 million channel is considered a financial necessity as a result of the July war, with the conflict and the aftermath costing Future over 25% of its project advertising revenue for 2006. By launching the new channel with a state-of-the-art 1,800 m2 studio, Future TV intends to claw back its profits and regional position among the top five networks. Munla said that by the end of the year, Future hopes to return to “pre-recent event levels” and recover its market share by 2008.

News will be primarily Lebanese, but Future will also allocate 20% of coverage to European and Arab affairs, to boost interactivity and understanding between the two regions.

Meanwhile, OTV, the Aounist outlet, is raising funds through a joint stock company open to the public. Starting with a paid-up capital of $2 million, OTV has raised over $10 million via one million $10 shares to establish a terrestrial and satellite channel, and is currently embarking on a regional road show to whip up demand for the remaining shares.

Although OTV claims it will be objective, the channel’s name, recalling the trademark color of Tayyar, and thus the politics of OTV’s mascot, have prompted scepticism among commentators about how neutral it will really be unless there is greater involvement from foreign investors.

Not all bad news

The divergence of opinion on Lebanon’s TV screens may be perceived as fanning the flames of sectarianism and political divergence, but on a practical level, such a kaleidoscope of opinions can also be seen as indicative of a rather healthy, democratic media environment.

“If freedom of expression is measured in how often the opposition is on pro-government stations and vice-versa, we can be considered a highly democratic media industry,” said Munla.

From a certain perspective, Lebanese networks’ relatively open biases may be less dangerous than the illusion of neutrality propagated by channels in other countries. In Lebanon, viewers have the option of getting comprehensive coverage—they just have to watch news broadcasts from both political camps, and remember that the truth lies usually lies somewhere in between.

March 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Dubai aims to buy Liverpool giants

by Executive Staff February 23, 2007
written by Executive Staff

Dubai looks set to enter the first division of world football, with news that the state-owned corporation Dubai International Capital (DIC) is closing in on a buyout of English Premier League giant Liverpool.

In a deal worth an estimated $880 million, DIC would acquire the majority stake in the club, winner of 18 English league titles and a number of European trophies, including the 2004-05 Champions League.

Liverpool’s chief executive officer, Rick Parry, said on Jan. 15 that DIC was in the process of putting the finishing touches to the details of its bid and completing the legal work associated with the offer.

“It is a case of finalizing the due diligence and pulling everything together, which we hope will be completed relatively quickly,” Parry said during an interview with British media. “A huge amount of work has been going on from both parts. I imagine we’ll have something to say relatively soon on that.”

Not the first foreign owners in football

If the deal goes through, as all parties expect it to, it would not be the first time that overseas buyers have gained control of one of English football’s icons. Both Manchester United, the current Premier League leaders, and Chelsea, the reigning champions, are foreign-owned, by American and Russian concerns respectively. A number of other teams in the English leagues have large shareholdings in foreign hands.

Owning a football team does not just mean getting the best seats at games. Should the DIC buyout of Liverpool go ahead, the Dubai investor would have a billion-dollar business on its hands and own an internationally recognized brand. Television rights, shirt sales, merchandising and promotional value are all the up side of such a deal.

Of course, football is a high-risk enterprise, and failure on the pitch can bring losses away from the playing field. If it becomes the owner of Liverpool, DIC will be expected to invest heavily in star talent, as well as in the new stadium the Reds have long been planning.

Football is increasingly becoming big business in Dubai, with a number of top European clubs drawn to the emirate during their mid-season breaks. Taking advantage of quality training facilities and the mild weather, teams such as Germany’s Bayern Munich, Benfica of Portugal and Italian outfit Lazio came to Dubai in January to both sharpen their training regime and recharge their batteries. Such visits not only earn money for the local tourism industry but also help promote Dubai in the overseas media, which always keeps a close watch on the doings of their sides.

Dubai is taking the task of becoming a football venue seriously, having poured millions into staging a showcase competition early in the new year. The Dubai Football Challenge 2007, which kicked off on January 8, pitted the national sides of the UAE and Iran and foreign teams such as German Bundesliga Hamburg SV and VfB Stuttgart against each other.

Played at Dubai’s showcase Maktoom Stadium, the three-day tournament drew good crowds and rated highly on television.

According to Jochen Schneider, VfB Stuttgart’s manager and sport administrator, the success of the first Dubai Football Challenge will enhance the appeal of the emirate for leading teams in the future.

High class, global appeal

To get such high class teams for the first tournament is testament to its global appeal, and the attraction of Dubai to big teams, he said. “We came to Dubai in January 2006 and that successful trip has been part of our domestic success throughout last year.”

Increasing the profile of sports such as football in Dubai is part of a wider strategy to expand the economy’s base as well as the emirate’s attraction to visitors. More than $2.5 billion is being spent to develop Dubai Sports City, a sporting and tourism project that aim to offer world-class facilities and act as a springboard for Dubai’s bid to host the 2016 Olympics.

Billing itself as the world’s first fully integrated purpose built sports city, the development will feature four major stadiums, and offer facilities for sports such as football, cricket, tennis, golf, rugby, athletics, swimming and hockey. One of its features will be a Manchester United Soccer School, continuing the strong push towards promoting football in the region.

February 23, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

GCC sees insurance industry booming With Dubai leading the way

by Executive Staff February 23, 2007
written by Executive Staff

In tandem with the emirate’s development, Dubai’s insurance industry is set to reach new heights over the next few years. Meanwhile, throughout the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) the insurance sector is booming.

According to a recent study published by Nexus Insurance Brokers, the region’s largest independent financial adviser, the GCC insurance industry will enjoy a period of strong and sustainable growth, fuelled by a surge in regional demand for insurance products. The sector is expected to grow by some $2 billion by 2010, reaching $7.1 billion. In particular, it seems the UAE insurance sector is currently growing by around 20% per annum.

With over 47 insurance companies, 23 of which are locally owned, the UAE has the largest insurance sector in the region. Most of these companies are based or have an office in Dubai. The sector may appear overcrowded, but a number of small insurance companies have low risk retention and act more as captive agents than real insurance companies. In addition, risk is offset by international reinsurance companies, which play an active role in the region. Meanwhile, some insiders predict mergers between small insurance companies in the near future.

The latest official figures on the insurance sector in 2005 released by the Ministry of Economy and Planning indicate that premiums rose from $1.29 billion in 2004 to  $1.85 billion in 2005, accounting for a healthy increase of 30%. A breakdown of premiums by class of insurance reveals that the non-life segment made up more than 74% of premiums. However, the life segment is expected to grow faster over the next few years.

While local firms dominate the non-life market and collect 75% of premiums, foreign firms control the life insurance market with a similar share with giants such as Arab Insurance Group, American Life Insurance Company (Alico), Axa-Norwich Union or Allianz. Their products are mainly sold to Western expatriates.

In the non-life or general insurance market, a breakdown of segments indicate that accidents and liability account for 61.8%, fire 16.9%, the land, sea and air transport 16.7% and medical 7.6%.

Despite this, UAE market is underdeveloped

Overall, the insurance market in the UAE remains underdeveloped by international standards. Indeed, although one of the highest in the region, the insurance premium density per capita, or the average amount of money spent on insurance products per person per year, stood at $444 in the UAE, compared to $4,508 in the UK or $5,716 in Switzerland.

The GCC governments have played an instrumental role in promoting the benefits of insurance policies. In July this year, the UAE introduced a new health insurance scheme in Abu Dhabi, a move which many say will undoubtedly boost and revitalize the insurance industry for years to come. This new product is finally becoming more acceptable in the GCC. Under the scheme, companies with a staff of more than 1000 will have to provide health insurance for their employees and their close families. An estimated 500,000 people will benefit from the plan, including low-wage workers. The scheme is set to be introduced in Dubai in early 2007.

The insurance industry as a whole is already starting to reap the benefits of this rejuvenating plan, set to expand given the predominantly young population.

Aside from health insurance, a new regulator will also emerge in 2007. Although still under the auspices of the Ministry of the Economy, the new authority will work to improve relations between insurance brokers and companies, as well as consider new solutions for motor insurance and professional indemnities for each sector.

February 23, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

UAE’s ‘du’ service Tackles foes

by Executive Staff February 23, 2007
written by Executive Staff

This year saw new UAE telecoms operator Emirates Integrated Telecommunications Company, branded as du, secure its customer base ahead of its expected launch of operations in February.

Du, which launched a campaign allowing customers to book their phone numbers with the company in November, has received approximately 500,000 subscribers booking 750,000 numbers. Under the campaign, customers are allowed to keep their old phone number but must change the prefix from ‘050’ to ‘055’. The ease of switching operators and the option for customers to retain their mobile number seems to have had a positive impact on du’s efforts to build a substantial customer base.

Etisalat and du square off

However, the imminent launch of du’s operations has led the existing operator, Etisalat, and the newcomer to adopt aggressive marketing strategies to showcase their new products, services and pricing. The mobile penetration rate in the country is extremely high, with estimates placing it at 125%—the highest mobile penetration rate in the Arab world. It also has internet penetration levels of 60%. Against such a backdrop, competition between du and Etisalat is set to be fierce.

Some analysts fear that this will not dramatically impact prices. Osman Sultan, CEO of du, said that the company will be looking to grab a 30% market share within three years of launching operations. However, this will not be achieved through a price war. According to Sultan, “We have a great deal of respect for Etisalat as a strong regional player with a very deep pocket. We will not be getting into a price war with them as such cut-throat competition would not be in the interest of either company.” However, Wisam Francis, BIS Shrapnel’s project manager for the Middle East telecom sector believes that du will struggle to achieve its ambitious targets, suggesting that it will only achieve between 10-20% market share up to 2009.

Du has been investing heavily in its infrastructure and human resources in preparation for the commencement of operations. The company has also been keen to make its mark ahead of the launch, highlighting its next-generation network and pricing structure. Particular areas of emphasis for both Etisalat and du are broadband and mobile television, both of which are expected to gain prominence in 2007. Du has also stressed its per second pricing strategy that distinguishes it from its competitor Etisalat. All customers will have the option to be charged on a second by second basis on all mobile voice calls. Sultan said that this was a particularly important development because, “It is only fair that our customers pay for precisely what they use.”

Etisalat is also preparing for the arrival of the new operator by readjusting its pricing structure. One key area that Etisalat is looking to address is international calls. The company is going to offer off-peak rates to business customers on their international calls, constituting a 35% discount on current rates. Ahmad Abdul Karim Julfar, the chief operating officer at Etisalat, seemed to concede that this decision was driven by the changing nature of the market in the UAE and recent developments. He argued, “In light of the current market environment we have reviewed our services and rates to ensure that the true cost of the service is more accurately reflected in the charges.”

VoIP still a controversial technology

However, it would appear that the rationale behind cutting prices on international calls is not simply driven by the imminent arrival of a new mobile operator in the UAE. Etisalat is also taking into account the potential changes to regulation on Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in the emirates. This issue continues to dominate the telecommunications sector in the country. As it stands, the technology is still illegal with services such as Skype blocked in the UAE.

It has been rumored that the national regulatory body, the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) is set to legalize VoIP. However, it has issued a rebuttal this week saying that the technology is still under review. The TRA’s manager for administration and public relations, Adnan al-Bahar told the local press, “Until the regulatory framework is in place VoIP is illegal.”

Nevertheless, it would appear that it is only a matter of time until the regulatory framework is put in place issuing in the legalization of VoIP. This is seen as a particularly important growth area in the telecommunications sector in the Middle East and North Africa region. According to Luke Kabamba, the Dubai-based ESM business unit head for IT software management company CA’s Europe Middle East and Africa eastern markets, The Middle East market has witnessed a huge surge in the last couple of years and many companies today have plans of investing in VoIP, which not only helps increase customer satisfaction and staff efficiency but also simplifies and reduces the cost of managing voice communication systems.

February 23, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

UAE, Oman link exchanges

by Executive Staff February 23, 2007
written by Executive Staff

In early January, the Abu Dhabi Securities Market (ADSM) signed a cross-listing agreement with the Muscat Securities Market (MSM), reflecting its will to attract foreign investors, improve its performance and strengthen its links with regional markets.

The agreement between the ADSM, the MSM and the Muscat Depository & Securities Registration Company allows for the listing of Omani companies in Abu Dhabi. Oman and Emirates Company will be the first Omani company to list in the UAE.

According to Abdullah al-Nabhani, the general manager of Muscat Depository & Securities Registration Company, the establishment of an electronic link between the two Gulf markets has fostered greater interest in the UAE markets. “Since MSM established the electronic link with ADSM, we have seen a huge increase in demand for UAE securities in Oman. We hope this agreement will help to not only meet this demand, but also offer investors the opportunity to diversify their risks by having more choice.”

The ADSM currently has 54,000 Omani investors registered making up 7% of the total and contributing $62.62 million to the market. The agreement with Muscat is part of a wider strategy on behalf of the ADSM to broaden its investor base and the number of foreign companies listed on the market. According to Rashed al-Baloushi, the ADSM’s acting director general, “As long as we continue to bring international companies and more diverse investment opportunities to the UAE local markets, we are helping investors to spread their risks, contributing to long-term market stability and ultimately furthering economic growth in the UAE.”

Similar agreements

Qatar, Pakistan and Jordan already have similar agreements with the ADSM, facilitating cooperation and dual listing on their respective markets. Pakistan was the first non-Gulf country to sign such an agreement with the Abu Dhabi market. As a result of the memorandum of understanding between the ADSM and the Central Depository Company (CDC) of Pakistan, 10 Pakistani companies have already received approval for cross listing.

This agreement paves the way for further investment between the two countries. There are currently 2,200 Pakistani investors registered on the ADSM, with investments worth $13.61 million. However, investment from the UAE to Pakistan is seen as a key consideration in this agreement. Al Baloushi believes that this agreement will help to consolidate Emirati investment into Pakistan. “Abu Dhabi is a significant investor in Pakistani companies so it is important for us to cement close ties between our markets. We also look forward to working closely with the three Pakistan stock exchanges as we implement our best practice program and continue to improve the regulation and governance standards in the UAE financial markets,” he said.

Hanif Jakhura, the chief executive of the CDC, also pointed out that the agreement would facilitate investment from the Pakistani expatriate community into their home markets.

Similarly, the agreement between the Securities Depository Center of Jordan and the ADSM is a step forward for facilitating investment relations between the two markets. Arab Bank is likely to be the first Jordanian company listed on the Abu Dhabi market. The presence of Jordanian investors in the UAE is already well established with approximately 7000 investors registered and investments amounting to $168.8 million.

Seeking more arrangements

Al-Baloushi said that the ADSM is seeking out more agreements along the same lines. Khaled al-Suwaidi, the manager of ADSM’s listed companies department, also recently told a conference in Singapore that attracting foreign investment is a strong priority for Abu Dhabi’s stock market. He further laid out the measures taken by the ADSM to bring the market into line with international best practice. The ADSM has suggested a corporate governance code for all listed companies as well as a UAE trust and custody law.  

These measures are seen as particularly important to attract foreign and institutional investors. Currently, foreigners can invest in 38 out of the 61 listed securities on the ADSM and account for 40% of investors in the market. Al-Suwaidi believes that this figure will increase because of the positive economic development prospects for the emirate.

In spite of the current slump in the market, al-Suwaidi believes the economic conditions of Abu Dhabi are conducive to investment. “Abu Dhabi’s progressive economic agenda, promoting diversification, liberalization and an enhanced role for the private sector, demonstrates that the long-term fundamentals for growth are in place,” he said. 

February 23, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 594
  • 595
  • 596
  • 597
  • 598
  • …
  • 686

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    Executive Magazine
    • ISSUES
      • Current Issue
      • Past issues
    • BUSINESS
    • ECONOMICS & POLICY
    • OPINION
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • EXECUTIVE TALKS
    • MOVEMENTS
      • Change the image
      • Cannes lions
      • Transparency & accountability
      • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
      • Say No to Corruption
      • The Lebanon media development initiative
      • LPSN Policy Asks
      • Advocating the preservation of deposits
    • JOIN US
      • Join our movement
      • Attend our events
      • Receive updates
      • Connect with us
    • DONATE