Home Real estateThe merits of renting

The merits of renting

Owning property ties up capital that could be put to better use

by Michael Dunn

Whatever the traditional love

or owning property,

Lebanon is beginning to

follow the worldwide trend toward

rental. International operators prefer not

to have capital tied up in real estate,

whether it is offices, shops or industrial.

They prefer to rent from pension

funds, insurance companies and real

estate companies – businesses that

have an interest in stable, long-term

yields. In developed countries, retail

will offer a yield of 5%, offices 7% and

industrial 9%. An average of around

7% is an ideal way for pension funds

and the like to help balance a portfolio

with yields of 4% on cash (no risk) and

11 % on high-tech and developing

markets (high risk).

In Lebanon, yields have been higher

– around 8.5%-9% on prime retail

and perhaps 10.5% on prime office.

These yields will reduce as the market

develops and becomes more settled.

But whatever the yield, the case for rental is strong, and one that

Healey & Baker always recommends to our clients.

Imagine owning a shop worth $1 million. If you sell the freehold,

but remain in occupation on a lease at $100,000 a year, you

immediately have $900,000 to invest in other shops or, if you prefer,

to buy Nasdaq stocks. Sale and leaseback can open up all sorts

of possibilities for many companies: It is extraordinary, for example,

that banks, whose expertise is exactly one of making money

grow, tie up their capital in owning buildings, something in which

they are not specialists.

Owners need to think long term. Looking for a low yield is,

paradoxically, a sign of confidence and not of weakness. Prime

property will tend to produce capital accumulation, especially

over longer periods of time. In retail, for example, attracting a

committed tenant who can generate rising year-on-year

turnover will help increase the value of the property, and this in

turn can justify rising rent that the owner can then capitalize. (It

is even possible to relate the rental to turnover.)

This goes against much practice in Lebanon, and there are still

short-sighted owners trying to justify absurdly high yields. But

it is, nonetheless, best business practice. Take the case of

Birmingham, a city of around 1.5 million in England: Yields of

just 4% have produced rental income rising by 300% in five years.

In Paris, yields have gone down from 6% to 4% in the past two years –

a sign of the city charging from recession to boom.

This kind of growth is not possible in

small towns, only in city centers with

large catchment areas and potential

for rapid expansion. But is Beirut

very different to Birmingham or Paris

in this respect? In its Saifi village residential

development, Solidere has

produced rental figures ($80-$110 per

m1 a year, with sale starting at$1,750)

that offer a yield of just 5%, way

below the figures of 13%-14% that

developers will look for on residential.

But is Solidere wrong? Why should

owners expect returns of 14%? And

why do they leave property empty

rather than let it at realistic prices?

Residential properties generally

require more management than commercial

ones, so if Solidere can take a 5%

yield on its flagship residential, how can

owners justify returns above 9% on office and retail? Part of the

answer lies in their worries about securing payment Just as banks

are beginning to show concern about bad loans, property owners fear

that tenants will either not pay or pay late. So they look for a high

yield to hedge against future risk.

This is, without question, a problem resulting from the lack of

regulation in the market and one that needs to be addressed. It

should be a top priority of the incoming government to strengthen

the judiciary, so that contracts of all kinds are properly

enforced and that all parties come to accept that prompt payment

of dues is in everyone’s long-term interest.

Sooner or later, this will come. Here as elsewhere, rental is very

much the future. Schemes like lease-with-option-to-buy are compromises

of limited worth. They may suit the mentality of the

would-be homeowner, whether in Lebanon or Britain (though the

French of course have no such qualms about renting their homes),

but they have no obvious benefits for business professionals.

If you want to own a castle or a palace, buy one. If you want to own

real estate, invest in a real estate fund. Don’t buy a house and certainly

don’t buy an office block. Leave it to the property professionals,

and spend your time and money doing what you’ re good at.

You may also like