• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
Feature

A cruel, hot summer

by Executive Editors September 23, 2010
written by Executive Editors

Like the wise farmer who knows disaster can and does strike, no matter how carefully he cultivates his harvest, policy makers at the Kremlin must be shaking their heads at how badly their well-laid plans have gone arwy.

Moscow had sown all the seeds a country should need to achieve a greater share of the global grain export market in recent years, having overhauled its agricultural industry and boosted sector investment. The result had been a near doubling of wheat exports between 2005 and 2009, from 10 million to 18 million tons, with Russia’s biggest export markets including Egypt, Turkey, Syria and Iran.

This amounted to Russia last year cornering 14 percent of global market share — a number that is precipitously set to plummet in 2010 from the disastrous interventions of Mother Nature and rising temperatures.

The wildfires raging across Russia this summer have destroyed as much as 25 percent of Russia’s wheat crop, with widespread drought diminishing yields of surviving fields. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a revised forecast predicting that by year’s end the crop will shrink to 45 million tons from 2009’s 60 million.

In response, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin at the beginning of last month imposed a moratorium on grain exports for the rest of the year to protect domestic supplies and stave off inflation in the price of local foodstuffs. Russians consumed 42 million tons of wheat in 2009 — slightly less than the total expected crop this year, helping to explain the export ban.

Yet the move surprised many international observers, who expected Russian leaders to continue to complete export sales by tapping into government inventories, as moves to restrict trade can damage a country’s reputation as a reliable exporter. 

Futures contracts for wheat were dipping to nine-month lows in early June, trading at $4.30 per bushel — some $158 per ton — on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT), effectively the world benchmark for wheat prices. Prices rose quickly as the Russian fires spread and reports emerged that other major wheat producing countries — such as Canada and the Ukraine — were also facing crops losses. Wheat spiked following Putin’s announcement, reaching near $285 on the CBOT [See graph page 24].

Abdolreza Abbassian, senior grains economist at the United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization, told international press on August 6 that: “a situation which was not serious has now become serious.”

A New York-based commodity, who was not authorized to speak to the media, told Executive that wheat “futures have been very volatile recently,” adding, “they made new highs right after the Russian export ban… but have come off [those highs].”

As Executive went to print at the end of August, the CBOT’s price-per-ton was about $243.

Production vs consumption of wheat (millions of tons)

Construction                Production
Source: USDA, (Qatar wheat data not covered)

Imports vs exports of wheat (millions of tons)

Imports 2009               Exports 2009
Source: USDA, (Qatar wheat data not covered)

Last time around

In 2007, an unusually volatile spate of natural disasters beginning in the summer caused widespread crop damage across the globe. This, coupled with rapidly rising fuel prices, spurred sharp inflation in foodstuffs globally. The price of wheat tripled on world markets, leading to social unrest and violence in many developing countries,  including Egypt, where rioters clashed with police when bread prices doubled.

This international food crisis revealed the interconnectivity of the modern world’s food and commodities markets, and exposed how dependent many countries are on these markets for their political and social stability.  

Russia’s sudden wheat export ban will force the Egyptian government to fork out $877 million extra to secure new supplies

Russian wheat in the Middle East

Egypt, as the world’s largest importer of wheat, has been particularly affected by Moscow’s export ban. The country’s total wheat consumption was 17 million tons in 2009, vastly outstripping domestic wheat production of 8 million — meaning Cairo must import the difference. The Egyptian government has said Russia’s sudden halt to wheat exports will force it to fork out $877 million to secure new supplies [For more see story on page 26].

Neighboring Jordan has taken steps to shore up its domestic stores of wheat last month, floating a tender for 100,000 tons, which was filled by Germany at a cost of $328 per ton on August 13. However, the increased price of wheat is not expected to cause a corresponding price uptick in Jordan’s bread market because of government flour subsidies, which cost Amman some $169 million in 2009.

“Despite the rise in international wheat prices, which will increase the cost of the government bread subsidy, we will continue supporting bread with the same mechanism,” said Amer Hadidi, the Jordanian Minister of Industry and Trade, to the Jordan Times. 

Syria and Lebanon will also have to import significant amounts of wheat this year. The effects of the Russian wildfires have combined with a ‘wheat rust’ fungicide epidemic, which has affected Syria particularly badly. According to the USDA, “the concentration of rust-affected crops is the highest in north-east Syria and southern and south-east Turkey, where the governments reported outbreaks in the prime wheat growing regions.” 

Syria imported 2 million tons of wheat this past year, which is its third consecutive year as a net importer after years of drought.

Wheat Futures US cents/bushel

Source: USDA

GCC prepared and spared

Gulf States appear to be better equipped to manage the price spikes and supply shortages, with Saudi Arabia intending to wait another five months before issuing its next wheat tender. The kingdom is betting that wheat prices will drop in the interim period and that it won’t have to pay the current, inflated price. 

Speaking to Reuters, Waleed el-Khereiji, director general of the Saudi Grain Silos and Flour Mills Organization said: “I don’t foresee a crisis, or a crisis similar to what happened in 2007 and the prices now are still below their level in 2007.” 

Saudi stores of wheat are enough to meet domestic needs until April 2011; not counting another 200,000 tons of wheat that will be delivered in September. The kingdom imported just under 2 million tons of wheat in 2009, none of which originated in Russia.

The United Arab Emirates also appears to be minimally affected by the inferno that burned across the Russian heartland.

According to a report issued by the Department of Analysis and Business Information, 89 percent of the UAE’s wheat imports originate in Canada, Germany, Australia and Argentina. Russia by contrast, provides only 2 percent of the total.

“I don’t foresee a crisis, or a crisis similar to what happened in 2007 and the prices now are still below their level in 2007” 

The next harvest

Fortunately, there is some optimism that a good wheat harvest in other parts of the world will make up for the damage caused by the loss of Russia’s crop.

The USDA has reported that North Africa produced 20.2 million tons of wheat in the  2009-2010 season, up from 14.4 million tons the previous year. Factoring in Russia’s harvest failure, the USDA forecast for the 2010-2011 global wheat supply was only slightly adjusted from 676 million tons to 651 million tons, as other countries are stepping in to close the supply gap left by the Russians, led by the United States and Australia.

The prospect of Russia being forced to import grain from other countries over the next year, however, caused price volatility toward the end of August, with Dow Jones Newswires reporting Moscow may import up to four million tons of various grains through the 2011 harvest season.

Speculators are also adding momentum to the price swings and were a major factor in the steep rise in prices seen in the past month, according to Makram Makarem, senior financial consultant at FFA Private Bank in Lebanon

“This up-move [of prices] is led by investors buying back their short positions after Russia banned grain exports, as well as speculators and hedge fund managers wanting to ride the wave,” said Makarem to Executive.

He pointed out that people should keep things in perspective, however, when making comparisons to price hikes that caused the 2007-2008 food crisis.

“We need to note that wheat reached a high of $13.34 per bushel in February 2008 after a much steeper increase in price,” remarked Makarem, while the highest prices peaked last month was $7.75 per bushel.

September 23, 2010 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Feature

Withering fields of green

by Executive Editors September 23, 2010
written by Executive Editors

Mohamad Ajami’s 65 beehives overlook the pastoral idyll of the Litani River Valley, with Jebel El Sheikh looming in the distance and Beaufort Castle laying to the right. Last year Ajami’s business was flourishing; he had a bumper honey harvest, generating 650 kilos. He was optimistic that this year would be even better, purchasing extra hives and equipment in anticipation of producing one ton of honey. At $25 for a 900-gram jar, Ajami should have netted more than $25,000.

But three months ago he started realizing all was not well. The winds had been continuously blowing from the east, dry, desert winds instead of the westerly winds that provide the right moisture and dew for flora to thrive, and for the bees to pollinate and produce nectar. Ajami also noticed that the bees were not breeding, meaning he could not artificially swarm them and build up the number of colonies to allow him to have more hives.

“That was when I realized something wasn’t right,” he said. “And while the summer flowers did come, there were no forager bees in the hives. Something did not encourage them to generate honey, something — beyond my understanding — that is beyond normal events.”

When it came to harvesting, Ajami’s suspicions turned out to be even more warranted than he had thought: “I only generated 50 kilos. It was not a harvest, it is solely for family consumption this year,” he said.

Ajami’s experience is not an exception; beekeepers throughout Lebanon have had a bad season, with rough estimates — in lieu of official statistics — of a 50 percent decline in production from an annual average of 200 tons. For Wadih Yazbek, a beekeeper and equipment distributor in Beirut, hardware sales are down 60 to 70 percent, indicative of the overall decline in the honey sector. “Beekeepers aren’t needing the extra hives and secondly, with not a lot of honey, keepers are not keen on purchasing new extractors or filters,” said Yazbek.

It is not just honey production that has been affected by the unusual weather patterns Lebanon has witnessed over the past year. Abnormal precipitation in the winter and spring — on average the same quantity but occurring over half the number of days — and a heat wave in prime harvesting time has also hit other agricultural sectors.

“We’ve had a lot of problems this year, particularly with grapes, olives, vegetables, apples and potatoes”

Leaner times

The United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Foreign Agriculture Service estimates Lebanon will produce 100,000 tons of wheat this year, a 23 percent drop from the 130,000 tons grown in 2009. Green leafed vegetables have been frazzled by the sun, and fruits are ripening earlier than usual. “We’ve had a lot of problems this year, particularly with grapes, olives, vegetables, apples and potatoes,” said Elia Choueiri, head of the department of plant protection at the Agriculture Ministry’s Lebanese Agricultural Research Institute (LARI) at the Tal Amara Station in the Bekaa valley.

In some areas the olive harvest is down between 30 and 50 percent, particularly in areas where olives trees were not irrigated or had supplemental irrigation. At two major vineyards in the Bekaa some 70 percent of the grapes were lost, while vineyards at higher elevations have also been affected, particularly white grapes.

“The heat wave had an impact on the physiological status of the vine: a rapid increase of alcohol content because of the increased sugar content in grapes over a very short period,” said Carlos Adem, president of the Syndicate of Wines and Spirits. “In general, the year 2010 will not be one of the great vintages, like 2003 for example.”

In the north, trees have brought forth fruit but not enough leaves, due to it not getting cold enough over the winter. Japanese plums are down 40 percent and forest fires have also wrought damage.

“Each plant has a life cycle, but they are flowering before time, so the life-cycle is shorter. It’s because of climatic change,” said Roula Faris, Middle East representative of the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture. “Leafed vegetables and herbs have flowered early due to the temperature, and they are unmarketable.”

While the Bekaa has had temperatures this summer of up to 45 degrees, in the country’s mountainous regions — where a significant amount of produce is grown, whether fruit trees or in greenhouses — temperatures have soared to unprecedented levels.

“For the first time in Lebanon, even the mountains are hotter than the coast,” revealed Faris. On top of all this, phytoplasma diseases have affected stone fruits such as peaches and almonds, killing more than 100,000 trees within three years. LARI’s Choueiri said: “We have tested over 100 insects to find the pathogen, but don’t know what kind of insect is spreading the disease… Also, due to the hot weather, the activity of these insects is higher, and we’ve seen large infections of peach trees in the south and the Bekaa. The diffusion is getting higher year after year.”

So far this year, LARI has recorded a further 40,000 trees in the south affected by the phytoplasma which, curiously, on a regional basis is only affecting Lebanon and Iran.

If the government subsidizes wheat it will come at a heavy cost. The alternative is potential rioting if bread prices spike

Give them bread

The extent of losses in the agricultural sector will not be fully known until harvesting is finished and all the data is collated. While early indications imply it has been a bad year, it has not been a total disaster, with some regions affected far more than others.

Lebanon has not experienced the drought that neighboring Syria has gone through over the past five years, which has hit agricultural output hard and affected the livelihoods of more than one million people. But the reduced yields have coincided with poor crops globally, particularly in fire-ravaged Russia, which has driven up global wheat prices, and the disastrous flooding in Pakistan, which has reduced rice cultivation [see story on page 32].

As global food prices are on an upward curve, Lebanon is sure to be affected. The country imports some 70 percent of the food it consumes, according to the United Nations’ Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). Indeed, with wheat production in Lebanon down 42 percent, the government banned exports at the beginning of August, preventing a ship loaded with 4,000 tons of grain at the Beirut port from setting sail.

Lebanon imports some 400,000 tons of wheat per year, and the government went to the international markets to purchase an immediate 50,000 tons last month, either for strategic reserves or to regulate domestic wheat and flour prices.

“With wheat prices at today’s level, around $320 for a ton, flour should be around $450 per ton or more but the ceiling for bread prices was set [by the government] at a maximum of $320 for a ton of bread,” said Arslan Sinno of Dora Flour Mills and president of the Syndicate of Agrifood Traders. “Someone must pay the difference, certainly not the millers, nor the bakers, so either the consumer by liberalizing the price of bread — which may increase the pack price from LL 1500 ($1) to maybe LL1800 ($1.20) or LL2000 ($1.33) — or the state by subsidizing the wheat by about $200 per ton.”

If the government subsidizes wheat it will come at a heavy cost to the state’s coffers. The alternative is higher costs for the Lebanese populace and potential rioting if bread prices do spike, as happened in Beirut in January 2008, when rumors spread that prices were to rise.

Agriculture could generate $3.5 billion if there was sufficient infrastructure investment

The new agricultural plan

The agricultural sector as a whole in Lebanon is underinvested, which has only compounded the losses caused by the topsy-turvy weather this year. According to the Lebanese Farmers Syndicate, agriculture generated some $1.5 billion in gross revenues in 2009, but could generate $3.5 billion if there was sufficient infrastructure investment.

According to research at the American University of Beirut (AUB),  some 50 percent of rural families rely on agro-food production. AUB also said that around 20 to 25 percent of the country’s workforce is employed in agriculture, although the Ministry of Agriculture puts this figure at nine percent. Either way, climatic change clearly poses a threat to agriculture’s potential and therefore to the income generation of a good swathe of the populace.

This importance finally seems to be coming to the forefront in politics, with Agriculture Minister Hussein Hajj Hassan releasing a four-year plan to address the sector’s core problems.

“As of this year, the agriculture ministry has started to be more active,” said LARI’s Choueiri, adding that LARI has taken on a further 70 staff to improve research. “If you compared 10 years ago to today, our work has improved incredibly.”

Implementing reforms requires data, which is currently sorely lacking; the last census on the agricultural sector was in 1988. FAO is carrying out a new census for the whole country, slated for release in October. “We’ve a horizontal project for synergy between all the ministries for efficiently developing the agricultural sector to help realize its potential,” said Ali Moumen, FAO’s representative in Lebanon.

LARI and the Ministry of Agriculture have implemented a strategy to boost and retain production levels. “We are working on new varieties that support dry climatic conditions, such as introducing new apple varieties at an altitude of 700 meters instead of the old varieties of the Bekaa,” said Choueiri.

Farmers are being given codes for identification purposes in the event of disease, nurseries are being monitored, workshops are being held on growing techniques and pesticide use, and a forecast service by LARI kicked off this year that sends text messages to farmers about disease and climatic change.

Organic agriculture, although very much in its nascence, is also improving, with the number of hectares rising from 250 to 2,465, and organic farmers increasing from 17 to 331 since 2000. “Organic agriculture can reduce global warming as there is lower water usage, it increases biodiversity and improves soil fertility,” said Faris.

Improvements in the sector will certainly help offset climatic change, but for the immediate year ahead, much will depend on future temperatures and whether precipitation is better spread and rainwater retained.

“If this year there is again hot weather over the winter period, it will be a big problem for apples, pears and cherries,” said Choueiri.

While the proactive approach of the ministry may offer room for cautious optimism — though very much weather dependent — many agriculturalists will be feeling the sting this winter.

For beekeeper Mohamad Ajami, the income he planned to live off has disappeared.

“I am really concerned about saving the bees for a harvest next year. Adding insult to injury, my whole land was burned as it was so dry and someone must have flicked a lit cigarette,” he said. “My focus was this line of work, but I’ll have to do something else to survive the rest of the year.”

September 23, 2010 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Editorial

The smartest solution of them all

by Yasser Akkaoui September 23, 2010
written by Yasser Akkaoui

Now that work restrictions on Lebanon’s estimated 400,000 Palestinians have been eased, though this is still a small step and should not be seen as an end to the plight of Lebanon’s Palestinian Diaspora, maybe it is time to explore what should be done with the roughly 150,000 Palestinians in Lebanon under the age of 18.

The only passport they have to escape the misery of the camps is proper healthcare and, more importantly, a decent education. But the Lebanese should not have to shoulder such an initiative alone – we were not a signatory of the Sykes Picot Agreement which, nearly a century ago, laid the foundations for the region’s current woes.

No, the world’s wealthy nations must do at least as much to ameliorate the problem as they have done to cause it, and play their part in molding the Palestinian youth into genuine global citizens. They could create 50 schools in Lebanon with around 3,000 students in each establishment. These would sharpen students’ minds 12 months of the year with sciences and arts of an authority unavailable to them through the United Nations classrooms, and empower their personalities to graduate as a generation of Palestinians who would throw off the label of global pariahs. As highly developed human beings, they would have all the necessary tools to be offered the opportunity to attend universities in London, Paris, Berlin, New York, etc.

Given the wealth of human capital this would instill, it is not inconceivable that the Lebanese would want to employ their knowledge and skills to Lebanon’s advantage; education could perhaps even be the untried key to opening doors back to Palestine. If not, then at least they can take their equity abroad.

It would be nothing short of a program for dignity, one that would cut the cycle of decades-old violence that has seen children without hope reach for the gun rather than the laptop, as they realize they are condemned to a life without pride and self-worth in the refugee camps of Lebanon.

It would also be affordable. Building schools and providing an education is relatively cheap and would produce some very high returns. Education for Palestinians is an initiative that the entire world can get behind and, once started, it might stimulate similar donations from wealthy Palestinians from within the wider diaspora. The world would be creating a cycle of prosperity rather than a cycle of misery. In the age of corporate social responsibility, the battle against carbon emissions and the era of smart solutions, surely this is the smartest solution of them all, and one that could eventually put an end to over half a century of misery.

September 23, 2010 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance

Return of the Egyptian giant

by Emma Cosgrove September 3, 2010
written by Emma Cosgrove

EFG-Hermes is looking once again to control a Lebanese bank, but this time, it appears it may be successful. The largest publically traded investment bank in the Arab world announced on August 17 that it has entered into an agreement to buy a 65 percent stake in Lebanon’s Credit Libanais for $542 million, with a further call option to purchase another 25 percent at the same share price within the next two years.

EFG-Hermes was able to use its own cash reserves to buy the bank from Capital Investment Holding, a Bahraini holding company with a Lebanese arm. The group has been holding onto a large stash of cash totaling close to $1 billion since it sold its stake in Bank Audi in January.

“The transaction is expected to be earnings accretive from the first full year of the acquisition before any synergy assumptions,” said EFG-Hermes in a press release.

Credit Libanais has branches in Cyprus and Bahrain as well as a representative office in Canada. It is the local network and retail and commercial banking services that made the bank attractive to EFG-Hermes, which is choosing to acquire its way to becoming a universal bank. 

EFG-Hermes was formerly a major stakeholder in Lebanon’s Bank Audi, holding 28 percent of the bank until January 18. The Egyptian giant sold its stake to a group of unidentified investors for $913 million when it became clear that further acquisition was unlikely, and control of the bank was unwelcome.

“In less than a year after the profitable disposal of its stake in Bank Audi, EFG-Hermes has secured a sizeable commercial bank at attractive terms and re-enters the Lebanese banking market… [The] acquisition will transform EFG-Hermes and facilitate the expedient roll-out of our regional commercial banking strategy delivering significant benefits for our shareholders,” said, Mona Zulficar, EFG-Hermes’ chairperson of the board of directors.

EFG-Hermes posted an 83.2 percent year-on-year rise in profits at the end of June, growing net profits to $101.9 million, according to Zawya. Shares of EFG-Hermes gained 2.4 percent on the announcement of the sale to reach $4.91.

According to Credit Libanais, final decisions as to changes among the board of directors at the Lebanese alpha bank are still being negotiated but EFG-Hermes will be represented on the bank’s board. EFG-Hermes has made it clear that the management of Credit Libanais will remain the same.

The deal is now awaiting approval from Banque du Liban, Lebanon’s Central Bank, which could take months. Credit Libanais was reportedly valued at $834 million for the acquisition.

September 3, 2010 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Comment

Summer of the stifling state

by Michael Young September 3, 2010
written by Michael Young

The possibility that several Gulf states, as well as India, might suspend BlackBerry services unless certain security conditions are implemented is the latest sign of the tension between modern technology and the impositions of the state. In July, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia sought to come to an agreement with BlackBerry’s Canadian manufacturer, Research in Motion (RIM), to impose an oversight mechanism allowing their security agencies to read the device’s encrypted messages. This would affect BlackBerry’s messenger service, which permits users to communicate in real time between themselves, as well as email services. RIM refused and the Emirati and Saudi authorities announced dates for the suspension of BlackBerry.

The governments’ calculations were that their threats would put pressure on RIM’s share value, forcing the company to comply. In early August, however, the Saudis reversed course, announcing that they would allow messenger services to continue, driving RIM’s share value up. Rumor has it that the manufacturers agreed to locate one of their servers in the kingdom, making it easier for the authorities to access data, though both RIM and the government has remained tight-lipped on the issue.  However, both the Indian and Emirati authorities continue to demand some access to BlackBerry’s internet services. The Indian security agencies argue that BlackBerries were used in the Mumbai attack of November 2008, while the group of assassins (purportedly Israeli agents) who killed Hamas operative Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai earlier this year were also thought to have used Blackberries or a similar device. However, the security argument is not particularly convincing. While there is no doubt that modern technology can facilitate terrorist attacks, preventing this might throw the baby out with the bathwater.

 Take the Mumbai episode. Those who carried out the rampage in the Indian port city also used cellular telephones. Yet no state, certainly not India, can readily tap into all cellular communications. And while BlackBerry messages are encrypted, in the confusion of a terrorist attack it is not always easier to intercept mobile phone conversations. The fact is, it is often the quality of policing and speed of reaction that defines the outcome of terrorist actions. Even in the planning stage there are infinite ways for terrorists to circumvent surveillance.

To place an entire population under the government’s eye is extremely illiberal, inconvenient and not necessarily guaranteed of success. Technology in the hands of committed groups generally remains a step ahead of sluggish countermeasures by states.

There is also the matter of image. It is part of the UAE’s brand that places like Dubai and Abu Dhabi are business-friendly. The business community has been willing to accept restrictions on certain aspects of life in exchange for an environment that is generally efficient and safe. But they may not be willing to relinquish their privacy for the sake of safety and security, particularly in their business affairs. If they feel the authorities can tap into their private communications and influence key aspects of their work, for example bids or strategies against competitors, suddenly the Emirates becomes less attractive.

Conditions imposed on RIM, particularly among the Gulf states, seems, at least publicly, to be prompted mainly by discomfort that technology is offering people more ways to avoid the state’s prying eye. What is new in the BlackBerry standoff is that the demands on RIM bring two systems into conflict: Western democracy which, for all the inroads into people’s private lives it has allowed in recent years, still defends the right to privacy in law, against systems with a more elastic view of privacy. RIM is being asked to undermine the confidentiality of its clients, thereby breaking its contract with BlackBerry owners, because certain foreign governments cannot do that themselves. This is different to blocking or scrutinizing the Internet, which numerous governments do because they control servers inside their own country. Economic power will be a major factor in determining the outcome of this tussle.

If India can get its way with RIM, it will have a significant impact on what Arab states, with less market weight, decide to do. Ironically, the free market may end up curbing freedom. There may be a point where RIM’s share price, pushed down by recalcitrant governments demanding an end to encrypted messaging, force the company to surrender. This would be bad news, because there is more at stake than just terrorism; not everything we do is the state’s to see. 

September 3, 2010 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance

Goodbye to great rates

by Paul Cochrane September 3, 2010
written by Paul Cochrane

 

The high interest historically paid out by Lebanese banks on deposits in Lebanese lira (LL) made the country an attractive location for stashing cash. At its peak, near the end of the civil war in February 1988, the average rate on lira deposits was 20.55 percent, according to data from Banque du Liban (BDL), Lebanon’s central bank. Such double-digit interest was the norm when Lebanon needed as much capital as possible to reconstruct the country. Come the Paris II donor conference in November 2002, lira interest rates dropped below 10 percent, never to return to such highs, as perceived risk was lower. They’ve been more or less in a gradual decline ever since, hitting a three-decade low in June this year when the weighted average interest rate on deposits hit 5.83 percent, according to data provide by BDL.

The cost of competition

As the global financial crisis set in, Lebanon was once again an attractive depositors’ haven, with $55 billion flowing into the country from 2007 to the first half of 2010, according to Bank Audi data. Such an abundance of liquidity, combined with the lower rates offered internationally and the heightened confidence in the Lebanese financial system meant interest rates had to tumble. As a result, the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance were in a position to demand lower returns on treasury bills (TBs) and certificates of deposit (CDs). 

But this represented a challenge for the banks in managing their spreads, particularly when the three-year and five-year TBs and CDs in lira matured, as it would no longer be advantageous to pay out high interest to clients when the banks themselves were no longer receiving such returns.

“On government paper for lira, [interest] was 11.25 percent for [the last] five years, but now it is 6.18 percent, so a huge drop in just a year and a half,” said Walid Raphael, general manager of Banque Libano-Francaise. “If you look at the three-year paper — what most banks are holding with the government — it was at 9.3 percent and is now just below 6 percent, so a 3.30 percent drop. It is the banks that are bearing this reduction in interest. If the market was really efficient the banks would not pay more than they are getting on TBs but much less, yet this is not the case.”

Earlier this year, the Association of Banks in Lebanon decided that the rates banks offered should be lowered, as paying out their current interest was no longer sustainable. But in a free market it is the prerogative of banks as to what rate they offer, even if this costs the institution to do so. “If you are getting 5.3 percent on three-year local treasury bills, why are you paying depositors 5.5 percent?” said Freddie Baz, chief financial officer at Bank Audi. “It is because of idiotic competition to attract clients. Banks are shooting themselves in the foot.”

The banks have to tread carefully though, as a rapid reduction in interest rates on the lira could trigger conversions back to US dollars and threaten the currency’s stability. As Baz remarked, the Lebanese “are not mentally prepared for this,” as depositors have become used to the high rates on the lira. He does, however, advocate a drop of 1 percent on lira interest in 2011.

Decline prompts diversity

Najib Semaan, assistant general manager at the Bank of Beirut, considers the lower interest rates as a boon for the government, the economy and the banks.  “Banks are happy to see rates go lower in foreign currency and the lira. Why? Because it will give a boost to the lending on the retail and corporate side, and servicing the debt of the republic will cost less,” he said. “But while it is beneficial to the government to have lower interest rates, I insist we reach a level acceptable to the government and the banks.”

The decline in the interest rates has clearly affected bank’s strategies, placing a greater emphasis on services to attract and retain clients; before it was a case of shopping for the best interest rate on offer. That said, interest rates are still a primary tool to expand the depositor base, hence some rates on offer are on par and even above the returns banks get on TBs and CDs.

For instance, Bank of Beirut is offering an account to new clients that pays 7.20 percent over 15 months. “We want to diversify and increase our client base, and have cross selling, such as to small investors,” said Semaan. “We are not accepting deposits over LL 60 million as we want to diversify and have longer term maturities. The interest rate is a welcome gift to new clientele because otherwise, on a small amount, whatever you pay doesn’t make sense.”

Such a rate is increasingly rare, and overall interest rates are likely to drop in years to come. This could prompt a change in mindset among Lebanese that have lived off the high interest.

“We are coming to normal times, not the extraordinary times of high interest and premiums, which could not last forever,” said Baz. “This could trigger a quicker development of the domestic capital markets as people will be forced to look at other alternatives. Today it is a rentier economy; if I can still get 6 to 8 percent interest, why should I understand the stock market?”

September 3, 2010 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance

Q&A with Muwaffak Bibi

by Emma Cosgrove September 3, 2010
written by Emma Cosgrove

If Muwaffak Bibi is in charge of your money, then you’re sitting on at least $25 million. The regional head of Citi Private Bank recently sat down with Executive to discuss where he would put that tidy sum and how the demands of high net-worth investor’s are evolving.

E  What kind of presence does Citi have in Beirut?

We have had a presence since the 1950s and are mostly focused on corporate banking and investment banking. We cater to governments, to banks and to large multi-nationals and large corporations. We cover private banking also and we work very closely with the branch here, but we cover it mostly from offshore centers.

E  How are high net-worth individuals (HNWIs) faring in the region?

This region in particular created a lot of excess wealth in the last 40 years as the oil boom started, and that has been reflected within the GCC but also [throughout the Middle East].

I would say that the growth in high net-worth individuals has been more significant in certain years than others. There is a new report by [Capgemini Worldwide], who consolidates all this information, and they showed a growth in 2009 of about 7 percent in high net-worth individuals in the Middle East versus in Asia, which was higher at 15 or 16 percent. So it fluctuates, but the most important thing is that the growth continues and it is sustainable because [it is tied] to oil wealth.

Our business is to be the window for investors globally. There is always excess liquidity that needs to be deployed in the international market, depending on where those opportunities are, and we would like to present ourselves as the bridge to those international opportunities.

E  Are HNWIs increasingly choosing to be single-banked as opposed to multi-banked?

Not really. Our experience with HNWIs is that the usual average is four to five banks. Some might have more, some might have less, but I really find it very unusual [for HNWIs] to have only one bank. 

E  Why so many?

To get different ideas from different thinking. Usually they would like to deal with a Swiss [bank], to deal with an American [bank], to deal with a UK bank, so it is very typical that you have four or five banks in a portfolio.

E  What sort of client base have you found in Beirut?

We have a large client base in Beirut as well as in the region. And obviously these days in Beirut there are a lot of the regional visitors coming in so we also meet a lot of our clients from the region in Beirut. People get bored on holiday and they want to think of ways to make money, so we’re there.

E  How has the relationship between the HNWIs and the banks changed in the last two years?

I would say that given the depth of the crisis which all the financial institutions have gone through, and the decline that happened in different asset classes across the world — and I stress the word “across” because everywhere there was an impact, the magnitude differed, but everywhere there was an impact –– I would say a lot of the trust between clients and financial institutions has been impacted and I think we are now in the healing phase.

There was a schism that was created in that trust. I think people are coming back to see where the blame is. Is it really the banks to be blamed or is it the system? Of course, we think it is a bigger issue than just blaming the banks — not that the banks didn’t have a role to play.

Our clients… are coming back with more demand for information. [They are] looking at banks and saying “I want to know exactly what I am investing in.” [They are looking for] maybe a little more simplicity: a lot of fixed income and lot of direct equity investments are being proposed rather than funds per se.

But, bit by bit the appetite is coming back. Given that the interest rate environment of close to zero percent does not excite people to [keep] money as cash, everyone is looking at other alternatives. But they want to know exactly what those alternatives are and to be careful about who’s behind them.

E  Are investors more interested in real assets as opposed to investment products and funds?

It depends on the client. We have seen clients buying more gold. We have seen clients being interested in real estate — that’s another important aspect if you are talking about inflationary fear, which we are not worried about immediately. But, if there are inflationary fears, real estate is a good hedge against that.

E  Where is real estate still a viable investment?

The United Kingdom is a very common area that our investors look at [for real estate], particularly central London. We’ve done many deals there. The United States is now coming up in terms of opportunity because we think that commercial real estate has come down dramatically and continues to do so as we are talking. I think we’re starting to come up with ideas as to how to capture that for investors.

E  Is it worrying that everyone seems to be turning their attention to UK real estate?

I don’t think so. There is no doubt that there has been an adjustment. If you took a property in Mayfair [an exclusive neighborhood in London] in 2006 or 2007 at the peak [of the crisis] and then looked at it in June of 2009 you probably had a 15 to 20 percent decline in value, but the surprising thing is between June 2009 and September or October, we saw the yields pick up dramatically because money started flowing in.

We think the reason our clients like London in particular is [because] it is very foreign-investor-friendly; the tax laws are very straight forward and more importantly, you have a lease structure of long-term leases of 15 and 20 years. For a lot of our investors this is like buying a bond with an underlying coupon with an appreciation in the capital value because London is limited — you don’t see cranes, you don’t see more buildings, there are a lot of building controls.

E  How do you perceive Citi’s US government bailout and what is the status of repayment?

We looked at that as something that was fortunate for us. I always say it: if we were a bank that was incorporated in Iceland, we would not be sitting together now and having this discussion. We would have disappeared.

The government stepped in and supported us with the TARP money, [along with] 10 other institutions, because that was a very, very difficult and challenging time. We are fortunate and grateful to the taxpayers for the US support we got.

I am very pleased to say that we have paid back the TARP money as of the end of December and more importantly, the government had 27 percent ownership as common stock in Citi as of April and they have designated Morgan Stanley as an independent party to sell off their shareholding.

Their entry point is $3.25. The sale continues as we talk and we expect that by the end of the year the government will have sold for profit — which is good for the taxpayers — their share in Citi. But we are very, very grateful that we got that support.

E  Do you feel that there is increasing competition in this region among banks competing for market share in private banking?

There is no doubt in my mind that during the past four or five years, even before the crisis, that a lot of institutions discovered the Middle East. And without naming institutions, without being derogatory, putting [signs] up and saying “I have opened a private bank for the Middle East” doesn’t mean you have a private bank.

Going and opening an office in the DIFC and saying “now we have Middle East representation” does not mean you are present in the Middle East. It takes a lot of years. We have had footprints for 50 years in the Middle East and it didn’t come easy. It came with a lot of work.

I’m not trying to be arrogant. I respect competition and I think it makes the best out of any institution. But, I can tell you, a lot of them are here for a very short period and they are going to disappear. It takes a lot of commitment and effort to stick around.

September 3, 2010 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

A new venture for capital

by Sami Halabi September 3, 2010
written by Sami Halabi

When it comes to political stability, you either drink the Kool-Aid or you don’t,” says Tarek Sadi, managing partner of Middle East Venture Partners (MEVP), using an American adage for wholeheartedly believing in something, as he sips a Nespresso in his office overlooking Martyr’s square. “We drank the Kool-Aid and we are investing in it,” he adds, as his partner Walid Hanna nods in agreement.

The pair and a third partner, Rani Saad, set up operations in Beirut in January when they decided it was time to brave the Lebanese venture capital (VC) market and invest in the county’s virtually nascent asset class.  

The idea was the brainchild of Hanna, who previously headed up Dubai International Capital’s Arab Business Angels Network. As the word ‘venture’ became less attractive to a market at a standstill, the imperative to move to greener and, previously, riskier pastures became all the more evident.

“It was very clear that the opportunities — what I do, and what I enjoy in venture capital — were not going to be found in the Gulf and that the real opportunity was in the Levant,” Hanna says. Hanna then convinced Sadi and Saad, who now advises the fund, to leave the ailing emirate and set sail for Lebanon.

That was a little more than a year ago. Today the company has already closed its first fund, the Middle East Venture Fund, at $10 million, and has targeted a treasure chest of $20 million. The partners are hoping to announce their first investments this month, following the approval of their investment committee.

Almost a Greenfield

The hope amongst many is that if MEVP meets its target and invests in its first company within nine months of setting up shop, the company will have set the stage for the revitalization of Lebanon’s relatively dormant VC space. Prior to MEVP entering the market, just three VC funds had operated in the country: the Berytech Fund, the Building Block Fund (BBF) and Byblos VC, Byblos Bank’s VC arm. Byblos VC never really got off the ground and no longer exists.

The BBF, which declined to comment for this article, has been inactive for over a year and recently fired its management over quarrels with its investors, leaving Berytech as the only functioning fund on the market. But even this is relatively small — Berytech Fund currently has only $6 million compared to BBF’s reported $16 million, which sits idly by, waiting to be invested. Nonetheless, the fund is in the process of closing its fourth investment, which had yet to be officially announced as Executive went to print.

Berytech Fund’s managing partner and part shareholder Sami Beydoun said he welcomed the competition that MEVP would bring to the market and does not view the company as a threat to his effective monopoly.

“It’s all about creating the ecosystem,” he says. “If you are a single jeweler on a street you are not going to get a lot of business but if others open up next to you they will spur on more activity, which is a good thing for everyone.” 

Indeed, outside of the technology sector where the Berytech Fund focuses its investments, the market for MEVP is wide open. The firm has already looked at some 40 companies and has narrowed the field down to five. If they occur, MEVP’s initial investments will range between $500,000 and $2 million for a period of three to five years and carry a management fee of 2.5 percent, as well as a target gross internal rate of return of 35 percent.

The high-risk-high-return dynamic at the firm is “the nature of the beast,” according to Maurice al-Haddad, financial analyst at MEVP.

“The growth capital that we inject comes at a very crucial point in the company’s history: the first three to five years. These companies experience their highest growth period’s year-on-year during that period so when we exit them, they are moving faster towards their peak and thus valuations are high and we get these high returns.”

Regional view

While MEVP’s investment targets may be Lebanese for the most part, the target markets of the companies they intend to invest in are not. “We look at businesses that have at least a regional, if not global, offering and Lebanon is a great test bed for that,” says Sadi.

“We wouldn’t invest in a company whose market is just Lebanon because it’s too risky,” adds Hanna.

The target market strategy is understandable considering the multiples that the firm is looking to achieve. According to Hanna, for companies to be shortlisted for possible investment, they must be expected to grow to the point where the firm gets back five to 10 times their original investment. In order to achieve this ambitious aim, the company says it is willing to allocate the resources required to take a “hands on” approach during the investment phase and help organizations structure their financial models before investing. 

“It takes much longer here to get to a point of investment than in other places because the entrepreneurs aren’t prepared and the semantics are different,” says Sadi. “We bit the bullet and we are willing to take the risk of the operation until we get our return,” he adds, while insisting that such an approach should be viewed as preferential treatment for favored investment opportunities rather than their standard modus operandi.

That notwithstanding, the firm also minimizes its risk by targeting mainly minority stakes in companies. “We invest in people primarily; so we don’t want to run or manage those companies,” adds Sadi.

MEVP insists that whatever risks it takes during the investment process, it has also taken wide ranging measures to cover its back before plunging into contracts in the murky waters of Lebanon’s infamous legal structures.

The firm’s “bulletproof” shareholder agreements, as Hanna describes them, include several clauses including the right of first refusal, a put option and preemption, and a veto on hiring senior management. For anything else that the law doesn’t cover, “we can always negotiate a shareholder agreement that makes up for all the missing parts of the law,” says Hanna.

Even though the fund has a Lebanese tinge, it took the decision to register in the Cayman Islands because “it’s a tax haven and we want to be tax efficient,” Hanna says, referring to the 10 percent capital gains tax on funds in Lebanon. That has also allowed the fund more leeway to set carried interest of 20 percent, distributed on an exit to the employees.

“Obviously a managing director gets more than others,” says Hanna without divulging the distribution of the carry over at the firm.

Feeding frenzy

Despite the added diversity MEVP may bring to the market in the long term, in the short term the firm is looking to consolidate its position by eyeing up the competition. According to Hanna, since BBF is currently in the doldrums, MEVP has launched a bid to take over management of the fund. If that occurs, it will have around $26 million between its own investors and those of BBF’s to exercise in the market — in effect quadrupling the amount of active capital in the market space.

In addition, the company is also open to syndicated investments, partnering up with other funds to make investments.

What’s more, having already closed its first $10 million, MEVP is looking to close another $10 million in the next three to six months. In order to do so, it is looking to draw on its current investor base comprised of “two of the leading five Lebanese commercial banks, three large Lebanese conglomerates, and six individuals who are mostly Lebanese with a couple of Saudis,” says Hanna. 

Both Hanna and Sadi insist that this institutional investor base is what sets them apart from the other VC funds that have operated in the Lebanese market. For instance, Hanna points to the fact that the Berytech Fund is backed by a large enterprise of several firms, which means “they do not have to cover their immediate salaries with management fees because they have the back-up.”

The Berytech Fund is indeed supported by 19 shareholders who include “prominent Lebanese banks, large national corporations, Fortune 500 multinational companies, local NGOs, a university and individuals,” according to its website.

Berytech Fund’s Moubayed, however, disagrees with Hanna and Sadi’s premise, arguing that the fund is a separate operational entity from Berytech — the large entrepreneurship, health and technology incubator which is supported by the European Union — but has a contract with the firm to manage the fund.

“The fund is an institution. It is neither more nor less ‘institutional’ [because of its investor base],” Moubayed insists.

A starry outlook

However “institutional” the firm may be, MEVP has been given a mandate to exercise between $10 and $20 million over three years, starting June 30. If the fund lives up to the promise of its potential, the Lebanese VC may finally emerge from the dark ages into an investment renaissance.

“Today the stars are aligned; the country is growing, the government is behind entrepreneurs, as are the corporates and the academics,” says Sadi.

But whether or not the hoped for renaissance occurs will largely depend on the market and if it takes to the kind of investment that VC entails. In the end, as Sadi concedes, “the more people who get involved the more real it becomes.” 

September 3, 2010 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Comment

Where to draw the line

by Nicholas Blanford September 3, 2010
written by Nicholas Blanford

Last month’s deadly border clash between Lebanese and Israeli troops raises a question about the curious manner in which the Blue Line — the term given to the United Nations boundary that follows the original 1923 border between Lebanon and Palestine — was delineated a decade ago. 

Other than the original 1923 border agreement, subsequently reconfirmed as the 1949 Armistice Line, the main source of data to define the line was the last border survey carried out by the Israel-Lebanon Mixed Armistice Commission (ILMAC) in 1949-1950. The appendices contained a list of coordinates, sketches and large-scale maps, which were used by the UN to help mark out the boundary after the Israeli withdrawal from South Lebanon in 2000. The process hit controversy when the UN agreed to a series of compromises that deviated the Blue Line away from the path of the original border to satisfy Israeli security interests.

One objection concerned a curious anomaly beside the kibbutz of Misgav Am. Long ago Israelis had pushed the border fence some 500 meters into Lebanon beside Misgav Am, and over the years the settlement had expanded onto Lebanese soil.  When it came time to delineate the Blue Line, the ILMAC map coordinates of the border provided by Lebanon cut through Misgav Am, leaving part of the kibbutz inside Lebanon. But ILMAC’s written description of the boundary recorded that it should run “to the west” of Misgav Am. In 1950, the written description may well have corresponded to the coordinates. But in 2000, the border identified by the ILMAC report had inched deeper into Lebanon, matching the creeping westward expansion of the kibbutz. The UN opted for the written description over the coordinates (thus sparing the evacuation of a few houses in Misgav Am) even though it clearly deviated the Blue Line away from the international boundary.

Another disputed area was a four-kilometer stretch of the border southeast of Metullah to the Hasbani River. The UN placed the Blue Line 100 meters north of the 1923 border. They appeared to have misread the 1923 boundary agreement, a point the cartographic team leader acknowledged to me in an interview in July 2000. The result, however, was that Israel was not required to pull back another 100 meters along this stretch of the frontier, allowing it to keep intact a military outpost and spare Israeli farmers from losing some apple trees.

More significantly, minor deviations spared the Israelis from having to pull back their forward outposts on the mountain peaks of the Shebaa Farms. If the Blue Line had followed the Lebanon-Syria border in this area, it would have shaved off the northern edges of three Israeli outposts, requiring the Israelis to dismantle the positions. Instead, the Blue Line loops around each IDF compound by a few dozen meters. The most bizarre deviation is at Addaisseh, the scene of the August 3 border clash. Here, the line runs for a few hundred meters just north of the main border road inside Lebanon, along which runs the fence. In other words, when Lebanese motorists drive between the villages of Addaisseh and Kfar Kila, for a part of their journey they are actually driving on the Israeli side of the Blue Line. The UN had blindly followed the ILMAC coordinates at this spot even though it was contrary to the description of the 1923 boundary, which states that the border runs on the southern side of the road. It seems, however, to have been a genuine mistake. One cartographer who worked on the Blue Line delineation blamed the anomaly on the short amount of time available to draw up the line, the inability to survey the ground (it was still under Israeli occupation at the time) and the relatively small (1:50,000) scale of the Blue Line base map.

As for the Addaisseh incident, the initial question in the wake of the deadly firefight which left two Lebanese soldiers, a Lebanese journalist and an Israeli officer dead was on which side of the Blue Line lay the tree that the Israeli soldiers wanted to prune. The UN confirmed that the tree was on the Israeli side. But what no one has mentioned publicly, either through ignorance or discretion, is that even the Lebanese soldiers shooting at the Israelis were on the Israeli side of the Blue Line, thanks to the idiosyncrasies of the delineation process 10 years earlier.

NICHOLAS BLANFORD is the Beirut-based correspondent for The Christian Science Monitor and The Times of London

September 3, 2010 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Comment

What lies beneath

by Paul Cochrane September 3, 2010
written by Paul Cochrane

The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is fortunate to be able to tap the majority of its oil onshore and in shallow coastal waters. That’s meant a minimal need for deepwater drilling and its associated risks, exemplified by the disastrous BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico that saw some five million barrels of crude spew out of the Macondo well over the course of three months.

But with oil fields maturing in North Africa, oil companies are exploring for black gold at ever-deeper depths in the Mediterranean Sea. In Libya, for example, the colossal Gulf of Sirte basin extends to depths 2,000 meters below sea level — that’s some 500 meters deeper than the Macondo well. Deepwater drilling is already underway in the territorial waters of Tunisia, Libya and Egypt.

Yet it was only when the tarnished British oil company BP announced in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico spill that it is to start exploration off the Libyan coast that Mediterranean states and environmental groups took note of the potential dangers, calling for a moratorium on deepwater drilling. Italy has been the most vocal in calling for a unified strategy for the Mediterranean, what with the Sirte basin only some 500 kilometers from its territory. The Italian foreign minister suggested deepwater drilling should be referred to the Union for the Mediterranean, but this body of European Union and littoral states has essentially been a white elephant thus far, initially beset by problems within the EU and stymied by the Israeli-Arab conflict. The need for a common front on deepwater drilling is a pressing one. An oil spill in the Mediterranean would be a disaster on par if not more calamitous than in the Gulf of Mexico, given the size of the sea and the 21 countries it borders. As the recent BP spill has shown, oil companies and governments are not prepared for when accidents occur.

Libya, according to the United Nations, does not yet have a national contingency plan for an oil spill, while Italian budget cuts have hampered the country’s response effectiveness. The rest of the Med is equally ill-equipped to cope with a major oil spill. With so many countries involved a unified front is unlikely, but pressure could be brought to bear on oil companies with deepwater drilling operations to hold off until the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico has been fully investigated, as the United States and Norway have done. Indeed, BP appears to have caved to pressure, delaying the launch of deepwater operations in Libya.

But deepwater drilling is also in the cards for the Red Sea, and over in the Persian Gulf more than 1,600 offshore wells — albeit in much shallower waters — have been drilled in the past decade, according to Energyfiles. A consolidated stance on offshore drilling for the whole MENA region is clearly needed, which could be spearheaded by the Arab League and then developed in coordination with the EU and other neighbors.

While many want deepwater drilling banned outright, as long as the planet relies on oil-powered economies, we arguably have little choice but to take the oil wherever it may be found. Indeed, over the past 15 years, deepwater drilling has sourced some 60 billion barrels of oil, according to Deutsche Bank, and will account for 10 percent of global oil production between 2008 and 2015. 

Deepwater drilling should be viewed in light of the pros and cons. Sure, income is generated, but an oil spill would cost billions to clean up and have untold costs on the fishing industry and the Mediterranean’s top earner, tourism. Ten percent of global oil production coming from deepwater drilling is significant, but alternative energies could offset this, such as the solar power projects underway in Morocco.

Countries embarking on offshore drilling, particularly in deep waters, need to weigh up these upsides and downsides. In any event, energy producing states and oil companies should set up a multi-billion dollar contingency fund for any potential spill in the MENA region. With so much money being made off energy, protecting the environment should be considered an operational cost.  This makes even more sense when you consider that demands on MENA oil production are set to increase to offset lost output in the oil-drenched Gulf of Mexico.

PAUL COCHRANE is the Middle East correspondent for International News Services

September 3, 2010 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 407
  • 408
  • 409
  • 410
  • 411
  • …
  • 686

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    Executive Magazine
    • ISSUES
      • Current Issue
      • Past issues
    • BUSINESS
    • ECONOMICS & POLICY
    • OPINION
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • EXECUTIVE TALKS
    • MOVEMENTS
      • Change the image
      • Cannes lions
      • Transparency & accountability
      • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
      • Say No to Corruption
      • The Lebanon media development initiative
      • LPSN Policy Asks
      • Advocating the preservation of deposits
    • JOIN US
      • Join our movement
      • Attend our events
      • Receive updates
      • Connect with us
    • DONATE