• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
Levant

Fields of fallow

by Executive Staff April 9, 2009
written by Executive Staff

The Lebanese agricultural sector has been crippled by the lack of funds available to farmers and the scant attention given to training and education as urbanization increases. Neglect of this sector has proven to be an obstacle to the improvement of the social and economic betterment of many people living below the poverty line. Moreover, liberalization policies that are not backed by training schemes have actually worsened the status of farmers.

Farming in context

In 1995, the agricultural sector contributed to 12.4 percent of Lebanon’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which dropped significantly to 5.2 percent by 2008. Being able to claim self-sufficiency only in poultry production, Lebanon depends greatly on foreign aid and exports. It is no coincidence that the highest levels of poverty in Lebanon are in the same areas as those with the highest levels of agricultural production. These areas include North Lebanon, the Bekaa Valley and South Lebanon. Moreover, Lebanon has a high income inequality. Increased agricultural efficiency would enhance equity and minimize income disparities.

This concern needs to be taken into consideration given the efforts the Lebanese government is putting into entering the global economy and liberalizing its trade. Attempts to enter the World Trade Organization (WTO) and several other signed agreements will lead to the removal of trade barriers to imports. Behind this liberalization lays a threat to unsubsidized Lebanese farmers, who will have to carry the burden of low prices in order to compete with the products flowing out of countries where farmers are subsidized. Currency exchange rates represent a further burden. All of this indicates that a significant increase in agricultural productivity is needed; especially since Lebanon imports more agricultural goods than it exports.

Lack of capacity within the Ministry of Agriculture and increased urbanization are also blocking the growth of agricultural production. However, low export rates are mainly attributed to the low quality of products, which does not meet the standards of foreign importing countries. Although Europe is the prime destination for Lebanese exports, the producers are unable to meet the high quality standards European countries set due to high costs of production, inefficient institutional quality control or lack of knowledge and training. Moreover, Lebanon has lagged behind in the realm of technological development due to the various political disturbances and the marginalization of the agricultural sector within the successive governmental economic policies.

It is odd that these setbacks exist as Lebanon has the highest proportion of cultivable land in the Arab world, at almost 25 percent. Mismanagement comprises a great obstacle to growth. Farms tend to be small in size and there is very little attention given to the field. About 66 percent of farmers have second, nonagricultural jobs. Moreover, lack of cooperation and collaboration between farmers reduces efficiency.

Lebanon has high potential in the field of organic farming, however, the same obstacles stand in the way. Essentially, there is lack of knowledge and confusion over the definition of organic food, allowing people to confuse locally produced products with organic ones. Training local farmers to become organic growers will be a great challenge. Hence, it is essential that three aspects of the agricultural field be enhanced in order to improve the sector. These are human capital, information systems and financial support.

Policies to grow the agriculture sector

The Ministry of Agriculture can play a large role in enhancing the productivity, marketability, and efficiency of the agricultural sector in Lebanon. Primarily, it must conduct market-based research to identify the most convenient export countries for  Lebanese products. In addition, it must learn the standards and requirements relevant to each country. Accordingly, the farmers must be advised to specialize in the products that have a comparative advantage in the global market place. A shift to value-added products — in addition to sufficient training in the fields of manufacturing, product differentiation, quality control, health and safety — will surely improve the agricultural sector’s overall wellbeing.

Contributed by the Youth Economic Forum

April 9, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Tanking up with tax

by Executive Staff April 9, 2009
written by Executive Staff

At a time when oil prices are half of what they were a year ago, the retail price of gasoline in Lebanon has been stagnant or climbing. For example, in July 2007 when the price of Brent crude was around $78 per barrel, the government raised taxes on gasoline which pushed the price from $14.90 per 20 liters — the standard measurement for gasoline in Lebanon — to $15.64 per 20 liters. This is roughly the same price of gasoline in today’s retail market, at a time when crude sells at around $50 per barrel. Needless to say, this illogical development is confusing for the consumer.

In 1985, then Minister of Finance Camille Chamoun issued a governmental decree abolishing state subsidies on gasoline; so legally the subsidy was removed. However, the government has levied a tax on gasoline, which it increases or decreases at will. When the government decreases the tax, gasoline prices drop giving the feel of a subsidy.

Further exacerbating the situation is that most people in Lebanon rely on private transport. Lebanon’s approximately 1.4 million registered vehicles consume around five million liters of gasoline per day, according to Bahij Abou Hamzeh, president of the Association of Petroleum Importing Companies (APIC) in Lebanon.

Another factor experts in Lebanon point to is unfair competition. “There is an oligopoly controlling gasoline imports to Lebanon and this is the heart of the problem,” says Jad Chaaban, professor of economics at the American University of Beirut and acting president of the Lebanese Economic Association. “The prices are set by the Ministry of Energy in consultation with the APIC. When you have an oligopoly controlling an import sector you cannot pass on decreasing or rising prices with the same efficiency as when you have a competitive market.”

Collusion in a free market

For his part, Abou Hamzeh admits that the association does collude with the Lebanese Ministry of Energy, but insists that the market is open to anyone who has the means to set up the infrastructure.

“We regulate the market in cooperation with the ministry but we have to do it because it’s the only product in Lebanon that has a ceiling for the price,” claims Abou Hamzeh. “The government is setting the ceiling of the price on a weekly basis. This doesn’t mean we cooperate in order to monopolize the market; it’s not what we are after.”

Abou Hamzeh blames the government who earlier this year raised the level of taxes on gasoline to $6.35 per 20 liters of imported gasoline when the price of oil was at around $35 per barrel. Abou Hamzeh adds that the gasoline price ceiling, set weekly, is too low. “The government imposes a ceiling according to the international prices and a small margin to cover additional costs,” says Abou Hamzeh. “This margin does not cover our costs. We cannot continue like this; we are making a loss not a profit.”

Whether or not competition is fair, one thing does remains clear: that the government is making a lot of money. Most estimates are that government revenues from gas tax will increase this year to around $466 million as opposed to $199 million in 2008. On March 19, the Lebanese General Confederation of Labor Unions gathered in front of the Lebanese parliament to protest the high prices and taxes on gasoline and around 150 cars blocked one of Beirut’s main commercial districts.

Tax of necessity

The government, however, seems to have little choice when it comes to removing the tax, since it is already drowning in a sea of debt and in need of more revenue. Furthermore, according to a high ranking member at the Ministry of Finance who spoke on condition of anonymity, the government must keep the higher gasoline tax in place because it has already reneged on two of its other promises made to donors at Paris III: the five to seven percent taxation on bank deposits and the increase of Value Added Tax (VAT). The cherry on top may be that many in the government are reluctant to enact policy due to the upcoming elections in early June.

“When we protest the government tells you, ‘you are right but now we have to have the election’,” says Abou Hamzeh.

Whatever the reasons may be, for the immediate future it seems that the high gasoline prices and price fixing will continue. Once again it seems it will be Lebanon’s people and industries that pay the final price.

April 9, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Cityscape 2009

by Executive Staff April 9, 2009
written by Executive Staff

As April begins, so does the countdown for Abu Dhabi Cityscape 2009. Just a few weeks separate Abu Dhabi’s real estate developers, investors and market players from the capital’s most prestigious property show. Usually, Cityscape is where developers launch their multi-billion dollar projects such as high-rise towers, mixed-use developments and even entire new cities. This year, however, the definition has changed. Instead of bragging about their new projects, developers have to prove their resilience in the face of current market conditions. Experts will also have to demonstrate their understanding of the current situation and prove Abu Dhabi’s strong position. On the other hand, investors and end-users will be watching to see whether Abu Dhabi still represents a good opportunity for investment.

Cityscape Abu Dhabi will take place in the Abu Dhabi National Exhibition Center April 19 to 23 and will include a series of conferences and summits, during which 101 key speakers will be discussing the most important challenges and issues facing the property market. Moreover, three post-conference workshops will take place on the last day of Cityscape. In the first workshop, Louise Sunshine, chairwoman and CEO of Domineum will be tackling the global property solution in the current challenging economy. In the second, Oscar Marquez, a real estate master trainer at the Leader’s Edge Training will be discussing new marketing strategies. The third conference will be lead by Matthia Gelber, who will confer about how companies can become green and make money out of it. Additionally, Middle East Real Estate Awards will be held on April 19 at the Emirates Palace in the presence of 500 industry leaders, where distinctive projects that combine architectural excellence with eco-friendly solutions will be awarded.

The optimistic view

Marquez, who remains very optimistic about the real estate market in the Middle East, says that Cityscape will give people a lot of hope.

“People think that this is the end of the world, while it is not. Many investors will become aware [during Cityscape] of the big opportunities that are right now in real estate,” he explains. Moreover, Marquez also thinks that at Cityscape, developers will make up their mind on how much prices have to be reduced in order to keep the economy moving forward. “It is just a matter of time before [developers] realize that they can’t make 100 percent profit,” he adds. 

Other experts agree with Marquez, while saying that this year, the number of transactions that are going to take place will be minimal. Indeed, now more than ever investors are cautious about their investment decisions. They will likely consider Cityscape as a means to see how developers are progressing on their previously launched projects as well as the prices and payment plans that they are going to present.

Hussain Ali Al Shamkhani, chief investment officer at Escan Real Estate PJSC, says that Cityscape 2009 represents an opportunity for developers to show that they are still in the market and still going ahead. He explains that “developers should show the benefit of the demand-supply gap [in Abu Dhabi] and show people that instead of speculating, they can buy units and rent them out and make seven to eight percent return. [Developers] should sell that as the main benefit of buying a unit.”

Shamkhani also adds, “they need to emphasize and explain the potential of Abu Dhabi, how it is very different from Dubai and why it is much safer and more profitable. I think this should be the theme for the show and this is the best message to get across.”

IIR Middle East, the organizers of the event, introduced the first Cityscape Connect breakfast recently, where 150 real estate and property stakeholders met to increase confidence in Cityscape and the market in general. At the breakfast, Sami Eid, Aldar’s senior marketing manager, said “it’s one of the biggest events and we’ll be showcasing ourselves and showcasing Abu Dhabi… We won’t be unveiling anything new but it’s important to be out there and we’ll be showing all our projects.”

This statement is likely to apply to all developers who are considering Cityscape a chance to prove themselves as well positioned to face the current turmoil. Since early February, 95 percent of the exhibition stands were booked, Cityscape organizers asserted. They added that 40 percent more floor space has been sold than last year. Moreover, attendance is expected to increase up to 27 percent from 35,000 during Cityscape 2008.

Real estate stakeholders are looking forward to this year’s show, waiting to see what Abu Dhabi has to offer. Consequently, Cityscape 2009 has a hard task to meet, since it will have to prove that Abu Dhabi is still, despite the current market turbulence, one of the most attractive destinations for investment in the Middle East.

April 9, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Private equity – Stacks of dry powder

by Executive Staff April 9, 2009
written by Executive Staff

Big or small, PE firms in the Middle East are faring much better than most other financial institutions in the region, despite the amount of “dry powder” — i.e. capital called or committed that is yet to be deployed — in the area. Nevertheless, sitting on a mountain of cash and not spending it because you don’t like what you see is more enviable then struggling to pay off your creditors.

The phenomenon of dry powder is not just an effect of the financial crisis and the ensuing downturn, which started to take effect in the last quarter of 2008. Investments by PE firms began to make an about-face around the beginning of 2008. PE investments over the whole of 2008 saw a significant decrease in both number and size year-on-year by 22 and 31 percent respectively, the principle reason for this being that private valuations still seem to be out of touch with public market perceptions.

“At the moment, valuations are generally too high so PE firms are saying ‘give us another six to nine months for them to fall,’” says Robert Hall, head of transaction services Middle East & South Asia at KPMG.

Hisham El Khazindar, managing director and co-founder of Citadel Capital, adds that “in the grand scheme of things valuations across the board are 70 percent of what they were two years ago.”

When the region’s PE firms will start to sprinkle their powder around will, for the most part, depend on how long it will take owners’ willingness to break away from their egos and admit that they are in trouble.

“A contraction is taking place, but certainly we are not seeing the valuations that are in the public sector. We are not in a situation where we see distressed shareholders who are willing to sell at any price,” Christophe de Mahieu, co-head at Gulf Growth Capital at Investcorp, said to The National.

Yahya Jalil, senior executive officer and head of private equity at The National Investor in Dubai, remarks that, “it’s a little bit of an ego thing to admit that things have gone bad; this region is not known for being forthcoming as people like to contain their problems.”

Overcoming egos aside, many shareholders and owners don’t see the point of going into the market.

“People who have been in the market for 20 to 25 years see the blip in the market as very temporary, so they are thinking: why should they off a portion of their equity at these valuations,” says Jalil.

Ammar Al-Khudairy, managing director and CEO of Amwal Al Khaleej Investment Co., says “one private consumer goods company said to me, ‘I brought in one of the big four, they did a valuation for me and said my company was worth $100 million back in August [2008] and nothing has changed since. I sell no less if not more and, in fact, my cost of raw material has come down. So why should I sell for less than 100?’”

The stalemate that is brewing between firms and investors doesn’t seem to be going away anytime soon and it remains to be seen if the same understanding with regards to delaying capital calls will be extended to the firms for much longer.

Stressed out

The possibility of distressed or mezzanine funds is something that many in the industry are starting to look at as a result of the trauma being suffered by many regional organizations. Significantly, the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) wants the Dubai International Financial Center (DIFC) to consider establishing the Gulf’s first private equity secondary market. This could provide a respite for many PE firms looking to rid themselves of their dry powder.

“The whole issue of distressed assets in this region hasn’t been fully experienced in previous recessions. If you look at what the ‘ultimate’ distress is, which is a company becoming insolvent and unable to pay debts as they become due, then you really haven’t seen much of that yet,” says Hall. “In the recession this time around, the economy is much bigger and there are undoubtedly going to be some companies that will have significant problems. For PE firms this will provide some great opportunities.”

However, for the time being things don’t look that bad and the omnipresent attitude in the region today is not one of going after high risk and high return opportunities.

“Mezzanine capital is definitely more expensive than traditional forms of capital and it works well when valuations are improving and in upward cycle,” says Tamer Bazzari, deputy CEO of Rasmala.

Jalil says, “in the long term mezzanine is a huge unmet need in the region, but for the next year or two I think that, relatively speaking, it is not going to be interesting for investors — the risk profile between mezzanine and secured is night and day.”

April 9, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Quick & lean

by Executive Staff April 9, 2009
written by Executive Staff

With the financial crisis at hand the question is: what are businesses going to do about it? The response many businesses in the region have is to look inwards and improve internal business processes in order to hold down the fort until the onslaught subsides. The next and perhaps more important question is: how will regional businesses restructure their organizations?

Despite the dismal undertone of the business news coming out of the region, there are a few encouraging signs. One sector that is doing surprisingly well as a result of the need for businesses to restructure and improve efficiency is the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) industry. According to the International Data Corporation (IDC), ERP growth within the GCC will range between nine and 12 percent, an enormous figure considering many regional states will not grow at all this year.

“We will probably have the best month we have ever had this month,” says Bill Tomlinson, general manager of Dynamic Vertical Solutions, a multinational Microsoft partner that specializes in vertical add-on solutions to Microsoft Dynamics ERP platforms.

Much of this anomalous growth results from owners and managers  realizing that ERPs can increase efficiency for them.

“Before the crisis there was more time and more money,” says Sergio Maccotta, managing director of SAP Middle East and North Africa. “Now companies are taking the opportunity to change, through IT adoption, in order to improve their internal processes.”

The industry itself is also experiencing a paradigm shift in relation to its operating environment. Before the crisis, many regional businesses were hesitant to adopt standard ERP processes, opting instead to fit the system to their businesses or not to adopt one at all. Today, however, the tables have turned.

“What we are seeing that we didn’t see before is that many of the upper to mid-market organizations are coming to us, while we used to go to them and try to prove our solutions,” says Tamer Elhamy, regional business solutions manager at Microsoft Gulf.

What’s on offer?

The ERP companies in the region are increasingly being queried about how their systems can help companies save on the more costly elements of doing business and keep in touch with their customer base.

“People want to manage their [human] resources a lot better now so they are looking for payroll and HR solutions more than ever,” explains Tomlinson. Maccotta adds that, “the money in the market is lower, so in order to secure your portion you have to execute better and stay closer to your customer.”

It should be noted that internally, ERP solution providers are also benefiting from some of the more sinister effects of the global downturn, such as rising unemployment, decreasing real estate valuations and weakening currencies. Although there has been “no drastic change,” according to Maccotta, in the resource pool for providers, there has been a decrease in the acquisition and retention costs of consultants for providers. “The [Indian] rupee rate is at 51 to the dollar, whereas it used to be 39 to the dollar and that cuts 25 percent of cost because I am on dollar fixed,” says Tomlinson. “Another benefit of the crash is that all the rents are down by about half, so if you want to bring in some big people for a project then you can do it cheaper and it’s making our job easier.”

The argument within the industry, however, is centered around the size of the solutions on offer.

“Many of the customers are deciding to adopt an ERP to increase their efficiency but they are trying to start with the minimum number of users and functionalities and taking a step-by-step approach,” says Elhamy. That approach is prompting many people in the industry to predict that smaller and less expensive ERP solutions will be the trendsetters in the future.

“In the global scheme of things, SAP and Oracle’s figures are down because they are too expensive. People are more cash conscience now and are actually exposing the product for what it is,” claims Tomlinson. Perhaps unsurprisingly, that assertion is being bitterly contested by the larger and more complex solution providers.

“I don’t agree when you say we are more expensive because our solution is extremely flexible, as well as scalable, and can fit any kind of business,” counters Maccotta. “We still see a lot of demand and having the vertical competence is putting SAP at a competitive advantage.”

“In order to secure your portion you have to execute better and stay closer to your customer”

April 9, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Much tilling without harvest

by Executive Staff April 9, 2009
written by Executive Staff

Last year food was big news as prices soared globally by 54.9 percent and associated riots erupted in 60 countries. In the Arab world alone the shortage in food sufficiency was estimated at $18 billion by the Arab Authority for Agricultural Investment and Development (AAAID). In the Gulf countries, dependent to the tune of $12 billion a year on imports and with agricultural water consumption at unsustainable levels, the issue took on grave importance. State and private investors promptly started eyeing up arable land in Africa and Asia to secure food for a region that is expected to increase import dependency to 60 percent by 2010, according to the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).

But while food prices and commodities have reduced in the wake of lower oil prices and the global financial crisis, the issue of food security has not gone away. However, it has yet to be seen whether all the touted agribusiness projects will take off as Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) and private investors tighten their belts in the face of the global economic slowdown.

The big issues

The Arab world’s population ballooned 121.9 percent between 1975-2005, while over a similar period, 1980-2004, the region’s food grain and meat production increased by 93 percent.

The shortfall was not overly concerning given access to the free market and that staples such as wheat and rice were fair cheap, at least affordable enough for governments to subsidize. Additionally, countries such as Saudi Arabia, Syria and Iraq were involved in large-scale agricultural projects to boost domestic production.

Saudi Arabia, for instance, spent a staggering $85 billion on agricultural development between 1984-2000, according to estimates by Elie Elhadj in The Middle East Review of International Affairs.

But the cost of such investment has gone beyond budgetary concerns. It is worth noting that while Saudi Arabia was paying up to $500 per ton for domestically produced wheat — when international market rates were around $120 —  to maintain local agriculture some 300 billion cubic meters of water was used between 1980-1999, two-thirds of it non-renewable, says the Ministry of Agriculture and Water. Such a gigantic amount of water was needed to grow produce in the kingdom’s arid climate, which is two to three times more water than required in a temperate climate.

After investing an estimated $16 billion to $18.7 billion over the last 30 years on its wheat program, according to BMI, last year Riyadh decided to phase out production due to water shortages. The costs versus the benefits were no longer sustainable, having been self-sufficient in wheat since the 1980s when production hit 4 million tons per year, Saudi Arabia is now a net importer and as of 2016 it will be totally dependent on imports. Furthermore, with Saudi Arabia joining the WTO, the kingdom has to abide by the organization’s requirement to reduce state support for agriculture to 13.3 percent over the next decade. This will have other knock on effects, such as on the 12 percent of the workforce involved in a sector that accounts for just 3.3 percent of GDP.

The region is losing an estimated one million hectares of arable land each year to salinity

Saudi Arabia is not the only country re-thinking its agriculture policies, with the region losing an estimated one million hectares of arable land each year to salinity, according to Dr. Shoaib Ismail, a halophyte agronomist at the International Center for Biosaline Research (ICBR) in Dubai.

“Twenty years ago there was good quality water everywhere. Now there is one-third seawater concentration in the groundwater and salinity is even higher in other places. Mismanagement has led to more salinity,” said Ismail. “Some 85 percent of water usage in the GCC is for agriculture, the highest in the world. In that sense, the question arises, how feasible is agriculture over here?”

The short answer is that it isn’t. Even producing processed foodstuffs for domestic consumption and export requires water, what has been called the “export of virtual water” and it may have to be re-thought given looming water constraints.

One solution is to use halophytes, plants that grow under high saline conditions, as opposed to glycophytes, non-salt loving plants, an alternative with which the ICBR is involved. But while halophytes could be used to replace more water intensive plants and trees, those plants would not produce adequate amounts of food. It is in landscaping, which accounts for 18 percent of water use in the UAE, that plants and non-conventional grasses can be advantageous, according to Ismail.

Oman is developing a salinity plan and it has invested in a project to clean water from the oil industry, because for every barrel of oil pumped out of the ground seven barrels of water are used. The UAE has also developed a ‘Master Development Plan’ to assess water usage and improve efficiency, such as changing irrigation systems, phasing out subsidies and expanding water pricing to include agriculture and industry.

Desalinization is another touted panacea for the region’s water concerns, but costing between $0.81-$1 per cubic meter, desalinized water is too expensive for agricultural use.

“Building new desalination plants is not the solution, as this warms up the sea and affects marine life,” said Ismail. It also increases the sea’s salinity.

Rich countries trying to secure land overseas risk creating a ‘Neo-Colonial’ System

Eyeing pastures new

With wheat prices rising 83 percent last year and other staples doubling in price, governments started eating into their reserves to placate populations which were spending ever-larger proportions of their income on food.

In Pakistan, the NGO Oxfam reported that, due to food inflation, the number of poor has risen from 60 million to 77 million since 2007, while in the Arab world the AAAID predicted some 35 million people were falling into poverty due to high food costs. As the region has an overwhelmingly young population and high population growth, food security is paramount.

For the GCC, the surge in food prices didn’t push people under the poverty line, but it was a contributor to inflationary pressures. And with the population expected to double by 2038 to 60 million people, demand for food will continue to grow at a rapid pace. Saudi Arabia, the Gulf’s most populated country, already imports some $5 billion per year of food and beverage items, according to BMI, and that will figure will spike in years to come.

“Food security is officially defined not just as a shortage, but also looking at availability and affordability,” said George Attala, a principal at Booz Allen Hamilton. “There are a number of ways to ensure supply is always available. One is try and diversify sources, not all wheat from say, Ukraine. Another is look at internal networks, such as imports through more than one port. A third way is storage capacity, of four to six months, while the fourth is to get into contract farming, but that is not always the best solution.”

Essentially, the Middle East is left with two choices. “The region has to import. The question is, invest abroad or rely on the free market?” said Dr Eckart Woertz, program manager in economics at the Gulf Research Center in Dubai.

Last year, Arab states appeared to be opting for the first choice in the face of high food prices, with government missions from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Egypt and Libya visiting Pakistan, Ethiopia, Cambodia, Uganda, Angola, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Thailand and the Philippines to discuss the possibilities of buying up arable land to cultivate. The private sector also got in on the act, with the likes of the Emirates Investment Group, Abraaj Capital, Al Qudra Holding and the Bin Laden Group reportedly acquiring land in Sudan and Pakistan.

But such policies are not always popular and they are also not necessarily dependable in the long run.

“For the GCC it is a ‘pros and cons’ situation. In the short term it is profitable to buy or lease land, but it also depends on the geopolitical situation. A country may be a friend today, but might not be tomorrow, so it is a dependency issue,” said Ismail.

Last year, the FAO warned that rich countries trying to secure land overseas risked creating a “neo-colonial” system. The concerns were related to Gulf investments in Sudan where only indigenous water and land were used, whereas fertilizer, seeds, equipment and labor came from abroad. It was a similar story in Pakistan.

As Woertz remarked, “the negative case is bribe an African official, then expel locals and pastoralists, so no benefit for the local population at all. There is political baggage.” Furthermore, he added, “the GCC doesn’t have a good track record of labor rights or the environment and these need to be taken into consideration.”

And while the countries being courted may be interested in foreign investment, they also have to feed their own populations. Sudan, for instance, has an estimated 200 million acres of fertile land, yet only 20 percent is being utilized. However, despite 160 million acres of available arable land, the country is importing two millions tons of wheat per year and five million people are dependent on food aid. Similarly, Pakistan is facing problems in feeding its population, as well as losing groundwater to salinity.

But although there are many reports on plans to buy land, there has been minimal information coming forth about these projects, with “transparency limited to media accounts,” said Woertz. “They announce it — billion dollar deals — but it is unclear whether it has taken off and how the private sector has been brought in.”

An additional factor is that discussions to acquire land overseas were began when oil and food prices were higher. “The urgency is not there now and there is less money to throw around,” said Woertz. “The SWFs lost money in the markets and have less revenues, so [acquiring land abroad] may not be such a widespread phenomenon as made out.”

April 9, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
GCC

Park sales to pump service

by Executive Staff April 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

The UAE automobile sector saw sales plunge by up to 45 percent in the first two months of the year compared to 2008, a remarkable downturn from the years of double-digit growth when the $3.6 billion sector was one of the fastest growing in the world.

“The end of the third quarter 2008 was vastly different from the fourth for manufacturers,” said Mike Devereux, president of GM Middle East. “This year we are looking at a decrease overall, with the same daily sales rates since December to now.”

But while the economic slowdown has started to bite, the sector is not sitting on the sidelines until a recovery starts. It has resorted to a change in financing strategy and a greater focus on services to shift units as access to credit tightens and consumer preferences change.

“The financial crisis has certainly affected automotive sales in the UAE, with banks applying more restrictions on financing. And since nearly 80 percent of the UAE’s automotive sales are dependent on financing, this is more evident locally,” said Waldo Galan, managing director of Ford Middle East. Ford, Lincoln and Mercury sales grew 35 percent last year.

As a result of tighter lending, manufacturers and dealers are teaming up with banks to offer zero percent interest on car purchases and making credit more readily available to customers. The most notable change in sales strategy has been the widespread introduction of leasing, a technique dealers had formerly eschewed as car prices were low and customers preferred to buy.

“Financing is a problem so schemes have to be more tactically focused. Screaming the price from the rooftops is not what it’s about, but customer issues. The change is more tactical and less general as there is too much on people’s minds,” Devereux pointed out, adding that: “Lots of people want vehicles but need financing, so we’re focusing on a partnership with the National Commercial Bank (NCB) in Saudi Arabia and in the UAE a car leasing scheme.”

In with the new but not out with old

While enticing customers into showrooms is one concern for the manufacturers, so is keeping dealerships afloat, having ordered vehicles months in advance that can now not be sold or re-exported elsewhere. This has been further compounded by 2009’s models now being on sale, yet there is excess stock of last year’s lines.

“Credit, wholesale finance and bank loans are difficult for dealers. Stock levels for dealers mean reduced working capital so less money in the inventory,” said Devereux. “We will winnow down our inventory and import much less cars.”

And while there is an excess of unsold cars, manufacturers are hesitant to offload vehicles in fleet deals and government tenders.

“We’re trying not to chase unprofitable fleet tenders that we would have done before, as there is little to no margin,” said Devereux. “We are now focusing on the retail business, with 65 percent retail and 35 percent fleet.”

Consumer preferences are also expected to shift towards more competitive fuel efficiency, fewer SUVs and more crossovers.

“While demand for luxury vehicles would possibly see a reduction, quality and value would still remain on top of the consumer’s list,” said Galan. “We believe that consumers will act more out of a rational mindset and look for quality and value for money rather than the emotional drive.”

After sales is a another area manufacturers and dealers are focusing on as sales stagnate — a sector valued in the Middle East at some $11 billion, while the UAE tire trade is valued at $1.1 billion and slated to grow this year.

“There is a big focus now on services, which will be a stable haven in a downturn. Most dealers here are under invested in service capacity and the number of vehicles has increased so quickly,” said Devereux. “There is a need to invest in new services as vehicles are coming into prime servicing years after 2-3 years since purchase.”

While manufacturers continue to monitor the local environment, they are optimistic that revenues will go up next year as supply and demand align, even though it might not be the double-digit figures of the boom years.

“There is a big focus now on services, which will be a stable haven in a downturn”

April 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance

Global economic crisis – A six-month tally of woe

by Executive Staff April 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

In October 2008, Alan Greenspan, the 1987 to 2006 chairman of the US Federal Reserve, testified before congressional leaders in Washington saying “I was shocked when the system broke down, my ideology and model that I always believed in proved me wrong.” He hastened to add that, “the crisis will pass” and that the then proposed $700 billion rescue package “is adequate to serve the needs.” In December 2008, he went on to say that “the global stock market value wiped out this year is $30 trillion, but human nature being what it is, we can count on a market reversal within six months to a year.”

Six months into the crisis, economic reality defies Mr. Greenspan’s assessments and predictions. The lost value in stocks has reached $50 trillion — nearly double his estimate and almost as much as last year’s world global output that is estimated to be $55 trillion.
In the meantime, the initial US rescue package was augmented by one trillion dollars this February, making the current US operation to save its economy more than 10 times bigger in real terms than the Marshall Plan of the late 1940s, which helped the European continent recover from a devastating war by increasing industrial production by 35 percent and restoring agricultural production to its pre-war levels in just four years.

A crisis like no other
This time it may take longer than four years for the world economy to get back to what it was before the crisis, as expectations for recovery are deteriorating by the day. Last November, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicted a slow down of the global output growth rate to two percent in 2009, from an average annual growth of five percent in the preceding years. In January, it revised this estimate to “possibly negative.” In economics, it is customary to qualify pessimistic expectations. Last December, the World Bank forecast a positive global growth of one percent, but in March that was revised to negative growth of possibly “up to two percent.” The Bank also expects that as a result of the crisis, global poverty will increase by 100 million, while the International Labor Organization foresees an increase in global unemployment by 50 million.
The ideology that Mr. Greenspan referred to is by now well known. It was practiced in its purest form, especially by the US and the UK. Since 1979, the year President Ronald Reagan was elected in the US and Margaret Thatcher in the UK. It was based on three pillars:
First, too much faith in unregulated markets — and there is a fundamental difference between ‘free markets’ and ‘markets’. Second, too much reliance on interest rates alone to manage the whole economy — at the expense of sensible fiscal policy, especially in the area of social services. Third, too much of a belief that central banks can and should avoid recessions happening on the watch of the government of the day — in defiance of the expected independence of central banks. This led to excessive leverage (debt creation) by financial institutions and unrealistic borrowing by households for housing (mortgages) and current consumption (read: credit cards).
Of course, elected politicians in democracies cannot have it their way unless the electorate is on their side. Both the UK and US have unquestionable democratic processes and educated voters in democracies tend to follow — with spasmodic deviations — what they believe is best for their own interests. The rhetoric that followed the so-called ‘neoconservative’ ideological revolution since the 1980s did just that: it used an array of populist arguments that made the majority of the electorate believe that free markets can best serve their interests and that economic insecurity can become a thing of the past.
Policies supporting this ideology followed suit. Firstly, shares of privatized companies in the UK were offered at low prices and appealed both to the short- sighted and the long-sighted. The short-sighted bought shares to make a quick profit by reselling them. The long- sighted bought them to start building a bigger nest egg as it was felt that returns on investments in stock markets were bound to increase fast.
Second, by offering subprime mortgages that have a high risk of default — one of the culprits of the crisis — house ownership increased (good for the citizens), corporate profits boomed, especially in the construction sector and the financial markets (good for economic growth), while the pressure on governments to fund low- cost social housing decreased (good for the public debt). What could be more appealing than this ‘triple win’?
Third, recommendations for securing the financial stability of the elderly overstated the growth and security of financial investments. Voters were aware that they had smaller families than their parents and that there would be fewer future workers to support their own pensions. In the meantime, they were facing increasing payroll taxes in the form of pension contributions, requirements for staying on longer at work and decreasing levels of pensions. Privately funded pensions based on returns on individual savings accounts invested in financial markets were marketed as another winning alternative and as a fair one. They were expected to provide higher pensions due to the then state-provided social insurance. And their ideological appeal was significant: those who earned and saved more would have a bigger pension than those who earned less — those with less were assumed to be lazy rather than unfortunate.

The model of greed
The rhetoric included many other arguments, but let’s mention just one more. In an interconnected, globalized economy it does not make much difference who saves and who consumes as long as the whole thing balances out. In such a world, over-spending by consumers in some countries — such as the US and the UK — can be the antidote to the thriftiness of other countries, notably China.
All in all, it was an ideology based on what is now widely termed as ‘greed’, though the word seems to be equally, and incorrectly, used both for workers and households who justifiably aspire to a better life in the already high income economies, as well as for financial executives and the 1,300 billionaires that have been created in the last couple of decades. In the words of economist Paul Krugman, the most recent Nobel laureate, it was the ideology of “private good, public bad” that prevented the development of sensible regulation for the expanding financial sector. Lack of regulation created asset inflation over time, which was deflated instantly after the onset of the crisis. The total 2008 financial losses were 40 percent for UK’s FTSE, 45 percent for the European FTSEurofirst, 42 percent for Japan’s Nikkei, 48 percent for Hong Kong’s Hang Seng, 39 percent for the New York’s S&P and 65 percent for China’s stock market.
None of this is surprising. Many people talked about the looming crisis, but strong arguments are not always enough to overcome strong political powers. Some of those in power did listen. For example, during the East Asian financial crisis in 1997, the prescribed rescue packages were criticized for being too based on ideological thinking — some called it the ‘Washington Consensus’. They said it put too much emphasis on fiscal austerity, raising interest rates and privatization. Furthermore, they said, “let the banks fail.” Today, Western economies follow the opposite track. Their recovery plan is based on expansionary fiscal policies, low interest rates and rescuing private companies and banks.
Similarly, soon after the 1997 crisis, the aforementioned Krugman became one of the many critics of the risk management model that replaced the role of regulation in the financial markets and eventually, and predictably, failed to ensure that the inrush of capital created in the financial markets was prudently invested. In 1999, Peter Warburton, a UK economist, published a 350- page book that focused on how the central banks were imperiling the world’s economy. The book’s message is obvious from its title, “Debt and Delusion.” In 2001, Joseph Stiglitz, a US economist who got a 2001 Nobel Prize, explicitly advised the Bank of Iceland what it had to do to avoid becoming the “champion victim” of the crisis. As recently as 2006, Nuriel Roubini, another US economist, earned a similarly unenviable title, “the prophet of doom,” after a lecture he delivered to an uninterested IMF, the international organization in charge of overseeing the global financial system.
Despite the warnings, the ideology crossed political boundaries. The Labor Party in the UK, referred to as “New Labor” after it took power over from the successive conservative administrations between 1979 and 1997, pledged to decrease child poverty by half to 1.7 million children by 2010 and to eradicate it by 2020. It is now estimated that 2.3 million children will still be in poverty in 2010, a discrepancy of 35 percent from the stated target, due to a financing gap of $6.15 billion a year. Let’s put these numbers in context. First, without any new policies to help low-income families — a likely scenario amidst the current crisis — child poverty could rise to 3.1 million by 2020, a number similar to the number of poor children in 1999 when the pledge was made. Second, the Royal Bank of Scotland paid nearly $5.87 billion in bonuses in 2007 and posted $35 billion losses in 2008, the largest corporate loss in the history of the UK. Third, the value of employees’ private pension funds dropped by nearly a third from $810 billion to $579 billion between October 2007 and October 2008. In the US, $2 trillion was wiped out in equity value from 401(k) and individual retirement accounts in the two months following the start of the crisis, nearly half the holdings in those plans.
The time has come to listen. This is already happening. In February, the new US administration under President Barack Obama added $1 trillion to what Mr. Greenspan thought was adequate to rescue the economy. Whether this will be sufficient, and how it will be spent in practice remains to be seen. For example, the faltering American Insurance Group (AIG), once the leading insurer in the world, is to receive $170 billion in rescue funds, but still faces hazards in its $1.6 trillion portfolio of complex derivatives.
This month, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown declared that he takes “full responsibility” for his role in the banking failures that led to the global recession. In the meantime, housing waiting lists have reached record levels, having increased by 55 percent compared to five years ago and they are expected to double by 2011. Some of this increase will be, of course, the result of repossessions and increasing unemployment as well as lower construction activity. However, much is also due to the shortage of social housing, whose availability decreased over time.

The economic gear shift
Probably nothing constitutes a more dramatic admission of change than the criticism of the now opposition conservative shadow housing minister saying, “The [Labor] government’s record on social housing is embarrassing — the average annual number of social rent properties delivered has halved since 1997.” The other main opposition party in the UK, the Liberal Democrats, is no more polite. “The government allowed the bubble in the housing market to get out of hand for many years. We are now seeing the results of that bubble bursting,” they said. Now the government’s target is to build 240,000 new homes each year until 2016, while Gordon Brown admitted that “the economic downturn marks the end of the era of laissez-faire government.”
One cannot but welcome a more balanced approach to managing the economy. The days of the glorification of financial markets as a magic creator of wealth have come to an end. Financial markets are not an end in themselves, but a means that enables the real economy to be more productive. Along with the individual efforts of the US, the UK and other high-income and developing economies, the UN set up a commission of experts chaired by Joseph Stiglitz to put forward “credible and feasible proposals for reforming the international monetary and financial system in the best interest of the international community.” There is also increasing recognition of the importance of multilateralism. Both the IMF and the World Bank are currently looking into governance structures that would increase their effectiveness.
Luckily, the attempt to create a one-sided global ideology failed. Hopefully, the attempt to find shared global solutions will succeed.

PROFESSOR ZAFIRIS TZANNATOS is a Beirut-based economist and was previously advisor to the World Bank and chair of the economics
department at the American University of Beirut

April 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Executive Insights

The bankers’ duel for deposits

by Julien Faye & Sameer Chishty April 3, 2009
written by Julien Faye & Sameer Chishty

The global financial crisis has hit Gulf banks hard. The catalysts that boosted their growth — high oil prices, a booming real estate market and strong credit ratings — have run out of steam. The challenges now are many. As the region’s equity markets tumbled, so did the banks’ lucrative wealth management services. The likelihood of additional asset write-downs has triggered concerns about banks’ balance sheets. Moreover, Gulf bankers have seen cheap wholesale funding dry up and are reluctant to lend to each other, leading to higher cost of funds and liquidity shortfalls.

The region’s banks are now locked in a battle for the lifeblood of banking — retail deposits. Winning this battle may be a matter of survival. The deposit opportunity is big as Gulf investors keep over 40 percent of their financial wealth in deposits. Deposits are also a low-cost source of funds. They can cost banks as little as one percent of capital versus seven percent for bonds.
To make the most of the deposit opportunity, banks need to focus on four areas: pricing, products, promotions and people.

Pricing — be nimble. 

Banks must urgently deal with how best to price offerings to lure and retain depositors. The big risk is that banks will be dragged into a price war, encouraged by government deposit guarantees. Simply to offer higher rates for deposits will only encourage customers to churn their accounts. Gulf bankers need to ensure the rates they pay on deposit products are aligned with their average cost of funds. They can also be more analytical about gauging how responsive different customer segments are to different rates. Lenders can offer rate-sensitive depositors higher- yielding products. In the UAE, a foreign bank offers a six percent rate of return on a one-year $13,500 deposit. Smart banks will compensate less rate-sensitive customers by emphasizing convenience and benefits. Banks must closely monitor competitors’ moves and act preemptively to retain customers — without triggering a price war. Some banks are converting short-term demand deposits into longer-term holdings. Several local banks are looking at offshore depositors.

Products — innovate.

The most innovative banks develop a deep understanding of customer buying behavior and target product offerings accordingly. By bundling products, for example, banks can offer savings accounts that entitle the holder to a home loan at a preferential rate once the customer accumulates enough assets in his or her deposit account. Watch for Gulf lenders to boost product offerings by highlighting non- price benefits such as a tie-in with an airline where a depositor gets air miles for opening an account. Some banks, like HSBC, have already started innovating. Its new ‘e-saver account’ permits UAE customers to open the account instantly online with no management fees, no minimum balance and a 5.3 percent rate.

Promotion — The right timing.

Smart banks will promote attractive offers when customers are most likely to respond, such as when a customer’s deposits mature. To build awareness of deposit products, they will launch promotional campaigns visible to customers wherever they come in contact with the bank — from branch windows to ATM receipts.

Bankers can also increase deposits by providing incentives to customers with salary accounts to directly deposit a percentage of their earnings each month.

People — Recruit, reward.

With the spotlight on deposits, banks will recruit top talent to staff product management and marketing support for their deposits operation, as well as build high-powered analytical capabilities. They will deploy their new talent to improve the end-to-end customer experience, such as setting up effective application processes. Successful banks will also set up dedicated deposit teams and reward employees who bring in new deposits and cross-sell products to existing customers.

For Gulf banks coping with falling profits, the stakes couldn’t be higher in the battle for deposits. Those banks that are analytical and innovative enough will become the places where much of the Gulf’s money is kept. Or, at least, they will secure their positions in a region that still has strong long-term growth prospects.

Julien Faye leads the financial services practice for Bain & Company in the Middle East and is based in Dubai. Sameer Chishty is a partner in the firm’s financial services practice, based in Hong Kong.

April 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Finance

IPO Watch – Spring investments

by Executive Staff April 3, 2009
written by Executive Staff

Economists far and near differ widely in their forecasts on when leading financial markets will enter into a new virtuous cycle, but one thing experts do agree on is that the global investment landscape has changed drastically in the past year due to the US-born financial crisis. As companies had to delay or cancel their plans for initial public offerings (IPOs), stock exchanges have been scrambling to drum up IPO business as investors continue to remain cautious and in standby mode.

There have only been three IPOs in the past two months in MENA region, with a total value of $99.15 million. This is not entirely bad when compared to the United States’ one IPO so far this year. Yet the lonesome offering of pediatric nutrition maker Mead Johnson Nutrition Co., a spin-off by drug company Bristol Myers Squibb Co., raked in more than $780 million, which was admittedly leagues larger than the three MENA IPOs combined.
March was void of any IPO subscription offerings — a stark contrast to nine companies that had invited subscribers in the same month a year ago — but there was a bit of consolation as the first quarter in 2009 saw the trading debuts of three companies. Quite remarkably in these shaky times, two of the three newcomers ended their first day up by healthy percentages: Etihad Atheeb, which started trading on March 21, climbed 55 percent and Green Crescent Insurance Co ended its first day on March 26 with a sunny gain of 32 percent, both from the issue price.
Both companies had listing obligations under legislated rules for their specific industries but the mandatory nature of their debuts apparently did not impede investor interest. On the other hand, construction group Drake and Skull International, which had delayed its debut by quite a while, traded 27.5 percent lower on its first day of March 16. The listing environment for the company, whose IPO last July was hugely over-subscribed, was subdued by the real estate and construction sector performance even as the firm had a surprise in store for listing day in the form of announcing a $162 million contract.
It is too early to speculate if March marked a singular low month in primary market activity around the Middle East, but the gains of Etihad Atheeb and Green Crescent in their first sessions at least give room for new hope that things may look up in the second quarter. A positive view can be further supported by the IPO calendar for April, which entails five IPOs. According to the latest data from information provider Zawya, the five IPOs are tempting subscribers with a combined subscription value of over $1 billion. The largest of the five is Vodafone Qatar, part of the Vodafone Group. The telecom provider will offer 40 percent of its shares to the public in an attempt to raise $951.88 million. Subscription will open on April 12 and close on April 26. Afterwards, the company will list on the Doha Securities Market. The IPO will consist of 338,160,000 ordinary shares at $2.75.
Meanwhile in Saudi Arabia, the region’s largest economy, the Saudi Capital Market Authority gave its approval for four insurance firms to float portions of their shares in an IPO from April 18 to April 27. This is the next batch of newly licensed insurance firms in the kingdom and one can expect their public offerings to be calmer than those of the 16 insurers that undertook their IPOs in the 2007 to 2008 period. The shares of these newcomers will hopefully be less prone to wild fluctuations in the first months of trading.
The new Saudi insurance companies include AXA Cooperative Insurance Co. and Wiqaya Takaful Insurance and Reinsurance Co.; each has a capital of $53.3 million and each will offer 40 percent of their shares to the public. Al Rajhi Company for Cooperative Insurance, with a capital of $53 million, will float 30 percent of its shares to raise $16 million. ACE Arabia Cooperative Insurance Co., which has a capital of $26 million, will offer 40 percent of its shares to raise $10 million. All the companies will offer the share at $2.67.
Also in the insurance industry, Bahrain-based Solidarity Group said it has received regulatory approval to establish a $146 million firm called Solidarity Saudi Takaful Co. in Saudi Arabia, with an authorized and paid- up capital of $147.9 million. The new company, which will provide takaful and family takaful services, will float around 40 percent of its shares in an IPO between August and September of 2009. A total of 60 percent of Saudi Takaful’s capital will be raised from contributions by Solidarity and other Saudi founders, with Solidarity holding a major stake.
While enduring the first quarter dry spell in primary action, executives of regional securities markets have busied themselves with discussing potentials and expected easing of listing requirements. Jeff Singer, NASDAQ Dubai chief executive told the press that NASDAQ Dubai “expects companies to resume launching IPOs by the second half of this year.” Singer also spoke of plans to ease listing thresholds to draw more IPOs from local family-owned firms.
“NASDAQ Dubai is in talks with several UAE companies, including some that are government-owned, about IPO listings at the exchange,” Singer said. “We expect to see some activities by the third or fourth quarter of this year, provided the market window opens,” he added. New listing policies would allow companies to list, but offer less than the current mandatory minimum of 25 percent of their shares and reduce the minimum capitalization requirement for companies hoping to list on the exchange.

April 3, 2009 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 473
  • 474
  • 475
  • 476
  • 477
  • …
  • 685

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

[contact-form-7 id=”27812″ title=”FooterSubscription”]

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE