• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
Editorial

Handout culture

by Yasser Akkaoui December 2, 2022
written by Yasser Akkaoui

It is bewildering to watch international humanitarian organizations donate food packages to Lebanon – the Middle East’s most fertile lands. One can only wonder: What prohibits the Lebanese from investing in the richness of the land under their feet and enjoying the abundance it can produce? 

I can still remember how amazed I was watching the harvest in Marjeyoun’s fields as a child when visiting my grandparents in the summer. These valleys used to feed more than thirty-five villages located around them, and more. Today, these same valleys are left uncultivated and neglected. Worse, the whole ecosystem that used to exist no longer exists; the cultivators, the harvesters, the flour mills, the olive presses, the colorful wholesale market and of course, the entrepreneurs who introduced innovative techniques to increase and improve the crop.

Since Lebanon’s independence our top-heavy and rentier minded government system has favored the capital, as well as the hospitality, tourism and services sector over the primary industry. With agriculture having been denied attention over three successive generations, the rural to urban migration boosted the services sector and increased jobs in the city, but precious agricultural knowledge was lost. Almost nobody cared, however, because the urban demand for cheap food was filled with produce from neighboring Syria and imports from more distant lands – a structure that over time contributed to the negative balance of trade and compounded in an economic loss for Lebanon. 

But even this imbalance was not something that the state cared enough about. Negligence in meeting international export standards has been exacerbated by the unhindered smuggling of drugs under cover of agricultural produce. This loss of elementary protection against abuse got a telling monetary value attached to it when Saudi Arabia banned the import of Lebanese agriculture products to its market in spring last year. The Lebanese food industry suffered an estimated $370 million market loss.

Many argue that the crisis triggered the revival of the sector. This renewed interest in the land can be considered as an awakening; one that is fueled by private initiative, promises safety and security, but threatened by greed and malpractice. 

On the pages of this issue, we take a deep dive into the good, the bad, and the vast spectrum of opportunity that could become of our home-grown reborn sector with the hope that one day we will maybe reach food safety and security. 

December 2, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Food securityPhoto EssaySpecial Report

On the value of Lebanese olive oil

by Thomas Schellen & Marc Fayad November 17, 2022
written by Thomas Schellen & Marc Fayad

Olive trees have their homes around the Mediterranean Sea. Britannica says they are cultivated commercially in two world-spanning climate belts between approximately the 30th and 45th latitudes North and South. Hundreds of varieties have been recorded and are grown for table use and olive oil production. For increased fruit bearing productivity, varieties are subjected to human involvement in their propagation, yet have spread across borders without prejudice of nation or race. Northern olive farmers tell Executive that the number of extant varieties in Lebanon and their ratios per growing region are not known but say the small and resilient local “Airouni” variety coexists in the same groves with Italian and Spanish peers. For our photo essay, Executive photo journalist Mark Fayad visited groves in Chabtine (above), Kfifan, and Kfar Helda in the hills east of Batroun. The operational base of olive oil farmer Rouhana Bassil, who was interviewed for this essay, is in the village of Smar Jbeil.    


Many parents involve their school-age children, treating the orchard as the classroom of life and perhaps telling their offspring that backbreaking work is fun

Seasonal laborers have arrived for the harvest. Women and men work in teams that divide the labor between shaking fruits from the trees, and picking up and bagging the olives from tarpaulins spread out beneath the trees. 


Men with harvesting tools – the mechanized shakers seen here – command the higher daily compensation rate of LL400,000, or around $10/day at the parallel market exchange rate in October/November 
Gathering the fruits from the tarpaulin 

A harvest season tends to be around two months long per growing region and requires six to seven hours a day of strenuous efforts. According to farmer Bassil, the compensation is between LL350,000 to 400,000 per day during this season. 

The sorting of the fruits from the chaff

he post-harvest processing of olives takes place at one of several presses that are distributed around the villages. Presses are commercial operations. Some of the presses in the Batroun district are operated for the sake of the farming communities by non-governmental organizations such as the Rene Moawad Foundation or by monasteries, of which the region is rich. Religious entities also own much of the land cultivated with olive trees, and Bassil says he prefers harvesting from those lands, because the monks care well for their trees and refrain from using pesticides.

Presses do not all employ the latest technology but functional in the second stage of cleaning the fruit before crushing them into a fine mesh that includes stones and fruits. 

The mesh is called khouwass and generated by an olive mill that exerts pressures of 200 tons. It is spread out mechanically on a mat (above). During the oil extraction preparation stage, the khouwass is traditionally layered into mahbass towers of mesh sitting on round mats (top right).  

This steady stream of olive oil still contains residues in varying shares. The first oil that is extracted from the mahbass without prior additions of chemicals or without heating might be marketed as extra virgin once it arrives in a gourmet store, but as it runs into a water-filled basin used for separation of oil and residues, labels such as virgin and extra virgin are just marketing mumbo jumbo. Nonetheless, the cold pressed and organically produced oil is liquid health with low-carbohydrate, high-monounsaturated fat content and anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties.  

Modern equipment is good for the production of quality oil and used by farmer Bassil in his own workshop for further refinement of the oil that comes from the presses. Bassil bought Italian-made machinery made from stainless steel, which he says lasts for “a very long time”. He regards it as more reliable than domestically manufactured equipment and uses his equipment to reduce the residue content of his oil by a further 500 grams per 16-liter batch, before it is ready for sale. Bassil’s family has been in the business for more than 30 years, and he retains a personal, religiously informed perspective on the value of the olive tree and its fruit. “Jesus prayed in the olive grove and one of our rituals as Christians on the feast of Shaanine is to hold olive branches. This makes me feel that this tree is God’s great blessing and I love it.”

November 17, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Food securityQ&ASpecial Report

The official trade and security angle

by Thomas Schellen November 16, 2022
written by Thomas Schellen

Along with other ministries, the Ministry of Economy and Trade (MoET) constitutes the administrative framework of enabling institutions for food security in Lebanon. To understand the MoET’s recent initiatives in promotion of agro-food exports, the ministry’s strategic approach to food security, and its ongoing activities relating to agro-industrial enterprises and entrepreneurs, Executive sat down with Mohamed Abou Haidar, the general director of Economy & Trade at the MoET. 

E  The 2022 edition of a leading European trade show, the SIAL International food exhibition held in Paris in October, included Lebanese participation. Is it correct that you have participated and have been promoting Lebanese agro-food sector exports at this trade show?  

Yes

E  What is the Ministry of Economy and Trade doing to promote agricultural and agro-industrial exports in this ongoing phase of the Lebanese recovery process?

Besides SIAL, we have also participated in Expo Dubai for six months, and I need to recognize the efforts of the Dubai government who provided the pavilion to us. There were more than 900,000 visitors to the Lebanese pavilion. Among other sectors, such as IT startups, Expo Dubai was a hub for the Lebanese agro-food, especially noting that the Lebanese cuisine is very famous in the GCC countries. At SIAL Paris, Lebanese industrialists [were organizing a Lebanese pavilion] in collaboration with NGOs such as René Moawad Foundation and [Business Innovation and Enhance Export for Lebanon program] Bieel Fairtrade. Also in collaboration with the Ministry of Agriculture, and the Ministry of Industry, and the Ministry of Economy and Trade, we provided this pavilion to the Lebanese [food industries] in order to enhance exports to the EU. We did this since we can assure that those [agro-industrial products from Lebanon] are now up to standards of quality, [such as] the standards of the Codex Alimentarius (international food standards of the FAO/WHO, ed.) and the Libnor standards. These products of good quality were [at SIAL] and we [organized business to business] meetings for importers and exporters. This is because Lebanese importers can find a different diversity of products, and we believe that competition corrects the price. It is a good opportunity for [importers] to get a diversity of products in very good quality and very good price in order [for import products] to be available to the consumers in Lebanon. So we have two situations, [one] to enhance exports and get fresh dollars into Lebanon, and at the same time [the opportunity] to enhance diversity for Lebanese consumers. 

E  After the initial collapse of the Lebanese economy over two years ago, the hot topic debated in relation to food imports was substitution of imports by local foodstuffs. Importing opportunities had been getting scarcer because of the implosion of the Lebanese purchasing power and sudden payment obstacles. But when one exports for example potatoes, the consumers in the country will not be able to eat them. From your perspective, how should we evaluate this relation of imports, exports, and substitution? 

As you know, 86 percent of our food is imported. At the same time, after the crisis, due to the [depreciation] of the Lebanese currency and the decreasing of the purchasing power, most of the [agro-industrialists] in Lebanon are trying to export, in order to recompense for what they may be [supplying at a loss] in our country. They are trying to recompense [their heightened local costs], especially if we take into consideration the high cost of fuel. [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]The direct cost on food is now between 12 and 14 percent – and this is unbelievable. [/inlinetweet]

E  So out of each 100,000 lira that consumers have to pay in the supermarket, there are 14,000 lira that go to transport and fuel?

That’s it. Thus the industrialists try to export in order to get the fresh money, in order to import raw materials, and at the same time in order to [retain] the families [and] workers who are still working in their factories and industries. As we know, some of them have left Lebanon.

 E  In talking about ratios of agro-food exports in relation to imports and the promotion of Lebanese exports, were there actually any exporting contracts that were signed between the Lebanese and foreign importers at the SIAL or EXPO time? 

This is a private sector [issue]. We did the B2B meetings for both of them and we left them to do their own business. Our targets are to enhance exports and to promote our products. At the end, the Chambers of Commerce, Association of Lebanese Industrialists, and some syndicates have their own business [dealings] and we do not interfere in these since they are private sector [activities], but provide the hub for them. 

 E  Executive has been told that the Ministry of Economy and Trade has requested a multi-year strategy for food security to be developed for Lebanon with the support of the FAO and EBRD, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. What would the focus points of such a food security strategy be for the MoET? 

As you know, after the August 4 blast [in 2020], there are today no silos in Lebanon. This means there is no strategic [storage] of wheat. The Minister of Economy and Trade, Amin Salam, got in touch with the World Bank and we got the approval for $150 million as a loan within the food security support framework that you mentioned. This is in order to provide wheat at the proper prices to the Lebanese citizens, knowing the Central Bank will no longer be able to subsidize this import. And it seems that during the upcoming days, we will start this program. This is in regard to a major part of food security strategy, especially since the start of the war between Russia and Ukraine. As you know, 80 percent of Lebanese wheat was imported from Ukraine and the rest from Russia. Also the crude [edible] oil also came from Ukraine and Russia. Packaged [edible] oil [was sourced] to 34 percent from Turkey; [however], Turkey was importing the crude oil from Ukraine. Although some of the peak prices of commodity food have since moderated, the cost of the [shipping in] vessels has increased and the cost of insurance has increased, so that we were facing a food security problem, worldwide and at the same time locally. But I have to highlight that some industrialists during the crisis had opportunities to start creating new products of high quality that will be available to our population. Regardless of the crisis, I think the agro-food sector and industrialists were in a good and safe situation. 

 E  Food security indeed seems to be the topic of the year all around the world. What is the strategy that will address food security in Lebanon beyond the Ukraine crisis and the problems over the availability of wheat? 

The Syndicate of Food Importers and the Association of Industrialists are finding alternatives. For example, during the first weeks and months of the crisis, they went to Croatia, Moldova, Romania, in order to get substitutes. They find solutions. We did not miss out on anything, but it was a matter of price. As you know, in Lebanon, the private sector is importing, not the government. 

 E  Is it correct that at the Ministry of Economy and Trade you neither have a budget for import subsidization or for such things as paying for pavilions at international food fairs?

We were trying to promote exports at EXPO and I have to again thank the Dubai government for their support. At SIAL, the private sector and Fairtrade were supporting us. This is a success story for the [partnership] between the public sector and the private sector. This is what is most important for all of us. And we have to benefit also from the triple P law that was implemented in our Parliament. [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]We need the public-private partnerships and this is a success story that the public and the private sector can do very good [things] if they work together. [/inlinetweet]

 E  But was the PPP law from its inception, and also the applications that had been discussed at the CEDRE conference and in other partnership plans before the crisis, not mostly related to infrastructure and transport?

Yes, I know but [my point here] is about the concept of jumelage, and affiliation between the public and the private sector. 

 E  Is there any specific design for PPPs in, let’s say the construction of silos at Beirut or Tripoli port? I know that EBRD did the per-feasibility study for silos at Tripoli port. 

I need to tell you that we have two directorates in our ministry, the directorate of economy and trade and the directorate of grains and wheat. This is under the patronage of the other directorate. Frankly speaking, [I have] no idea. 

 E  I have heard that there was a roundtable on food waste in the hospitality sector at the end of September, organized by the Lebanese American University, in which you participated. 

Yes, [this event] was very good.

 E  Taking a look at the study on food wastage in the hospitality establishments that the roundtable was basing its discussion on showed me that the study’s data were collected by LAU researchers prior to the economic crisis. 

LAU and AUB, and I announced during the roundtable a new competition for students for developing a proper awareness campaign, a video campaign, for raising awareness among citizens to reduce the waste of food, especially as they mentioned [in the study] that 35 percent of our food was lost. 

 E  My question is actually about changes in food waste ratios since the crisis, and how the shocks on affordability of restaurant meals and access to food in general might have already been impacting behaviors. Given that the underlying data of the study were collected in 2018 and early 2019, wouldn’t it be very interesting for public and private stakeholders to gain insights into trends in this area that have emerged since the crisis?

I totally agree. I recommend that you keep in touch with the center of studies at LAU, Dr. Hussain Hassan, and with Dr. Mohammed Abiad at AUB. 

 E  But you at the MoET don’t have newer data on this issue? 

Frankly speaking, no. 

 E  With regard to the collaboration between the Ministry of Industry, the Ministry of Agriculture, and the Ministry of Economy and Trade, also noting that you mentioned the two directorates that are working at the MOET, and knowing that there are other departments such as the commission for regulation insurance that would have a role to play in securing our food sustainability at the country level, is there a standing committee in charge of collaboration, or an established procedure for the coordination between all these public institutions? 

I am in good collaboration between the Ministry of Economy and the Ministry of Industry, especially on the level of the [Director Generals] and with the Ministry of Agriculture, and with all public sector [institutions], and also especially with the Chamber of Commerce when there is any issue regarding food security. We have also to take into consideration that the minister [Salam] is the head of the governmental subcommittee on food security. So he will usually give me the updates and instructions on things that need to be done. At the same time, I am working with my colleagues, the DGs, on this matter and find solutions whenever there is a need. 

 E  For how many years have you served in the role of DG? 

Two years. 

 E  And before that, you were overseeing the consumer protection unit at the MoET?

[Consumer] Protection and Quality. I was for five years working with UNDP in the Ministry of Economy and Trade. 

 E  So from your experience, how is the Consumer Protection Unit able to function today when it comes to price supervision and quality of food that is for sale in the Lebanese markets? Some people tell me that they buy food as cheaply as possible but don’t always know where it comes from and have had quality issues.

First of all, the Consumer Protection Directorate is working with not more than 60 inspectors, while we have 22,000 mini-shops, 180 supermarkets, and 160 bakeries [to supervise] and [outside of the food retail market] over 4,000 private [electricity] generators and 3,000 gas stations. [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]With regard to food security, everything that is imported could not be in the market unless we get the proper laboratory test [results]. [/inlinetweet]If it is up to standards, it will be in the market. Before imported food is in the market, it should be cleared, and this is what is happening. 

 E  Can you exclude that gray imports would come in across the land borders, such as smuggling of poultry or tomato products? 

We are checking everything. Everything is checked either under the umbrella of the Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Public Health, research labs, or the Ministry of Economy and Trade. Regarding the internal products, the Ministry of Industry is doing a good job with the industrial [establishments] in order to organize and supervise their activities. At the same time, the Ministry of Agriculture, also in collaboration with us, is trying to compensate for the lack in our staff. We also addressed a letter to the syndicate of supermarkets in Lebanon and told them not to accept any new Lebanese product that is published for the first time, before informing us and getting the results of the lab tests. Also the Ministry of Industry informed them that they have to obtain the certificate that the company is registered at the Ministry of Industry, in order to avoid those fraud industries. 

 E  I had the opportunity of interviewing the then-Minister of Economy and Trade shortly after the Lebanon Economic Vision, or McKinsey plan, was released a few short years ago. In the context of providing the Lebanese producers with guidance on export opportunities and promoting agro-food products abroad, is the McKinsey plan of help to you today? 

What happened before 2019, is not 100 percent applicable now. But in the end, in the McKinsey [plan], there is a solid infrastructure regarding high-tech, agro-food, industry; everything was put. For sure, this is very good. We have to take it into consideration and perhaps have to do some fine-tuning about this part. There are also new studies published with the minister in collaboration with ESCWA. I think all those studies need one keyword: execution. They have to be executed. 

 E  In the international arena, there have been some controversies about the concept of food sovereignty, meaning the need and ability of countries to develop their own local foods and small indigenous agro cultures, versus the issue of food security, which is sometimes associated with corporate control of agribusiness, genetically modified organisms, and dominant roles of multinational groups. What is your personal view on such controversies? Do you prefer for Lebanon to be champion in food sovereignty or a success in food security?

We need both of them. Since [the country] is trying to move from a rentier business model to a productive business model, I think you first need to secure the security of your population. At the same time, since our raw materials are imported and we are historically importing everything, we need to be exporting, so I think we need both. 

November 16, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
CommentSpecial Report

Land of milk and honey?

by Alexis Baghdadi November 16, 2022
written by Alexis Baghdadi

In 2019, ‘Honeyland’, a documentary produced in a little-known country in what the United Nations calls East Central and South-East Europe, earned wide critical acclaim and won international awards. It tells the poignant story of one beekeeper in North Macedonia. In the documentary, greed and the lure of easy profit swiftly eradicate traditional knowledge and respect for nature, ending in tragedy for both Man and Honeybee.

Contrary to widespread perceptions, it most probably was not Albert Einstein who predicted that humanity would die if bees went extinct. But the cause-effect relationship is true nevertheless. Surely you have heard the saying that if you teach a person how to fish, you feed them for a lifetime? The saying makes sense – at least until our seas and rivers can no longer provide enough fish for a sprawling and hyper-consuming human race. The same is true about teaching people to grow food or keep honeybees; how long before the planet is unfit for both our crops and our honeybees?

Now, consider that crops and honeybees cannot exist without each other. Honeybees have been here for millions of years, and primitive beekeeping dates back at least 10,000 years. But only a century ago did scientists begin to understand the true gift of bees: pollination, and why we would die without it. [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]Around three-quarters of our crops depend on pollinators like honeybees to yield fruit and vegetables.[/inlinetweet]

So yes, we should be very worried about going hungry. As the 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference takes place, agriculture and food security find themselves once more on the sidelines of top discussions, and honeybees are nowhere to be heard. A silent spring without these striped pollinators would spell the end of food security faster than anticipated.

Magic seeds and other grim tales

This scenario is not based on conjecture or fantasy. In the past two years, the number of people facing food insecurity worldwide has almost tripled to reach 345 million, according to the United Nations World Food Program. While conflicts, COVID-19, and climate shocks have exacerbated this food crisis, it is becoming more apparent that the fault lies with the currently prevailing food system.

For the past 50 years, what started as the “green revolution” has promoted industrialized agriculture as the solution to world hunger. The model for this food system relies on intensive practices of planting large monocultures of single crops, supported with fossil-fuel based and chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and other “ides.” Initially, this model concerned food crops, but it soon spilled over into non-food crops like cotton, cattle feed, biodiesel raw materials, and so on. And what if the production of these crops is threatened by conflicts? Pandemics? Climate change? Use more chemical inputs or more resistant seeds, says “Big Agriculture” and its minions. As recently as September 2022, Bill Gates pitched bioengineered (read: genetically modified) “magic seeds” able to resist climate change as the only solution to world hunger. Who would control these seeds? Can they really solve hunger? We are not sure.

We are even less sure about the fate of honeybees. We have witnessed industrialized agriculture initiatives like the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa fail to alleviate hunger. What we should now start worrying about is how it actually destroys ecosystems that nurture honeybees and other pollinating insects, but also birds, bats, microscopic organisms, and even larger mammals – all of which make up the ecology of natural life-sustaining systems.

Problems abuzz

[inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]The Syrian honeybee (Apis mellifera syriaca) is the native honeybee subspecies of Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine, and Syria.[/inlinetweet] It is ideally adapted to dry climates, resistant to pests, and blessed with a profusion of endemic nectar-bearing plants. Today, the Syrian honeybee is all but gone. Over the past century or so, it has been replaced or cross-bred with imported Carniolan honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica), a subspecies of bees from Europe that is much tamer than its local cousin. Recently, other “immigrant bees’’ have been flown in from Egypt and the United States, promising higher honey yields and less stings.

Why is this a problem? Mainly because of a lack of education or responsibility. Few beekeepers or project leaders acknowledge that the close proximity of beehives from different producers makes bees susceptible to disease and loss of genetic traits. First, female queen bees mate with any male drones brave enough to approach them (the mating ritual is intense and lethal for males). A pure-bred queen may take on undesirable traits from a male. Beekeepers often have to buy queens from specialized breeders (local or overseas) to ensure their bee stock stays pure.

Second, newly introduced bee species are less resistant to diseases and pests, requiring beekeepers to import expensive treatments and equipment. Worse, if bees are not treated for these diseases, they can easily contaminate beehives of other beekeepers. By the time beekeepers realized the benefits of the Syrian honeybee’s resilience and sought to cross it with their own weaker breeds, the original subspecies breed had been largely diluted or gone.

Third, the number of beekeepers continues to swell through well-intentioned livelihoods programs financed with foreign aid. This means more bees competing for food in decreasing natural spaces due to rampant urbanization and climate change, leading to lower honey yields each year. The old-timey solution of feeding “sugar-water” to bees as an alternative to flower nectar is no longer economically viable due to the devaluation of the Lebanese pound and rising commodity prices. More outlandish solutions from misinformed beekeepers included planting such exotic species as eucalyptus trees to feed bees.

Meanwhile, illegal hunting, spraying, and burning of green spaces is seriously reducing biodiversity. In such unbalanced ecosystems, there are fewer animals, birds, and insects to cull honeybees’ natural predators like wasps and hornets.

The bee road ahead

The main takeaways from above can be summarized as another bullet point in Lebanon’s rising food insecurity. A comprehensive analysis of the problem would entail a treatise on botany, zoology, agriculture, sociology, and climate change, but there is neither time nor space here.

The sad reality is that the life of honeybees around the world is growing more precarious by the day. Even as internationally-funded programs continue to position honey production as a means to ensure food security or improve livelihoods through exports, the appeal of beekeeping is dwindling.

If things are left unchecked, the best scenario we can hope for is one where only the most resilient (read: US dollar-backed) beekeepers remain in operation to produce a luxury product: Lebanese honey. This would of course require strict regulations on honeybees’ health and honey quality to be able to position this product among global competitors like Yemeni or Manuka honey. For the sake of sustainability, this would ideally require reintroducing the native Syrian honeybee and limiting honeybee and beehive imports, the way Europe is trying to protect its near-extinct black honeybee (Apis mellifera mellifera). Even so, we would only be treating the symptoms of the problem, not its root causes.

Threats to honeybees and to food security cannot be dealt with separately, nor independently of the threat of climate change. In our interconnected world, no place is indefinitely safe from conflict or contamination by disease to the Honeybee, Livestock, Crop, or Man. And even the most adapted and adaptive species – humans included – cannot stave off climate change forever. Worsening climate disasters and extractive industries have brought the stingless honeybee (Melipona beecheii) of Mexico’s near-isolated Yucatan Peninsula to the brink of extinction.

The only way to address food security effectively is through the lens of agroecology. This approach involves science, practice, and a social movement, and considers food systems as both social and ecological systems, from production to consumption.

What this means is that Lebanon is not out of the woods yet – not by a long shot. But we can allow ourselves to imagine a coalition of farmers, beekeepers, shepherds, dairy workers, economic and social activists, lawyers, journalists, environmentalists, researchers, and more coming together to discuss solutions. Their perspectives may seem different, but once they understand that these all fall under the same principles that agroecology upholds, perhaps a movement can be born and join global voices to preserve our planet with its previous humans, bees, animals, plants, soils, water, and natural resources.

November 16, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
CommentFood securitySpecial Report

Circular agriculture

by Carl Safi November 16, 2022
written by Carl Safi

Circularity is an approach that has been intensively studied over the past ten years. It is based on three main principles: designing out waste and pollution; keeping products and materials in use; and regenerating natural systems. It fundamentally differs from the traditional linear economy where products are produced to ultimately become, after being used, low-value products or waste (Figure 1). Whereas in the case of an ideal circular model, the products enter into a closed-loop where each component of the product will be valorized and reinjected into the cycle for similar or different use in the market. Therefore, no waste is generated, the value of the product does not decline, and it has a positive environmental impact. The circularity approach applies across a range of industries such as agriculture, textile, construction, energy, plastic, furniture, alcohol, and many others. However, before diving into circular agriculture, it is worthwhile spotlighting on a plausible example that is in line with the circular economy: the refurbishment of electronics. Refurbished items are reconditioned, verified, tested and given a second or even third life in the market. They are affordable, as efficient as new items, and most importantly, the environmental footprint associated with refurbished electronics manufacturing is significantly lower. Undoubtedly, a perfect circular process is not realistic for every single sector given that some waste is expected and thus fresh new feedstock will always be required, but to a much lesser extent (Figure 1). Therefore, another challenge for the optimal system is to source the inflow of resources from sustainable sources and use the residual flows leaving the circle low value applications (energy, compost) or in other sectors if possible (Figure 1).

In addition to its positive environmental impact, the circularity approach has promising economic prospects. According to McKinsey and the Ellen MacArthur Foundation,[inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””] the economic potential of a circular economy is estimated at $1 trillion globally.[/inlinetweet] That potential has led to the emergence of many startups across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region that focus on disruptive ideas as alternatives to traditional approaches.

Consequently, in the first half of 2022 alone, nearly $2 billion was raised from startups in the MENA region. Despite its disastrous situation on all levels, Lebanon held the second position after the United Arab Emirates in terms of fund raising. The implications of this ranking confirm that Lebanese entrepreneurs are resilient, knowledgeable, and surely capable of overcoming the unprecedented struggles that Lebanon is currently facing.

Maximum value from agricultural residues

Agriculture plays an important role in the Lebanese economy. It is vital that it adopts the circularity approach in order to be sustainable and increase the value of its crops. Therefore, an optimal processing cascade to valorize the agricultural side streams or leftovers will certainly increase the value of the crops, thereby closely integrating the circular model. In agriculture, it is important that the circularity model takes into consideration the cascading process that will first valorize the valuable components into high-end applications and the remaining into low-value applications (Figure 1).

Among the main Lebanese agricultural industries are grape, apple, potato, orange, lemon, tomato, carob and olive. All these resources have been present in the Lebanese market for decades. However, they generate large leftovers or side streams which are not well managed. In most cases, they are either disposed or burned, or transformed into compost to fertilize fields. This indicates that Lebanese agriculture complies more with the linear approach that the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, a charity advocating for a circular economy, often describes in three main stages: take (harvesting of raw material), make (item production), and waste (use and ultimate disposal of the item). [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]Using agriculture residues as fertilizer and soil enhancer is already a form of circularity. [/inlinetweet]This is already a step forward in sustainability to synthetic fertilizers. Nevertheless, this approach underestimates the true potential of agricultural leftovers. Agricultural residual streams are loaded with a wealth of valuable components that can be used for food, feed and biobased materials. Among these components are proteins, fibers, nutrients, unsaturated fatty acids, polyphenols, starch, sugars, fructose, sucrose, and the list goes on. This implies that a number of valuable applications can be developed and an additional line of revenues can be sustainably generated. Therefore, Lebanese agriculture should adopt a more modern approach to valorize its agricultural leftovers and avoid selling its raw material at a cheap price. In addition,[inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””] agricultural residues should not be looked at as a burden but rather as an economic and environmental opportunity.[/inlinetweet]

Let us take the example of carob; a bean legume with an industry that generated $802 million in 2020, and is forecasted to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 6.4 percent within the next eight years. Every year, Lebanon produces around 4,000 tons of carob that is either used to make molasse or a carob-based milk beverage, or cheaply exported ($1,000 per ton) abroad. However, given the growing interest in carob constituents and their health benefits, multiple applications have been created from carob and their leftovers that go beyond the production of molasse. Accordingly, industries are interested in Locust Bean Gum, a natural thickener that can be found in carob seeds and used in food applications, nutraceuticals, cosmetics and other biobased materials. There is also an interest in carob powder as a cocoa alternative.
Therefore, a simple economic extrapolation (Figure 2) shows that the benefits of adopting the circularity approach by valorizing these high value components outweigh the benefits of the traditional approach by 10 to 30-fold after including the costs associated to the production of these applications.

Sustainable generation of profit

Lebanese farmers and producers have the edge when it comes to carob because these trees grow in the Mediterranean region. Given that the interest in carob ingredients is rising exponentially across the globe, Italy, Spain, Portugal, and Cyprus have started to intensify the cultivation of carob trees in order to gain a bigger market share and properly valorize this crop. Lebanese farmers should follow the example of these countries to take part in this growing industry and benefit from Lebanon’s perfect geographical location to grow carob trees. Moreover, Lebanese farmers should start to think big by producing and selling the (intermediate) products rather than the raw materials.

Lebanese grape production is another example that should adopt the circularity approach, especially when it is associated with wine production. A large amount of grape pomace is generated after producing wine. It is estimated that 1 kilogram of pomace is generated for every 6 liters of wine. Overall, Lebanon has produced 9.7 million liters of wine so far in 2022, which implies that around 1,620 tons of pomace have been generated. The price of grape pomace compost is estimated at $4.5 per kilogram. Grape pomace is composed of grape skins, grape stalks, and grape seeds. Polyphenols range from $5 to $100 a kilogram depending on purity, and pectin from $25 to $35 a kilogram, are abundant in all of these fractions. The seeds are also rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (from $5 to $35 per kilogram) and proteins, whereas the stalks are rich in fibers that are suitable for biochar production at $2.5 per kilogram. However, despite these facts, Lebanese farmers in general are still selling grape pomace as compost or disposed of, thereby neglecting its true value in a linear form. Thus, rather than simply transforming grape pomace into compost, it will be worthwhile adopting the circularity approach to properly valorize this side stream and sustainably generate ten times more profits. The same approach applies on other Lebanese crops like olives, acorn, apples, tomatoes, potatoes, lemons, and oranges.

Agriculture in Lebanon should not be seen as a low value domain but rather as an opportunity in which new technological advancements and approaches should be incorporated. Nevertheless, a major change of mindset should be established by starting from basic education up to advanced education in order to increase awareness and provide guidance in how to develop Lebanese agriculture. The circular economy model is the fruit of over a decade of research that validated its efficiency in a world that is witnessing major ecological shifts, and it is a true economic potential for Lebanon. Major corporations across the globe have adopted the circularity approach, and many startups are following the same model by creating new ideas that gravitate around circularity. In a lot of economically thriving countries like The Netherlands, such models and innovations are strongly encouraged and facilitated by investing in research, education and subsidizing projects. Unfortunately, due to the lack of financial resources and supporting governance, the Lebanese government does not have the means to support such initiatives. Alternatively, the private sector, NGOs, foundations, associations, the Dutch embassy in Beirut, agencies like USAID and UNDP are very active in Lebanon and they must lead the way to make a positive impact with such development projects. Furthermore, Lebanese people are very ambitious, educated, driven, courageous, and willing to embark on new disruptive ideas that will make a positive difference and contribute to Lebanon’s self-sufficiency and sustainability. The combination of private sector, non-profit organizations and Lebanese people will certainly put things on track for a better valorization of agricultural leftovers.

November 16, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
CommentFood securitySpecial Report

Less hype,more hope

by Thomas Schellen November 16, 2022
written by Thomas Schellen

It was a sequence of electrifying experiences for a kid from the German provinces. It began with
looking in awe around the grand movie theater in no less than Leicester Square, London, and soon went on to being captivated by the cinematic depiction of abject misery of children in a workhouse, and then to being shaken by the hymnal intensity of one of the first English songs that this youngster heard and actually understood – at least the words “food” and “glorious.” Ergo, the imprinting of memes from seeing the musical “Oliver!” while on vacation around the time of having had the first English lessons in high school, for yours truly, still makes for one very strong chain of associations when the word “food” comes to mind and food security is on the table.

This year, food has surged to the top of international concerns. Political and civil society agendas have been filled with statements on food security, respectable magazines are putting the topic on their covers, and the International Monetary Fund at the beginning of October added a one-year “Food Shock Window” to its emergency response toolkit. The first disbursement from $1.3 billion worth of Special Drawing Rights was made to Ukraine in response to imperilment of the country’s balance of payments due to wheat export revenue losses.

One has to note with both surprise and conviction that what the simple word food, and even more so the inconspicuous word combination “food security” means and stands for in 2022, is actually as laden with contradictions as it was some fifty years ago. And that was at a time when the modern narrative of food security was empowered by the development of high-yielding, corporate involvement supporting crops.

Moreover, the perils of food insecurity are in many parts of the developing, and even the developed, world today as present as they were in Europe almost 200 years ago when Charles Dickens wrote his stirring novel “Oliver Twist”, adapted for film in 1968, about the dichotomous social realities that existed at the time of Britain’s adoption of the poor law amendments. It serves today to remind us of two things: that food is vital for social peace and coexistence and that food crises keep haunting the world to the point that calling
food security both a great need and a contentious issue, is an understatement.

Existential contradictions

Food is full of contradictions. Nutrition is vital for human bodily sustenance and mental health but food is also sensual, emotive and cultural. This is the first contradiction. We cannot hope to cover the cultural value of food by addressing the – indispensable – issue of improving nutrition and lowering food insecurity.

The second contradiction is that the economy of food has been expanding tremendously and that this economic cosmos of food, which includes food expenditures of households as well as the aggregate GDP contributions of agriculture, agro-industry, and industries that are food related, such as beverages, hospitality and restaurants, are riddled with economic dichotomies. For example, whereas in 2022 food insecurity has globally been rising for four years and still is rising precipitously for millions under the specter of future climate trouble and global recession, the world’s largest food com pany and the largest restaurant multinational, are doing very well. Nestle and MacDonald’s, have recently reported better than projected results for the first nine months of the year, with nine-month organic revenue gains of 8.5 percent in the case of Nestle and third-quarter 10 percent improvements in global comparable sales for MacDonald’s.

A third, enduring food contradiction relates to fair and principled access. [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]More wheat is being harvested around the world than ever before, and there is more than enough food to feed all [/inlinetweet]– but the amount of food that goes to waste around the world each year in our highly educated, highly networked, and supposedly efficient global economic system, is staggering. The United Nations World Food Programme says that almost one third of food produced each year does not get eaten. The 1.3 billion tons of unconsumed food, according to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) website, entails loss ratios of estimated 14 percent between harvest and retail and 17 percent at the retail and consumer level, whereby an 11 percent household-level wastage of food is the primary culprit of the estimated 17 percent of total global food production that goes to waste each year. “Food that is lost and wasted accounts for 38 percent of total energy usage in the global food system,” the FAO laments.

Zero hunger, responsible consumption and production goals

In this emerging third decade of the century, the obscene historic inability to match food needs and supplies is newly exacerbated by humankind’s oldest enemies: ourselves and the forces of nature. Climate and war and diseases – of plant and animal and people – seem in the last few years to have been threatening our planetary food security to degrees that policy makers and activists may not have not been thought imaginable 22 years ago, and again only 7 years ago when they debated and devised the declarations of Millennium Development Goals (MGDs) and their successors, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).

In the first and second decade of the century, [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]hopeful aspirations for the eradication of poverty and “zero hunger” were adopted as global targets by the UN[/inlinetweet], first in the Millennium Declaration of 2000 and reiterated and expanded as SDG 1 and 2 in the Sustainable Development Goals of 2015, with SDG 2 calling upon nations to “end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture.” This year’s worries over short-term and longer-term increases in acute food insecurity, which have been triggered by the Ukraine conflict but are in the long run interrelated with deep climate fears, are departures from this previous SDG optimism.

Moreover, SDG 12, which postulates a shift towards responsible production and consumption patterns, listing food first among the areas where production and consumption are far behind a responsible and productive equilibrium. Available data on food waste and loss are inconclusive with regard to measurable reduction of the numbers such as the billions of tons of unconsumed food. A 2018 report on progress toward SDG 12 from the year 2000 up to that point, notes that there has been progress in the development of policies and in research but admitted that “the application and implementation of these to foster concrete and tangible changes in practices and impacts remains limited.”

The impressive agreements on the MDGs and SDGs shine as peak expressions of optimism during a long cycle of political calm and economic peace after the end of the Cold War, a period when faith in human capacities and good will were burgeoning. But the current immersion of SDG optimism into deep water suggests some of the SDG enthusiasm towards the later 2010s fed into a wave of cornucopian beliefs which celebrated themselves under disregard of serious warnings over the longterm shameful fiasco of humanity in managing our own species, and the planet that it inhibits.

This is to say that in the global risk aggregation of the past few years, humanity could have witnessed the epitome of divergence between a pious wish for no poverty and zero hunger and a reality of a world being treated to willful and continued denials of environmental and climate costs. These costs have throughout the capitalist era and into the present time been externalized by industries, ignored by policy makers, and underrepresented in modeling by economists who were more interested in coming up with theories that would accelerate or preserve growth than with developing models that showed the risks of human economic activity.

An underappreciated report

Perhaps the purest expression of this culture conflict between dogmas of growth and warnings of human risk was the debate over the population bomb, and the modeling of global resources exhaustion detailed in the “Limits to Growth” book lead-authored by American scientist Donella Meadows. The 1972 original study famously endeavored to warn of unencumbered growth in industrialization, resource depletion, pollution, food production and population, auguring on the basis of a novel computer model that on unchanged trajectories of those factors, “limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next one hundred years” – a maximum deadline that passed to 50 percent at the advent of this year.

If one continues along this logic of a dialectic of growth and risk, the part desperate and part overoptimistic bent of UN debates at the time when the MDGs were designed and announced as achievable in the year 2000 could be read as antithetical positions to what Meadows and her co-authors concluded in their revised edition, “Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update” (NLTG). But this dialectic is lessened at first glance by the fact that in some of the ten scenarios that Meadows – shortly before her death due to cerebral meningitis – and her team explored under an adaptation of the World3 computer modeling framework used in Limits to Growth, there is a spark of sustainability.

Diverging from the greed-as-usual and consumption-as-usual presuppositions that rule more than half of the NLTG scenarios, in only one scenario, (and from timing perspective nonimplementable) key sustainability policies are introduced already in the 1980s. Meadows et al conclude that their World3 model’s assumed goals or industrial goods per capita cannot be reached for a world population greater than 7 billion people – an amount which has been passed in the last decade – and that delays in introducing fundamental change to human behavior “reduces the options for humanity’s long-term future.” In full cognition of this dilemma, the NLTG authors still see open pathways for a global transition to a sustainable society, which to them is a society that sustains “the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

The first “future generation” envisioned in NLTG, has already been born and is presently aspiring to shape society to their needs. It is a digital-native generation of more-educated and more-connected-than-ever youngsters who have experienced immense exposure to ahistorical and absolutist ideologies, fake news, and virtual pressures disseminated through faulty social networks. They are confronted by the climate risk mitigation failures of the two preceding generations, plus have to grapple with their unexpected and mentally unshielded vulnerabilities to pandemics, wars, and extremist and populist leaders of all ideological colors and non-compromise persuasions.

This does not bode well for utopian optimism. Jorgen Randers, one of the co-authors of the original “Limits to Growth” and its 20- and 30-year follow-up publications: “Beyond Limits to Growth” and “Limits to Growth – The 30-Year Update”, has commented discouragingly on the worldwide outlook on the 50th anniversary of the original study’s publishing date of March 1972.

“Fifty years later, we know that the world has followed the scenario predicted in the book – broadly speaking,” Randers opined, and prophesied that over the coming decades, human wellbeing will decline with a “too- little, too-late” scenario continuing in response to a dual threat of overshooting nature’s support capacity and of rising social tensions. “In effect, I believe that regional social collapse will precede global environmental
collapse,” he lectured darkly.

Perpetual oscillation between misery and happiness

But even if the propositions of SDG 1 and 2 have been losing momentum to the point of reversing, learned pessimism is not necessarily the view that prevails in the end. The Malthusian trap is not inescapable and what Thomas Robert Malthus believed to be an obvious truth, that “population must always be kept down to the level of the means of subsistence,” has been dismissed by human progress in terms of population and food supply in the past two centuries since the insightful parson and economic thinker published his speculative work, “An Essay on the Principle of Population”.

The disproving of Malthusian population risk dynamics notwithstanding, the correlated polar juxtaposition of Malthusian and Cornucopian views on the fate of society, of which the latter belief stipulates that the future will always be saved by economic means or technological innovation, and which has been clashing throughout the modern ages with the former’s skepticism on human superiority, cannot be disregarded. It should rather be acknowledged that this dialectical contest of wits in what Malthus described as debate between those who claim that “man shall henceforth start forward with accelerated velocity towards illimitable, and hitherto unconceived improvement” and those who see the fate of the species as “condemned to a perpetual oscillation between happiness and misery” in their chase after an unattainable perfect society, lately seems to have again been moving towards the Malthusian corner.

But it is exactly this point where lies the best Lebanese move in the worldwide mental tournament on food security: the country may be best advised in taking a contrarian, anti-cyclical route that steers clear of Malthusian philosophy. Whereas the global route of SDG over-enthusiasm has been curtailed by climate concerns and widening social fault lines, and whereas the threat of food insecurity is escalating in many developing countries, it stands to reason that Lebanon can still be elevated into a comparably comfortable situation with regard to food security – if it only applies the food security insights, SDG wisdoms and rational agrosector development strategies that have not been implemented in this country during the 20 years between 2001 to 2020.

There are certainly limits to the national food security potential if considered in a narrow sense; Lebanon will not be able to create large-scale agriculture that produces millions of tons of commodity crops. In terms of food safety – an important and currently weak pillar of Lebanese food security -[inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””] the presence of cholera is urgent but only the latest warning shot signaling that the combination of crowding people into deprivation zones with substandard infrastructure[/inlinetweet] creates kill zones for epidemics.

However, Lebanon to this day has an uppermiddle-income country’s capacity for healthcare and could have a clear path to food safety if it were to improve critical infrastructure and implement, supervise, and enforce regulations more thoroughly. On the side of securing the nutrition needs of the population, much has been theorized about the creation of social safety nets that even the filing cabinets in the concerned public sector institutions must be able to answer all questions about their essentials.

Finally, as a country with excellent food production potential but efficiency deficits in food production – such as shortfalls in advanced harvesting equipment, good testing, storage, and packing infrastructure – Lebanon can do much to lower food loss. The economic conditions of widespread poverty bring with them a chance to educate consumers on avoidance of food waste and on healthy, inexpensive nutrition. In economic terms, with all appreciation of the increase in food security that by local standards large processors and branches of multinationals bring to Lebanon, the best path to food security is indirect and based on small but sophisticated and institutionally incentivized agriculture and agro-processing.

This indirect path should be trodden by implementing the applicable global standards, developing the identities and brands that appeal in foreign markets, and moving out of ethnic niches. But at the same time strengthening food sovereignty – in sum, by producing more for export markets and by modernizing the amazing native food culture. Then, by contributing to constructive global food interdependence – which conceptually negates the contradiction between food as physical sustenance and food as a cultural asset and trove of sensual treasures – food security might cease to be a concern in the sense that zero hunger can be achieved in Lebanon.

November 16, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AnalysisFood securitySpecial Report

To rise from ruins

by Thomas Schellen November 16, 2022
written by Thomas Schellen

The Souk El Tayeb farmers’ market on Beirut’s Armenia Street has an established feel to it. There are many regulars to be seen on both sides of the small stands. Regular customers are crowding the isles on the main market day, which is a Saturday. Facing the customer streams are market traders peddling fresh produce, flowers, preserves, nuts, hot sauce, chocolate, manakeesh, and an eclectic mix of village goods. Their display tables tend to be crowded, too, as the growers and purveyors of artisanal or small-scale agro-food products make the most of the presentation space that they lease from the market operator – the Souk El Tayeb social organization – for a fee of $12 per day.

The organization does not collect exact visitor stats, but managing partner Christina Codsi estimates that over half of the market’s patrons on an average Saturday are locals and regulars. Although, she notes that during the summer, the market also sees many tourists and visitors from the Lebanese diaspora, in addition to a heightened influx of foreign expatriates who reside in Beirut. According to Codsi, the farmers’ market started out as a social venture in the mid-2000s on a rationale of providing market access to small scale – usually not land-owning – farms with produce and agro-food products.

Neither Codsi nor her social co-entrepreneur, Kamal Mouzawak, have a farming or food trading background. They wanted to allow farmers to bypass wholesale markets that then and now dominate the distribution segment of the agricultural value chain, but cut into farmers’ earning margins while being organizationally opaque and obscure in standards and rules. “When we studied this back in 2004, we realized that a lot of potential for small farmers existed in accessing urban markets,” Codsi tells Executive.

Souk El Tayeb has not always looked as solid as it does nowadays. The twice-weekly affair not only has a stable home in a covered hall with an adjacent, small management tract, but is co-located with a “farmer’s kitchen” restaurant – Tawlet – and a rural-to-urban retail outlet called Dekenet which is especially strong in food preserves and processed items such as jams, molasses, and oils. Both are parts of the Souk El Tayeb organization, which also includes guesthouses and a community kitchen. By contrast, during its first 15 years, the Souk El Tayeb market led a nomadic existence, popping up in open-air locations around Beirut’s affluent neighborhoods.

A tale enhanced by shocks

Whereas there are no exact metrics for comparison of same-stand sales at Souk El Tayeb for daily, weekly, monthly, and annual visitor numbers at the current location, Codsi confidently confirms the market’s growing reach in its urban catchment area. Vendors have told her they are increasing their sales in the past 12 months, while she has also observed that the location has been working well. “We know that demand is strong because the farmers run out of stock all the time. Since day one after opening last year, we had an invasion of people,” she says.

And this is where the Souk El Tayeb venture tale turns Lebanese-metaphorical. “The past three years were turbulent and many things happened,” Codsi says, an epic understatement. As she continues her narration, she mentions three disruptions to the operation in less than two years, shocks that were also key moments in shaping the nation’s mindset.

These disruptions began with the nomadic market’s closure during the thawra protest waves of October, November and December 2019, which continued with the Covid-19 induced lockdown periods of spring and summer 2020. Finally, there was the total disaster in August 2020, when what became the current site of the organization, quite literally was blown to shreds.

This is to say that Armenia Street in its entire length is situated in the area that was hardest hit by the August 4, 2020 port explosion, and the present, permanent location of the Souk El Tayeb is in one of the most devastated parts of the central-northern section of Beirut, which was turned into an urban disaster zone by multitier criminal negligence.

“These moments make you think of the end of the world but then there comes a moment when you know that you need to move on,” Codsi reflects. The market vendor’s reported increase in their sales, and the growing footfall at the operation has to be seen against the backdrop of the restart of Souk El Tayeb at the Armenia Street site less than two months after the catastrophe.

[inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]Metaphorically, it is a rise from the ruins of a dysfunctional system that has been dealt the final blow by inaction and corrupt indifference.[/inlinetweet] In economic terms, the increase in revenues – which is not an increase in profitability – demonstrates the viability of a new, and copied, direct-to-consumer niche in the Lebanese food market. As well, it shows the great need – and profound opportunity – to work towards and eventually achieve consolidation and sustainability.

Codsi sees a number of factors in play in driving consumer interest in farmers’ markets and shopping local products, rather than being obsessed with branded imports. These factors in her estimate included changing price structures: “Imports started being very expensive,” she says, as well as the growing awareness “of the importance of eating local, clean, and authentic Lebanese foods” among the organization’s target audience, and also the pandemic-induced trend towards cultural introspection, under which people started paying more attention to what is being produced in their locality.

Some specifics of a social market operator

The room for growth, need to realign food value chains, and improve market efficiency, or more importantly blur social efficiencies, is unmistakable when Colsi points out that the Tawlet hospitality operation at the central location has seen stable revenues, alongside a 10 to 15 percent increase in sales volume at three locations outside of Beirut in 2021. A further sales improvement is expected for FY 2022 due to a booming summer season. However, this is juxtaposed with the fact that the menu prices at the central Tawlet, for example, had to be slashed by 20 or more percent in dollar terms versus the pre-crisis offer.

Thus, while the success of the market speaks to the ability of improving food availability, producers’ direct market access and food security, the economic sustainability model has to be vastly improved to make this example of the direct-toconsumer niche become a pillar of local food security. Just as transportation costs are challenging farmers who want to bring produce to any farmers’ market in Beirut, rising costs put a lot of pressure on the bottom line of the Beirut operation of the Souk El Tayeb organization, despite the benefits from consolidating the market, store, and hospitality outlet under one roof.

Energy costs consume half of the revenues of the market, and the $12 per day stand fee has not been set with a profit motive, according to Codsi. “The cost of functioning is greatly increased. We cover costs of Souk El Tayeb jointly with Tawlet and Dekanet operation. The restaurant and shop have been doing good sales, but it is a constant fight to maintain limited profit,” Codsi says.

On the social equity side, the organization’s initiative at the time of its opening in Armenia Street led to setting up of the Matbakh El Kell community kitchen with 2,500 meals per day capacity, in partnership with foreign funders, local charities, and NGOs. It is an example of how Lebanon’s plunge into crises has been triggering community-level support responses which are inadequately accounted for in ubiquitously cited estimates of food insecurity. But at the same time, the charitable activity underscores the persistent lack of food security on a national level, and the need for developing overdue safety nets. “We thought that we would operate it for a year and close it again but then realized that the demand is actually growing,” Codsi explains.

As it is with retail markets in general, the reality of a previously overvalued currency and unsustainable consumption on household and institutional levels loom large in the promising economic niche where farmers access urban markets. This distorted past screams from margin and price deterioration pressures for Lebanese producers and food services providers, when present price levels are compared against the “fresh” dollar, which is de-facto predominant in all segments of the food value chain.

The situation on the side of conventional retail

In the wider retail market segment of medium-to-low end supermarkets, the challenges of contributing to food security are expressed in ways that put the narrative of the substitution of food imports by locally produced foodstuffs into a more realistic perspective, and reveal how the crisis might have engendered market concentration shifts in favor of the biggest players.

As to the progression of food imports substitution, Hussein Bashir, procurement and operations manager at Bashir Business Center, first thought that the Lebanese market would be “flooded with Lebanese products,” but it did not turn out so, he tells Executive. Bashir runs the 1,000 square meter wholesale and retail enterprise and supermarket in Choueifat, south of Beirut. Consumers can find more than 2,000 stock-keeping units (SKU, a codified number that represents specific items available for sale) in the supermarket’s food section.

Instead of a surge in local products, however, markets frequently down-shifted on price points by substituting brand imports from Western Europe and North America with imported processed food from more competitive producer countries which undersell local agro-industrial manufacturers, Bashir confirms. He says some consumer needs, such as detergents and household disinfectants with variable quality, are today supplied locally. But others, such as budget-price sweet biscuits and chocolate wafers which have a domestic manufacturing history going back to the 1950s, are not the cheapest in the market since they are challenged by wafer products made in Turkey.

In examples as diverse as beer, confectionery, and pasta, an alert consumer may indeed have encountered situations where imported products, sold under the house brands of large retail chain, as well as products sourced from agro-food producers in countries with large populations, were equally priced or sometimes significantly underselling local brands.

Retail with a conscience

Another observation of market-influencing change, which is especially notable in the context of reported extreme poverty rates, comprises of revealing consumer preferences. “Sales are still low as a total number but are reverting to the ways things were [before the crisis] in terms of consumer behavior. They show a mentality of ‘if I want it, I will get it’,” Bashir notes. The instant gratification demand, according to him, has caused items which stopped selling during the crisis to sell in a stable way. “The consumers would for example at some point have considered a Mars bar to be a luxury, but now they are putting them again into their shopping carts. Even though it costs a lot [in relation to lira incomes], consumers are willing to spend this much,” he says.

This is opposed by extreme price-consciousness of consumers on other parts of their shopping lists. Strategizing to cope with competition continues on a marginally or even hypothetically supervised playing field. For several years prior to the crisis, Bashir Business Center was developing two house brands: one for canned fish and one for canned vegetables.[inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””] In the environment of depleted purchasing power, however, the customer base is hunkering heavily after the most cut-rate cans on offer.[/inlinetweet]

“We have a can of tuna that retails for $1.5, one for $1, and one for $0.5. Consumers are seeking out the cheapest one,” he explains, but points out that these price tiers represent quality differences in the fish, with consumers apparently not prioritizing that consideration if the lowest priced-can satisfies their nutritional needs. “In some retail markets today, you see certain products that are dubious or not worth buying, and it is hard to compete in a market where such products are present,” he says.

He adds that he has in a personal capacity recently conducted market research on zaatar (thyme) for a friend who, like himself, hails from South Lebanon, and discovered that not everything sold as a budget mix of the healthy herb was containing much zaatar at all.

“You might buy a cheap brand of zaatar and find that it mostly is made from wheat. [Traditional quality mixes] usually contain sumac, zaatar and sesame.[inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””] What the low-end producers are putting, is citric acid, a lot of salt, and some broken wheat like burghul that is passed on as sesame. [/inlinetweet]There also are mixes with a high share of crushed semolina that is passed on as zaatar. These are locally packaged products of questionable origin in either Lebanon or Syria.”

Markets face challenges in balancing the consumer search for the cheapest offer, with their interest to gain customer loyalty and satisfaction by providing budget products of reasonable quality. What Bashir describes confirms that food security and quality can be an issue for both cheap imports and local cut-rate products. Against the dangers of fake products and unhealthy ingredients, many retailers know that they have an important social and economic interest in directing their customers to the best-available quality products at differing price points, yet they cannot perform this function without the regulatory and supervisory function of public institutions.

A pile of further challenges and then problems of market concentration

On top of factors such as having to cruise the aisles to assess price displays for accuracy, and initiate changes in accordance with rather imprecise information on the Lebanese currency, and the latest supply chain impacting events, retailers suffer further from labor supply and engagement issues. “We have more labor, but we have less quality labor,” Bashir says.

According to him, the most qualified persons are no longer in Lebanon, even at the level of farm labor and retail store labor. “What we used to get done by one worker, we have now to use two to three untrained and unmotivated helpers. These days, not only workers but even managers are unmotivated, even owners are unmotivated. It is getting hard for everyone to find motivation to work. I don’t know how to motivate my workers when it is hard for me to be motivated,” he muses pensively.

The competition with what Bashir calls three “whales” in the Lebanese retail space – chains with very strong market power concentrations in modern retail in comparison to competitors – has possible short-term impacts which are detrimental to impoverished persons’ access to food and also more longer-term implications of potential gloom.

“During the crisis, suppliers have given these whales many benefits, which helped them grow and eat a lot of market share,” Bashir says. He alleges that suppliers were accepting banker’s checks from the mega-chains at times when these were not accepted from other retail companies and also would have priority in seeing their stock orders filled at times when supply was constrained to a minimum. “They would get bigger portions in comparison to competitors, so that consumers would find everything at [their supermarkets]. This was harming business for everyone, and I hope that this will rebalance at some point,” Bashir says.

In evaluating the role of retail markets in the economic context of access to food, it is finally important to note that factors which impact food security on the consumer side have arisen on the fronts of inflation and external threats.[inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””] “I wake up every day and check the news to see if Russia has done this or that. Then I go to the store and, if necessary, raise the price of imported sunflower oil,”[/inlinetweet] Bashir comments, describing a new routine that he says never before existed.

Inflation spikes imperil food security, but hit retailers in their revenues and margins, he testifies, and inflation adjustments – by evidence seen in the local food-retail sector in either direction – are therefore often hesitantly implemented and with time lags at the retail level. All efforts notwithstanding, however, the impact of supply chain risk, currency risk, and sovereign risk on Lebanon will find no other final outlet than these food insecurity risks with the retailer or the consumer, and the despondency devil proverbially takes the hindmost.

In the end, the food security and food safety situation of Lebanon from the markets’ perspective is conflicted. Social ventures appear to be in a better position to contribute to food security through different channels they are attuned to when compared to conventional retail. However, conventional retailers do not operate without consciences and regard for their long term economic sustainability. The markets have not failed, in the sense of their ability to deliver products to people who can afford them. There are new opportunities and open windows to growth for retail markets just as they exist for food entrepreneurs, artisans, and industrialists, but these opportunities are juxtaposed with systemic gaps, inefficiencies and shortfalls. All of the latter combine into a system of failures that is very costly and stands against the potential of the retail sector to ultimately, even if indirectly, enhance the food security of the Lebanese people and restore it to the levels that existed before the economic collapse.

November 16, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AnalysisFood securitySpecial Report

Bad market, good market

by Thomas Schellen November 15, 2022
written by Thomas Schellen

Markets were the first places where food security was achieved in a commercial context. It can be philosophically presumed that the other conduits of prehistoric food security consisted of charitable sharing, in the context of group solidarity and religious belonging, and of the intra-familial or tribal organic sharing economy which existed millennia before idle intellectuals and ambitious wordsmiths ever coined terms like “sharing economy”.

The rest of what can be said about individual subsistence living and group living in prehistoric human communities is mostly conjecture and speculation. The entire narrative of the “agrarian revolution” is endlessly suspect in view of recent archaeological discoveries and anthropological theses. The relationship between markets and food security has been acknowledged in research as a component of societal existence whereby the former is empowering the latter, by providing availability of food and making food accessible on the terms of the market. In this regard, the principle of competition and [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]the need for market actors to woo customers by meeting their demand helps people access and afford food.[/inlinetweet]

The Food Aid Convention of 1999 and the World Food Assistance Convention of 2012 set standards for food security support for vulnerable populations, but referred to markets more by a way of negative delineation from markets. The 2012 Convention’s second article, on principles governing food assistance, includes stipulations that food assistance must not negatively impact markets. Food assistance must be provided in a way that does not “adversely affect local production, market conditions, marketing structures and commercial trade,” states Article 2a. It is also a principle that the parties to the convention abstain from using food assistance for their “market development objectives,” as per Article 2b.

After the Great Recession of 2007-09 shook the world out of free-market complacency for a while, the moral impulse for seeking recovery from a man-made financial crisis, in combination with then-thriving international enthusiasm for global development goals and species-wide concerns, led to new international declarations and programs that expanded on the work of the four United Natoions (UN) world food and food security summits of the 1990s and 2000s.

In the 2010s, markets were acknowledged as contributing systems in food security. The United States (US), in the context of the Obama administration’s commitment to a global response against hunger and food insecurity, established the 2010 Feed the Future initiative, aimed at assisting 19 food insecure countries in the Global South. Concepts for the use of markets under food security objectives were developed in correlation, one of which was laid out in a study by the Washington DC-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

As a compilation of policy trends and thoughts at the time, the CSIS study advocated in strong support of the US’s determination to fight hunger through market-relevant policies and actions. This was despite that it was at a time, when in hindsight the world was financially challenged, but yet comparatively unperturbed by massive challenges like a health pandemic, wars, or climate trouble, all of which have made this decade much more costly. One recommendation was for reducing supply-side constraints by implementing trade agreements with US partner countries and also lowering protectionist barriers. Other recommendations called for the US to be fostering regional integration in other parts of the world, pushing for reform of international agricultural trade systems, and acting towards the improvement of hard and soft infrastructures in countries which are ridden with corruption, inefficiency, and excessive trade costs.

In the recent peak attention to food security issues in context of the crises of the 2020s, the UN issued the Roadmap for Global Food Security–Call to Action which advocated for seven points of action, four of which were directed at “member states with available resources” and three addressed to all UN member states. These three points included references to the roles and responsibilities of governments in food markets, beginning with an appeal for states “to keep their food and agricultural markets open,” and further calling for states to increase their investments in relevant research and development, and “closely monitor markets affecting food systems, including futures markets, to ensure full transparency, and to share reliable and timely data and information on global food market developments.” It may read somewhat abstract and state-centric, but at least markets were mentioned under a global list of priorities.

The forces of the market, however, are neither known for obeying governments nor are they social per se. Markets appear to have forever (certainly since their conceptual discovery by economists), worked in favor of the resourceful. This makes for a complicated relationship with food security because of the fact that wants are served well in markets if the wants are backed by purchasing power, but needs without the presence of such means, are not.

Rights, as a category of human self-definition and philosophical debate, have been entering markets as an evolving moral category for less than one hundred years. Not inherent in markets, economic rights have gradually been codified from principles of freedoms of conscience and broad economic imperatives, such as the freedom from want into a series of moral and economic rights, like the right to labor and the right to food.

The new millennium’s expansion of moral concepts with economic relevance, such as the Sustainable Development Goals and the UN Global Compact, today provide a joint mental framework with the economic concepts of stakeholder capitalism and corporate citizenship. Forward-looking companies with long-term profit perspectives as well as defined social agendas have become beholden to sustainability and the responsibilities that determine the societal embeddedness of a business.

Notes informed by the Lebanese market dilemma

Lebanon has a peculiar system of societal organization that combines entitlements of quasi-dynastic or familial, tribal, and religious-based entitlements. This combination produces a predilection to maximize economic opportunities through social networking and the exchange of goods. The system’s immersion in the recent crisis illuminates many aspects of the market system which have implications beyond the very painful crisis experience. In this sense of abstract evaluation, [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]the crisis has demonstrated impressively that markets react to all interventions.[/inlinetweet] They can be distorted by well-meaning subsidies, but also by charitable interventions that in turn create black secondary markets.

On a very important, constructive note, markets are extremely resilient and the lingering crisis emphasizes how markets, from regulated to gray, and the blackest of black markets, favor not only those who are financially resourceful – in the form of purchasing power – but they also smile on those who excel in negotiations and the uncovering of new opportunities. Markets in this way have self-regeneration capacities which can be indifferent to state actions, and extend far beyond governmental intentions and inferences.  

It is a lesson from the global experience with inflation –  a novel shock for the G7 economies in comparison to their experiences of the past forty years – which shows that concentration of corporate market power in times of inflation makes it easier for the strongest to set prices at will. Customers lose sight of the price logic and are confronted with information deficits on the validity of price increases. High-powered market players can use bouts of inflation to pass own cost increases onto consumers and even increase prices further than justified by cost hikes.

In this regard, in a comparison with developed markets’ far more intense inflation rate, and the complex inflation shocks exposed to Lebanese consumers shows on one hand how severely weak public controls and ill-managed, understaffed consumer protection systems will amplify the market power of the dominant players. In the markets of food security, it will worsen the divergence between powerhouses and lower-powered stakeholders, but also cause a widening of the societal market sphere through the entrance of non-commercial and social orientation.

On a general level, Lebanon is a prime example to show that markets will be stifled in artificial complacency under conditions of imbalanced monetary and market distortions from cronyism. While the departure from such a situation becomes more painful the longer the distorted system has been practiced, freeing the market from illogical and unsustainable restraints, such as the removal of subsidy schemes and forced abandoning of artificial monetary stability, opens new windows for the rebalancing of market shares, product availability and prices.

This removal of stability under a construed status quo can be marginally beneficial to new entrants and detrimental beyond measure for too many stakeholders in food markets. But in decentralized and informal markets, the beneficial effects of entrepreneurial market forces in the essential good markets might come to play out more quickly than in centralized, highly supervised, or concentrated markets – up to a point.

Markets can incur inordinate divergences in the ability to satisfy wants, but markets in the context of an intact social fabric and a tradition of mutual solidarity can perform better than economic models in the satisfaction of needs. Moreover, as crises reshape the economic playing field, markets seem to have the capacity to eventually produce unexpected benefits for the realization of economic rights and unleash new and socially constructive, economic energies.

November 15, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AnalysisFood securitySpecial Report

Falling food safety standards have left a population sick

by Rouba Bou Khzam November 15, 2022
written by Rouba Bou Khzam

Access to sufficient quantities of safe and nutritious food is a basic right, yet in Lebanon, such access can no longer be guaranteed. The three-year old economic crisis, which quickly expanded into a socio-economic crisis, has radically changed the lives of citizens up and down the country. Priorities have switched: how does a mother choose whether to buy meat for her children or sanitary pads for herself? Filling the car with gasoline, or buying medicine? Such ever-present dilemmas have forced many to resort to purchasing cheaper items, which is leading to a higher risk to consumer health and safety. 

In Lebanon, slipping food safety standards is a by-product from a range of external deteriorations: widespread electricity shortages, depreciation of the Lebanese pound, the dwindling state subsidy, and so on. As food inflation has reached among the highest in the world, consumers have turned to cheaper items where safety standards cannot be guaranteed. The electricity blackouts have posed a major challenge for shop owners and restaurateurs, who have been forced to chuck out huge quantities of spoiled meat and dairy produce, together losing revenues and customers. 

 Lebanon’s reliance on imports for 80 percent of its foodstuffs has been exposed during the last three years of economic downturn. The dependence has been to the detriment of the population, as US dollar shortages left the government scrambling to subsidize wheat, grains, oils, and other food items deemed essential. It forced a change in the food market and lower quality products have filled the shelves of shops. 

Food Quality and Safety Standards 

 Agro-food engineer and food safety specialist, Sabine Chahine, tells Executive that a high-quality product conforms to local or international standards which take into account aspects such as: product components, nutritional content, prohibited and permitted substances and their percentage, external shape, color, taste, thickness, acidity, and pollutants. 

 She defines food safety as food free from contamination risks which might lead to food poisoning, a malady many of Lebanon’s residents will have found themselves familiar with over the past twelve months. Possible risks range from biological (germs), chemical (sediments, agricultural pesticides, and antibiotics), physical (hair), allergic risks (wheat), and food-borne diseases, which are especially dangerous to people with compromised immunity, like the elderly or the very young, pregnant people, those chronically ill, or those undergoing chemotherapy treatment. 

Absent Checks 

The economic crisis has led to long-term repercussions and successive crises across sectors. One of the more tangible aspects has been the rise in cases of food poisoning, a direct consequence of the breaking down of basic services like electricity and water. [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]Daily blackouts mean food in fridges and freezers cannot be kept at required temperatures[/inlinetweet], which has caused a surge in bacteria growth and sickness, though it is difficult to gauge the precise amount of cases aside from anecdotal evidence, as the Ministry of Public Health does not publish regular figures. 

 “Nowadays, controlling the quality and safety of products in the Lebanese market is no longer as effective as before,” Chahine says, explaining that citizens are no longer able to afford products from reputed international brands with ensured safety standards. 

 “We are witnessing an increase in cases of diarrhea that usually appear in the summer season as a result of the high temperature, but this increase is due today to the power outage that leads to the multiplication of bacteria in foods. As we know, food must be stored and preserved at temperatures below 5 degrees, especially cheese, dairy, meat, raw chicken and eggs… These foods, if they carry bacteria and are placed at normal room temperature, will lead to the proliferation of bacteria and cause food poisoning.” 

 Chahine also notes that salmonella bacteria are most commonly found in foods in Lebanon, as well as other types of bacteria spread through contaminated surfaces. “The roads are full of waste, which causes a gathering of rats, flies and mice, which carry germs with them and distribute them wherever they are,” Chahine says. 

 The economic crisis and subsequent deterioration of living standards has caused a rise in public health concerns, resulting from slacking food safety standards among the responsible government departments. Elie Bteich, chief executive officer of Byscon Consultancy, a local firm specializing in all food safety, quality, health and environment management systems, notes that an absence of proper supervision and safety checks has led to more people buying “corrupt” materials for their lower price. “The spread of spoiled meat is the result of poor preservation or the presence of bacteria in it, which is usually sold at low prices after some traders refuse to dispose of it and seek to resell it,” Bteich says. 

 Some meat and dairy items are entering Lebanon in an illegal manner, according to Bteich, and as such are averting necessary quality control checks. “[The food is] either not fit for eating or spoiled, as a result of being transported in unrefrigerated cars and in very bad conditions, or in warehouses that lack electric current and that do not meet the safety requirements,” he says. 

 Earlier this year, the Bekaa Health Department was forced to shut down four butchers after 50 residents were struck with food poisoning from eating raw meat, and subsequent testing found four separate butchers were selling contaminated meat. 

Bteich notes that among Lebanon’s dairy and cheese factories, while there are “very reliable and respectable factories,” there are also some which are “not subject to any supervision and the quality of their products cannot be ascertained.” 

Careful Consumers 

 Over the last year, many Lebanese have been discovering different ways to avoid food poisoning; buying items and cooking the same day, going vegan or simply choosing to purchase cupboard items which do not rely on refrigeration. Sabine explains that “food remains edible for four hours after a power outage, but after this period some foods spoil quickly, and they must be disposed of immediately, such as raw foods like chicken, meat and fish.” 

 She also says that consumers must be aware of the meat’s color, smell and texture. “It must not have a sticky substance on it because this means that it has begun to spoil. As for chicken, when pressing on it, there should be no traces of fingers on it.” Any animal-based products, like dairy and eggs, Chahine also advises to take similar precautions with, like buying in small quantities at a time. 

Looking at the larger picture, changing mentalities by improving education should also be included as a method to improve food safety among the population. [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]Bteich recommends increasing consumer awareness through training seminars[/inlinetweet], or even television campaigns. However, he says that on a government level “a full plan from laws including importation, to distribution chains, storage and food handling should be implemented on all levels.” 

Measures Taken  

 The growing absence of health and safety standards among Lebanon’s food is an ongoing challenge for society and the state, and has already come at a great cost to the wellbeing of citizens, just at a time when the health sector is juggling its own shortages and financial woes. Earlier this year, the Ministry of Public Health launched an action plan for food safety, following a tumultuous previous summer of food-related sickness. Caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati called the issue a “top priority” for the reputation of the industry and for the safety of citizens. The ministry’s absence of a central laboratory, which the Health Minister called “one of the most important controls for the issue of food quality and medicine,” will remain one of the major hindrances to safer standards for residents. 

Like many of Lebanon’s other sectors, the support of the international community is necessary to improve standards and services through training and education, equipment and expertise. However, unlike many other sectors, the health of the population is dependent on the quality of the food industry, and as that quality falls, so too does the wellbeing of the individual. 

November 15, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AnalysisFood securitySpecial Report

Lebanon’s food security in crisis-mode

by Rouba Bou Khzam November 15, 2022
written by Rouba Bou Khzam

The latest chapter of Lebanon’s compounded and overlapping disasters has emerged in the shape of a bleak and multifaceted food crisis. As if a hard-hitting dose of COVID-19, the Beirut port explosion of 2020, and a crashing economy was not enough, this year, world-wide economies were shaken by Russia’s war in Ukraine which triggered unprecedented global food security fears. 

For Lebanon, the crisis has exacerbated social hardships among an increasingly poor nation, which has disproportionately impacted poor and vulnerable households, and reinforced inequality. [inlinetweet prefix=”” tweeter=”” suffix=””]Every week, more and more families are resorting to cut staple items from their shopping lists[/inlinetweet] as food inflation rates rise uncontrollably, while politicians idly stand by. Lebanon’s food sector, insecure prior to the economic crisis, now has all its weaknesses exposed. 

 Yet the war in Ukraine and its global ramifications are not only to blame. There are multiple factors which contribute to food insecurity in Lebanon; some have been born out of the crisis, while others have plagued the sector for years, like neglect of agricultural investment, local and regional political instability, and financial mismanagement. 

 Food Availability 

 Lebanon’s position as a net importer of food has been uncovered as a major vulnerability in light of the global disrupted grain supply chain, which is  aggravating existing difficulties in maintaining adequate stocks. In addition, as the Lebanese pound has collapsed, the Central Bank’s foreign exchange reserves are dwindling, and consequently its ability to subsidize essential foodstuffs. 

 The Ukraine-Russia conflict continues to exert pressure on international wheat prices and threaten future harvests for the two fighting countries, both renowned for their grain output. This is particularly concerning for the Middle East, where many countries rely on Ukrainian and Russian wheat to feed societies reliant on bread as a daily food. In Lebanon, around 78 percent of imported wheat comes from the two countries. 

 Prior to this year’s global wheat disruption, Lebanon’s food accessibility had already dealt a major blow in 2020, when the country’s main grain silos were blown apart in the huge port blast in Beirut. With a capacity to store 120,000 tons of grain to meet a consumption rate of 50,000 tons a month, the disaster was a major hit to the core of the country’s food security. 

Meanwhile, Lebanon’s oligopolistic food importers, who hold control over prices and stocks, have worked to the detriment of supplies. Supermarket shelves filled with an array of American and European brands have been emptied and instead stocked with Turkish and Syrian products, as suppliers struggle to access US dollars.  

 Despite rich soil and an apt Mediterranean climate, decades of poorly managed economic affairs led to inefficient use of arable lands. Cultivated land represents less than 25 percent of the country’s total landmass, according to a country profile report on Lebanon from United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization. Land ownership is also highly unequal and fragmented. The agricultural sector itself is dogged by poor financial access, partly from the financial crisis and also from unsophisticated production processes. In addition to the high cost of production, it leads to a weaker competitiveness for Lebanese products.  

 

Food Access 

 Several international reports have proven the impact of the economic crisis on food security in Lebanon. Recently, the World Bank published findings showcasing Lebanon’s food inflation rate: the second highest nominal inflation rate in food prices globally during the first eight months of 2022. This was also matched by a report from International Information, a Beirut-based research and consultancy firm, which detailed a 500 percent rise in the cost of living from the beginning of 2020 until the end of August 2022, as the prices of imported goods increased by more than the rise in the exchange rate of the lira to the dollar, as well as the price of locally produced goods.  

 On a day-to-day level, the deterioration of food security has forced a change in local eating habits and citizen’s health. Speaking to Executive, Maha Hoteit, member of the National Scientific Committee for Food Safety of the Ministry of Public Health and professor at the Lebanese University, explains that over half the Lebanese population suffer from poor dietary diversity and are eating less than two meals a day. 

 Food security requires “food availability, food access, proper food utilization, and stability or consistency in these components,” she says. “The biggest challenge today is not in securing food commodities, but in the ability of citizens to pay for them, especially after the dollar exchange rate approached LL40,000 and the purchasing power of citizens decreased further.” She also mentioned that people have been forced to abandon meat and dairy foods since prices jumped, creating potential health vulnerabilities and deficiencies in essential nutrients.  

 “Oftentimes, people are quitting breakfast to eat mankousheh or a falafel sandwich for lunch, and in the evening, they eat sweets to withstand hunger to the next day,” Hoteit says, before adding that such a diet can harm a child’s mental and physical development. Hoteit says the quality of food has been negatively affected by the country’s economic collapse, while underlying poor standards have exacerbated it: “Poor packaging and preservation of foods, especially proper cooling, has caused problems in the digestive system of some, in addition to an increase in poisoning rates, and its symptoms including vomiting, [and] diarrhoea.” 

 Over the past twelve months, a surge in the number of food poisoning cases was reported widely in local media, as the hot temperatures of the summer combined with power outages have impacted refrigeration and food hygiene. 

As for whether the focus on grains is sufficient as a substitute for other items in the diet, Hoteit answers: “Sufficient amounts of proteins that are usually consumed from fish, white and red meat can be obtained if the majority of dishes are from Lebanese cooking characterized by a mixture of ingredients, especially grains and vegetables. As for vitamins, minerals and fiber, they are all available in Lebanese dishes and cereals, thus focusing on them in the diet is more beneficial for human health without meaning that we should completely abandon meat, chicken and fish in our diet.”  

A recent study by the American University of Beirut also demonstrated the changing nature of local food habits. Some 91 percent of households (among a survey of 931) have had to reduce the quantity of non-staple foods that they buy, and 33 percent of adults were skipping meals more than once a week.  

Need for Immediate Action 

Perhaps the worst part of the current food insecurity cycle is that it was predictable. For decades, the international community has warned that without a real long-term food and nutrition security strategy, Lebanon’s next food crisis would be deeper and existentially damaging. 

 Despite the urgency of the situation, the government is still struggling to pass a comprehensive economic recovery plan which could mitigate parts of the crisis. The paralysis has forced the mobilization of civil society and the extensive Lebanese diaspora to meet the growing desperation. Multiple grass-roots organizations, like Food Blessed or Matbakh el Balad, have since emerged and their thousands of volunteers are delivering food packages and warm meals across the country. But this remains a glaringly short-term emergency solution, and does not address root causes, which lie in the hands of the government. 

 In August, the United States announced a $29.5 million humanitarian aid package to Lebanon, which will target vulnerable populations in light of rising food insecurity. Within the package, $14.5 million will support vegetable and grain farmers with seed and seedling supplies to help local food production, among other projects for local producers. 

Lebanon has the highest proportion of arable land per capita in the Arab World, yet its agricultural sector is neglected. Nonetheless, the agricultural sector alone is no miracle cure. Only the adoption of a broader set of economic reforms will help restore confidence in the country and promote financial stability, thus prompting the international community to step up their assistance. Essentially, the world will help Lebanon when Lebanon helps itself. 

November 15, 2022 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • …
  • 685

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

[contact-form-7 id=”27812″ title=”FooterSubscription”]

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE