Information Minister Walid Daouk discusses the thinking behind his controversial draft law regarding the regulation and control of websites based in Lebanon — the Lebanese Internet Regulation Act — and why his plans for a quick fix failed.
An inside look at the cannabis farming of the Bekaa Valley
Lebanon’s banks see soaring profits slow as trouble brews both at home and next door in Syria, while American muscle-flexing makes for costly compliance measures
The prices of some popular weapons on Lebanon's black market have dropped for the first time since the uprising against the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad began in March 2011.
Bearing in mind that the demand that drove prices to record highs was almost all from Syria, the recent dip appears to strengthen reports that Syria's armed opposition is gaining ever-greater access to weapons and ammunition.
The two weapon types that recorded the largest drop are AK-47 rifles and rocket-propelled grenades. In March 2011, a good-quality Russian AK-47 or the Polish-manufactured version, known in Lebanon as a “Circle 11” from the stamp on the metalwork, cost around $1,100. By April this year, however, the rifle had doubled in price to around $2,200. The price climb for RPGs was even higher. A single grenade in March 2011 was worth $100 (itself a significant rise given that five years earlier it was selling for about $10). By April, however, it was nudging close to $1,000. Arms dealers were grumbling that they could not even find RPG rounds on the market.
However, since the beginning of May, both AK-47 and RPG prices have dropped to around $1,800 and $700 respectively. The cost of 7.62mm ammunition for the AK-47 also has declined from around $100 for a box of 50 rounds in April to $83 in June. Both AK-47 rifles and RPGs were the most commonly used, and sought after, weapons for the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and other armed opposition groups. The drop in prices suggests that the FSA is receiving a regular supply of armaments today, which has lessened demand in Lebanon.
It is widely believed that Saudi Arabia and Qatar have begun funding the FSA and that fresh arms supplies are reaching the fighters, mainly from Turkey. The New York Times reported in mid-June that CIA officers were in Turkey monitoring the flow of weapons to ensure that the recipients were not groups that shared Al-Qaeda's ideology.
The FSA also has had increasing success in raiding Syrian army depots and stealing weapons and ammunition, or co-opting Syrian army officers with access to arsenals. Indeed, the profits to be made from selling weapons have spurred Syrian soldiers to steal weapons and sell them on the black market, according to Lebanese arms dealers. That has led to some Syrian army weapons, including RPG rounds, to enter the Lebanese market.
The enormous profits to be made from selling arms has blurred political loyalties. There is a story presently circulating in the Bekaa about a member of a Syrian-backed political party who was in charge of the group's arsenal in his village. He struck a deal with a man from an influential family to sell the weapons to the Syrian opposition and they would split the proceeds. The weapons were duly sold across the border, but the second man then refused to share the profit with the party member. In revenge, the party member told the police where they could find the second man, who had a string of arrest warrants. The police laid an ambush and the second man died in a gunfight. The relatives of the second man then kidnapped the party member and he has not been seen since.
While AK-47 and RPG prices have declined, the cost of prestige weapons continues to climb. They include arms such as the AKS-74U, popularly known in Lebanon as the “Bin Laden gun” as it apparently was favored by the former Al-Qaeda leader. A Bin Laden gun costs $5,000 today, compared to about $2,800 a year ago. A Russian “Dushka” 12.7mm heavy machine gun is worth a staggering $9,000 compared to $3,000 in March 2011. Even that pales to the price of an American M4 assault rifle fitted with a M203 grenade launcher. Worth $5,000 in March 2011, today it will set you back at least $15,000.
NICHOLAS BLANFORD is the Beirut-based correspondent for The Christian Science Monitor and The Times of London
On a hot Saturday in mid-June, hundreds of young people across Beirut took part in a campaign to temporarily occupy key high traffic locations and replace them with ‘guerrilla gardens’. What took place was a welcome contrast from the tire-burning and road-blocking protests of late; instead, participants laid out patches of grass on sidewalks and roundabouts and picnicked under umbrellas to raise the profile of their cause for public green spaces.
Only two days before, the chief of the Beirut municipality, Bilal Hamad, held a press conference to announce the launch of the “Beirut is Amazing” initiative. Attempting to both respond to public pressure and direct the discourse, Hamad announced plans to rejuvenate the city’s parks. Unfortunately, the project is as uninspired as its name, and ignores an area constituting 77 percent of the city’s public green space — the Horsh Beirut. This park is a key issue of the guerrilla gardeners.
The Horsh — destroyed by fire in an Israeli raid during the civil war — is a sprawling 330,000 square meter urban park that until now is reserved for the exclusive use of those selected by the Beirut governorate. Only two years ago this historic piece of real estate was a non-issue for most Beirutis. That was until a non-governmental organization called Nahnoo (Arabic for ‘us’) rallied supporters and started asking the right questions. Today, beyond their media campaign, Nahnoo has compiled research, consulted legal experts and urban planners, organized public events and coupled advocacy with a policy focus to lobby cooperatively with decision makers. The movement, however, isn’t without detractors — including many ordinary citizens from neighborhoods around the park. In typical ‘tragedy of the commons’ rationale, critics of the campaign say the Lebanese will not be able to collectively own such a pristine space without destroying it, pointing to threats as terrifying as barbecues, argileh, littering, and “immoral behavior”; thus, we must deprive ourselves of our public space in order to protect it. Hamad himself made these very arguments during a public forum organized by Nahnoo earlier this year. The forum attracted an almost full house at Hamra’s Madina Theatre, where the majority of the audience was too young to remember the park in its glory days. Many were also angry. They saw the park’s closure as an act of exclusion, one that deprived them of a much-needed refuge from Beirut’s concrete jungle and a meeting point in a city that has one of the lowest levels of public green space in the world. Of course, it is not simply about green space, and the reasons given for the parks closure are superficial at best.
In a sectarian and segregated city the park takes on new meaning. Its triangular shape separates the suburbs from the city with barb-wired walls, keeping Christian, Sunni, and Shia neighborhoods apart. The question that many are asking away from the spotlight reveals an unspoken yet palpable sectarian turf war: “Who will control the park?” Of course legally, the municipality would be required to ensure the park remains clean and safe. On the ground, control is exercised differently. Groups of young men loyal to this or that political bloc could set up shop, hang their flags and effectively “take over” the space. Some believe that Sunni and Shia youth will clash and the violence could ruin Horsh Beirut.
Those leading the campaign for public access to the park understand the risks and realize that a sense of community ownership is necessary for its survival once opened. This is why they are planning to use the space to bring youth together, undertake public education programs and create an active Horsh Beirut neighborhood association to play a role in ensuring responsible use of the park. The tug of war over this rare publicly-owned green oasis in a slowly suffocating city represents a clash between two ideologies: those with a ‘fear-of-the-other’ worldview and a new generation that refuses to submit to prevailing stereotypes and are adamant about reclaiming public space for the people; while the former sees the park through the prism of perpetual conflict and eyes it with suspicion, the latter looks to make the Horsh a space for community and unity, and a source of hope for the future. In many ways, it is the struggle between continuing to entrench the trauma of the civil war and moving Lebanese society forward.
ALI SAYED-ALI works in democracy and civil society development in the MENA region
Press reports that the Syrian government is printing money in Russia to pay civil servants salaries and to close its budget deficit have raised serious concerns.
Two issues — one political and the other financial — are at stake.
The decision to print Syrian bank notes in Russia has been known for some time, as the Minister of Finance, Mohammad Jleilati, announced at the end of May that his government was close to finalizing discussions with the Russian authorities for that purpose. It follows a ban imposed last fall by the European Union on printing Syrian bank notes; two EU members, Austria and Belgium, were among the countries printing Syrian currencies.
However, by going to Moscow, the Syrian authorities have only confirmed an increased dependency towards their Russian counterparts, with all the political consequences that this new state of affairs may entail. For months now, the consecutive rounds of sanctions imposed by the EU, the United States, the Arab League and Turkey have squeezed the Syrian government’s room to maneuver and increased reliance on Russia. Last December, for instance, the Central Bank of Syria announced that it had opened correspondent accounts with three Russian banks — VTB, VEB and Gazprombank — in a bid to avert new sanctions on its foreign assets by the European Union, which were eventually imposed in February.
Since then, there has been speculation that much of the country’s foreign reserves had been moved to Moscow, though a lack of transparency makes it difficult to confirm the location of these assets or their size (estimated at around $17 billion prior to the beginning of the uprising in March 2011). Other indications of this growing dependency include negotiations to have Syria join the existing Customs Union that consists of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan, or the recent series of bilateral agreements in sectors as varied as petroleum, electricity and manufacturing.
As international calls for action to stop the bloodshed in Syria grow, Russia is likely to hold an increasing number of cards in its hand to pressure Damascus. From a financial and monetary point of view, however, the main issue of concern is not where Syria prints its currency but for what purpose. Indeed, while the story initially published by Reuters quoted Syrian bankers saying that the newly printed money was meant to finance the government’s deficit, the governor of the Syrian Central Bank strongly denied it, saying that the new bank notes would replace worn out bills, an operation the central bank “has been regularly doing since it was established just like every central bank around the world.” The government has also denied it was having any difficulties financing salaries and other payables; Jleilati recently said that the 2012 budget deficit was forecast at a reasonable 6 to 7 percent of gross domestic product, in line with expectations. The Minister of Finance has an obvious interest in downplaying the difficulties his government is facing, but while there is little doubt that the treasury is increasingly strained, it is difficult to claim that a collapse is imminent.
It will not be easy to identify the purpose for the government to print new bank notes. Since May 2011, the Central Bank has stopped publishing its monthly bulletin, which reported, among other things, the levels of money supply. What is clear, however, is that if the government were to resort to the printing press to finance its expenses, the risk is an immediate inflationary impact.
While the government had managed to keep a relative lid on the consumer price index for most of last year, prices have jumped in recent months, climbing 15 percent in January on an annual basis, and more than 30 percent in March and April — including a more than 40 percent increase in the food and beverages category. Relying on the printing press, therefore, risks increased social unrest.
However, the only obvious conclusion from this debate is that both from a political point of view and from a financial rationale, the options at the hands of the Syrian government are fast declining.
JIHAD YAZIGI is editor-in-chief of The Syria Report
Walid Daouk, Lebanon’s minister of Information, was given a baptism of fire upon taking his post in June 2011 when his pet piece of draft legislation, The Lebanese Internet Regulation Act (LIRA), caused a storm of opposition and vitriolic denunciations, leading it to being put on the back burner. Executive met with the minister to discuss life after the LIRA and the promise and perils within Lebanon’s media sector.
What was your incentive to develop the LIRA legislation?
I have not seen any legislation related to electronic media. What I had in mind was to protect the [news] websites. There are so many of them and they are of great importance. In the coming couple of years they will become more important than the newspapers. I said let’s not try to regulate, but fix it in some way. I had two ideas. The first was to put a label that will let us know where the website is domiciled. This would make it more credible.
The second part of the law was to help the websites get better services. What can you do if another website is able to steal your content as soon as you post it? So to protect the intellectual property rights of a website, I would say the registered website would benefit from the legal intellectual property rights in Lebanon.
Were you surprised by the backlash to your proposed law?
Unfortunately I didn’t lobby with the community because it didn’t occur to [me]. I saw there was a loophole in the law and I wanted a law that would benefit the owners of the websites. In my mind it was great, but unfortunately some people were against it and said that I am against freedom of speech. This is not true, in the second article of the draft law I said freedom of speech was fully respected.
Do you still think new websites, news or otherwise, should have to register with the government?
No, they don’t have to. The law is for those that want to. It is not obligatory.
Would Lebanese libel law also apply to the registered websites?
Yes, if a website is registered I would know where it is domiciled and therefore if people are illegally harmed by these sites they could take them to a Lebanese court.
Would content on social media websites be subject to these regulations?
No, absolutely not. This has nothing to do with it and you cannot control this.
Is LIRA dead in the water now?
It is put aside for now as there is a draft law that concerns all of the media and it is being studied within a media commission at the parliament. Definitely it is better to have everything within a greater code, but my idea was to address this loophole quickly. In any case it is optional. A media code in parliament in my opinion will take many years to pass, during which time we will still have the loophole.
With so many media barons represented in parliament, will this law pass?
It will but the questions are ‘if’ and ‘how’. It is so political. This is why I prepared my draft law to be quick.
On Twitter recently, you said you believed in “absolute freedom of speech in any blog or any media” but later tweeted “bloggers in some circumstances should refrain from telling the whole truth for the sake of the public and the community.” There seems to be an inherent contradiction here.
It is not a contradiction. I believe fully in freedom of speech. However, in some professions, such as lawyers or doctors, there is a ‘code of ontology’.
But doctors and lawyers are responsible to their patient and client. Who are journalists responsible to protect?
You can say whatever you want as long as what you say does not harm the public interest.
Who determines that?
There must be a code of conduct for journalists and the media sector but in Lebanon this does not exist. I am pushing for such a code.
Enforceable by law?
Definitely not. It should be by the media’s own adherence.
Most journalists don’t have access to the editor’s syndicate and there is no union or syndicate for broadcast journalists. What are you doing to formalize this profession and to ensure journalists can enjoy proper professional support and protection?
The syndicate was presided over by the same chairman for the past 50 years [Melhem Karam]. To join the syndicate was something pending his will. These days, however, we should not only leave the syndicate open for the ones who benefited from the time of Melhem Karam. Now we should open the syndicate for all journalists.
Does the ministry have a role to play in that process?
The ministry has a moral role and I am trying to push it. I am going further, to have the syndicate become a federation, because now it does not include the broadcast journalists. We want everyone in the media profession included, such as the photographers and the sound engineers… I want to have a federation that is one body that is united and therefore stronger.
This is what you would like to see but have you seen any movement in that direction?
It is too early to say but the new syndicate was voted three weeks ago and I am pushing very hard in this direction.
Chapter 10 of the Audio Visual Law aims to limit political and corporate control of the media but is patently not enforced. Can the ministry do anything to curb the increasingly partisan and sectarian tone of the Lebanese media?
Unfortunately not, for political reasons I can’t even impose penalties against any defaulting media — that is to say media that is not in line with their conditions of contract, and unfortunately they are all breaching the law. However, I can re-equilibrate by improving the public media.
Previous cabinets wanted to protect their own [political] and religious media. No cabinet dared to strengthen the public media. They neglected it. I am saying it is now time to reinforce Tele and Radio Liban to give them their federative role.
This takes money. Where is this going to come from?
The government could get the money even if it will take a lot. I don’t have today the intention to be in competition with the private media, especially in television. But Tele Liban could have a niche where it could succeed, for example in education or local output. Commercial stations would not go there because it would not generate much advertising. Tele Liban’s news gets good audiences. We are around 4 percent, which in my opinion is good. We also have the national news agency, which has correspondents all over Lebanon. We are the first to broadcast the news but the majority of the media takes the news from the NNA and then do not credit it.
Lebanon’s predominance in Arab media has dwindled in the face of huge budgets and assertive media coming from the Gulf and other areas of the region. On a policy level can anything be done to ensure Lebanon maintains a prime position within the regional media?
Yes. I hope to have a Beirut media center. At the Dubai media center the majority of the workers there are Lebanese. The idea is to have a media city, or cities, in Lebanon where you can incorporate the studios and the newspaper buildings. I am confident we can attract these Lebanese ex-pats back to Lebanon.
Many of the TV licenses expire this year. Can we expect new terms of contract or will the status quo continue?
Unfortunately the status quo will remain.
Why unfortunately?
Because everyone knows there is a breach in the conditions of contract, and unfortunately for political reasons nobody is being penalized for these breaches.
Enab got its name from the vine that connects all the grapes together,” says co-owner Hasan Rahal. “We wanted a name that reflects the idea of the Lebanese family life.”
This concept comes across well in the decor and the general ambiance of the venue. While the idea seems somewhat déjà vu — yet another establishment boasting a Lebanese menu in a pleasant setting — Enab has some interesting features that distinguish it from other places in the same milieu.
To walk into Enab, is to walk into the dars, or salons, of times gone by. The light, wide space opens up into several rooms, each painted in a different vibrant color, thereby creating a different mood. The traditional architecture is complimented by equally authentic accessories found throughout the space, such as the sink with the antique faucets or the wooden chest full of drawers. “Each item we used was handpicked and chosen to match the ambiance of the space. They are items commonly found in village homes,” says Rahal.
Outside, a serene garden with a rocky wall echoes the Lebanese mountainside. Within are the plants traditionally grown in Lebanese homes such as gardenia, jasmine and lemon and orange trees.
Enab’s atmosphere and setting encourage people to enjoy typical Lebanese traditions such as the sobhiyeh (morning gatherings over coffee), tawleh (backgammon) with argeeleh in the afternoons and long dinners over mezza and arak.
“Enab is the story of every Lebanese household and we want everyone to enjoy it,” says Rahal. “We are not restricted to one class of society and our prices are a reflection of that: they are very fair considering how generous our portions are and what the prices of the competition are like.”
Indeed, the prices Enab offers are reasonable: a typical meal of a salad, four mezza and a mixed grill plate costs around $20.
A plateful of profits
The people behind Enab are Hasan Rahal and Zaher Rizkahllah, who, between them, also own the Second Cup franchise, the Zucca Beirut restaurant and Karam — a Lebanese restaurant popular in the Gulf, according to Rahal.
For this project the owners chose Mar Mikhael as their location and then started looking for an old house with a garden in that area. The initial investment for the project was $2 million dollars, according to Rahal, an amount they hope to return in three years time on the basis of their current turnover rate of around $150,000 a month.
Four months into the project Rahal claims they are taking in around 250 customers on a weekday, and 350 on both Saturday and Sunday, of whom most are local Lebanese.
Another strategy that Rahal says will help them reach the $2 million target is a franchising strategy in the Arab region, which is tipped to begin next year.
Enab prides itself on being a restaurant, and not merely a café, says Rahal, who adds that the menu focuses on the sort of dishes that our grandmothers used to cook. When asked about Layla’s or Frieda’s having the same kind of menu, Rahal replied that those places offer a fusion cuisine with a twist on old favorites, while Enab focuses on the traditional dishes as they are.
While that may be a new idea in the modern setting that Enab offers, the menu could do with having a few signature dishes. In short, go to Enab for the mood and the quality preparation of old Lebanese favorites, not because you are hoping to discover a new recipe or dish.
With election fever yet to hit Lebanon, less than a year ahead of the 2013 parliamentary elections, the eyes of Lebanese and much of the Arab world were turned westward in recent weeks, toward two countries that hold particular geo-political significance on the world stage, and with whom Lebanon has a special historical, cultural, and emotional bond.
Affectionately referred to as Umm el Hanouna and Umm el Dounya, the similarities in the recent presidential campaigns of both France and Egypt, respectively, are to a large extent limited to these terms of endearment.
Though both countries adopt a two-round system of elections, with the top two runners-up in the first round facing each other in a second and final round and the president directly elected by universal suffrage, the fact that France has been honing its democracy for more than 200 years has clearly placed it at an advantage. This was fairly evident when comparing the campaign that led François Holland to the Elysée to the one that saw Ahmad Shafiq squaring off with Mohammed Mursi for the Egyptian presidency.
At face value, and considering that it was the country’s first genuine elections since the 1952 revolution which ended Egypt's multi-party system, the presidential elections in Egypt had nearly all the components to render it a true democratic milestone, one that the revolutionaries of January 25, 2011, many of whom aspired to a “western-style” democracy, had fought for. A presidential oversight commission made up of the country’s highest judges was set up, Egyptians living abroad were given the chance to vote in embassies and consulates, a campaign-spending ceiling was placed and each candidate allocated a number and logo to facilitate identification and recognition and a campaign silence period was promulgated and largely enforced to maintain a “free voting environment.”
Yet despite all these measures, and regardless of the influence of the military in the process and the enactment of tailor-made laws and regulations to prohibit certain candidates from running (or allowing them), the key failure that prevents hailing these elections as a testament to pure democracy is the lack of political maturity.
Missing the point
While it might seem harsh, and may be excused to a certain extent because of a lack of precedent or a deep-rooted democratic culture, the reality of the matter is that the situation resembled one of a completed puzzle with a missing centerpiece.
In fact, little effort was made to make voters aware of their roles and responsibilities as citizens to cast their ballot based on their conviction in the program of their preferred candidate. Nor was there any to drive to highlight the issues at hand that voters would need to consider when choosing who to vote for. Instead, most campaigning prior to the elections focused on the mechanics of the process, failing to trigger the much needed debate on the nation’s post-autocratic agenda.
Moreover, while both candidates in the run-off did publish electoral programs setting their vision for the country, these programs were seldom referred to, debated, challenged, or used as a basis for proposing two distinct options for the country that voters would choose from. Alternatively, the campaigning often centered on the individuals and their personalities and backgrounds, rather than on their ideas and what they have to propose for Egypt.
In France, as in other developed democracies, opposing candidates lay out their strategies for tackling such issues as economic growth, poverty alleviation, investment opportunities, job creation, social security, healthcare, education, etc. In Egypt, all such issues were marginalized and treated as secondary priorities, with the campaigning focused on defamation and hollow accusations of corruption and treason, all the while stressing the past and failing to emphasize the vision for the future.
Though passions and emotions are a staple of any elections, they should be a side effect and not the main drivers of the process, which was certainly not the case in Egypt where ideas and issues took a back seat to instinctive and “populist” discourse.
The result is that whoever is elected will not be held accountable for promises made. Nicholas Sarkozy had promised to lower unemployment to a specific level, and though the European crisis might be blamed for his incapacity to achieve the target set, the majority of the French sanctioned him for it, along with his other unfulfilled pledges, choosing to vote Hollande out of a rejection of Sarkozy. Regarddless of whoever leads the nation, it seems hard to believe that Egyptians would be able to assess and evaluate them based on tangible and objective criteria.
Social media’s limitations
Another key point to be learned from the Egyptian elections, which is intrinsically linked to the political awareness and maturity of the country, is the extent to which social media has had a role in influencing or even deciding its outcome.
While social media was widely heralded as the catalyst behind Egypt’s revolution, whether rightfully or not (it would be a gross simplification to attribute complex geo-political developments to one medium or platform even if it succeeded in galvanizing demonstrators and breaking the chains of fear), it remains that it did show its limitations during the Egyptian presidential elections campaign.
True, social media was pivotal in mobilizing voters and getting them to take to the streets to express their opinions or cast their vote, but its powers were rather shallow in moving beyond simply calling for action or in succeeding in elevating political maturity to a level that would make a tangible and long-lasting difference.
This conclusion might anger some, particularly among the many bloggers and political pundits whose intentions and motivations were certainly noble, but having closely followed the elections, it is unfortunate to notice that the issues often failed to take center stage. In the United States they say, “It’s the economy, stupid,” to refer to what the elections, more often than not, boil down to. The same could be said about France, the United Kingdom, and other developed nations.
If we as Lebanese are to move to that stage, knowing that we definitely have what it takes for it, we need to enhance our political maturity and to start voting with our minds, and not simply our hearts.
Summer has hit Beirut and the temperatures are sizzling, as are the prices of entry to the various resorts along our coastline.
The country’s most exclusive resorts have always been overpriced compared to neighboring countries, but over the past few years it seems the cost of most seaside retreats has become well out of reach of many Lebanese hoping to top-up their tans on what, in theory, are ‘public’ beaches.
Still, while complaints over increasing entry fees and dwindling tourist numbers abound, major resorts claim they are not experiencing a decrease in customers. Though both have increased their entry fees, LazyB reports a 30 percent increase in visitors from last year while Edde Sands boasts almost double the clients.
Some beach goers admit to frequenting the beach less than they did last season, while preferring to go to the “luxury beaches” when they do. “When I do go to the beach, I like being pampered and receiving good service. I might be paying a high amount for this, but since I don’t spend every day at the beach, it’s worth it,” says teacher Dania Naamani.
Ziad Abou Nasr, beach lounge manager at Riviera Hotel, believes you get what you pay for: “If you want to eat a falafel sandwich, you pay a small amount and get it. If you want to eat a high quality meal, then you have to pay more. We are not forcing people to come to us,” he says. Abou Nasr says Riviera has also not reported any complaints or decrease in customer numbers.
Too many lira for a lounger
Still, others refuse, or simply cannot afford, to pay those high fees. “I bring my family to AUB Beach because it is free for me (as I work here),” says Hassan Youssef, a staff member at AUB who frequents its beach, which is free for its faculty, staff and students. “Last month, I took them to a beach club in Jiyeh, I paid $70 for entry and food because we weren’t allowed to bring our food with us. Now, I bring them here every weekend, its better.”
Ahmad Khatib, a student, admits to inviting his girlfriend to the beach only during weekdays as the entry fees are a bit less than on the weekends. Youmna Ashi, a young employee, dislikes the idea of paying for entry to a beach meant to be public and purposely avoids such resorts, preferring to head South or North where there are some beaches with free entry, such as Pierre and Friends in Batroun and the public beach in Sour.
Beach resort managers Executive spoke to justified the increases in their prices by citing the increase in the general cost of living in the past three years, which has also affected them as resort managers. Many cited the increased salaries they now have to pay their staff, the added cost of electricity generators and the diesel they run on, and the increased cost of raw material as reasons for the heightened entry fees.
LazyB’s owner George Boustany speaks of the newly added 3,000 square-meter family area as the reason they had to inflate the entry fee. Edde Sands management also speaks of the new bungalows and other improvements they made.
Others, such as Atlas Beach in Jiyeh say they have not increased their prices due to an already challenging season that has seen tourists chased away by unrest both at home and in the region. They hope that keeping the same reasonable prices will attract more clients.
Whether this year’s season will reap any real profit for the beach clubs is unknown. But one thing is certain, the price of a tan in Lebanon has gone up.