• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
Levant

Syria: A new attitude

by Executive Staff June 30, 2007
written by Executive Staff

Just five years ago changing dollars in Syria was a tricky process – either wade through mounds of paperwork and bureaucracy at a state bank to change foreign currency at an exceedingly bad rate or wander the streets waiting for a man to idle up to you and whisper, “change money.” Back then, any Syrian seen with greenbacks poking out of his wallet would have been paying a trip to the local police station.

Today, it is another story. You can change money pretty much anywhere, withdraw from an ATM or go to one of the numerous private banks newly established in the last three years.

Syria’s banking reforms, kicked off in 2001 with amendments to the law allowing the entry of foreign banks, has been the harbinger of this change, boosting the private sector and slowly altering attitudes to banking and financial services.

“We are moving in the right direction, setting up private banks and the stock market,” said Dr Nabil Sukkar, Managing Director of the Syrian Consulting Bureau for Development and Investment.

Role reversal: Enter the Lebanese

Lebanese banks were the first to enter this essentially virgin market, which had seen no private banks since nationalization took place in the 1960s. This had forced Syrians to either operate through the moribund state banks, bank in Lebanon, the Gulf and elsewhere, or adopt the seemingly highly popular option of shoving money under the floorboards.

“After nearly 50 years of public banks, people are gradually starting to trust banks, taking money from their cushions. This will bring liquidity into the market, and act as a different cushion for the economy,” said Jean Bassil, Assistant General Manager of Byblos Bank Syria.

A lot of money seems to have been pulled out of cushions and from under the floorboards, with banks doubling assets in the first two years of operations. That initial surge is not likely to be as impressive this year however. “We won’t double assets this year. The number of private banks has increased tremendously – seven banks now, two Islamic banks and the third on its way. But the cake is so big in Syria that whoever comes to operate will have enough cake,” said Georges Sayegh, General Manager of the Bank of Syria and Overseas (BSO), part of Lebanon’s BLOM group.

The growth of private banks in Syria is evident not only in deposits and credits doubling year on year, but the number of branches mushrooming around the country – from 25 in 2005 to 43 last year (BEMO Saudi Fransi, BSO, International Bank for Trade and Finance, Audi, Arab Bank, and Byblos). By comparison there are only 271 branches for the country’s six state-owned banks, roughly one branch for 432,000 people according to Bassel Hamwi, Deputy Chairman and General Manager of Bank Audi Syria.

“I hope to see it come down to 10,000,” said Hamwi.

Byblos plans to open new branches in Tartus, Latakia, Hama and the north over the next three years, while BSO plans to open three to four branches this year.

Meanwhile, other Lebanese banks are gagging at the bit to enter Syria, with Bank Libano-Francaise and Fransabank recently granted licenses, and First National Bank to enter with an 8% stake in the Syria Gulf Bank in June. The Lebanese Canadian Bank is also reportedly in talks about entering the fledgling market, and the Bank of Beirut has applied for a license in partnership with the Qatar National Bank and the Emirates Bank of Dubai. BLC’s Shadi Karam said they were waiting for a change in the law to open a subsidiary. “The law is still not friendly enough for me,” he said.

An increasingly diverse sector

Bankers are enthusiastic about the entrance of Islamic banks into Syria, believing the globally growing Islamic financial sector will help diversify the sector and attract deposits from Syrians that have been hesitant to deal with commercial banks.

“Product differentiation is key. I was happy that Islamic banks are coming in, as they are not trying to take market share but broaden the market,” said Hamwi.

The two Islamic banks currently in operation – one Kuwaiti, the other Qatari – are to be joined by Bahrain’s Global House Group, which has launched a new Islamic bank with a capital of $500 million, and the Dubai Islamic Bank, which has also received approval to launch. Three other Islamic banks are reportedly in the pipeline.

“I think a lot of people will move money to these banks,” said Sukkar. “Deposits will grow fast, but to make money will be difficult until people learn about Islamic financing. Islamic banks will do well, but not at the beginning,” he added.

There is also a draft law under review to increase capital requirements for Islamic banks from the current $100 million to $200 million. This same draft law, if passed, will raise maximum foreign ownership from its current 49% to 60% to attract international banks.

The government, however, is dragging its feet to implement the law, adopting a wait and see approach to monitor how the current banks fair, and of equal importance, how state-run banks adapt to the new banking environment.

If passed, the government would likely raise the capital requirement from the current $30 million to $100 million, which would ward off smaller regional players and potentially attract the big players.

However, international banks might hesitate before entering the Syrian market, concerned about Damascus’ politics, the US ban on the Commercial Bank of Syria along with economic sanctions, and due to overly rapid expansion by top players in recent years. Indeed, a Citibank manager admitted as much last month, saying the bank had become too unwieldy in its worldwide operations.

Regardless of whether the law will change, the 51% ownership of banks by Syrians is widely viewed as a façade, with the foreign banks handling overall management. This is reflected in one of the biggest challenges for banks: manning new branches. “We are targeting Syrians educated outside, and then repatriating them,” said Bassil. Top management at the Lebanese banks is typically Lebanese, with middle to lower management a mix of Lebanese and Syrian.

A few more bridges to cross

Attracting new talent is not the only concern of private banks. Attracting suitable clients is equally problematic.

“Approaching a client is difficult as financial education is minimal, as well as transparency and auditing. Few companies have financial managers, and it is difficult for banks to lend due to the risk,” said Bassil. The same applies to attracting foreign investment.

The Gulf is keen to utilize its high liquidity by investing in the likes of Syria, but legislation still needs to be amended to improve the free flows of capital.

An amendment to the law in February – allowing the export of capital by foreign firms – has eased some of these concerns, but the modernization of the legal system is still moving at a snail’s pace. Legal issues over ownership still need to be addressed, taxation needs to be overhauled, and a culture of transparency needs to be introduced. There is also a noticeable gap in the market for investment and merchant banks, alongside other financial institutions to cover all the financial bases for Syria to really excel.

The Central Bank is working to address these issues however, currently taking on two advisors from the Bank of England, and the European Union funding reform of the Finance Ministry.

But most pressing for the sector is what to do with the deposits flooding into their vaults.

“Banks are awash with money and need new products [to sell], but don’t know much about the economy, market and society,” said Sukkar.

However, that said, banks are offering mortgages, credit cards and car loans, as well as altering more traditional approaches to banking to appeal to more clients. “Before, Byblos was into trade finance, but we now offer medium- to long-term facilities,” said Bassil. “We are also trying to gradually bring retail products to Syria as we believe it is a lucrative market,” he added. Indeed, if governmental statistics are accurate, Syria’s exports spiked from $6 billion in 2005 to $10 billion last year. As this rise is attributed to the growth of the private sector – Syria’s oil sales are rapidly dwindling – further money could enter the system.

Nonetheless with more money entering the system, and inevitably the banking sector, banks are appealing for alternative outlets for their deposits.

“We first and foremost need some kind of liquid investment, a treasury bill of some sort to ease distortion in the sector – bank institutions take rates fixed by the regulator but have no place to deposit on a short term basis,” said Hamwi.

Liquidity was originally deposited in a bank-specific colored vault at the Central Bank at 0%, and as of December raised to 1%. Banks want that rate to be raised.

“At least give us a chance to get pennies on our liquidity,” said Sayegh.

The problem of what to do with such inflows of cash could be addressed in the next six months with the launch of the Securities Exchange and the issuance of treasury bills.

Stock market dreams

The securities exchange, slated to open by year end in Yarfour, is being financed by a Syrian investor in the UAE as a gift to the government. Sukkar thinks the bourse will not be opened to foreigners initially, despite regulations that allows foreigners to do so, as the system will take time to adequately handle flows of capital in and out of the country – factors that led, in part, to the financial meltdown in South-East Asia in 1997.

The prospects for Syrian investors looks good, however, with bank IPOs heavily subscribed when released over the last few years.

More compelling for the banks will be the introduction of treasury bills sometime in the next year. “We certainly need it, as a non-inflationary way of providing for the budget,” said Sukkar. “But I hope banks don’t do what they did in Lebanon by buying the bulk of treasury bills as a way to make money. This is possibly why the government is postponing it, to make banks fund the real economy.”

Hamwi thought this wasn’t necessarily the case, however. “This is unlikely given a number of things, such as the ability to borrow multi- and unilaterally as Syria has low international debt and no rating.”

Ultimately, no matter how much the financial sector is reformed and all the corresponding knock-on benefits boost the economy, other sectors need serious investment for there to be viable economic progress.

“We’ve done more on tourism and reform of the financial sector than agriculture and manufacturing – there is a lopsided focus. We shouldn’t forget these sectors need to be restructured in parallel,” suggested Sukkar.

June 30, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lebanon

Foreign Banks: Staying put

by Executive Staff June 30, 2007
written by Executive Staff

Last spring Hani Houssami, General Manager of the Saudi National Commercial Bank (NCB) in Beirut, was gearing up for a busy summer season ahead. Tens of thousands of Saudis were expected to descend on Lebanon and some $4 billion was earmarked for investment.

“It was a dilemma for me to manage – a nightmare the number of people coming,” recalled Houssami.

The July war changed all those expectations, with Houssami left with a headache of a different kind – a glut in Saudis tourists and investors as Lebanon struggles to get back on its feet amid political instability and a sluggish economic environment.

But NCB, 79% owned by the Saudi government, has no plans to leave.

“We’ve been here 52 years so we’re not going to pack and go – it’s a country we believe will re-emerge,” said Houssami.

NCB’s decision to stay the course is not an exception to the other international banks and institutions operating in Lebanon. The majority have been in Lebanon for decades, weathering the country’s ups and downs, ever optimistic that the country will pick up and rise, as the cliché goes, like a phoenix from the flames once again.

Indicative of this belief is regional investment bank Shuaa Capital’s recent decision to open a branch in Beirut’s downtown in September, and rumors of BNPI’s talks with the Bank of Sharjah about a possible takeover.

Nonetheless, international banks are finding the political environment a constraint on their activities. “Every time we look to expand the number of branches, something happens,” said Charles Hall, Chief Executive Officer at HSBC.

“It is very difficult to plan meaningfully ahead. We tend to operate on a yearly plan in reference to our five year plan.”

HSBC, which has been in Lebanon since 1946, have nonetheless had a good year so far, registering 10% growth.  “There was a very conservative framework for this year, but ahead of internal forecasts and historical results, so unless [the situation] deteriorates further, we should make 20% to 30% compared to 2006,” said Hall.

Standard Chartered, which entered the market in 2000, also expects double digit growth this year, said Naji Mouaness, head of consumer banking. “Defaults have been normal, not abnormal, so this is a good sign,” he added.

NCB has also achieved growth, “but not hit the ground yet” and has no plans for new products. “We cannot anticipate the future. Some friends in other banks spent a fortune a few years ago on products they couldn’t use,” said Houssami.

The situation has not dampened Standard Chartered’s plans, diversifying into private banking for high net worth individuals. But instead of shelling out for new branches, the bank has introduced a payment mechanism through Liban Post, a 24-hour deposit service, and soon, internet banking services.

“The war  [last summer] didn’t affect our strategy for new products; we are going ahead with aggressive plans to grow our portfolio,” said Mouaness.

Driving growth for both HSBC and Standard Chartered are credit cards, with both banks in the top five in terms of issuance of plastic. HSBC has some 41,570 credit cards out of the 277,000 credit cards currently issued, according to a January statement by the Central Bank, while HSBC Visa cards account for 22,000 of the 97,000 visa cards nationwide.

HSBC are also looking to expand their presence when the time is ripe.

“We had one or two approaches for mergers, but the environment is not quite right,” said Hall.

Although Lebanon is well catered for in terms of banks, foreign and national, there is the possibility of more Arab banks entering the market.

“The big Saudi or Jordanian banks, the big three players, will establish a presence here. Bank Audi is present in their markets, so why not in ours?” said Tarek Khalife, Chairman-General Manager of CreditBank.

Expansion is not likely for NCB, however. “We are not investing in expansion, as we are not sure if tomorrow we can cross the street,” said Houssami. “One day we might move activities out of the country if the current situation continues.”

Hall also suggested that banks should exercise caution.

“International banks that want to enter should consider private and corporate banking, or takeover or acquisition. The cost of setting up in a heavily banked area is too expensive,” he said.

Equally, the country’s instability could also shy off potential investors that are not already committed. Remarking on the slated growth figures for this year, Hall added: “the major caveat is if the situation doesn’t deteriorate.” As NCB and other banks found out last year, projections for Lebanon can all too quickly go belly up.

June 30, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Gglobal indicators

by Executive Contributor June 20, 2007
written by Executive Contributor

Journalists killed on duty 1992-2007

The Committee to Protect Journalists applies strict journalistic standards when investigating a death. It considers a case “confirmed” only if it is reasonably certain that a journalist was killed in direct reprisal for his or her work; in crossfire; or while carrying out a dangerous assignment. It does not include journalists who are killed in accidents – such as car or plane crashes – unless the crash was caused by hostile action (for example, if a plane were shot down or a car crashed trying to avoid gunfire).

It includes only confirmed cases in our database and in the statistical analysis above. If the motives are unclear, but it is possible that a journalist was killed because of his or her work, the Committee to Protect Journalists classifies the case as “unconfirmed” and continues to investigate to determine the motive for the murder. 

*Adds up to more than 100 percent because more than one category applies in some cases.

**CPJ considers justice fully served when both the perpetrators and masterminds are convicted. If perpetrators are convicted, but the intellectual authors are not, CPJ classifies the case as partial justice.

Older workers

Persons aged 55-64 in employment as % of the population of same age group

  OECD countries must get more people into employment if they are to boost living standards and maintain welfare services. That is the message from the OECD Jobs Strategy 2006. Some population groups merit particular policy attention. For instance, only 65% of women of working age are employed in the OECD, versus 87% of prime-age men. Meanwhile, premature retirement and barriers to getting a job affect older people that wish to work. In several countries, including Italy, less than a third of 55 to 64 year olds were in employment in 2005, compared with over 60% in the US and Japan, and nearly 85% in Iceland. The Jobs Strategy sees four pillars to effective employment policymaking:

A: Setting appropriate macroeconomic policy

B: Removing impediments to labor-market participation and job-search

C: Tackling obstacles to labor demand

D: Facilitating the development of labor-force skills and competencies

Healthcare spending

Public and private spending, per capital

Healthcare spending has grown faster than GDP in every OECD country except Finland between 1990 and 2004. It accounted for 7% of GDP on average across OECD countries in 1990, but reached 8.9% in 2004. Spending is projected to increase as a share of GDP due to costly new medical technologies and population ageing. The public share of health spending – 73% on average in 2004 – has fallen in some countries, but has risen in others. This includes the US – 40% to 45% in 1990-2004 – where, despite a dominant private sector, US public spending per capita in health remains higher than in most other OECD countries.

Some workers will inevitably be in jobs for which they are overqualified, but the rate of overqualification is higher among foreign-born populations. In Italy and Greece, immigrant overqualification is particularly high compared with native populations. Immigrant overqualification is also relatively high in Norway and Sweden, though this reflects refugees rather than economic migrants. While the native/ foreign gap in overqualification rates is narrower in the UK and US, these countries have respectively the fifth and seventh highest overqualification rates for native-born workers of the 21 countries in

Youth and traffic fatalities

OECD countries

Proportion of youth in

the population: 10%

Proportion of youth in driver

fatalities: 27%

Traffic crashes are the single greatest killer of 15 to 24 year-olds in OECD countries. These drivers pose a greater risk than other drivers to themselves, their passengers and other road users. The problem also imposes great social and economic costs on individuals, families and societies. In the US alone, government estimates put crashes involving 15 to 20 year-old drivers at $40.8 billion in 2002. Some 8,500 young drivers of passenger vehicles were killed in OECD countries in 2004. Death rates for 18 to 24 year-old drivers are more than double those of older drivers. Moreover, death rates for young men are consistently higher than those of young women, often by a factor of three. In other words, even where overall road safety is improving, young driver risk is not.

June 20, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Financial Indicators

by Executive Contributor June 20, 2007
written by Executive Contributor

What some analysts camouflaged as “the events in North Lebanon” in the last third of May wiped out modest gains, which the BLOM index had made in the first part of the month. But owing to its resilience and apparent long breath of many investors, the index closed at 1,223.01 points on May 24, within half a point of its close on April 30. The mid-month top mark was 1,248.81 points on May 17. Solidere accounted for the bulk of trading volume in the nervous fourth week of the month but held its ground, all things considered. Main banking stocks Audi and BLOM also fared respectably, with Audi trading above $63 and BLOM at $70 and higher throughout the month. Byblos Bank confirmed that it bought 6.6% of Jordan Ahli Bank.

Beirut SE: Blom  (1 month)

Current Year High: 1,550.85         Current Year Low: 1,168.36

The Amman Stock Exchange trailed its peers with a drop from 5,992.10 points on May 1 to 5,753.89 points on May 27, a 4% weakening. Although government officials and several companies used the World Economic Forum to announce investment initiatives, the ASE was listless because of the troubles in Palestine and Lebanon. Among the announced deals, Jordan Phosphate Mines teamed up with Bahrain’s Venture Capital Bank for a new $65 million chemicals complex. Kuwait Finance House-Bahrain will establish a new investment bank in Jordan with $50 million capital while Bank of Jordan got its license for Syria. According to an ASE publication, first-quarter earnings for 95 listed companies were up 50.4% from a year earlier and the banking sector reaped 65% of the total earnings.

Amman SE  (1 month)

Current Year High: 6,920.89         Current Year Low: 5,267.27

The Abu Dhabi Securities Market shot up almost 600 points, or some 20%, between May 1 and May 27. This rally has lasted for two months and made the ADSM the top gainer among GCC bourses for the year to date. On May 27, the ADSM jumped 4.4% and closed at 3634.93 points, an eight-month high. Energy, real estate, and banking stocks had the most pizzazz with Taqa and Aabar Petroleum among the stocks in demand. The two energy stocks went up 33% and 37%, respectively, in May but were still outdone by real estate stocks Aldar and Sorouh, which climbed 45% and 53%. Fujairah National Insurance made its debut. At the end of the month, ADSM and the Bahrain Stock Exchange signed a memorandum of understanding.  

Abu Dhabi SM  (1 month)

Current Year High: 3,833.94         Current Year Low: 2,839.16

The Dubai Financial Market’s general index rose from 3,670.47 points on May 1 to 4,480.80 points on May 27. The gain of more than 20% mirrored that of the ADSM this month, but due to the DFM, ended the reporting period only 6.9% up for the year to date. Dubai saw the UAE’s second largest initial public offering for 2007, from real estate firm Deyaar. Retail investors pushed demand up to over $12 billion, or 14 times the $880 million share offering. Good performers on the DFM included Dubai Islamic Bank (up 31%), and the DFM stock (up 20%) in May. Emaar Properties  closed at AED12.35 on May 27. The UAE market regulator noted approvingly that for the first time, all listed companies met their results reporting deadlines for the first quarter.

Dubai FM  (1 month)

Current Year High: 4,985.39         Current Year Low: 3,658.13

The Kuwait Stock Exchange ranked second among GCC bourses in 2007 index performance at the end of May, with a 13.27% increase for the year to date. Achieving its climb more steadily than the meteoric Abu Dhabi exchange, the KSE index moved from 10,776.40 points on May 1 to 11.403.40 points on May 27 – its highest stand since end of February 2006. Shares of MTC were in the limelight with rumors of strategic share buying by regional investors. The company formally denied that there was any buying or selling of strategic stakes in MTC or its African subsidiary, Celtel. Kuwait Finance House saw good demand and its shares went up 30% in May. In macro news, Kuwait stirred up the GCC by announcing its switch from a dollar peg to a basket of currencies, which was read as nay to the intended GCC currency union.  

Kuwait SE  (1 month)

Current Year High: 11,403.40       Current Year Low: 9,164.30

The Saudi Stock Exchange remained volatile compared to its peers. From 7,574.48 points on May 1, the TASI moved lower in the first week and closed at 7,667.92 points on May 27. Sabic made headlines by purchasing the plastics business of US manufacturer GE for $11.6 billion. Saudi Kayan Petrochemicals, a Sabic affiliate, was the biggest IPO catch last month with a SR6.75 billion offering that was subscribed almost five times over. A bundle of five insurance firms offered between 31% and 40% of their capital and met good demand. The cement sector was the strongest gainer in the third week of May, after producers hiked their prices. Although the government mandated revocation of the price increases after a week, the companies’ outlook remains good. Agriculture was the most volatile sector in May.

Saudi Arabia SE  (1 month)

Current Year High: 13,509.09       Current Year Low: 6,916.85

The Muscat Securities Market showed further bullish sentiments in May and climbed from 5,807.53 points on May 1 to 6,092.65 points on May 27, giving the MSM a 6.7% gain since the start of 2007. BankMuscat continued to push for negotiations over an acquisition offer it made for Alliance Housing Bank (AHB), a bank with market capitalization of $205 million. The AHB board rejected the offer by BankMuscat, Oman’s largest bank with $2.95 billion market cap, citing other regional suitors. BankMuscat offered a 34% premium on the share price of AHB as of early May and the stock has since gone up by about one third. Oman United Insurance Company and privately owned Al Ahlia Insurance, however, called off a merger plan.

Muscat SM  (1 month)

Current Year High: 5,956.46         Current Year Low: 4,657.16

The Bahrain Stock Exchange was the fourth GCC bourse with a steep ascent during the merry month of May. In a 9% gain, its index rose from 2106.70 points on April 30 to 2,298.67 points on May 27 – making good for losses in the first four months of the year and ending the month on a high note. The kingdom had its share in the month’s primary market glee through the successful initial public offering of Seef Properties, which met strong subscription demand from institutional investors. After announcing management changes and expansion plans, shares in Batelco moved up in May but the Bahraini operator denied rumors that it was talking with an international sector firm over selling it a 20% stake.

Bahrain SE  (1 month)

Current Year High: 2,298.67         Current Year Low: 1,996.68

Continuing on its upward path from April, the Doha Securities Market took May in stride with an 18% gain from 6571.13 points at the start of the month to 7,749.37 points on May 27. With the concentration of gains in the second half of the month, the market’s main movers included Barwa Real Estate, Nakilat, Industries Qatar, and banking shares, including Doha, Rayyan, and International Islamic banks which all advanced by margins of more than 20%. Some investors cashed in on gains with profit taking at the end of the month.  Barwa Real Estate made news with a $1.1 billion Egyptian land purchase for a new super-sized residential project in New Cairo. Qatar Islamic Bank said it will set up a sharia-compliant subsidiary in London.

Doha SM: Qatar  (1 month)

Current Year High: 8,276.65         Current Year Low: 5,825.80

 After a third consecutive month of moving sideways, the Tunindex closed at 2,568.90 points on May 25, down 30 points from its close on April 30. This made the small Tunisian bourse the month’s most unspectacular performer among the three North African exchanges but kept it up by 9.68% when compared with the start of the year. Market cap leader SFBT saw its stock drop by 4% to TD79.98, while Banque de Tunisie lost 3% and Tunisair share prices weakened by 7% between May 1 and May 25.

Tunis SE  (1 month)

Current Year High: 2,712.33         Current Year Low: 1,861.15

The Casablanca All Shares Index started the month with a week of gains to a pinnacle of 12,723.23 points on May 8 but then selling set in and the index shed 14% in a week’s trading that saw it briefly dip below 11,000 points on May 15. To the end of the month, the index picked up another 500 points and closed at 11,464.60 on May 25. Despite its downward fluctuation, the Moroccan bourse is still the best performer, index-wise, in North Africa for the year to date, with a gain of 19.4% from the start of 2007. Maroc Telecom dropped 10% and leading bank Attijariwafa Bank shed 18% of its market value in the middle of the month in the downtrend that showed across several sectors before the bourse’s slight recovery in the fourth week of May. Local brokers described the market’s dip as expectable profit taking. 

Casablanca SE All Shares  (1 month)

Current Year High: 12,723.23       Current Year Low: 6,563.27

The Hermes index for the Cairo & Alexandria Exchanges was 9.39% up for the year on May 27. Entering the month at 65,582.80 points, the index climbed to 68,274.93 points on May 27. Analysts were less ebullient about CASE than about the GCC markets last month but said that telecom and banking shares did reasonably well, the latter with expectations that several regional banks will compete to buy a significant stake in Al Watany Bank. Piraeus Bank Egypt launched a $53 million rights issue. Sodic, the real estate investment company that signed an urban development contract for Sodic land with Lebanon’s Solidere, had to acknowledge that merger talks with another company failed. Sodic’s stock dropped 13% in May.

Cairo SE: Hermes  (1 month)

Current Year High: 68,274.93       Current Year Low: 41,965.37

June 20, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Special Report

Public Private Partnership can boost ME economic development

by Executive Contributor June 20, 2007
written by Executive Contributor

Growth in the MENA region is enticing strategic partnerships between governments and private companies to create infrastructure critical to support and sustain growth.

A Public Private Partnership (PPP) provides a mechanism for the forging of the strengths of the private and public sectors to deliver more economical, higher quality services to the community.

Nizar El Hachem, Principal – Head of Investment Banking at Injazat Capital Limited (ICL), the first regional bank to have submitted a proposal for a $3 billion dollar PPP deal in the region – tells us more.

Provide us with a broader understanding of the PPP concept.

A PPP involves a government engaging the private sector to design, construct, finance and operate infrastructure traditionally developed by governments. In return, the private operator is rewarded with revenue generated from tariffs levied on users of the infrastructure, periodic service payments from a government, or a combination of both. Typically such an agreement spans 25-30 years.

Is it true to say that the current development of the GCC region provides the perfect platform for PPP arrangements?

The region is experiencing significant economic growth that is expected to continue well into the future, this combined with the fact that GCC countries have some of the highest population growth rates in the world provide private enterprises compelling incentive to invest in the area through a PPP. Likewise, governments in the region are looking for innovative solutions to ease the financial burden of providing quality services across all sectors particularly health, transportation and education.

What are the key principles of a PPP?

A PPP allows each of the parties involved to concentrate on activities that best suit their respective skills. The government ministry will focus on developing policies based on service needs and requirements, whilst the private sector consortium goal is to deliver the services at the most efficient cost and provide mechanisms for risk transfer.

Why should governments consider PPPs?

The current strain on infrastructure as a result of the development across the region is placing increased pressure on governments to renew, maintain and operate existing infrastructure and to build new infrastructure. The ramifications for governments with budgets insufficient to meet levels of consumer demand for quality infrastructure in each sector are significant.

The decision to enter into a PPP arrangement is driven by two major criteria:

1. Will the quality of service provided by the private sector continue to meet/ exceed government and the general public’s expectations?

2. Will the service provision provide value for money for both the government and the general public?

For the government, value for money will be achieved if the provision of services under private sector management results in cost savings and improves service quality to the general public.

The key benefits include:

Improvement in the quality and quantity of public services and public access to improved services now, not when a government’s spending programs permit

Deliver greater value for money compared with that of an equivalent asset procured conventionally through government

Transferring the risk of performance of the asset to the private sector

Reduction of government debt and freeing up of public capital to spend on other government services

Bringing in innovation and enhancing best practices resulting in reduced cost, shorter delivery times and improvements in the construction and facility management processes

Enhanced investment decisions based on symmetrical information

Decreasing the tax burden on citizens who do not need to pay higher taxes to finance infrastructure development

Supporting the reform efforts of the public sector 

What are the key success factors for the structuring and execution of a PPP?

The key structural considerations for a government and the private sector are represented in the diagram below.

In addition to these structural considerations, there are five requirements key to the successful execution of the PPP:

Political support

Public support

Enabling legislation

Expertise

Project prioritization

A real challenge considering the nature of the PPP investments appears to be the financing of projects. What size of investment is called for and what type of financiers are attracted?

Typically, PPP projects require large investments  – for example, the recent proposal submitted by ICL in the healthcare sector approximated $3 billion. Fortunately, a number of sources of financing are available to the private sector. Equity and debt financing, government to government debt or government funding in the form of aids and grants are potential sources of financing that may be utilized.

Financing requirements will differ by sector and region and may be capital intensive. A valid regional concern for lead managers in the Middle East is the prominence of Islamic banking. Islamic banking accounts for some $15 billion in sukuks, $500 billion in Islamic assets and $350 billion in Islamic funds. Further, the sophistication of Islamic financing tools are driving complex financing schemes that are attracting an increasing number of institutional and individual investors. It is evident that expertise and networks of the lead manager in both the sector and the region can be crucial to securing project funding and ICL has a clear advantage in the MENA through the provision of its sharia-compliant financial services and well established network with financial institutions.

The sector and region in which a PPP is conducted will also dictate the type of investors attracted to participate. In the emerging market for PPP projects in the Middle East, partners and shareholders of ICL have displayed a strong appetite to participate in investing and financing activities. In addition, international organizations are breaking ground in showing a willingness to co-finance PPPs through grants. ICL was successful in securing the support of international organizations such as the OECD in their recent proposal.

Who are the key stakeholders and how do they contribute to a successful PPP project?

A diverse consortium of stakeholders collaborates to reach the common objective of a PPP project. The government ministry holding the infrastructure that is the focus of the PPP provides:

Objectives of the PPP in consideration of community expectations

Education of the public on the benefits of the PPP

Legal and regulatory environments suitable to PPPs

Lenders, equity investors and consultants provide the funding required to obtain private sector involvement in the PPP to provide an off-balance sheet transaction.

Design, engineering and construction contractors bring the skills and experience in infrastructure development and construction.

Project managers manage and monitor the performance of the project to PPP objectives and operators and managers bring the skills and experience in operating in the sector.

Special purpose vehicles, formed by the private sector participants for the delivery of the PPP project oversee the delivery of the PPP project.

Insurers, legal and financial advisors provide administrative, legal and financial support to the PPP.

Finally, consultants provide the link between the government ministry and private sector financiers.

In the recent $3 billion PPP proposal, what was ICL’s role?

The role of ICL entails guiding a PPP from inception through the inception, structuring, fundraising, and finally management stages.

The attractiveness of ICL in the recent $3 billion proposal submitted in the North Africa region was promoted through its broad corporate advisory experience and the strategic networks relevant to each stage.

At the inception stage ICL performs the necessary market research to collect information relating to the PPP from the government and other relevant sources, as well as and identifying and resolving critical strategic issues.

In the structuring stage ICL utilizes its experience in financial modeling, valuation and funding options appraisal to develop an appropriate deal structure, manages the tender process and identifies consortium partners.

At the fundraising stage, ICL sets the investment terms and fund raising process, ensures the optimal financial management of the transaction and provides treasury management to the PPP.

In the management stage, ICL monitors and measures performance of the PPP to ensure key strategic objectives.

The success of PPPs has spread internationally with application to a diverse number of projects. What particular sectors are taking advantage of PPPs?

Sectors where PPP has been applied in the United Kingdom, Europe, Australia and Canada include:

Aviation

Road and rail transportation

Health

Energy

Water

How does ICL foresee the future of PPP in the region?

The current regional dynamics, particularly the accelerated economic and population growth, continue to place a significant burden on the existing infrastructure, highlighting the need for the heavy investment in infrastructure in order to support growth and secure a sustainable future. Governments and key financial institutions in the area are becoming increasingly aware of the necessary role the private sector must play in providing the resources required to develop the region and provide citizens with world class standards of living.

The current focus on PPPs as a viable solution to the growing burden on infrastructure in the region is evidenced by the exposure it has received in dedicated summits and through the attention of government bodies region wide. The stage has been set for PPPs and ICL believes the sophistication of the current financial markets is adequate to facilitate private sector involvement in the region.

All indications make it clear that the future delivery of traditionally government funded services and infrastructure lies in strategic alliances with the private sector.

June 20, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
North Africa

Tunisia Banking on it

by Executive Contributor June 16, 2007
written by Executive Contributor

The May visit by IMF Deputy Managing Director Murilo Portugal saw him deliver a combination of praise for efforts to strengthen Tunisia’s banking sector, with warnings regarding the continuing worry over non-performing loan (NPL) levels in the system. Banking sector reform was highlighted as a priority in the 11th Presidential Plan, which started this year and will conclude in 2011.

The Central Bank, Banque Centrale de Tunisie (BCT), is working to implement Basel II requirements across the banking system and driving up standards of transparency and governance, as well as tackling the high levels of NPLs.

As Portugal from the IMF stated: “I share with the authorities the view that strengthening the financial sector is a priority. In particular, efforts are underway to reduce the level of NPLs. I am encouraged by the progress in the implementation of most of the recommendations of the Financial Sector Assessment Program conducted in collaboration with the IMF and the World Bank.”

In a report in March, the IMF highlighted lowering the NPL ratio and ensuring better provisioning for them as a “key priority.”

The banking system in Tunisia is well-developed by regional standards and geographically extensive. Institutions present include clearing banks, development banks, merchant banks and offshore banks, and specialist financial establishments such as factoring companies, debt collection agencies and leasing companies. Tunisians have a choice of 20 commercial banks, eight offshore banks and two investment banks, and more than 900 banks give population coverage of around one bank for every 11,000 people.

BCT is currently working to ensure the banks adhere to international standards for debt and reserves. As part of this drive, the Basel Committee’s capital adequacy recommendation of a minimum risk-weighted capital/asset ratio of 8% has been made a requirement for the banks.

Next year, Tunisia joins the World Trade Organization (WTO), meaning that banks will be required to adhere to international norms, which could prove costly in the short term but will help them manage risk and reduce costs.

The authorities have also moved to bring down the level of NPLs, which have hamstrung the development of Tunisia’s financial sector, and improve provisioning. Tax legislation has been altered to incentivise banks to meet the BCT’s 70% provisioning objective by 2009, which the IMF has said “must be considered a minimum.” Meanwhile, public-private organisations known as Sociétés de Recouvrement de Créances (debt recovery agencies) have been founded to purchase non- and under-performing debts from commercial banks. However, in March, the IMF reported that “Up to now the amount recovered on the loans transferred (TND 1.3 billion [$1  billion]) has been modest.”

There have also been changes in procedures for realizing real estate collateral, and the rules regarding the writing off of bad debt have been made clearer, while a new NPL bureau will provide data on total NPLs by debtor and the classification attributed according to prudential regulations.

Contentious issue

NPLs have long been an issue for Tunisia. In 1993, they totalled 34% of credit. While the ratio dropped to 18.8% in 1999, it has since risen to 20.9%. The reason for the malaise is attributable to high levels of lending to the tourism sector in the 1980s, fueling a boom in construction outstripping demand. The thinner margins that resulted caused a glut of defaults. Another area that received a lot of funding was agriculture. Both sectors are mainstays of the Tunisian economy, and vulnerable to geopolitical problems in the former and climatic factors in the latter – the terrorist attacks and droughts of recent years have not helped.

NPLs are a particular problem in the state-owned banks, which average over 20%, while most private banks have ratios below 10%, some close to zero. Provisioning is also higher in the private sector, at 82%, while the national average is 57%.

Consumers are being encouraged by BCT and the government to rein in their personal debts, not allowing them to exceed 40% of their gross salaries, and the bank is keen to limit lending on consumer goods (excluding houses and cars) to three years.

The IMF reports both praised the Tunisian authorities’ efforts to reform the banking sector and highlighted areas in which serious improvements are still needed, notably NPLs. In this area, as in others, progress is being made, albeit from a weak situation. If targets are met, Tunisia should be on the way to meeting international banking norms.

June 16, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
North Africa

Morocco New direction

by Executive Contributor June 16, 2007
written by Executive Contributor

Morocco’s Central Bank, Bank al-Maghrib (BAM), is joining the growing trend in embracing sharia-compliant finance. For some time, regulators had outlawed banks from offering such products. However, earlier this year, the Central Bank announced that it would be legal for banks to offer a range of “alternative finance” options to their clients from July.

There has been a considerable amount of pressure from the private sector for the Central Bank to allow sharia-compliant, or “Islamic” finance, a fast-growing sector worth $500 billion a year internationally according to Standard & Poor’s. sharia-compliant finance is particularly popular in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region, the largest investor group in Morocco, but institutions also exist in many non-Muslim countries. More than 270 sharia-compliant finance institutions operate in 80 countries, and Standard & Poor’s estimates that compliant banks have around a 12% market share in Malaysia and 17% in the GCC area.

A recent report by Standard & Poor’s highlighted the growth of sharia-compliant banking, describing “mounting demand” and “buoyant expansion” in the sector. Many of the world’s largest banks are now moving into the market. ABN Amro opened its first sharia-compliant scheme in Pakistan this year, and Citibank has also confirmed that it will start looking into providing sharia-compliant products over the next two years.

‘Alternative’ products

BAM’s governor, Abdelattif Jouahri, has now given the go-ahead to sharia-compliant financing on the proviso that the products are referred to as “alternative” rather than “Islamic.” The 2004 banking law made the offering of “alternative” products legal, but it was not explicitly specified that this could include what are essentially sharia-compliant finance offerings.

The basis of the new products will be the same as those used in other parts of the world: interest, or riba, is forbidden, as are investments in companies involved in alcohol, gambling, armaments and pork.

Three such products have been authorized by the Central Bank and comply with regulations issued by the Bahrain-based Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions: moucharaka, mourabaha and ijara.

Moucharaka operates rather like private equity, with the bank purchasing a stake in an unlisted company with potential, and retains it until an agreed date, or sells off the share bit-by-bit. In moucharaka, the bank takes on a share of the potential losses of the company, as well as potential profits.

Mourabaha involves the bank acquiring an asset and selling it on to a client incrementally for a profit, while ijara entails renting a property to a client, sometimes with the option to buy at the end of the contract.

It is likely that many international banks which already offer Islamic products in other countries will transfer them to Morocco, getting the scheme off to a flying start.

“We see a significant potential demand for these alternative products,” said Rachid Marrakchi, director-general of Banque Marocaine du Commerce et de l’Industrie, a subsidiary of BNP Paribas. “Our colleagues from BNP Paribas in the Gulf already have long experience with this type of product, and we are actively preparing ourselves for its introduction to the Moroccan market.”

The new products still await authorization from the Groupement Professionnel des Banques Marocaines (GPBM) and the Association Professionelle des Sociétés de Financement (APSF), the two banking trade associations.

Financial-service professionals in Morocco hope that the offering of sharia-compliant products will help drive up banking penetration rates, which have stayed at around 24% for several years, to parts of the population to which traditional banking does not appeal. They hope that this will help bring more of the informal economy out of the cold, as well as provide investors from the Gulf with the sharia-compliant products they prefer.

“The introduction of ijara, moucharaka and mourabaha should allow a widening of banking services and contribute to a higher rate of banking in the economy,” the Central Bank said in a statement.

BAM last year signed a memorandum of understanding with its counterpart in Bahrain, which has been a leader in sharia-compliant banking. The compact will allow the Moroccan institution to tap into the expertise of its partners on areas including the Islamic sector.

With an under-banked population of 33.75 million, Morocco offers interesting opportunities for players in the Islamic banking sector.

June 16, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
North Africa

Algeria On track

by Executive Contributor June 16, 2007
written by Executive Contributor

The proposed privatization of Credit Populaire d’Algerie (CPA) has shown the government’s renewed confidence in the private sector, with several international players bidding. Four years after the collapse of Khalifa Bank, the government has finally shown willingness to reduce its ownership of one of the smaller state banks. A successful privatization could build momentum for the sell-off of other state banking assets.

On May 21, the Algerian government began reviewing the candidates for a 51% stake in CPA, the country’s fifth largest financial institution. Algerian Financial Reforms Minister Delegate Karim Djoudi said the process would also help bidders become better acquainted with CPA’s structure, credit policy and the local banking environment. The offer will be studied in July, while privatization is expected to be completed by end-2007. The government is set to retain a 49% stake in CPA for the foreseeable future.

The CPA sale is seen as a test case for privatization in Algeria’s banking sector, which is overwhelmingly dominated by state-owned banks such as the Banque Exterieur d’Algérie (BEA), Banque Nationale D’Algérie (BNA), Caisse Nationale d‘Epargne et de Prévoyance (CNEP), and Banque de l’Agriculture et du Développement Rurale (BADR). In 2005, state banks accounted for 92.6% of credit and 93.3% of deposits, despite the fact that they represent only seven of Algeria’s 17 commercial banks. It is expected that the CPA sale will be the first of a handful of privatizations in the pipeline over the next few years.

CPA is an attractive proposition for investors, with a 15% share of the local market and 135 branches nationwide. Six banks have registered interest in bidding for the bank: France’s Natexis (part of the Banque Populaire Group, BPG), BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, and Société Générale are complemented by Spain’s Banco Santander, and US giant Citigroup. An acquisition by BNP or Société Générale would give those banks an immediate extension to their limited presence in the market, while the other banks would gain their first foothold in the growing Algerian banking sector.

The government has decreed that bidders must have a minimum $3 billion in capital and an extensive branch network internationally.

Proposals to privatize CPA were first floated in 2000, and initial plans were scheduled to be completed by the end of Q1 2007. However, in the wake of the Khalifa Bank scandal, the government has prioritized structural reform and attacks on corruption. The 2003 collapse of Khalifa, then Algeria’s largest private bank, led to an investigation that revealed endemic corruption and poor accounting practices, with similar issues, albeit on a smaller scale, affecting the rest of the banking sector. Khalifa Bank collapsed with $1.5 billion in debts, and investigators found evidence of graft and corrupt deals with public bodies and in Khalifa Bank’s dealings with its sister companies, seriously damaging confidence in private banking. Further investigations revealed irregular practices at Banque Comercielle et Industrielle d’Algérie (BCIA) – where $187 million of government funds were embezzled – and at BNA. BCIA was later liquidated. The government then banned public bodies from working with private banks, retarding their growth.

In March, former Khalifa boss Abdelmoumen Rafik Khalifa, currently in exile in the UK, was convicted in absentia and given a life sentence. Another 55 executives were also convicted.

While the Khalifa affair may have put the privatization of state banks on hold, the increased presence of foreign banks has injected some dynamism into the sector.

However, some enthusiasm for privatization has been renewed, with other banks expected to follow CPA’s lead. The next to go on offer is expected to be Banque de Développement Local (BDL), a relatively young institution founded in 1985, and recommended for privatization by the World Bank as early as 1994. The bank’s focus on the booming private small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) sector gives it good access to a growing customer base.

The sale of the two banks could take the private sector’s share of the Algerian banking market to 35% to 40%.

There remain no plans to privatize the largest state banks, BEA, BNA, CNEP and BADR. This has led to criticism in some quarters, as public banks have proved less efficient than their private counterparts. The former suffer from non-performing loan (NPL) rates of around 38%, compared to 5.8% in the private sector. The state-owned banks also struggle with a lack of human and physical resources and poor information systems, though the latter is being remedied in part by the introduction of the Algeria Real Time Settlement (ARTS) and the Algérie Télécompensation Interbancaire (ATCI, Algeria Interbank Clearing) systems, which have cut transaction times.

However, the CPA privatization shows that the government has lost its aversion to private players on the market and the ghost of Khalifa has, by and large, been laid to rest.

June 16, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
North Africa

Sudan Ripe market

by Executive Contributor June 16, 2007
written by Executive Contributor

In the last few years, leading Lebanese banks – Byblos Bank, Fransabank, Bank of Beirut and Audi Saradar – have set up shop in Khartoum. The expansion of Lebanese banks in Sudan was built on personal relations linking Lebanese bankers to the Lebanese community  in Sudan and later with the Sudanese financial community. “It’s a relationship that can be traced back to the 70s,” said Laurent Hawath, head of the international banking division at Byblos Bank.

In a world where globalization has become a way of life, the move was also part of a broader development strategy. “The Lebanese banking sector boasts a total balance sheet amounting to 3.5 times the Lebanese GDP. In such a saturated market, Lebanese banks are simply bound to expand abroad. In our case, it materialized through Fransabank Aljazaer in Algeria as well as Sudan and Syria, where we are scheduled to open in 2008,” said Mansour Bteish, Fransabank’s general manager. According to Fouad Chaker, assistant general manager at Bank of Beirut (BOB), “Expansion in Sudan is mainly driven by lucrative business opportunities as well as regional expansion concerns.”

Besides historical commercial ties linking Lebanon to the country, Lebanese banks are also attracted by its size and enormous resources. Sudan occupies over 2.5 million square miles and is home to around 36 million people. Ravaged by a 23-year-old conflict that has pitted the Muslim north against the Christian south, the country ended its civil war in 2005, with the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). Since then, the economy appears to be on the fast track, driven by the need to rebuild a tattered infrastructure. “The country looks like Saudi Arabia did 50 years ago,” says Georges Andraos, deputy head of the international department at Fransabank. 

Huge potential

Sudan encompasses vast areas of cultivatable land, has gold and oil reserves and huge untapped minerals. “Other core export materials are Arabic gum, sesame seeds and live stock,” said Dr Imad Itani, general manager at Bank Audi and chairman of Al Ahli Bank, its National Bank subsidiary.

According to Nassib Ghobril, head of Byblos bank’s economic research department, “The large expat community living in the Gulf accounts for massive yearly remittances, while the burgeoning oil industry in 2006, produced around 492,000 barrels per day – up from 312,000 barrels in 2005 and appears to be steering the economy.”

The surge in revenue stemming from the oil bonanza has translated in an average 8% growth as well as inflated foreign reserves increasing by 45% in 2006, from 40% in 2005, reaching around $5 billion. In 2007, they were equivalent to 4.3 months of import cover, a key indicator. “Growing foreign reserves have given the Central Bank the possibility to support the local currency, which has steadily strengthened in the past few years, picking up from 255 to 210 Dinars against the dollar,” said Ghobril.

With sound macroeconomic policies underway and public companies restructuring and privatizing – such as the Worker’s Bank and the Agricultural Bank – the Sudanese banking sector is opening up. Sudan underwent an IMF reform program that came into effect in 1997, introducing a number of strengthening measures, such as tightening capital adequacy ratios and classification and provisioning against bad loans, establishing new capital minimum requirements, relaxation of strict credit allocation rules, and rising internal liquidity ratios.

“The Central Bank is also encouraging mergers and foreign capital investment,” said Chaker. With Sudan ranking 11th out of the 17 Arab countries on the IMF banking sector developing index, there is definite room for improvement. “Another good indicator to market potential is the level of loan portfolio to GDP, which is around 15% compared to 80% in Lebanon,” said Hawath. The sector has recently witnessed rapid growth, as the reconstruction effort progresses and production from Sudan’s oil fields steps up. According to Nassib Ghobril, banks assets increased in 2005 by 47% to the equivalent of $6.63 billion.

Common language and culture is another important factor for Lebanese banks. Byblos was the first to step into the Sudanese market in 2003, with Byblos Bank Africa Ltd. It owns 65% of Byblos Bank Africa’s $25 million capital, in partnership with the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and the Islamic Corporation for Development, which own  20% and 10%, respectively; the remaining 5% belongs to a local Sudanese businessman. The bank offers tailor-made products to Sudanese corporations and private clients and features a wide range of services, such as commercial, correspondent and private banking as well as investment products. “We have one head office for now and are planning three more branches in the coming few years,” pointed out Hawath.

Fransabank owns 20% of Sudan’s Capital Bank in partnership with Kuwaiti and Egyptian financial institutions. The bank boasts a paid-up capital of $55 million and focuses mainly on wholesale banking, financing major projects and investment funds as well as capital markets, share placement, deposits and investor services and targeting real estate, infrastructure, services, industries and the agriculture sector. “We’re focusing on wholesale and corporate finance. We’re not expecting to open any branches in the near future,” said Bteish.

Bank of Beirut (BoB) recently acquired 17.76% of the Sudanese French Bank’s $40 million capital, the second largest privately-owned bank in Sudan and the third largest among public and private banks. As for Bank Audi, it purchased 75% of the National Bank of Sudan in September 2006.

The National Bank of Sudan  owns 17 branches in Khartoum and in other areas – except in the south and Darfur – with five branches set to open in the next few years as Audi National bank. Run by a Lebanese general manager, the bank is backed by 12 permanent Lebanese staff members and supported by 280 employees. “We will offer traditional retail, commercial and corporate banking. We are currently geared toward the industry sector, shying away from the agriculture, which requires a more specialized approach. Trade financing is also another area we intend to capitalize on,” said Itani.

Burgeoning opportunities

In a country where retail banking remains in its nascent stage, several banks seem to be directing their attention on wholesale and corporate activities. However, advances of commercial banks by sector show that agriculture accounts for 7%, industry 15%, exports 6%, imports 3%, local trade 32% and others 37%.

“In 2006, growth in credit expansion, in the form of advances to the private sector increased by 79% and stock of domestic advances increased by 60%, the latter being a good liquidity indicator. Of course we have translated these indicators in conventional banking layman terms, as we cannot really talk in Sudan about credit or interest, because of the Islamic system,” said Ghobril.

The Sudanese banking sector is Islamic, except for the southern area, where conventional banking is common practice. “The dual system between the north and south is challenging and could result in some policy incoherence,” underlined Ghobril. 

Under the CPA, the Sudanese banking sector follows sharia law, and is placed under the jurisdiction of the Central Bank. “In the south, however, the sector is monitored by the local Central Bank,” said Itani. “There is a big debate about implementing a dual system, but I don’t think it will ever be finalized. Operating under sharia law, however, provides us with an excellent opportunity to expand into other lines, such as Islamic banking, which has witnessed dramatic growth recently,” said Itani.

Bank of Sudan has continued to play its role as the bank for the central and regional governments, and for government and governmental institutions, contributing to their capital formation and keeping their accounts in both local and foreign currencies.

According to several institutions, the central bank has often tried to direct investment efforts toward specific sectors, such as craftsmanship and agriculture.

Underlying the Sudanese banking sector is the political risk that is dovetailing the country’s economic progress. Although the CPA has created great opportunities and given hope to potential investors, the Darfur problem still puts a heavy toll on the economy. “Political instability is limiting growth and liquidity and creating an non-conducive environment,” said Hawath, who sees volatility as another by-product of the emerging market. For most banks, political risk, legal risk and operating under an Islamic system are inherent to Sudan’s market risk.

“Another main issue was the staffing and human resource aspect, a matter of importance in an operation comprising 57 employees. After all, banks are built on reputation, people and systems,” added Hawat. For Itani, the high correlation between oil prices and Sudan’s potential growth is another risk factor, in addition to corrective reforms the political system is willing to undertake in an effort to ward off corruption. Last but not least is the non-performing loan (NPL) ratio, which has fallen from 9% in 2004 to 6.9% in 2005. As the rise of commercial banks into the sector increased, the ratio of actual loan provisions to bad loans increased to 32% in 2005, from 26% in 2004. “From an international standard perspective, NPLs are still quite high,” underlined Ghobril

Regardless of positive prospects in Sudan, the Darfur question and its possible negative consequences on the country’s fragile economy remains of essential importance. The country is at risk of falling victim to sanctions as well as from concerted efforts of activist organizations, such as Save Darfur and others. Recently, Fidelity Investments and Berkshire Hathaway, which both own shares in Chinese oil companies operating in Sudan have been under attack from activist groups. “We do not know anything yet about the nature of the sanctions regarding the Darfur issue or when they will ever be implemented,” said Ghobril. 

Meanwhile, the race seems well underway in the Sudanese banking sector. Lebanese banks are not alone in seeking to carve out a bigger piece of the cake, with Arab Gulf banks spending their oil revenue surpluses in Sudan. According to Andraos, Kuwait alone has invested around $6 billion in the African country. “Sudan is also witnessing an assault of emirate banks, which are entering the market en force,” said Chaker.

Within the MENA region, Sudan offers promising business opportunities, though tainted by political risk. “Management of the peace process has given us hope on how the Sudanese government will go about the Darfur question. Based on the type of investment we’ve made, our management approach and our balanced expansion strategy, we expect to reap the benefits presented by the market,” concluded Itani.

June 16, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
North AfricaUncategorized

Egypt Reform flurry

by Executive Contributor June 16, 2007
written by Executive Contributor

The flurry of mergers and acquisitions that has taken place in Egypt over the past few years continues apace, egged on by the Central Bank as part of the state’s privatization drive and reform of the sector.

Following the implementation of a new law in 2003 that put the mantle of reform in the Central Bank of Egypt’s (CBE) hands, the CBE has encouraged banks to merge and public sector banks to sell off holdings in joint-venture  banks whilst making it harder to enter the market without acquiring an existing bank.

“They are setting up criteria for the sector to really expand, provided, of course, they go through with the privatization of the big four, which have 70% of the sector,” said Anwar Jammal, CEO of Lebanon’s Jammal Trust Bank, which operated in Egypt until recently.

The liberalization of the sector really kicked off last fall with the sale of Egypt’s fourth largest bank, the Bank of Alexandria, to Italy-based Sanpaolo IMI. The acquisition was supposed to have set a new benchmark for the sector’s reforms, but consolidation has not happened as fast as the CBE wanted, with the slated reduction from 57 to 30 by the end of last year not achieved. There are currently 43 government-registered state, private, and joint venture banks and foreign bank branches in Egypt.

The most significant news has been the scrapping of the planned merger of the country’s second and third largest banks, Banque Misr and Banque du Caire (BDC), which had been slated for December by the CBE. Due to large loan defaults at BDC – the largest debtors have either fled the country, been imprisoned, or died – Banque Misr instead acquired BDC’s entire shares for $281.6 million in March.

The original plan had been to create a super state-owned bank that could compete with other major players domestically and internationally.  For instance, the National Bank of Egypt (NBE), the country’s biggest commercial bank, has been instrumental in the growing trade between China and Egypt, estimated at $3.18 billion, up 48.8% from 2005.

NBE handles 65% of the financial services between the two countries, with the bank to turn a representative office in Shanghai into a branch by the end of the year.

Talk of mergers

Although the privatization of the public sector banks has not taken place as initially expected, with six state banks still in operation, regional banks are seeking stakes in private and joint-venture banks.

Egyptian Saudi Bank shares have soared lately over government plans to sell its 11% stake with Albaraka Banking Group, the bank’s major shareholder and potential buyer, while the Export Development Bank of Egypt has increased its capital to 800 million LE ($140 million) on the back of a possible merger or acquisition.

The Suez Canal bank and El Watany Bank of Egypt have also received acquisition offers, with reported interest in El Watany by the National Bank of Kuwait.

Pushing interest in the sector has been huge cash inflows from the Gulf, with $10 billion in investments coming from the UAE last year alone. There are some 215 joint ventures between the UAE and Egypt, largely concentrated in financial services and industry.

Last year, the Emirates’ Union National Bank purchased 94.8% of the Alexandria Commercial and Maritime Bank for $44 million and increased its wholly owned subsidiary’s capital to $176 million this year.

April saw the Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank (ADIB) beat off competition from Saudi banks to acquire a 49% stake in the National Bank of Development (NBD). The CBE has demanded that ADIB increase NBD’s paid in capital to LE500 million ($88 million), and then to LE2 billion ($351.6 million) within three years of the deal.

Last month, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority acquired an 8% stake in regional investment bank EFG-Hermes, which reported a profit of $43.6 million for the first quarter, up 20% over the corresponding period last year. Meanwhile, EFG-Hermes’ UAE brokerage operation, established in 2005, holds number one position on the Dubai Financial Market this year with an average market share of 9%.

Egypt holds significant potential for the banking sector, retail in particular, with only 10% of the country’s 75 million population estimated to hold a bank account.

“Although the per capita income is low, that is improving,” said Saad Azhari, Vice Chairman and General Manager of Lebanon’s BLOM Bank, which bought out Misr Romanian Bank in 2005.

“Egypt is very promising with the adjustment of macroeconomic policies,” he added. In its first year, BLOM Egypt reported $11 million in profits and projects $15 million this year.

For Egypt to take advantage of all this external interest in its banking sector, the full liberalization of the sector is key, along with legislative and bureaucratic reform for the sector to run smoothly.

June 16, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 576
  • 577
  • 578
  • 579
  • 580
  • …
  • 695

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    Executive Magazine
    • ISSUES
      • Current Issue
      • Past issues
    • BUSINESS
    • ECONOMICS & POLICY
    • OPINION
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • EXECUTIVE TALKS
    • MOVEMENTS
      • Change the image
      • Cannes lions
      • Transparency & accountability
      • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
      • Say No to Corruption
      • The Lebanon media development initiative
      • LPSN Policy Asks
      • Advocating the preservation of deposits
    • JOIN US
      • Join our movement
      • Attend our events
      • Receive updates
      • Connect with us
    • DONATE