• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
LevantUncategorized

Jordan Coming of age

by Executive Contributor June 16, 2007
written by Executive Contributor

As Jordan’s financial services industry comes of age, the banking sector has been shaping itself into one of the major contributors to the country’s increasing economic power. The sector may also be experiencing what is equal to its Sturm und Drang period, brimming with ambitions, growth instincts, and sometimes conflicting impulses.

In recent reports, analysts credited increased purchasing power of consumers along with liberal attitudes towards personal debt with driving Jordan’s explosive banking sector growth. Deeper rooted drivers of development included increased investment from the GCC, improved regulations, and focus on the development of retail business.

A variable helping the sector sustain its growth is trade and banking services activities originating from neighboring Iraq, which has provided significant fee income for local and foreign banks. Observers also say that the sector appears to have benefited from the ongoing political instability in Lebanon where certain capital inflows make it to Jordan in search of a safer environment for investment.

Banking sector deposits, which last year reached $20.6 billion and equaled 1.4 times Jordan’s nominal GDP, have grown at a slightly faster rate than GDP – supporting the notion that the country’s financial culture has left its underbanked past firmly behind and that banks are reaching the customers. However, in spite of the highly competitive environment, the market remains concentrated, with the top three banks dominating the market.

Good asset

Jordan sports 13 local commercial banks plus eight foreign owned, two Islamic banks and five investment banks for a population of 5.9 million. There is no state ownership in the sector. But one of the significant features of Jordan’s banking sector is its high concentration. The leading bank is the Arab Bank, which holds approximately 60% of overall banking assets. Observers agree that size matters when it comes to the performance of banks and Arab Bank demonstrates the accuracy of this theory.

Research shows the strength of Arab Bank is such that the bank’s 40% increase in profits in 2006 reflected very positively on total sector results, which rose for all banks to $773 million (JD547.35 million; JD1 buys $1.41) in 2006 from JD 500.77 million in 2005, representing a 9.3% increase. According to research firm Amwal Invest, only Arab Bank and four other banks experienced growth in their bottom line in 2006. 

In any case, the sector’s 2006 growth is paltry when compared to the 80% increase in 2005. But nevertheless, experts say the sector’s prospects for 2007 are promising, specially the sector’s performance on the Amman Stock Exchange.

In 2006, the sector’s consolidated assets grew by 14.9% to reach JD 24.24 billion. Figures from the Central Bank of Jordan (CBJ) showed that 25.6% of the total assets at the end of 2006 comprise foreign assets, with balances held at foreign banks making up the bulk. The remainder represents local assets, with the lion’s share claimed by facilities given to the private sector, constituting 39.31% of total assets. The largest increase in assets in absolute terms was for the Arab Bank, which grew by JD1.624 billion.

The International Monetary Fund said it expects Jordan’s economy to keep growing at around 6% in 2007 on the back of 6.5% real GDP growth in 2006. Expecting a bumper year in 2007, a number of the local and foreign bankers are willing to expand their business in the kingdom.

The IMF encouraged the increasing role of the banking sector, but issued a warning on credit growth. “Particular care is required with new forms of lending, which carry greater risks, such as margin and non-collateralized loans that have been growing rapidly,” the international watchdog admonished, arguing that the profitability of banks and, implicitly, the health of loan portfolios have yet to withstand tests of a slowing economy. 

The stats

Figures by Amwal Invest show 2006 saw the consolidated credit facilities offered to the private sector grow by 26.1% to reach JD9.7 billion. “Facilities extended to public entities increased by 18% to JD423.2 million, while those to financial institutions declined by 63.4% from JD20.5 million in 2005 to JD7.5 million.”

Amwal did note two distinct changes in the sector between 2005 and 2006. “In 2006, net interest income made a more significant contribution to total operating income at almost 70%, pursuant to a refocusing on core operations, while gains from investments played a much smaller role, making up only 3%.” When compared to 2005, interest income contributed 55% to total operating revenue, and gains from investments around 13%. “The average increase of net income for all the banks was 27%, the most significant being Jordan Commercial Bank, rising by 62.9% from JD 9.66 million to JD 15.74 million,” Amwal’s report said.

Property financing increased to meet the expansion in the real estate sector in Amman and other tourist areas. Similarly, other kinds of financing, such as personal loans, holiday loans, marriage loans, car loans, and business loans also thrived. These developments trickled down to fee-income and thus, the bottom line.

Both the Arab Bank and the Housing Bank for Trade and Finance (HBTF) posted profit increases of over 20% in the first quarter of 2007. Arab Bank announced first quarter profits of $187 million after taxes and provisions, which was a year-on-year increase of 24.6%. HBTF reported even a better increase of 36% with profits standing at $51.7 million for the first quarter of 2007.  These robust results to a certain extent were also achieved by other banks with Jordan Kuwait Bank reporting profits of $15.7 million in the first quarter of 2007 or a 5% increase when compared to the same period in 2006.

Despite rapid growth and high levels of profitability, the banking sector still requires further development, including long-term strategies to diversify sources of income, innovations in product and service delivery, greater choices for customers and investing more on staff training.

Charging ahead

Experts agree that the upcoming three years hold considerable challenges for the banking sector, as well as for policy makers who determine aspects of the environment in which the sector operates. Banks will be looking for sources of growth and to maintain the high profit rates that they become accustomed to, while competition intensifies, and technological changes impact on the way that banking operations are carried out.

Banks must also introduce new strategies aimed at the most efficient utilization of capital in line with capital adequacy requirements. Large banks must accelerate efforts to penetrate new markets regionally and internationally. The CBJ must also encourage a consolidation phase in the next two years as the market is saturated. Consolidation should first start in acquisitions between local banks, especially smaller ones. This move would encourage the introduction of new products and services and enhance the quality of those already existing, allowing effective competition on a regional and international level.

Another challenge local banks must face is the entry of foreign banks. Foreign banks have many advantages over their local counterparts and could eat away at their profits if additional reforms and development of the sector fails to materialize.

Although experts warn of the potential shortfalls in the sector, the report by Amwal Invest acknowledges that most “Jordanian banks enjoy a higher capital adequacy requirement ratio than the 12% set by the CBJ, which is also higher than the 8% ratio set by Basel II Committee.” After the CBJ raised the minimum paid-up capital for Jordanian banks last year, “most banks went about increasing their capital through the distribution of stock dividends or through private placements. The step helped banks secure sufficient funds to seize investment opportunities locally, regionally and globally.”

In non-fiscal aspects, Jordan’s financial services industry has a number of governance and cultural issues to master. The sector’s evolution recently showed some large-scale employee migrations and shifts in personnel that seemed indicative of challenges in the management of highly skilled human banking resources, which are somewhat scarce in the country. In one recent banking conference in Amman, a sector critic asked the president of a smaller bank outright why his institution was lambasted by so many people for “loan sharking”. In other instances, industry insiders still frequently clam up when asked about the dominance of Arab Bank and its impact on the entire sector, virtually forcing further questions on transparency and the authenticity of all facets in the country’s banking picture.

Although the economy and leading sectors are showing consistent growth, the government in Amman is tasked to have strong strategies to mitigate potentially even higher oil prices, address unemployment and control inflation in order to remedy the country’s trade and current account deficits. As more foreign investment is flowing in and alternative financing means gain in popularity in the broadening financial industry, supervision of the Jordanian banking sector through the CBJ will be existential for the further sound development, believes the IMF. But, the government must also assist in establishing a central credit bureau to help banks make better risk assessment. And implementation of the Basel II accords by the end of 2007 is a move that cannot be avoided. Market forces will drive mature banks to excel – with a little helping hand from the regulator. 

June 16, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lebanon

Foreign Banks Staying put

by Executive Contributor June 16, 2007
written by Executive Contributor

Last spring Hani Houssami, General Manager of the Saudi National Commercial Bank (NCB) in Beirut, was gearing up for a busy summer season ahead. Tens of thousands of Saudis were expected to descend on Lebanon and some $4 billion was earmarked for investment.

“It was a dilemma for me to manage – a nightmare the number of people coming,” recalled Houssami.

The July war changed all those expectations, with Houssami left with a headache of a different kind – a glut in Saudis tourists and investors as Lebanon struggles to get back on its feet amid political instability and a sluggish economic environment.

But NCB, 79% owned by the Saudi government, has no plans to leave.

“We’ve been here 52 years so we’re not going to pack and go – it’s a country we believe will re-emerge,” said Houssami.

NCB’s decision to stay the course is not an exception to the other international banks and institutions operating in Lebanon. The majority have been in Lebanon for decades, weathering the country’s ups and downs, ever optimistic that the country will pick up and rise, as the cliché goes, like a phoenix from the flames once again.

Indicative of this belief is regional investment bank Shuaa Capital’s recent decision to open a branch in Beirut’s downtown in September, and rumors of BNPI’s talks with the Bank of Sharjah about a possible takeover.

Nonetheless, international banks are finding the political environment a constraint on their activities. “Every time we look to expand the number of branches, something happens,” said Charles Hall, Chief Executive Officer at HSBC.

“It is very difficult to plan meaningfully ahead. We tend to operate on a yearly plan in reference to our five year plan.”

HSBC, which has been in Lebanon since 1946, have nonetheless had a good year so far, registering 10% growth.  “There was a very conservative framework for this year, but ahead of internal forecasts and historical results, so unless [the situation] deteriorates further, we should make 20% to 30% compared to 2006,” said Hall.

Standard Chartered, which entered the market in 2000, also expects double digit growth this year, said Naji Mouaness, head of consumer banking. “Defaults have been normal, not abnormal, so this is a good sign,” he added.

NCB has also achieved growth, “but not hit the ground yet” and has no plans for new products. “We cannot anticipate the future. Some friends in other banks spent a fortune a few years ago on products they couldn’t use,” said Houssami.

The situation has not dampened Standard Chartered’s plans, diversifying into private banking for high net worth individuals. But instead of shelling out for new branches, the bank has introduced a payment mechanism through Liban Post, a 24-hour deposit service, and soon, internet banking services.

“The war  [last summer] didn’t affect our strategy for new products; we are going ahead with aggressive plans to grow our portfolio,” said Mouaness.

Driving growth for both HSBC and Standard Chartered are credit cards, with both banks in the top five in terms of issuance of plastic. HSBC has some 41,570 credit cards out of the 277,000 credit cards currently issued, according to a January statement by the Central Bank, while HSBC Visa cards account for 22,000 of the 97,000 visa cards nationwide.

HSBC are also looking to expand their presence when the time is ripe.

“We had one or two approaches for mergers, but the environment is not quite right,” said Hall.

Although Lebanon is well catered for in terms of banks, foreign and national, there is the possibility of more Arab banks entering the market.

“The big Saudi or Jordanian banks, the big three players, will establish a presence here. Bank Audi is present in their markets, so why not in ours?” said Tarek Khalife, Chairman-General Manager of CreditBank.

Expansion is not likely for NCB, however. “We are not investing in expansion, as we are not sure if tomorrow we can cross the street,” said Houssami. “One day we might move activities out of the country if the current situation continues.”

Hall also suggested that banks should exercise caution.

“International banks that want to enter should consider private and corporate banking, or takeover or acquisition. The cost of setting up in a heavily banked area is too expensive,” he said.

Equally, the country’s instability could also shy off potential investors that are not already committed. Remarking on the slated growth figures for this year, Hall added: “the major caveat is if the situation doesn’t deteriorate.” As NCB and other banks found out last year, projections for Lebanon can all too quickly go belly up.

June 16, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
North Africa

Morocco: Need to build

by Executive Staff June 7, 2007
written by Executive Staff

Although the Gulf has seen the majority of construction activity in the MENA area of late, Morocco too is beginning to emerge as a favorite for a variety of European and Gulf investors.

The Investment Commission, chaired by Prime Minister Driss Jettou, announced on June 13 the setting-up of three major cement factories at a total cost of Dh8.9 billion ($1.1 billion). These significant investments in the cement industry are designed to meet the increasing demand in the construction and real estate sector.

Although the cement industry still is dominated by foreign capital, two out of the three factories will be Moroccan-owned. The first one is initiated by the Ynna group and will be built in the Settat region. The second one, to be established by the Addoha group, will have two units, one in the region of Beni Mellal and the other one also in Settat.

The Ynna group is investing Dh3.3 billion ($400 million), creating 500 jobs. The Addoha group’s factory, also know as Ciments de l’Atlas, will require an investment of Dh3.6 billion ($430 million), with the creation of 1,000 jobs in its two units.

Spanish firm Lubasa, over the past 50 years specializing in construction, real estate development and environmental management, will set up the third cement factory. To complete this project in the region of Sidi Kacem, Lubasa will invest Dh1.9 billion ($228 million) and create 170 direct jobs and 300 indirect jobs.

The investment commission has also studied many other projects. In total, some Dh25 billion ($3 billion) and the creation of 5500 jobs are at stake.

Most developments are high end

Among others, the commission will soon assess the Loukos construction project, a city planned by Emirati firm Al Qudra and Moroccan firm Addoha. The investment for this new city amounts to Dh1.2 billion ($144 million) and will create 2024 jobs. The investment program includes the construction of apartments, houses, public facilities and shopping malls.

According to a study conducted by the Centre Marocain de Conjuncture (CMC) published in March 2007, the construction and real estate sectors make up 7% of national production for an added value of 5% of GDP. The latest statistics on employment reveal that the construction and public works sector employs around 700,000 people directly, representing 6.7% of the working population. The real estate sector generated Dh2.9 billion in foreign direct investment (FDI) in up to the end of September 2006, which represents 15% of all FDI flow.

“The real estate market is booming, as illustrated by domestic sales of cement at the end of September, which rose by 10% compared to the same period in 2005. The construction and public works sector also created 61,000 jobs by the end of September and the number of mortgages contracted by banks by the end of November rose by more than 25%,” said Leila Haddaoui, project director at CDG Development, a development and construction firm for large-scale urban projects.

In that sense, FDI development prospects in the real estate sector look very promising as illustrated by the real estate boom in high-end products: luxurious condominiums, office headquarters, five-star hotels, tourist resorts and port facilities.

Although there are many who bemoan the lack of maturity in Morocco’s real estate sector, notably the lack of reference prices, the lack of insurance tools and the threat of a speculative bubble, the construction sector continues to thrive.

The housing shortage, combined with the development of tourism projects and the emergence of a new type of professional real estate service industry all point to a promising future for Morocco.

However, while the market is in danger of becoming oversupplied with property for upper and middle income groups, the country is still suffering from an acute shortage of low-cost housing. Morocco’s cities are growing, as increasing numbers of migrants move in from rural areas. In 2000, 53% of Morocco’s population lived in urban areas, a figure that is predicted to rise to 65% by 2012.

While demand for residential property in Morocco is high, the market faces three principal challenges: affordability, limited financing options, and unclear laws regarding landownership and titling issues.

As foreign interest in Morocco continues to grow, the government needs to be careful to ensure that the all-too-common problem of “make it all luxury” is not repeated in a country that needs to house a rapidly growing population. With a housing shortfall estimated at anywhere form 500,000 to 1.5 million, social housing could well be more of a priority.

June 7, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Levant

Turkey: The market yawns

by Executive Staff June 7, 2007
written by Executive Staff

Despite political uncertainty with the coming elections and setbacks in negotiations with the European Union, Turkey’s economic fundamentals remain strong. While there have been short-term wobbles due to recent events, and long-term issues such as inflation, the current account deficit (CAD) and poverty remain, the IMF and the market expect growth to continue, most likely under the current ruling party with a renewed mandate after July’s elections.

At the end of April, the Turkish stock market and the lira were hit by a statement by the military voicing support for secularism, which was seen as an attack on the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) government, with its roots in political Islam. The markets were also influenced by large demonstrations against AKP in Istanbul, Ankara and Izmir.

The demonstrations came in the wake of Prime Minster Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s decision to name Foreign Minister Abdullah Gül as candidate for president, a role elected by parliament. There had already been demonstrations against Erdogan when it was thought that he would stand for the presidency. The opposition boycotted the vote in parliament, so Gül failed to achieve the required two-thirds majority. The vote was annulled by the constitutional court, with the consequence that the AKP announced changes to the constitution allowing the president to be elected directly. These changes have been rejected by the court and secular President Ahmet Necdet Sezer, and will now be put to the electorate by referendum. Meanwhile, the legislative elections have been brought forward to July 22. Tensions are running high between the AKP and Turkey’s secularists, who accuse the party of trying to usher in elective dictatorship as a first step towards Islamic rule.

However, despite the shocks to stocks and currency, the response of the market as a whole appears to be “so what?” Turkey has in the past been vulnerable to capital flight, but business confidence in the country remains relatively unperturbed by political events for two main reasons. Firstly, the economy has been performing strongly enough, with sound enough fundamentals, for the political worries to have less effect than previously. Secondly, the AKP, which has presided over several years of growth, looks increasingly likely to be re-elected thanks to divisions in the secularist camp.

Difficult relations with the EU

Turkey’s strong and stable economic performance under the AKP administration has seen the party win friends in the domestic, business community, the EU and the IMF. The party came to power in 2003 with a majority in parliament, the first since the Motherland Party (ANAP) governments of the 1980s.

Under the AKP, economic reforms have continued, the economy has performed well and a historic milestone was reached when EU accession negotiations were opened. However, as elections drew closer, the privatization program has slowed, and the EU has suspended eight “chapters” (or policy areas) of negotiations due to Turkey’s intransigence on certain issues, including allowing ships and aircraft from the Republic of Cyprus to use its ports and airports.

However, the country’s economy is still in good shape. The budget deficit is 2% of GDP, considerably less than the maximum of 2% required by the EU; public debt, at 61%, is only a touch above the EU ceiling of 60%; and growth has averaged almost 8% over the past four years, taking the average per capita income at purchasing power parity (PPP) to $8,400 in 2006, from $6,700 in 2002, according to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

The growth has been boosted by high inflows of foreign direct investment (FDI), which has also been financing the current account deficit. Between 1980 (the year of the last military coup) and 2003, Turkey attracted $18 billion in FDI. However, in 2003, the country brought in $1.7 billion in FDI, and in 2006 $20 billion, a figure that could rise to $30 billion this year.

Turkey’s custom union with the EU has further contributed to country’s economic development. Turkey is one of only two non-member countries with such an agreement. Ulrike Hauer, the undersecretary of the EU Delegation of the European Commission to Turkey said that the EU and Turkey were enjoying good levels of trade and that this has helped Ankara decrease its trade deficit with the bloc. “Turkey’s trade deficit declined to 20% from 60% during its trade with the EU,” she declared.

Economic challenges remain. Inflows of money due to the appreciating lira and high interest rates are restraining corporate profits and exports. The current account deficit remains large and is growing, hitting 8% of GDP earlier this year. Inflation, for years the bugbear of the economy, is under control and decreasing, but still well off target at 9.6% in 2006, with the Economist Intelligence Unit forecasting a 6.5% rate by year end. Official unemployment stands at 9.9%, and poverty remains an issue.

Relations with the EU have been given a further setback by the election of Nicholas Sarkozy as French President, and the subsequent victory of the party backing him in parliamentary elections. Sarkozy’s election platform explicitly stated his opposition to Turkey’s membership of the EU as the country is in “Asia Minor.” A Turkish military incursion into northern Iraq (seen by many as a pawn in the AKP-military game) would also hit relations with both the EU and the US, though it is likely to be a brief operation. Business has been ambivalent about the potential for military action, divided between those benefiting from trade with northern Iraq and those supporting a stronger security focus following the Ankara bombing in late May.

Despite these important caveats, Turkey’s disciplined macroeconomic policies, strengthened economic institutions and structural results continue to bolster confidence. This is apparent from the latest IMF report on the nation’s economic outlook, part of the 2007 Article IV Consultation meetings.

“Turkey’s macroeconomic performance in recent years has been impressive, combining strong growth with a sustained reduction of inflation,” the IMF said in a statement. “Political stability, structural reforms and favorable external conditions have facilitated this good performance.”

According to the IMF, the primary drivers behind growth are private consumption and investment, declining real interest rates, surging capital inflows, rapid credit expansion and rising productivity, combined with falling inflation.

The statement concluded: “The goal should be to build on the economic success of the last five years to firmly entrench high growth, secure low inflation and make the economy more flexible and resilient to external shocks.”

The EIU, sharing the IMF’s confidence, forecasts continued growth, with 5.5% in 2008, 5.2% in 2009, 5.1% in 2010 and 5.2% in 2011.

A June report by ING, the Dutch banking group, pronounced the June EU summit as “a non-event for Turkey,” and said that a likely AKP victory would keep the economy on track, whereas its rivals may herald a return to instability. The report, part of ING’s Prophet series, says that, despite the election of Sarkozy, France is likely to hold off from lobbying to change the objectives of Turkey’s EU membership talks until December.

The report said that opinion polls showing 35-40% support for AKP indicates it is likely to win, “with positive implications for economic development… [and] good news for bonds.” The opposition secular Republican People’s Party (CHP), which is nominally social-democratic, is currently polling around 20%. ING says that the party program, which promises cuts in tax on income and fuel, higher subsidies for agriculture and industry and cheap student loans, “would be very worrying for the market if enacted … it harks back to the populist type policies that voters backed in the 1990s which led Turkey into three economic crises.” However, the report states that the stronger economic foundations existing now could prevent another crisis on the same scale.

The confidence of international institutions in Turkey remains resilient, considerably more so than in the past, despite political fireworks and a worsening in relations with the EU. Turkey seems likely to overcome these headaches and move forward, under an AKP government, albeit perhaps one with slightly clipped wings. However, with Turkish politics known for its volatility, the final outcome of the July elections is still a difficult call.

June 7, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
By Invitation

Implementing Paris III: what it takes

by Mounir Rached June 1, 2007
written by Mounir Rached

As part of Paris III, the Lebanese government has promisedto embark on a number of fiscal reforms addressing primarilythe revenue side “in view of the relatively limited scopefor further cuts in public spending.”

The objective of these reforms is set in paragraph 92 of theParis III reform agenda. It aims at minimizing distortionsand enhancing equity and fairness in the distribution of thetax system.

Can these reforms achieve their objective?

Lebanon’s revenue structure relies heavily on indirecttaxes. Taxes on income and profits constitute only 14.5% oftotal revenues and 3.3% of GDP; while indirect taxes (mostlyVAT and customs) contribute 46% of the total. In spite ofexemptions, indirect taxes are, as generally recognized,regressive.

To recall, the most important tax measure taken recently wasthe introduction of a one rate and one stage value added tax(VAT) in 2002 that resembles more a sales tax. This isregressive tax in spite of exempting basic items andservices. It was a step forward to shore up revenue anddiversify its base. Its impact was visible and raised taxrevenue to a record 15% of GDP. However, it magnified equitydistortions as it was not accompanied by other tax reformsto enhance equity. Customs top rate, for instance, remainsat 90%, and customs provide 25% of tax revenue.

Making adjustments

Will the proposed new measures, as part of Paris III,impact significantly on revenues and its structure? The taxadjustments include VAT increase to 12% in 2008 and to 15%in 2010, and the tax on interest income to 7% in 2008.

These two adjustments, assuming a neutral effect oncapital and on the consumption pattern, could raise taxrevenue by 1.5%, accruing mostly from VAT. Raising taxrevenue to GDP to the desired objective of 18% by 2011 hasto be generated by administrative measures. These include:activating the large tax payer’s office (LTO), fullystaffing the Tax Roll department – a data base department,expanding the withheld tax registration, and adopting a TaxProcedure Code. A Global Income Tax without rate change isplanned for 2008. These measures are expected to raiserevenue by another 1.5% of GDP.

Direct tax collection on income (enterprise and wagetaxes) will, after all, remain very low at 4% of GDP by 2011compared to an unweighted average statutory rate of 10%.This implies the presence of either extensive tax evasionand/ or ineffectiveness in collection. An endemic problem inLebanon, which is not being addressed genuinely by any ofthe proposed measures except in the enhancement of coverageby tax withholding.

The revenue structure will continue to remain nearlystagnant, and to rely heavily on indirect taxes (50% oftotal revenue) and non-tax revenue (32%); without enhancingequity. A comparison of before and after tax income (basedon the family income distribution study CDS, 1998) showedthe ineffectiveness of the pre-1999 structure (a moreprogressive tax) on equity enhancement. The after tax incomeshare of the tranche with the lowest income (6%) increasedto 1.12% compared to 1.09 % of the total before taxes. Forthe tranche with the largest income (3.1%), the after taxincome share dropped only to 15% from a 15.9% share beforetaxes.

These indicators point out to the need to further strengthenincome tax share to enhance equity; especially in the caseof Lebanon, where income distribution is highly skewed. TheOECD countries, for instance, have moved in their recent taxpolicy reform towards reducing marginal income tax rates andplacing more reliance on VAT and other indirect taxes.However, income taxes remained the largest portion of totaltax revenue in these countries (25%, compared to 3.3% inLebanon). Their reforms set priority on fairness andsimplicity, and were based on public support reflected inthe platform of political parties.

New measures needed

In Lebanon, a more effective collection of income tax evenat the current rate structure (five marginal rates) couldraise revenue by another 6% of GDP, thus closing most of thefiscal gap needed to reduce debt accumulation. Income is thelargest tax base that needs to be fully tapped. Currently,civil servants and wage earners are the most compliant. Somereforms are inevitable, however, such as treating financialand on-financial enterprises equally by raising the rate onthe former to 21% and applying this one rate on both.

The direction of reforms in Lebanon needs to be based onpublic choice rather on a centralized decision induced onlyby the objective of raising revenue. An open public debate(or even a referendum) on tax choices could guide thegovernment and garner support for its decision.

Dr. Mounir Rached is a senior IMF economist and a founding member of the Lebanese EconomicAssociation. The views in this article don’t represent those of the IMF. Dr. Ghassan Deeba is Associate Professor at the LAU.

June 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lebanon

Looking Overseas – Banks eye lucrative markets

by Executive Staff June 1, 2007
written by Executive Staff

Bullish is not a term many would use to describe Lebanon’seconomy in the current situation, or indeed Lebanon’sbanking sector on a domestic level, but when it comes toLebanese banks expanding beyond their own borders, bullishwould seem to be the right terminology.

All the Alpha banks, along with a good proportion of theBeta banks, are getting in on the act, putting Lebanon backon the regional banking map after largely disappearing fromview in the late 1970s when the sector lost out to Bahrainand the UAE as a Middle Eastern banking hub. In manyrespects, the roller coaster ride Lebanon has been on forthe past few years has actually been positive for thebanking sector, compelling banks to diversify away fromLebanon and mirror the movement of Lebanese white collarworkers that have gone to the Gulf and elsewhere in theMiddle East in search of more promising employment.

As Semaan Bassil, vice-chairman and general manager ofByblos Bank put it, “One positive thing of the [July] warwas putting pressure on Lebanon to find new markets outside.This is very healthy, as before the civil war, the marketwas outside.”

Changes to the regulatory environment in the MENA regionhave also been conducive to the banks expansionaryaspirations. Syria’s banking sector came in from the cold in2001, allowing foreign and private banks for the first timein over 30 years; Sudan, Algeria and Egypt have opened up,and Qatar has becoming an increasingly assertive financialmarket.

An additional factor is that the Lebanese market holds fewpossibilities for serious growth. “All banks have reached asaturation point and cannot compete for more market share.The main driving force is [that the banks are] not happy inLebanon,” said Shadi Karam, Chairman of BLC.

Equally, it has only been in the last few years that bankswere able to viably entertain the idea of expansion. “Onlynow have banks reached a certain size to allow them toexpand overseas – whether in total assets or equity,” saidSalim Sfeir, Chairman and General Manager of the Bank ofBeirut (BoB). Chasing the money

The Central Bank has been key to the expansion, relaxingcross border lending and dishing out approvals to encouragethe sector to charter new waters. Indeed, with bank lendingto the government gradually declining – although still thebedrock of the banking sector – the Central Bank, under thesound guiding hand of Governor Riad Salameh, is under nomisconceptions about the potential for cannibalism if bankswere not able to seek new markets.

Equally, with inter Arab trade estimated at $20 billion,Lebanon would be foolish not to go after a larger slice ofthat pie, given its geographical positioning and commercialas well as retail banking strength. Lebanese bankers alsohave an added advantage over their internationalcounterparts operating in the Middle East – namely, anunderstanding of the culture and language as well as theknow-how of turning a banking sector around, as was the casein Lebanon after the civil war. Lacking such insight, someBritish banks that recently entered Egypt have read themarket wrongly in terms of products and services. But forLebanese banks, such attributes have played into thebankers’ hands, particularly in Jordan and in Syria. Aftertwo and half years in Jordan, Audi “could reach $2.5 billionin assets,” said Freddie Baz, advisor to the chairman atBank Audi. While in Syria, after two years of operations,Audi Syria reached some $400 million in assets. BLOM andByblos have also fared well in Syria.

The fledgling Syrian market is attractive to other banks,with First National Bank (FNB) an 8% stake holder in thesoon to be launched Syria Gulf Bank, and Libano-Francaise,BoB and Fransabank waiting for licenses. The Lebanese-Canadian Bank (LCB) and CreditBank also plan to enter theSyrian market. “It’s a natural expansion into Syria, as itwill benefit the sector and help to converge the two marketsto a common denominator,” said Tarek Khalife,chairman-general manager of CreditBank.

For Libano-Francaise – with 10% to 15% of its business inLebanon consisting of corporate loans to Syria, and 90% oftheir Paris operation catering to Syrians – the bank was“following our clients,” explained Walid Raphael, deputygeneral manager. The bank had planned to enter Syriaearlier, but shareholders in France opposed the move.

Cairo and beyond

Jammal Trust Bank (JTB) is also in expansion mode, planningto rectify their position in the Egyptian market afterlosing their license in 2005. “When the late chairman passedaway two months before the [Egyptian] Central Bankrequirement to increase capital, I couldn’t raise anextraordinary session because the one who passed away held99% of the shares. I had to wind down operations, but nottotally liquefy,” said Anwar Jammal, Chairman and CEO of JTB.

√Meanwhile, JTB is looking to expand to West Africa. “Ithink there is huge potential, be it catering to Lebaneseexpatriates or the locals. We’re also hoping, at a laterstage, to move into the Gulf,” said Jammal.

Other banks are faring better in Egypt, which is proving tobe a lucrative market. Bank Audi bought Cairo Far East Bankwith $47 million in assets, and after nine months, had $1billion. BLOM bought Misr-Romania Bank at the end of 2005for $100 million, $60 million in net equity and $40 million“in good will.” “The first year generated profits of $11million. For the first three months this year, it was $6.3million, so by year’s end, it should reach $15 million,”said Saad Azhari, BLOM’s vice chairman and general manager.After a year of operations, BLOM Egypt had 40% growth inlending and 25% in deposits.

BLOM, Byblos and Audi are already in the Gulf, and otherbanks are also moving to have a slice of the boomingmarkets. CreditBank plans to open offices in the QatarFinancial Center (QFC) and the Dubai Financial Center, aswell as a representative office in Kuwait. BLC, which wasbought out by the Qatari Investment Authority in late 2005and is well established in the UAE, is planning to open inthe QFC.

Driving the move to the Gulf is the surging number ofLebanese expatriates working there, using correspondingbanks or the Lebanese bank equivalent to remit money home.For instance, in 2002 there were some 3,500 Lebanese inQatar, there are now 35,000, according to Khalife. Suchremittances are highly significant to the economy, withworldwide remittances to Lebanon recently estimated at $5.2billion or equivalent to 25% of national GDP.

As Khalife remarked, “The middle class has disappeared fromview, but not from the banks, they are [working] in theregional markets.”

Risky business

While Algeria is proving a promising market for BLOM,Fransabank and the Lebanese-Canadian Bank with its 60% stakein Trust Bank Algeria, banks are wary of the recentlyliberalized Libyan market for political and bureaucraticreasons. Indeed, one of the top five banks recounted how anemployee wasn’t able to visit Tripoli to prospect thebanking sector as he was unable to get a visa. Sudan is alsoseen as potentially risky given the ropy peace and thetroubles in Darfur, but Bank Byblos is already present, asare the Lebanese-Canadian Bank with a 3% stake in Al SalaamBank, Fransabank with a 20% stake in United Capital Bank,and just last month, Bank of Beirut acquired an 18% stake inthe Saudi-French Bank.

Bank Audi is also optimistic about its presence there.“Sudan could bring millions of dollars in assets, its on theright track to increase significantly,” said Baz. Some banksare equally bullish about Iraq, with Byblos andInternational Bank operating in Irbil in the Kurdish areaand FNB angling to get in on the action.

“We are looking very seriously to open in Irbil, probably in2008 with a license for all of Iraq,” said Yasser Mortada,deputy general manager of FNB.

Other banks are hesitant to enter the market until thesituation improves and clearer regulations are establishedconcerning Central Bank regulations, whether from Irbil tooperate in Northern Iraq or in Baghdad to operate in thewhole country. Such issues recently warded off Bank Audi,and as BLOM’S Azhari put it, “we look at countries more andnot less stable than Lebanon.” Given the current situationin Lebanon, that is probably sound advice.

Nonetheless, the benefits of expanding outside of Lebanonare manifold. BLOM and Audi are now among the top 20 banksin the region in assets and ratings, with both estimating50% of deposits will come from outside Lebanon in the nextfive years. Already some 40% of the deposits collected byLebanese banks abroad are by BLOM, said Azhari, while ByblosBank’s foreign operations account for 20% of profits anddeposits, slated to reach 40% in the next five years. “It’sa win-win situation for well established companies to useLebanon as a platform to export products and services,” saidBassil.

Whether Lebanese banks will go even further afield as theygrow larger, banks are reticent to say. Libano-Francaisehinted that they were not confining plans to the MENAregion, and Sfeir said that the Bank of Beirut was activelyseeking acquisitions to establish new branches in differentmarkets.

Further expansion of Lebanese banks in the region isassured, although the country’s most regionally prolificbank, Bank Audi, was keeping quiet about its expansionstrategies. “Currently in the pipeline are three to fourother markets we are working on, either for a license oracquisition. We will hopefully close the year with a minimumof two new expansions in the region,” said Baz.

June 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
By Invitation

The dire need for acquisition financing

by Imad Ghandour June 1, 2007
written by Imad Ghandour

Private equity in the region is like a limbering man: almostall acquisitions of this $20 billion industry are beingfinanced directly from the coffers of the private equityfunds. It is the good, old way of investing, but somethingthat has been abandoned a long time ago in other parts ofthe world.

What is missing from the private equity secret potion is thepower of leveraging: using less expensive debt to financeacquisitions instead of using the more expensive equity.Take an example: Suppose a company is acquired for $100million by equity only (ie all the $100 million came fromthe private equity fund) and is sold at $130 million in oneyear, then the IRR is 30%. However, if the same investmentis financed by $50 million bank loan at 10% interest rate,than the remaining $50 million invested directly from thefund own pocket will be returned as $75 million aftersettling the loan and the interest of $5 million, thusyielding an IRR of 50%. This is the power of leveraging!

With relatively low interest rates on the US dollar and thecarry trade from yen to other currencies, it became veryattractive to use debt to finance private equityacquisitions. Today, more than 80% of an acquisition isfinanced by different flavors of debt, and 20% is financedby the fund’s own money. With record global private equityvolume of $650 billion in 2006, the acquisition financemarket has ballooned to reach more than $400 billion.

Mezz & Co

In order to drive the maximum benefit out of leveraging,private equity players have perfected the art of leveragingnot only through traditional bank financing, but throughusing mezzanine financing as well.

A typical private equity deal will have several layers ofdebt put on top of each other in order to reach the maximumlevel of debt based on the companies operating cash flowswhile at the same time optimizing the interest and principalpayments. A typical deal will have two layers of senior bankdebt, one amortizing quickly and another one with back-endedpayments. On top of that, there will be several layers ofmore exotic debt: second lien debt, subordinate unsecureddebt, high yield bonds, mezz debt with equity kickers,preferred shares, etc.

Commercial banks are the typical suppliers of senior(secure) debt. The more exotic flavors are supplied from anincreasingly diversified group of financial institutions.Pension funds, insurance companies, and endowments will beseeking to have higher yield debt with long tenors in orderto meet their long term obligations. There are also aspecialized number of mezzanine funds, and hedge funds areone of the newest entrants, seeking complex structures thatwill yield even higher returns.

Middle East is still behind

Unfortunately, the debt providers in the region are stillbehind in this area Most PE transactions in the region arestill financed largely through equity due to the limitedavailability of proper debt financing, and less than 10% ofPE transactions are leveraged at the target company level.

The limitation of debt financing in the region is drivenby a limited understanding for the PE asset class by lendinginstitutions, shallow debt capital markets, andunsophisticated lending focused on balance sheet assets,collateral and personal or mother company guarantees. Thesefactors are leading PE firms to seek financing frominternational players while others are attempting to educatelocal lenders on the concept of cash flow based lending.

Given that it is expected that the private equity industrywill have $20 billion of assets under management in 2007,Arab banks simply cannot ignore the opportunity to financeacquisitions. International banks are starting to offerlocal PE players this product, and local banks have startedto take notice. Given the attractive margins on acquisitionfinance, local banks will sooner or later set up specializedunits targeting this niche. However, the more exotic formsof debt, like mezzanine, will probably take slightly longerbefore becoming readily available in the region.

Imad Ghandour is Principal – Gulf Capital andHead of Information & Statistics Committee –GVCA

June 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lebanon

Alternative Strategies – Banks staying strong

by Executive Staff June 1, 2007
written by Executive Staff

The Lebanese banking sector has always had an exceptionaldegree of resilience given Lebanon’s checkered politicalhistory. The current political crisis and economic malaiseis no exception, with Lebanese banks reporting stronggrowth, launching new products, and diversifying throughexpanding into new markets.

But challenges do lie ahead for the sector. The situation isaffecting banks’ overall strategies – driving externalgrowth in particular – and with the implementation of theBasel II Framework only six months off, the requirements arelikely to act as a catalyst for further consolidation of thecountry’s heavily banked sector.

“The major problem we banks face stems from the differencebetween risk and uncertainty. Risk is something measurable –there are tons of models to manage risk – but uncertainty issomething not measurable. By its very nature, its parametersare flimsy,” said Shadi Karam, Chairman of BLC.

“The situation is creating a huge question mark onfunctional decision making in institutions. If you havequestions about tactical moves, it affects strategicalmoves,” he added.

And as Walid Raphael, deputy general manager of BanqueLibano-Francaise pointed out, “most players are onwait-and-see mode. We still see new projects, but the paceof investments are lower than early last year.”

Nonetheless, due to the unique role of Lebanon’s bankingsector in the economy, the real economy might be in thedoldrums, but the monetary sector is not. The reasons forthis are manifold: the huge remittances from Lebaneseabroad, which brings in an estimated 25% of the country’sGDP; banks’ high capital ratios; interest on lending to thegovernment; and a buoyant real estate sector.

“The major driver is GDP not foreign investment,” saidFreddie Baz, advisor to the chairman at Bank Audi. “TheLebanese are still the most important trigger for aggregateddemand, so is therefore GDP growth. We are not borrowingfrom domestic income but national income, from inflows fromexpats. As long as this exists, inflows are unrelated to thesituation in Lebanon and the monetary sector is immune,” headded.

This was evidenced last year when the war dampened growth onthe real sector and monetary sector deposits increased in2006 by $6.5 billion.

The cumulative assets of Lebanese banks also reflect thesector’s strong position. At $78 billion, or 375% ofLebanon’s GDP, the sector is far and above the regionalaverage of 90% of GDP, 107% in emerging markets, and 132% indeveloped economies.

This is in large part due to profitability of financingLebanon’s public debt, which is currently at $41 billion.

“Most profit comes form the government and will take time todiversify away from that,” said Semaan Bassil, Byblos Bankvice-chairman general manager. “So as long as the governmentborrows and pays, and keeps costs under control, banks willmake money but can’t rely on that forever.”

After all, returns on investments have slid from highs of40% in the 1990s to less than 10% after the Paris II donorconference. BLOM Bank’s TBs and Eurobonds, for instance, nowaccount for 17% of its balance sheet versus 24% to 25% in2003.

Nonetheless, BLOM is managing a new Eurobond issue withCitibank to raise $400 million for the government.

Products and more products

With so many factors at play, banks are adopting twofoldstrategies – consolidate market share and expand regionally(see page 40). With one eye on the region and the other onthe domestic market, banks have spent millions in the lastfew years on infrastructure and upgrading services.

In such a highly competitive market where the top threebanks – Audi, Byblos and BLOM – have over 50% of the marketand the other 61 banks vie for the rest, banks are coming upwith innovative ways to sell products.

“Lebanese banks are making big efforts in advertising andmarketing to attract new segments of the population,” saidElie Azar, marketing manager at the Lebanese-Canadian Bank.“It’s harder to attract new customers than keep customers,”he added.

As a result, banks have repackaged personal loans with newnames to entice customers, from solar panels and dental careto computers and plastic surgery. First National Bank (FNB)has been at the forefront of such campaigns, offering thehighly publicized plastic surgery loan.

“We are number 14 in size, but in relation to our peergroup, we spend a lot more on publicity than ourcompetitors,” said Yasser Mortada, deputy general manager ofFNB. “We offer different products from the plain vanillaproducts on offer.”

But, such advertising splurges are not seen as overlysound, some bankers say, given the outlay in relation to thereturns.

“These advertising campaigns cost a huge amount of money andthe products are not profitable per se, they are better forimage building,” said Salim Sfeir, chairman-general managerof the Bank of Beirut.

For banks not in the top 10, brand building is essentialto attract more local customers, but given the economicconditions, this is proving difficult.

“This year, there will be no growth in the economy, maybe1%. We need stability to promote products and grant loans.You cannot have a prosperous banking sector if there is apoor economy, and vice versa,” said Azar.

As a result, most commercial banks are now focusing onprivate banking, wealth management and insurance todiversify their portfolios.

“We want to establish private banking and investment bankingas we believe markets are not accessible enough. This isstill lacking in the economy and something to be developed,”said Tarek Khalife, chairman-general manager of CreditBank.

FNB is also looking to expand its investment portfoliothrough its 60% ownership of the Middle East Capital Group.“The time is not good for investment banking services, butonce back to normal there will be plenty of opportunities,”said Mortada.

Credit and charge cards are also a growing segment forbanks, with the number of cards issued surging in the lastfew years as electronic payments become more widespread.

“Until three or four years ago people paid cash, but now useelectronic transfers. That has increased the bankingpopulation,” said Anwar Jammal, Chairman and CEO of JammalTrust Bank (JTB).

Banks have adopted the same strategy to market cards as inthe West, using point reward schemes, free insurance,mystery prizes, and by teaming up with mobile phoneproviders to offer free calls.

Banks are, however, essentially chasing a limited numberof economically viable clients, prompting some institutionsto cater to small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) andlower income customers.

“The possibility for expansion within Lebanon is somewhatlimited if you just go by head count. How many of the fourmillion are bankable?” questioned Jammal. Indeed, with anestimated 60% of the country’s wealth in the hands of 6% ofthe population, serious increases in GDP per capita areneeded for the sector to take a closer interest in theoverall population.

JTB itself is focusing on the SME sector, which now accountsfor 85% of the bank’s clientele.

Personal vs. automated

There appear to be two schools of thought in Beirutbanking circles about how to expand and reach morecustomers. One school favors bricks and mortar, as Jammalput it, investing in new branches in the less banked areasof the country and in the capital.

“The aspect of face-to-face interaction with clientele isvery important. The click entity doesn’t work, you need abrick and mortar entity,” said Jammal, citing thedifficulties British banks had that went the solelyautomated route.

The other school has embraced a mix of automated andpersonal.

“A physical presence is important, but penetration of themarket is not necessarily through banks. In the developedworld, it is less important, and this is where we think theindustry is going,” said Mortada.

The number of FNB branches has soared from four to 18 inthe last six years, and more are planned.

“Having a physical presence helps but it’s not the only wayto have contact with prospective clients. Today, withelectronic banking and mass communications, you can attractclients by providing special customer services,” addedMortada.

BLOM, the Bank of Beirut and Banque Libano-Francaise areto open new branches in the coming months, with the majorityof banks also investing in online services.

Bank Audi plans to continue its expansion. “Every year wewill expand our network. The Lebanese banking market is seenas over banked, over banked in numbers, but explicitmeasures – accounts per household, banks per capita – youfind it’s not over-banked despite reaching a size large fora domestic economy,” said Baz.

From Basel I to II

The smaller banks that rely more on the personal bankingrelationship might suffer from the Central Bank requiredimplementation of Basel II by the beginning of next year.

The vast majority of banks are in the final stages ofimplementing the Bank of International Settlements’ RevisedInternational Capital Framework, drawn up in Basel,Switzerland last July to replace the 1988 Basel I Accords.

Basel II provides measures and minimum standards forcapital adequacy for banks to better handle risk, along withrequirements to implement compliance, under a three pillarconcept: i) minimum capital requirements; ii) supervisoryreview; and iii) market discipline to promote greaterstability in the financial system. The cost of implementingBasel II poses the main headache for the smaller banks.

“We expect more consolidation as a lot of banks cannotafford the system,” said Azhari.

Such costs will cut into profitability, and unless bankscan weather profit loss in the short-term, mergers or sellsout are likely for either regional Arab banks or the bigthree.

“We would like to consolidate further to leverage more outof our extensive branch network, and by increasing marketshare to 15% to 16%,” said Byblos’ Bassil.

Baz said that due to the high capitalization of Lebanesebanks, mergers and acquisitions will be kept to a minimum.“It won’t generate any systemic crisis in the banks. I don’tforesee any pressure at this level,” he said.

With banks nevertheless eyeing prospective targets, theCentral Bank should act pro-actively in anticipation ofpotential fallout from Basel II.

“The Central Bank and the authorities have a major role toplay now to revive law on mergers and encourage banks toundergo consolidation,” said Karam.

June 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Capitalist Culture

Goodbye, but not good riddance

by Michael Young June 1, 2007
written by Michael Young

For some people, the humiliation of Paul Wolfowitz, who atthe end of this month will step down as president of theWorld Bank after allegedly showing favoritism for his femalecompanion, Shaha Ali Reza, was his second defeat at thehands of the Middle East. The interpretation is tendentious,but it’s true that Wolfowitz paid the price in Washingtonfor his involvement in the Iraq war. And that was theproblem.

Wolfowitz’s legacy will long be debated by historians, muchlike that of Robert McNamara, who was defense secretaryduring the Vietnam war, before being named as head of theWorld Bank. Yet where McNamara spent decades ploddingthrough personal atonement for the war he had played a keyrole in sustaining, Wolfowitz has never doubted himself, orallowed anguish to push him to the edge of mental collapse.

That is what seemed to irritate so many employees at theBank, after the Bush administration named Wolfowitz toreplace James Wolfensohn. Here was a man who personifiedevil in the minds of many employees, who had supposedlystarted a war that no cultivated person could endorse; yetwho also had the bad taste not to admit it. Precisely whyWolfowitz was under any obligation to come clean before aconfederacy of international bureaucrats remains unclear –bureaucrats who are among the most pampered on the planet,therefore, phonier for wearing their self-righteousness on their sleeve, and appointed by governmentsthat often amorally deal with the most corrupt statesaround.

The specifics of the Wolfowitz case notwithstanding, hisposition was untenable from the moment the news leaked outthat he had provided an especially high pay raise to AliReza, after she was forced to temporarily leave the Bank toavoid a conflict of interest. Wolfowitz’s defenders say he’sthe one who admitted to the relationship in the first place,and that Ali Reza was entitled to a high pay raise becauseshe was unfairly removed from her post and paid heavily forthis. Moreover, Wolfowitz believed the Bank’s board hadokayed the step. The president’s critics said the board didno such thing, and that Wolfowitz knew something was amissby trying to cover it up. The point was moot, however, oncethe president found himself disowned by both his staff andby the Bank’s governors.

When the Europeans dropped Wolfowitz, he was pretty muchfinished. While it would be nice to see it as a case of asystem righting bureaucratic abuse, the fact is that much ofthe staff and the governors probably saw a goldenopportunity to get rid of someone they never really caredfor, who rarely tried to compromise with the institution’sbulky bureaucracy.

Which takes us back to the Iraq war. We may not know howmuch of a role Iraq played in Wolfowitz’s removal, but it’ssafe to say that he arrived at the Bank’s headquarterstarred and feathered by the conflict. Similarly, Ali Rezanever fit the mold of Arabs mostly critical of Americanbehavior in the Middle East. She was a believer in USinterventionism to help democratize the Arab world. Herintimacy with Wolfowitz was, if nothing else, a sign thatwhen considering the Middle East, he had a face off which tobounce his grand ambitions; it was not mere manipulation ofpower. Indeed, Wolfowitz was one of the rare Bushadministration officials who actually seemed to care aboutArab democracy, and who brought ideas to the table indefending his choices – albeit sometimes overly abstractones.

I recall interviewing him in 2004 and hearing him mention,with considerable precision, his worries that the Kurds hadgotten too much autonomy in the Transitional AdministrativeLaw, the interim Iraqi constitution. He went on to refer toFederalist No. 10 on how to avoid factionalism, which eventhen he realized was emerging as Iraq’s greatest bane. Thereis no doubt that Wolfowitz bears a great deal ofresponsibility for the fiasco in Iraq, and that won’t goaway, but the war was not for him what it was for manyothers in the administration: an expedient item allowing asenior official to keep his place in the presidential loop.

That’s why the outcome at the World Bank was sounsatisfactory. Wolfowitz erred, but just as he needed tobetter engage the bureaucracy of the World Bank, the Bankcould have responded better to a person well placed toremind entrenched pencil pushers what their job was allabout. There is a moral dimension to the Bank’s work thatthe staff often ignores. And while there are those who willargue that Paul Wolfowitz has no claims to moralitywhatsoever, they will have to prove that the World Bank,frequently a monument of amorality through its devotion tothe status quo, deserves to be the one distributing thebrownie points.

Michael Young

June 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Comment

Taking the hejab heat

by Gareth Smith June 1, 2007
written by Gareth Smith

Summer arrived early in Iran this year, and withthe hot May days the annual drive against “bad hejab” tookon greater force than usual. Police arrested thousands ofwomen deemed to be flouting laws requiring covering inpublic, seizing women with hair spilling out from headscarves or whose coats were too short or too tight.

There has been talk of offending women being exiled fromTehran, although nearly all are released quickly aftersigning a pledge to dress better in future.

The crackdown has also targeted shops selling shortmanteaus, the lighter body-covering coat chosen by manyupper-class and younger women in preference to the moretraditional, all-enveloping black chador.

Pressure for the police action had been building up for sometime. Senior ayatollahs in the holy city of Qom have longbeen disgruntled with what they see as the lax socialpolicies of president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, epitomized by hisdecision last year – later suspended by supreme leaderAyatollah Ali Khamenei – to allow women to be spectators atfootball matches.

Conservative parliamentary deputies had claimed visitorsfrom other Muslim countries, especially the Arab states ofthe Gulf, were shocked by the display in Tehran of highheels, heavy make-up, and dyed blonde hair. “Men see modelsin the streets and ignore their own wives at home,” saidMohammad Taqi Rahbar, a prominent parliamentarian. “Thisweakens the pillars of the family.”

At the beginning of May, conservative students at Tehran’sAmir Kabir university protested after a lecturer hadallegedly insulted a student by pulling her hair out. Therewere similar gripes among the conservative media after thepresident kissed the gloved hand of his formerschool-teacher, now an elderly woman, whom he met by chanceat a ceremony for National Teachers Day.

Like many other aspects of life – including business andsport – women’s clothing is highly politicized in Iran, withfactions eager to gain advantage against rivals. Few areinterested in the point made by Mohammad Ali Abtahi, theformer reformist vice-president, that religious laws arebetter advanced through persuasion than through penalties.The conservative parliament elected in 2004 has spent manyhours debating the need for a ‘national Islamic dress’ andeven encouraged Islamic fashion shows.

On the other side, ‘secularist’ satellite television, whichis beamed into Iran from exiled opposition groups mainly inLos Angeles, features unveiled women announcers and evenskimpily dressed Iranian pop stars. Western media coverage,meanwhile, often reduces women’s rights to opposition tohejab.

In the resulting melee, more important issues facing womenin Iran tend to be brushed aside. On the president’sprovincial trips, he receives tens of thousands of lettershanded in at special collection points. The vast majority ofthose who write them are women, and they concern theunemployment of their sons, or the cost of housing, or amyriad of day-to-day issues rather than hejab. Others writeabout the hardship of raising a family alone after losingtheir husband in the 1980-88 war with Iraq.

Iran is a deeply conservative society. A young man may wearhair gel and curse “the mullahs,” but may still not take hiswife to Dubai on holiday for fear of other males looking ather in the mall.

For Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, leader of the 1979Revolution, hejab was a means for women to come out of thehome and move in society. The Islamic Republic’s legalrequirement of hejab reconciled many fathers to theirdaughters attending university. Of the 600,000 enteringhigher education every year, 60% are women.

Woman can vote, stand for most public office, drive andsmoke in public. The contrast with Saudi Arabia, and someother Arab Muslim countries, could hardly be greater.

But various other inequalities persist. Although polygamy israre, it is still allowed, and women’s inheritance anddivorce rights are inferior to men’s.
Syma Sayyah, who stood in Tehran unsuccessfully as anindependent in December’s local elections, says Iranianwomen need a “reality check” to concentrate on what’simportant.

“We keep hearing that 60 odd percent of university studentsare women, but where are these graduates in the work place?”she asks. Most who dare to tip their toes into reality andget a job do so temporarily and until they or their familyfinds the ‘right husband.’ Middle and upper-middle classwomen are the worst.”

Sayyah’s advice to women is therefore straightforward. “Geta good solid education and training that leads to a decent,well-paid job. Then work on the legal inequalities withregard to marriage, inheritance and so on.”

GARETH SMYTH is the Financial Times Tehran correspondent

June 1, 2007 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 578
  • 579
  • 580
  • 581
  • 582
  • …
  • 695

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    Executive Magazine
    • ISSUES
      • Current Issue
      • Past issues
    • BUSINESS
    • ECONOMICS & POLICY
    • OPINION
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • EXECUTIVE TALKS
    • MOVEMENTS
      • Change the image
      • Cannes lions
      • Transparency & accountability
      • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
      • Say No to Corruption
      • The Lebanon media development initiative
      • LPSN Policy Asks
      • Advocating the preservation of deposits
    • JOIN US
      • Join our movement
      • Attend our events
      • Receive updates
      • Connect with us
    • DONATE