• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
The Buzz

Tarek Ayntrazi

by Executive Staff October 1, 2005
written by Executive Staff

In August 2005, Tarek Ayntrazi, the Starcom Group’s Middle East chief executive, left the media-buying arm of Leo Burnett after 15 years with the company, to head up Future TV (FTV), taking over from Nadim Munla, now an economic advisor within the Future Movement. Not only was the new position a challenge in the sense that Ayntrazi was moving to another branch of the media equation, he had been handed the reins of a TV station that had been pushed to the forefront of the struggle for a new, independent Lebanon. In this exclusive interview with Executive’s editor, Michael Karam, Ayntrazi talks of his ambition to consolidate the financial fortunes of Future TV and the inherent challenges that go with preserving the station’s core values of responsible broadcasting to Lebanon and the region.

E Your previous employers called the time of your leaving a “transitional period.” Was it a good time to get out?

Absolutely, it was a good time. On reflection, I should have made a move a bit earlier. Still, I am very excited about the move. I have always said to family and friends that my next job would be running a television station and there are not that many around, so it is lucky I like Future. I feel that it is important to like it as a viewer … its political and social values and standards. In that way, I couldn’t see myself running a Saudi station. There were a couple of channels I liked and both of them offered me a job. I took this one.

E What was the other channel?

I’d prefer not to say.

E How did you get the job exactly?
What made them certain you were the right man?

I don’t know if I can answer that [laughs]. I think Future wants to get programming closer to the advertisers’ and the viewers’ needs and demands rather than being a media that comes up with programs it thinks people will like. So, we are trying to bridge the gap, to get closer to the Arab consumer, the Arab youth in particular and advertisers outside Lebanon. My 15 years working in the Gulf was an important factor.

E A more commercial approach?

No, not a more commercial approach. We want to adapt to the viewers’ needs and demands and a natural consequence of that is if you are more in tune with what people want to see, then ratings go up and then you get more ads. One leads to the other. If you adopt a purely commercial strategy, there are more shortcuts to get an audience, such as sensationalism, which is not part of this station’s policy, strategy or culture. This is a station that will never offend social or religious values. Even in its politics, it has always looked at the point of intersection rather than a point of conflict. We try to bridge the gap. Some may call this boring. Some may say we should stand out, but I feel that the right thing to do is to act in the best interests of the community and youth.

E So responsible broadcasting with an eye on the bottom line?

Absolutely.

E Adopting this approach, how easy is it to take on the competition. Are they more ruthless in getting viewers?

Our job is more challenging and more difficult when you have to work within boundaries. We believe this is the right thing to do for the owners and the viewers.

E You mentioned reaching out to the community. Which community?

Future has a core audience base in Lebanon and with satellite Arab viewers in the Gulf region. Our main target is Saudi Arabia as an economic heavyweight, and also for its religious and social demographic. Then there are the other Gulf markets, such as Kuwait and the UAE. Yet we will not alienate Egypt or the Levant area. We are very strong in Lebanon and in Syria, where many areas get us without a satellite. We are strong in Jordan, as reflected by the Superstar voting and the fact that a Jordanian won; also in North Africa where we have distribution plans.

E You have outlined the broad strategy. Can you tell us specifically what we can expect on Future in the coming months?

As you know Future Television went through a crisis with the assassination of former prime minister Rafik Hariri. We had to respond politically to this and rise to the events and this meant less entertainment programs from our regular schedule. However, I believe we were the catalyst in driving events. We were part of shaping the future rather than covering events that shaped the future. We set the agenda. Now we are back to our original mission and we are planning a big relaunch for Ramadan, for which we have a rich grid. Ramadan is a landmark in every year. It represents 25% of annual ad budgets and is very competitive. We all try to get the latest drama series from Syria or the Gulf. We have a bloc of eight hours of new programming from the iftar till the early hours. We have signed the two top Egyptian dramas this year – one with Yusra and the other with Yehia Fakhrani – the top Syrian productions and one of the best comedies to come out of the Gulf, a Kuwaiti production. Ramadan is the trigger, the point for us to re-enter the market. Ah yes, and we will start the 3rd season of Superstar. Future will come back to the viewers and the advertisers.

E Was Future blown off course this year?

Future had a choice. It could have gone for 40 days of mourning with classical music and the Koran or say: “Yes we are sad. Yes we are angry. Yes we are serious and we are not going to remain silent anymore.” So we rose to the challenge. At the end of the day we have a responsibility to the community more so than the advertiser and you have to lead or at least stand next to your community facing the social, economic and political challenges. So we took a pioneering role and before long the political establishment was dancing to the tunes of what was being shown on Future Television. At least this is what people said at the time. This is not my observation.

E Is the new season a move to leave that behind?

The station will never let go of its political and social responsibility.

E Have you been appointed general manager with a view towards increasing ad revenue?

One could be a hypocrite and say no, but we want to increase market share. So building on my strong understanding of Arab viewers and being a TV buyer for 15 years and having lived in the Gulf and knowing what the young generation is looking for, I am sure I can bring programming closer to this.

E Competition among Arab Sat TV

stations has been increasing. Where do you see the growth potential of FTV, where are the best markets and what are the types of programs that hold most promise (survivor stuff, talkies, quiz games, own soaps, or political coverage)?

It’s a combination of so many things. Each segment of the day requires a different formula: early morning, morning, noon, afternoon, prime time, late night. We are a general entertainment channel. We are not news. We are not movies. We must meet the needs for every segment of the day.

E The Lebanese market is minimal, and the terrestrial channels are well sated. How important is Lebanon for FTV, what are your programming essentials here, and how will the terrestrial channel differ from the sat channel in coming months?

The Lebanese channel has more of a focus on local politics and local news. It has more of a Lebanese flavor with no GCC programming.

E What is the weighing of your resources and revenues between the terrestrial and the satellite channel, and how is it going to change?

It is difficult to assess as there are a lot of shared resources, but the emphasis is on the satellite channel because this is where we generate 70% to 80% of our income. It’s as simple as that.

E The genesis of FTV is inextricably linked to the station’s founder, Rafik Hariri. It was widely considered a media where the views of Hariri and the Mustaqbal movement were receiving priority coverage. Over the past seven months, FTV very understandably emphasized the life and death of Hariri by allocating large theme blocks to related issues. How is the dissemination of the Hariri message and preservation of his personal legacy going to remain a priority in FTV programming and to what extent?

By continuing to be socially responsible and by continuing to promote tolerance, openness and acceptance of others and by rejecting any cause that encourages confessionalism, which other stations continue to hammer in their news coverage. We see this day in, day out, especially during elections, which helped wipe out the achievements of the March 14 movement by their coverage. So tolerance, acceptance and liberal thinking were key. We [prioritized] this when he was alive and we continue to do this after his death. I believe Sheikh Saad and everyone within the Hariri political movement is committed to this.

E So not him but his values?

This is how you pay tribute to someone’s legacy. E You are poacher turned gamekeeper. Coming into this position with experience in media buying on behalf of advertisers, do you see the media industry, and the TV industry in particular, as mature partners to advertisers in terms of the transparency of the dissemination of data and information?

The biggest challenge, and maybe these are harsh words, but the biggest crime against television stations is the lack of transparent and reliable research data. The TV audience data available in Lebanon is shameful. I will not make any further comment on this because there is currently a court case against the people who have been providing the data for the past seven or eight years but in reality, in the absence of this data, we are all operating in the dark. I think that a certain program is good because my family and my friends like it. As fragmentation increases … did you know there are now over 200 satellite channels in the Arab world – it gets harder. We used to have our own data and fund it. We were not ignorant but every year every agency was put under pressure to skew the data one way or the other and every time you used data that was not in conformity with someone’s demands all hell would break loose.

E So what is being done?

There is a project underway to revamp the TV audience measurement system and another project in the Gulf led by the GCC Association of Advertisers. We believe that advertisers and media owners have no interest in biasing the data in one way or another. Advertisers want to know where they should spend their money and TV owners want to know the real value of their programming in the eyes of the viewers. All the others have a vested interest: the media sales rep will skew the data to where his financial commitment is higher with no consideration to the media owner or the advertiser. We are happy the advertisers have established their own association and we are fully supportive, knowing they will work in their best interests. Research should move away from the media sales reps, because they have no interest in getting transparent data.

E Between advertiser interests, the political legacy of FTV, and the overall political and social operating environment for Arab TV stations, what is your vision for a mature FTV network – journalistically, entertainment-wise, and commercially?

Look, 60% of the Arab world is under 30. These people are disoriented by the violent times and often conservative times in which they live. I want to reach out to the Arab youth. I want to offer them entertainment and responsible broadcasting.

E You yourself are young. Is that a handicap?

[Laughs] I am 39. Is that young? If so maybe, it is part of this station’s strategy to reach out to the youth. It has not been an issue. It has in fact been a plus.

October 1, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economics & Policy

Corruption: How bad was it?

by Peter Speetjens October 1, 2005
written by Peter Speetjens

Since the Syrian retreat last April and the euphoria of the Cedar Revolution a month earlier, more and more examples of how public money was squandered, stolen or simply squirreled away have come to light, strengthening the case for privatization and even leading to calls for a formal audit of the handling of public finances over the last 15 years.

We always knew it was going on. A 1995 World Bank study among Lebanese expatriates concluded that “there is a perception that corruption has become institutionalized in networks of protection, beyond the law, for self-dealing, bribes and the bartering of favors and influence.” A 2001 report by the UN Center for International Crime Prevention stated that 43% of Lebanese companies “frequently” paid bribes and 40% “sometimes” did, while Lebanon ranked 97 out of 145 countries on the 2004 annual corruption index issued by Transparency International. Now, those who move and shake in the new Lebanon want answers.

Exposing the extent of it

But we never really knew how much was going on and what it was costing us. Now, Lebanese businessman and outspoken critic of corruption, Joe Faddoul, has taken it upon himself to reveal all. According to Faddoul, there is no use talking about solutions to tackling the national debt without looking at the main cause, which he sees as corruption. In recent months, the founder of the software company Istisharat, has gained something of a reputation as a whistle blower, following a presentation to the French Senate and the publication of an extensive list citing the main money drains. “The total of direct and indirect levies from racketeering,” Faddoul estimated, “amounts to a total of $26 billion for the post-war period since 1992. Add interest and you can pay off the national debt.”

The case for an investigation is compelling and Faddoul does not mince his words in describing the old “system,” in which the Syrian regime granted its Lebanese surrogates crumbs of power and money by appointing them as MPs or ministers. “In return, the appointees covered Syrian racketeering practices and certain political positions. This post-war system of racketeering, shared between Syrian and Lebanese officials, drained the country of an estimated $2 billion a year.” According to Faddoul, one of the most telling and blatant examples took place in the largely government owned Casino du Liban, where every morning, employees from the ministry of finance would collect the previous night’s takings as is their job. They did not however empty the slot machines, which were emptied by other state officials. No one knows exactly how much money was diverted, but Faddoul estimates a siphoning off of $50 million a year. The practice stopped as soon as the last Syrian soldier left Lebanese soil. “Before Hariri’s death,” said Faddoul, “the price of a casino share stood at $146. Despite the political turmoil in recent months, the insecurity and consequently the decline in tourist arrivals, the share price has since risen and by August stood at $345.”

Trouble at the port

Faddoul continues that like the Casino du Liban, certain areas of the Beirut Port were no-go areas for Lebanese custom officials, as they stood under the direct control of the Syrian intelligence and much of the customs tariffs paid on imports were diverted towards Damascus. In 2001, the Dubai Port Authority (DPA) canceled its 20-year Furnish, Operate and Own (FOO) contract regarding the port terminals signed in 1998, officially due to disagreements over compensation for contractors at the port. Many insiders however, whispered that the DPA was just not able to operate in a Beirut harbor, infected as it was by corruption. It would be too simple however, to only blame Syria for these shadowy practices. Lebanese were only too happy to enter into these joint ventures, as is illustrated by the example of incoming international phone traffic which should officially pass through the Ministry of Telecommunications. According to Faddoul, however, three illegal operators were established to handle roughly half of all incoming international calls: one in the Bekaa Valley (allegedly run by the brother of an ex-minister), one in Beirut’s southern suburbs and a third in the Keserwan region (owned by a former minister). Normally it would take a hefty investment for an operator to install a network, but not so in Lebanon. The illegal operators simply subscribe to a few hundred government-owned lines. “This just shows you the level of complicity between the government, the illegal operators and their sponsors,” said Faddoul. In 2002, the former minister of telecommunications, Jean Louis Qordahi, announced that an estimated 30 million minutes a month ran through the illegal companies, which with an average price of $0.70 cents a minute amounts to a loss of $262 million a year. The illegal phone traffic is typical of the general pattern of racketeering, in which part of Lebanon’s political and economic elite shared cuts, spills and kickbacks.

Lights on, no-one home

No doubt, one of the heaviest burdens on Lebanon’s national treasury is Electricite du Liban (EDL), which makes an estimated loss of $500 million a year. Referring to a report written by the head of the Electricity Authority, Faddoul estimated that 30% of produced electricity is stolen through illegal connections, while 15% is lost due to technical shortcomings. Only 50% is billed, of which only half of that is actually collected. In effect, only 25% of Lebanon’s electricity is paid for.

However, this is not EDL’s only problem. According to Faddoul, it was common practice for ministers and state officials to take commission on any construction or maintenance contract that needed their signature. As always, “profits” were shared with “associates and protectors.” Former minister of electricity, the late Elie Hobeika, is said to have taken a 10% cut on any EDL transaction and is understood to have set up a special office complete with a secretary to run this lucrative side business.

His successor, Mohammad Abdul Hamid Beydoun, continued this proud tradition, before being sacked for not sharing the spoils.

And then there is EDL’s fuel purchasing policy. For the import of oil and gas, a government permit is needed, which has been issued to five companies that all belong to high-profile politicians and that effectively operate as a cartel. Like anyone in Lebanon, EDL is forced to buy its fuel for a fixed (read inflated) price. The practice is so lucrative that the electricity plants of Badawi and Zahrani, which at the cost of some $800 million were transformed to operate on gas, still to this day burn fuel oil. With an estimated loss of $4 billion to $5 billion over the last decade, the EDL is arguably one of the least profitable companies in the world.

Bloated bureaucracy

And then we come to the bloated and inefficient public sector. Until its restructuring in 2002, Lebanon’s national airline MEA lost $80 million a year, employing 4,000 staff. (For an airline with nine planes the international norm is less than 20% of this number). “After the war, there was a deliberate policy to employ as many ex-militiamen into state service as possible,” said Reinoud Leenders, a former senior analyst for the International Crisis Group. “The number of civil servants increased after the war by some 50,000, while the state’s contribution to GDP remained at some 7%. Not surprisingly, a 1997 government report concluded that 60,000 employees could be made redundant without affecting productivity.” Regarding clientalism, Leenders dug out a depressing litany of abuse. “Reading a list of contractors in state-financed road construction is like reading an inventory of Lebanon’s political elites, their associates and relatives.” According to Leenders, one of the most notorious examples concerned a road construction contract in South Lebanon, where a Syrian company was awarded a contract to build highways, even though the price of $4 million per kilometer was four times the price of a similar stretch of road in California.

Where to now?

The Syrian withdrawal has no doubt had a positive influence on Lebanon’s financial health (one only has to look at the Casino du Liban’s share price), but her role in the ethical deterioration of a nation must not overshadow the complicity of the Lebanese themselves, especially the public figures whose shady business dealings are common knowledge, accepted and in some cases even applauded by those who admire such behavior. Nonetheless, Joe Faddoul remains positive about the future. “The time that ministers and politicians could abuse their positions is over. It is now an open system of checks and balances, so they can not get away with things that easily any longer,” he said, adding: “Look, I just collected the bits and pieces, which were already out in the public domain, be it in a very fragmented manner. I hope others will pursue the case from here.”
 

As a matter of procedure Executive contacted the public bodies mentioned in this article, but in every case they were unavailable for comment.
 

October 1, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

After the Generals

by Michael Young October 1, 2005
written by Michael Young

In early September, the daily Al-Anwar, citing “financial circles,” wrote that investigators looking into the accounts of the four generals arrested on the recommendation of United Nations investigator Detlev Mehlis, had found that, together, they held some half a billion dollars in liquidity. Nor was this necessarily everything they own. Very soon afterwards, the Lebanese began calculating what that came out to in monthly, weekly and daily revenues, and generally agreed the generals had lived well. The money incident provokes sundry thoughts related to Lebanon’s embrace of a capitalist culture, one characterized by free minds and free markets. More importantly, it prompts a warning: in acting against its financial abusers, the state should not go too far in limiting freedom.

Most people hardly blinked as investigators pushed aside Lebanon’s banking secrecy laws to delve into the generals’ accounts. The debate over financial transparency has been a sustained one in recent years, as international financial actors, particularly the United States government, have sought to do away with banking secrecy, mainly to curb crime, terrorist transactions and the stashing away of illicit money. Lebanon has resisted this for pragmatic reasons, believing that concealment encourages more depositors to use Lebanese banks. The free marketers have elevated defending banking secrecy to a matter of principle, arguing that complete financial transparency allows the routine invasion of privacy.

The Mehlis precedent is interesting, because it’s unclear what message it sends to the banking system: supporters of intrusive financial policies will say the matter of the four generals proved that banking secrecy only protects money illegally earned, so that the system must be overhauled and cracked wide open. Defenders say that because the investigators were (and presumably will again be) able to access the accounts of criminals on an ad hoc basis as happened in the generals’ case, there is little impetus to so fundamentally change a system where most depositors are not crooks. The balance will probably tilt decisively in the way of the opponents of secrecy, however, since that’s the direction in which the world’s financial community is firmly going; and Lebanon, as the Mehlis investigation has underlined, is in no position to stand up to an international consensus.

The disappointed can yet take heart, however, if their interest is in a more open system of political and economic freedoms. The Mehlis report will lead to a fundamental revamping of the security apparatus, probably for the better. Corruption will continue, but the Syrian departure and the breakdown of the previously institutionalized system of theft, of which the intelligence chiefs were a central motor, will mean change, particularly if the security services prevent crime rather than promote it.
Lining their pockets

And yet one pauses to reflect on what remarkable entrepreneurial capitalists the four generals must have been, if the figures for their fortunes are true. They must have been devoted to the art of making money; inveterate middlemen, fixers, whose daily duty, when it didn’t involve intimidating and spending the fruit of their labors, centered on planning and implementing business bonanzas where their cut was in inverse proportion to effort. If this magazine gave out prizes on the basis of profit margins, the four would surely merit taking the podium together amid the applause of their fellow inmates.

But when the kudos dissipates, the state will have to decide how far it intends to go to regulate the purged economic environment. Naturally, there will be those who will present the authorities with a formidable laundry list of reform demands that, while their rationale may be justifiable, will likely lead to institutional overkill and stifle investment. There is no doubt the post-Syria state must set the foundations of an equitable free market, free of monopolies and oligopolies, but as Prime Minister Fouad Siniora surely knows better than most, getting the state too involved in economic life merely means increasing costs all around.

The problem with economic reform and the return or introduction of the rule of law is that the state creates providential hopes it can rarely satisfy. The legitimate view today is that the state, thanks to the four generals and countless others – many still in power – is in urgent need of radical, state-induced shock therapy. The state does have a role to play, but mainly to ensure the private sector stays honest and free. After all, what the generals really embodied was the perversity of the state’s hijacking of the economy.
 

October 1, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Special Report

The print matter

by Thomas Schellen September 21, 2005
written by Thomas Schellen

It may have been an unreported milestone in the history of Middle Eastern printing: last year the Arab region’s first web offset printing press celebrated its 40th anniversary. A young technology back then, web offset machinery revolutionized the printing of newspapers by facilitating the huge print runs that have given readers their 100-page Sunday editions and publishers the incentive to produce larger circulations. The first such printing press to operate in the Middle East was brought to Beirut in 1964 by the Mroue family, publishers of The Daily Star newspaper and formerly also of the Arab daily, Al Hayat. 

While it is worth remembering that Lebanon was the first country to operate a web offset machine in the Middle East, it is less of an advertisement for the country’s print industry that this machine is still running today, largely because the operating company sees no point in replacing it with a new model. Although the press, by modern print technology standards an outright antique, is used nightly in the production of four daily newspapers, these print runs are insufficient to occupy the machine to more than 50%, according to the head of the operating company Print Technology, Malek Mroue. Replacing it with a new machine or even running regular three-month cycles of preventive maintenance by the book would represent financial layouts irrecoverable in the ailing domestic market for newsprint. 

Lebanon’s enterprises working in the classic domains of volume in printing books, magazines and newspapers – or what the German pioneers of Gutenberg fame dubbed the “black art” – constitute a highly qualified industry that is capable of turning out world-class quality products. But the country is no longer the navel of Arab printing.

Book printing began in Lebanon far back in the 18th century through a monastic print shop for religious tractates and for a very long time, the country was the printing hub for the region. Until deep into the 20th century and with very few alternatives, books printed in Lebanon were ruling regional markets from North Africa to the Arabian Gulf. Still in the 1970s and 1980s, Lebanon’s printing industry was in full bloom, producing schoolbooks and educational materials for numerous Arab countries, delivering copies of the Holy Koran in enormous quantities to Saudi Arabia, and also churning out publications ordered by Palestinian organizations.

By the 1990s, however, a mega-printing company in Saudi Arabia had stepped into the printing of Islamic scriptures and Gulf financiers began investing in building high-capacity print houses in other GCC countries. National print industries got powered up in Jordan and in North Africa and more recently Syria’s private sector has invested millions of dollar into modern presses at a level that makes representatives of leading international equipment manufacturers say that printers there are now better equipped with the latest technology than their colleagues here.

Thus, while other print locations in the Middle East are gaining a profile and some are booming with international aspirations, local suppliers and operators largely dismiss the idea that Lebanon could ever return to its former position as a leader in Middle Eastern printing.

Yet how much of a function the Lebanese print industry could assume or which areas it could develop, is a tough question to address. It is actually extremely difficult to gauge the size and role of the Lebanese printing industry in both its regional and domestic dimensions, because even the most basic data on performance, capacities and markets are lacking.

The print industry association, the Lebanese Graphic Arts Syndicate, has been in existence for six decades and numbers 180 member companies but cannot provide information on their performance, because none is available, the syndicate’s manager, Rania El Haji, told Executive. Neither does the syndicate have data on the activities and results of hundreds of print enterprises that are not members of the industry organization.

Executive requested data and comments on the syndicate’s assessment of the state of the print industry in Lebanon from its president, Joseph Sader, but questions faxed to him and numerous calls went unanswered. According to El Haji, the syndicate is in the process of having a market research firm conduct a survey of sector activities and expects to have relevant data available within one month but said: “it is a very hard question, because printers do not report what they do and who they work for.” 

She attributed the reasons for this habit of numbers obfuscation to the fact that many print shops are not licensed or insufficiently so, and thus operate in the shadow economy by not registering workers and not reporting taxes. The syndicate is growing in membership, but can only accept fully licensed companies and on occasion has to dismiss some for failing to pay their membership dues, she said. Some industry managers, however, offered the view to Executive that the syndicate has been less than fully proactive outside the realm of social gatherings. 

Industry insiders queried for this report estimated the turnover of the sector to be somewhere upward of $100 million annually, while not exceeding $200 million. In the absence of surveyed results from companies, a comparatively concise indicator on the print industry as far as international output is concerned, can be found in the export statistics of Lebanese customs. According to these data, exports of printed matter (mainly books, newspapers and pictures as categorized under the respective customs number) in the years 2001 to 2004 were worth on average $34.2 million per year.

As sample export ratios provided to Executive by a few major printing companies were in the 20% to 30% range and reached 50% for the most export-wise productive firms, a very rough ‘guesstimate’ would support annual turnover in the mid-$100 millions as not an unreasonable assumption for annual sector performance, which makes printing almost certainly contribute less than 1% to GDP. 

On the import side, the customs statistics reveal that printed matter entering Lebanon between 2001 and 2004 was valued on average at $39 million per year, making the country a net importer of published material by worth. Only in 2002, exports at $50.7 million were significantly above average and also exceeded imports. Industry managers pointed out that around that period, large orders came in for printing schoolbooks for Libya. Another significant export opportunity arose from a large volume of orders from UNICEF for printing schoolbooks for Iraq.

The various obstacles preventing the better economic performance of printing companies include the difficult economic environment along with other market-related problems, namely the high cost of electricity, the difficulty of customers to obtain bank finance for publishing projects from corporate brochures to books, and a grueling collection process under the prevalent payment morale where exasperated operators have to spend undue time and efforts in collecting receivables.

Two operational handicaps with their own magnitude are the ever-troublesome regional security situation and the domestic legal environment, the latter constituting an area with its own inner inconsistencies. As Lebanon compared to other Arab countries enjoys greater legal assurances for the freedom of expression, this greater freedom makes printing in Lebanon a good proposition for publishers in surrounding countries. In the opinion of some print industry experts, this publishing freedom is today the country’s strongest comparative advantage over other locations.

On the other hand, the prevalent politico-clientilistic culture of seeking to control divergent viewpoints counteracts the legal framework of the freedom of speech. It hampers publications. In the realm of newspaper and periodicals production, existing legislation is even detrimental to the development of both publishing and print enterprises. Arcane restrictions on the publication of foreign media has deprived the country of opportunities to produce for instance, small (and lucrative) partial print runs of Arab newspapers based in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf for their readers vacationing in Lebanon. 

Other barriers include fragmentation in the industry, which is characterized by low cooperation. In the newspaper industry, the major dailies in the country handle their print runs on their own presses, although consolidation and outsourcing would make much more sense in economic terms. But due to political reasons, vanity of ownership issues and fears of having their real circulation numbers leaked, the major publishers have reportedly long refused to consider solutions where a high-capacity web offset printing company with advanced equipment could come into play.

Also among printers specialized in books and magazines, all too many companies seem glued to an operating mentality that emphasizes single ownership and the primitive segmentation of the market – however, without tapping into the positive potentials of family management and developing niches. This parochial mindset is so deeply entrenched that a major Lebanese print personality would decline to discuss any aspect of the business with a publication that does not print at his enterprise.      

However, this isn’t the entire picture. The organically grown expertise and entrenched quality of the Lebanese print industry are acknowledged by international experts. On the cost side, too, Lebanon is not without edge over competing locations. According to Georges Chemaly, general manager of the printers Chemaly & Chemaly, the labor cost for a qualified operator in Lebanon carries about a 40% advantage over an Eastern European location such as Bulgaria.

Operating a $12 million facility whose break even point is a monthly turnover of $350,000 to $400,000, Chemaly’s firm achieves half of its orders from European, Gulf and African markets, demonstrating that Lebanese printers today can profitably act on the international scene. The service and flexibility of printers here is better than in Dubai, Chemaly claimed, and the strong customer relationship angle of a family-run print house can be used as an asset that super-sized ventures cannot offer.

Nonetheless, Dubai must be acknowledged as the Middle Eastern print industry location that Lebanon cannot measure up against. Alongside the opulence in investments and planning that is now customary in this boom emirate, Dubai has ambitions to enhance its printing activities for regional and global customers, including establishing print factories that are geared entirely towards exporting to Europe and international markets. A new, typically enormous free zone for media enterprises, the international Media Production Zone, has gained location commitments from several multi-million dollar print industry start-ups and the zone aims to attract 70 printing companies with a size of $13 million to $18 million each. Dubai also wants to establish the world’s largest printing company with a $2.1 billion investment, reports have claimed.  

In determining the future growth chances of Lebanon’s diminutive printing industry, even the best imaginable evolution of domestic demand will hold printers within clear borders, due to the inescapable scale limitations of the domestic market. Modern printing is a very capital-intensive proposition, and huge printing plants such as the $40 million web offset presses installed over the past few years at the UAE newspaper, Gulf News, would seem wholly inappropriate in Lebanon under financing and market-size perspectives.

The potentials of GCC markets are beyond comparison to that of Lebanon’s. In the past two years alone, publishing activities in the UAE increased at an estimated annual growth rate of 20%. Advertising spending in the GCC countries has topped $2 billion in the first half of 2005, and 55% of that flowed into print media.

International suppliers of high quality printing machines to Lebanon nonetheless see continued potential in this market, and can support this with reports of sales that are – albeit much smaller than in the Gulf – by local standards very respectable.

The firms dominating the field are the German manufacturers Heidelberg Druckmaschinen and MAN Roland. Heidelberg sold equipment valued at 6 million euro in Lebanon in its business year that ended in March 2004. MAN Roland is represented in the entire Levant and most Gulf countries by Dynagraph, a Beirut-headquartered firm that claims a regional turnover in the 50 million euro range and which just completed moving into a new head office building here.

In the opinion of these suppliers, Lebanon has quite a future in the printing industry, if increasing specializations such as packaging print are taken into consideration. “In the long term, there is a relocation of printing from Europe to the Middle East. What the Far East once was [in attracting print jobs from Europe], the Middle East will become more and more,” said Christoph Fischer, the MAN Roland delegate for the Middle East and North Africa stationed at Dynagraph. He quoted shorter transport distances and greater cultural proximity as reasons why Middle Eastern locations, including Lebanon, could gain increasing ground with European customers.  

One field where the entire Middle East is significantly underpowered in regards to printing is however training. Not a single vocational college or technical university in the region is specialized in this field. The Lebanese Graphic Arts Syndicate is aware of this, and Haji told Executive that it has an old dream to establish training facilities on a regional scale and “wants to revive training by creating an institute in Lebanon that would closely follow technological progress and form professional and competent employees.”

It seems that the Lebanese company Dynagraph and its international partners couldn’t agree more. In kick starting the creation of advanced training capacities for the Levant, Dynagraph and MAN Roland just spent 2.5 million euro on creating a Beirut training facility for the Levant, replicating a similar investment they had undertaken in Dubai. The centerpiece of the training workshop is a brand spanking new five-color plus lacquering offset press where employees of clients and trainees can be introduced into the latest secrets of the multi-colored art.

While acknowledging that such a facility cannot substitute a technical university, they are sending out a positive sign of their confidence in the development and future of the industry here. Actions speak louder than words.

September 21, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Uncategorized

Destination Armenia

by Executive Editors September 10, 2005
written by Executive Editors

Having spent nearly a century seemingly dormant under the Cold War blanket of Soviet rule, Armenia in recent years has become an increasingly popular destination for tourists and investors the world over, including many Lebanese. “Interest for Armenia has been steadily growing every year,” said Emma Bedrossian of Nakhal Tours, “but this year it has been overwhelming.”

A trend illustrated by the fact that national carrier, Armavia’s weekly direct flight between Beirut and the Armenian capital Yerevan is completely overbooked. To avoid long waiting lists, people should book about one month ahead. A second Armavia weekly flight to and from Yerevan is being added to cope with demand.

According to figures of the Armenian Embassy in Lebanon, the number of foreign visitors to Armenia increased from 31,904 in 1998 to more than 250,000 in 2004. “In the first six months of this year we saw again a 30% increase,” said Areg Hovhannissian, the Armenian ambassador to Lebanon. Most visitors stem from the EU, followed by the United States and Russia. About 10%, or some 30,000 people, originate from the Middle East, up to half of whom are Lebanese.

Some 80% of Lebanese traveling to Armenia is of Armenian descent, but according to Nakhal Tours, interest among other Lebanese is growing. Armenia is only a two-hour-flight away, offers a European culture, as well as cool mountain air, and last but not least in time of economic distress, Armenia is considerably cheaper than the Western Europe.

However, it is not only tourists traveling to Armenia. With an annual economic growth rate of 8% to 12%, Armenia is booming, and the Lebanese would not be Lebanese if they did not see some business opportunities there. “Last year,” said Hovhannissian, ”late Prime Minister Hariri visited Armenia for the 3rd time and signed a protocol calling for the establishment of free trade zones between Lebanon and Armenia.”

That plan has not been executed yet, but that has not stopped Lebanese entrepreneurs of taking their chances. Most notably, businessman Pierre Fattouche has opened a mobile phone company, while according to Hovhannissian, at least one anonymous Lebanese bank is close to opening its first branch in Yerevan.

September 10, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Uncategorized

US Embassy to relocate

by Executive Editors September 10, 2005
written by Executive Editors

The US embassy says it is moving from Awkar to Baabda for security reasons. Construction will cost around $111 million and once begun will take between 28 and 36 months to complete.

 “It was one of the only places we could find with enough space for the construction project,” said a US embassy source. “We have this new committee back in Washington [which] made new requirements for safety standards in buildings. We needed more space in order to meet those requirements.”

One Lebanon-based real estate consultant predicted that real estate prices in the “fairly shabby bit of Baabda” to which the embassy is moving would increase as a consequence while the move away from Awkar would probably have a deflationary effect on that area.

“The Baabda area to which it is moving is awful, really very lower middle class,” he said. “The shops and petrol stations and cafes reflect it. The move can only have a positive effect on the new area mainly because the Lebanese like living near Western embassies. It makes them feel good.”

He said the cost of the new plot was probably something approaching $20 million. “They’re picking up a very large site relatively cheaply,” he said. “It has multiple access routes, entry and exit options, several different ways of getting into Beirut on the Damascus road, and is quite close to the presidential area. It’s an easy place to get to and is neither Christian nor Muslim.

Raja Makarem, managing partner of RAMCO real estate advisers was more circumspect. “Nobody really knows how prices will be affected. It’s difficult to say,” he opined. “The move will definitely add confidence to the area but it’s not necessarily really going to affect the prices.” He said prices in Baabda over the last few years had been seesawing. “Sometimes there was big demand, sometimes major stagnation.” Meanwhile prices in Beirut have risen at least 20% since the beginning of the year, he said.

September 10, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Uncategorized

Aviation hazard or political spite

by Executive Editors September 10, 2005
written by Executive Editors

According to Parliament’s Public Works Committee, planes landing at Beirut Airport could in theory crash into the newly completed, 122-meter Metropolitan Tower in Sin al-Fil.

A member of the committee who asked not to be identified said the danger was outlined in letters signed by the General Director of the Civil Aviation Authority and the General Director of City Planning. He argued that according to civil aviation guidelines no building in a plane’s runway approach path can be higher than 150 meters – including ground elevation. Natural ground elevation at the Metropolitan Tower site is 98 meters, he said. This implies that the Metropolitan Tower shouldn’t be taller than 42 meters.

In a letter to the Lebanese media, the Habtoor Group, which owns the Metropolitan Tower, says that an extension to Lebanese Law No. 402/95 allows hotels to increase built-up-area skyward in exchange for added payment on the value of the land. The company says it was granted permission to construct more floors on 16 December 2002, under addendum 90247 of the law, by the Council of Ministers then presided over by slain former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, and with the accord of the Higher Council for Construction and Redevelopment and of the then tourism minister. Habtoor says it paid the municipality the additional sum of $2,200,000, in line with Law No. 402/95, to be allowed to construct more floors.

The letter also notes that in the years of al-Habtoor’s presence in the Sin al-Fil area, neither the company nor residents of the region have observed any aeroplanes flying over. Ominously, the letter warns that if investors who are helping Lebanon negotiate its economic woes are subjected to this kind of pressure, they may decide to pull out.

“I am not prejudiced against the Metropolitan Tower,” the Public Works Committee member said. “But the license given them to build was unlawful.”

He said the only solution was to make modifications to the airport’s Eastern runway, 3-21, something currently being examined by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).

A more cynical interpretation was offered by a Lebanese MP on condition of anonymity. “I understand that the underlying politics of this is the continuing joust between the Hariri group and the anti-Hariri group. I don’t see how this building can be a hazard to an aeroplane,” he said.

September 10, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Uncategorized

Hotel auction

by Executive Editors September 10, 2005
written by Executive Editors

Bids in the auctioning off, by the Central Bank, of the Sheraton Coral Beach hotel have been flooding in, according to a government official closely involved with the process. The auction has been running for several weeks now and closes on 10 September.

The hotel was repossessed by the Central Bank as collateral when Banque al-Madina collapsed and over a billion dollars of depositors’ money disappeared. It was owned by Taha Qoleilat, a businessman who was Banque al-Madina’s biggest depositor and was implicated in the scandal. The resale is designed to provide liquidity with which Bank al-Madina depositors who have lost their money can be repaid.

One real estate consultant claimed that Starwood Hotels & Resorts, a Sheraton management branch, was considering whether or not it wanted to stay on after the sale. He estimated the hotel’s value at around $35 million. “It has a beach complex that makes two or three million dollars over two-and-a-half months a year,” he noted.

Acting Sheraton Coral Beach Manager Talal Jundi said it was up to the eventual buyers to decide if they wanted to retain Starwood Hotels & Resorts as managers of the hotel. He said he expected the hotel to fetch more than $30 million, and possibly $50 million.

“The hotel is likely to appeal to Saudis, Emirates, Kuwaitis who like hotels,” the real estate consultant said.

Asked if he thought the hotel was a good buy, The consultant answered: “I don’t see why not except that it’s a little bit limited. It’s an old design. It was refurbished about five years ago. When you do that, there are always compromises compared to when you build. It’s a seventies design so it’s not as good as say the Four Seasons. Is it a good buy if you can get it for $20 million? Yes.”

September 10, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Uncategorized

Summertime blues

by Executive Editors September 10, 2005
written by Executive Editors

Despite upbeat reports in the local media, leading players in Lebanon’s hospitality sector admits the season – plagued as it has been by bombs and stay away Gulf Arabs – has been a disappointment with no upturn in sight.  

According to Paul Ariss, President of the Union of Restaurant, Café and Nightclub Owners, between February 14 and April 9 – when Bahia Hariri, attempted amid much fanfare and price-slashing to revitalize the Central District – business in Downtown Beirut was down 100%. Between April 9 and August 19 – the day Ariss spoke to EXECUTIVE – general turnover in the Downtown area was down 30% compared to last year. Over the same period, across Beirut as a whole, business had been down 30%-40%, he went on. Outside Beirut, especially in the mountain resorts, the damage was even worse – “dramatic,” he said. Was it down more than 50%? “Oh yes,” he responded.

“We have had very few tourists in June and July,” he explained. “A few Arabs and other foreigners came in August, but nothing compared to last year.”

On the hotel occupancy front, a similarly bleak picture emerges. The period from 14 February until 15 July, was “very bad,” lamented Pierre Achkar, President of the Lebanese Hotel Association. “The first two months were very, very, very bad.” The occupancy rates of hotels outside Beirut were less than 10%. In Beirut the figures lay between 18% and 22% over the same period, compared to 71% occupancy on 14 February. When a modicum of normailty returned to Beirut and a few tourists did emerge, hotel occupancy in Beirut for April and May rose to between 32% and 35% – still uncomfortably low compared to the 70% of last year. Since the June legislative elections, occupancy rates have fluctuated between 45% and 60%. When EXECUTIVE spoke to Achkar on 19 August, he said Beirut occupancy was running at between 75%-80%. “Last year, everywhere was 105% full,” he said.

September 10, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Uncategorized

Appetite for investment

by Executive Editors September 10, 2005
written by Executive Editors

Syrian investors last month showed an insatiable appetite for buying into the capital of Bank Audi Syria (BAS). During a 10-day subscription period open exclusively to Syrian nationals, demand for the 25% publicly offered equity participation exceeded supply almost tenfold.

What the bank called an initial public offering to raise approximately $11.7 million (SYP 625 million) towards its start-up capital of $46.7 million (SYP 2.5 billion) was oversubscribed by more than $103 million, representing coverage of 988%.

The offering was the second tranche of inviting Syrian investors into the equity of BAS, which under the country’s law has to be to 51% in the hands of Syrian shareholders. Prior to the offering, Syrian founding investors into the new bank already held a 26% stake in BAS, which obtained a banking license from the country’s council of ministers in early June and intends to commence operations later this summer.

Non-Syrian shareholding in BAS comes to 47 % from Audi-Saradar Group member companies Bank Audi, Audi-Saradar Investment Bank (ASIB) and Lebanon Invest. The remaining 2% are held by Saudi investor Sheikh Abdallah Abdel Aziz Al Rajhi.

Executives at Audi Saradar Group commented elatedly on having achieved the hitherto largest oversubscription of any investment in Syria to date and Marwan Ghandour, chairman of ASIB, called it an “eye-opening experience” for ASIB to manage the public offering. “I hope that we will continue to provide additional investment banking products as the market potential is clearly impressive,” he said.

Finance experts in Beirut evaluated the huge interest of the Syrian private sector in the Lebanese-Syrian banking venture as proof that investors in the neighboring country sense a lack of attractive investment opportunities in their economy and have no qualms about dealing with Lebanese business and banking partners. “It shows that there is a lot of liquidity in Syria and that money has no borders, no feelings,” said Jean Riachi, chairman of Financial Funds Advisors (FFA).

Meanwhile in another development in capital formation of a new Syrian-Lebanese joint venture bank, Bank Byblos and the OPEC Fund for International Development signed an agreement under which the fund assumed a $3 million equity stake in Byblos Bank Syria (BBS).

September 10, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 630
  • 631
  • 632
  • 633
  • 634
  • …
  • 708

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    Executive Magazine
    • ISSUES
      • Current Issue
      • Past issues
    • BUSINESS
    • ECONOMICS & POLICY
    • OPINION
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • EXECUTIVE TALKS
    • MOVEMENTS
      • Change the image
      • Cannes lions
      • Transparency & accountability
      • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
      • Say No to Corruption
      • The Lebanon media development initiative
      • LPSN Policy Asks
      • Advocating the preservation of deposits
    • JOIN US
      • Join our movement
      • Attend our events
      • Receive updates
      • Connect with us
    • DONATE