• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
Banking

Running realty’s gauntlet

by Executive Staff December 8, 2008
written by Executive Staff

Before the global financial crisis hit home, the main priority for banks in the UAE was how to decrease inflation rates. Another top concern in 2008 was dealing with the flood of liquidity streaming into the market, as well as currency speculation. But then, at the end of the second quarter, liquidity started to dry up, and immediately after the financial crisis climaxed in September banks became reluctant to give out loans as liquidity was so scarce. By the end of 2008, banks across the United Arab Emirates will have borrowed a minimum of AED70 billion ($19 billion) from the government. As of the beginning of November, banks had already received 80% of this liquidity package. Such a move aims to — most importantly — provide liquidity to the sector, in addition to easing tight lending requirements amid the continuing global financial crisis. Raj Madha, director of equity research at EFG-Hermes, thinks that the government “has been doing quite a good job” via pumping liquidity into the banking system and thus has been “very successful in bringing down interest rates.” Standard & Poor’s (S&P’s) announced in a recent report that the tightening liquidity conditions in the UAE are “only tangentially related to the global credit crunch and are being driven mainly by a host of country-specific factors, including speculative investor activity surrounding the UAE dirham’s peg to the US dollar, rapid domestic growth in recent years and concerns over the real estate sector.” Even though banks in the UAE have been growing at 40-50% per annum in the last two to three years, this will “inevitably slow,” said Eirvin Knox, chief executive officer of the Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, to  Bloomberg newswire.

With the country’s economy heavily based on development projects, the market will inescapably witness a slow down as projects will be more difficult to finance and loans harder — and more expensive — to acquire. And if liquidity dries up again, “funding future projects will, however, become more difficult, thereby affecting the UAE economy’s hitherto extraordinary growth,” according to S&P’s. But, a simmering in growth “would not necessarily be a bad thing,” argued S&P’s, “as it could alleviate infrastructure and resource bottlenecks that had been stoking inflationary pressures, as well as reduce the risk of a significant oversupply in the real estate market.”

As the UAE real estate index had declined by 46% in July 2008, banks have also been affected by some of the property market’s concerns. S&P’s stated that by the middle of this year, the UAE’s direct exposure held somewhere between 15-20% of their total loans and 80% of their adjusted total equity. Overall, a colossal decline in real estate prices would, undoubtedly, negatively affect the banking sector, via direct exposures and indirectly through the depleted value of the collateral taken.

Solid vaults

All in all, domestic banks in the UAE show robust financial profiles distinguished by high profitability, good asset quality and strong capitalization. Third quarter results have been, in general, “strong” according to Madha. Despite the significant write-downs that took place, they were not as big as expected. “They are having to change their lending criteria, but that is what you would expect in a rescue environment,” he said. Regarding short-term stability in the immediate aftermath of the global financial crisis, UAE banks have stabilized thus far.

Since year-on-year growth has been rather remarkable in the UAE, “the thirst for credit has been substantial,” noted S&P’s. But while a part of this has been quenched by external borrowing, the local banking sector has satisfied most of the credit needs. S&P’s contended that loans granted by UAE banks have expanded annually by an average of 35% in the past four years. Following Qatar, “this is the fastest rate of loan growth observed in the Gulf.” The pace of growth, underlined S&P’s, “even accelerated in the first half of 2008 (to about 50% annual increase), boosted by massive borrowings from government and government-related entities to expand their business domestically and internationally.” Although customer deposits also grew rather briskly, they could not keep up with the excessive growth in lending. Thus, by the end of June 2008, the loan-to-deposit ratio exceeded 100% for the entire banking sector. Now, with an ongoing era of uncertainty, banks must keep their eyes open to any and all possible solutions to these new long-term problems.

The temptation for mergers and acquisitions has thus never been more appetizing for those banks suffering from the crisis. Mashreqbank, the UAE’s largest private bank, has said it is only open to a merger if “one plus one equals three” — i.e. if both parties involved will benefit from the activity — said the bank’s chairman, Abdul Aziz Al-Ghurair.  The CEO of the National Bank of Abu Dhabi, Michael Tomlin, has also said the bank would welcome a merger, emphasizing that “we need to be bigger to compete effectively on the global stage.” With over 50 banks throughout the Emirates, financial institutions have had little impetus to merge until the recent global crisis. Right now, the majority of bankers are keeping mum about the possible need for mergers and acquisitions. No one wants to be kicked while they are down and voicing a desire to merge or be acquired is viewed as a sign of weakness. In November, Sultan bin Nasser Al Suwaidi, governor of the UAE Central Bank, said the bank would support any mergers and acquisitions if that would help soften the blow of the international financial crisis on the local economy. Madha, however, does not see any advantages to mergers and acquisitions, feeling that it “would take up a lot of airtime and a lot of management time. You want management to be focused on liquidity issues and managing risk, not busy with M&A activity.” For the time being, banks are displaying more interest in expanding abroad than integrating domestically, but in the long run, integration could be something to consider.

Forecasts

In the medium term, the UAE banking sector faces a few challenges in terms of future growth and profitability. In the coming period wholesale funding will be harder to attract, and cost more. S&P’s forecasted “a potential moderate deterioration in asset quality in the medium term. On the liabilities side, banks are expected to step up their competition to attract additional customer deposits to fund their growth and keep their liquidity at satisfactory levels.” The ratings agency expects UAE banks “to continue to re-price lending risk, which should act as a significant buffer to overall profitability.” Madha highlighted that loans for share purchases — potentially a derivative exposure — will be a chief concern for Emirati banks in 2009. Another major issue will obviously be provisioning, said Madha, “and that will depend on how the labor markets do, and again, the labor markets are not as solid as they have been in the past. We’re certainly seeing a reality check in the labor markets at the moment.” A further principal obstacle, asserted Madha, is the continuing lack of visibility in the system. “The fact that there is effectively no communication between the government and analysts — I see it as significant risks,” he said.

For the future, Madha is concerned with long-term stability in the banking sector. He feels this will heavily depend on the performance of the real estate market in the UAE: “if the property sector holds up, then the banking sector should be fine.” Al Suwaidi, however, firmly holds that the UAE’s banking sector is strong enough to deal with any corrections in the real estate market. Keep your fingers crossed for the banking sector, because the real estate market seems to be facing some serious downturns in 2009. Overall, next year banks in the UAE will continue to try to stabilize whilst facing numerous challenges.

December 8, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Real estate

Gains wane

by Executive Staff December 8, 2008
written by Executive Staff

While the boom in North African real estate continued through most of 2008, a downturn in global financial markets could put the brakes on the burgeoning sector in 2009. Algeria’s unstable security situation and fickle political climate continued to scare off investors and any significant growth in the sector over the past year, but Tunisia and Morocco pushed forward with ambitious state-sponsored public housing projects, as foreign investment flows helped finance the development of tourism projects, upscale properties and numerous mega resorts.

Analysts have predicted that the financial crisis will have little direct influence over the Tunisian and Moroccan economies. However, as the crisis worsens, regional real estate insiders are calculating the indirect influence they may see in the coming years, as these countries’ economic dependence on affected economies like those in Western Europe becomes a greater liability.

For instance, Tunisia and Morocco, like so many other developing economies in the globalized world, have come to rely heavily on the economic boost that remittances from workers living abroad send home. Out of the estimated $5 billion that is sent to Morocco in remittances, as much as 86% is invested in real estate. Now, as layoffs increase in developed economies and consumption trends dip to dangerous new lows, remittances to developing economies will sharply decline as the Moroccans and Tunisians living abroad tighten their belts.

Land of the second home

In addition, Tunisia and Morocco have had great success in marketing to second-home buyers in Western Europe and other regions. Offering lower real estate prices than the northern Mediterranean countries, year-round sunshine and hundreds of miles of undeveloped Atlantic and Mediterranean coastlines, both countries have became seductive destinations for Europeans interested in a vacation home or secondary residence. The region’s real estate boom, which most agree began in 2006, was further reinforced by the recent arrival of new low-cost airline carriers like Ryanair and Jet4You, which increased routes between exotic North African cities and European capitals and offered more competitive prices on fares. Analysts expect a sharp decline in demand for second-homes and vacation properties in these countries as financial conditions abroad grow worse.

As for the domestic real estate market, Tunisia’s outlook is bright for the following year with local demand largely met. Though many locals may complain of rising prices, the government implemented a strategy to promote national home ownership by preventing foreigners from participating in the property market until national ownership reached approximately 80%. Tunisia currently has the highest home ownership rate in Africa and one of the highest in the world. Morocco, on the other hand, with its much larger territory and whose population is nearly three times that of Tunisia, suffers from an ongoing housing deficit for which Housing Minister Taoufiq Hejira is finding no easy solutions. The development of the kingdom’s upscale market and tourism industry have by all means proved an economic windfall, but climbing prices of residential real estate in many areas have now reached peaks that are well beyond the reach of most Moroccans.

Due to a somewhat late entry on the international property market scene, Tunisia remains much less well-known than Morocco as a real estate investment destination, with an up-and-coming property market that is just beginning to attract a great deal of attention from investors in Europe, Asia, and the Gulf. In 2005, new legislation made it easier for foreigners to purchase property in areas designated for “economic and tourist activities.” Prices in Tunisia are still low, especially compared to some regions of Morocco (namely the much hyped Marrakech, a longstanding staple on the jet-set scene), where thirty years of foreigners buying villas have raised real estate prices to European levels. If prices continue to rise and they begin to lose their competitiveness with areas like southern Spain, buyers will choose properties in markets north of the Mediterranean, which have vastly superior infrastructures and identical climactic conditions.

The Moroccan administration is firmly in favor of economic liberalization and Hejira has proclaimed the state’s intention to completely withdraw from real estate development within five or ten years, entrusting the industry entirely to the private sector. But the administration continues to demonstrate a willingness to step in when necessary, making new land available at strategic moments in order to combat real estate speculation and sponsoring the development of 170 new urban zones. The proliferation of shantytowns is a painful and highly visible reminder that a healthy rate of economic growth and low inflation are not changing the kingdom’s high rates of poverty and unemployment as quickly as many would hope.

Social housing is currently a top priority for the public sector, which it is trying to pass on to the private sector. The Ministry’s ambitious plan to provide 130,000 social housing units by 2012 seemed like the ideal way to resolve the housing deficit (annual demand is officially estimated at 30,000 – 40,000 units). But while private-public partnerships formed the backbone of the state’s strategy to meet demand, the private sector has become more reluctant recently to invest in this bracket of housing, in spite of tax breaks and land incentives offered by the state. Social housing units, which must be priced at around 200,000 MAD ($23,000) to meet buyers’ capacity, are less and less economically feasible, since rises in construction and land costs over the past year have practically erased the profit margin for private developers.

Samir Benmakhlouf, President of Century 21 Morocco, thinks that domestic demand could carry the real estate market through the turbulence of the crisis period. When asked if the real estate boom could be over, he replied: “The demand is still there and the demand is much bigger than the supply. There is a readjustment period that we have to go through, but we still have a lot to build. We still have a more than one million housing unit deficit. The demand is very big and the opportunity is still very big. However there is a stagnation that is causing a lot of people to think twice about coming to the sector.” As he pointed out, a period of stagnation could actually prove beneficial to the market over time: the sector’s rapid growth and the promise of huge profits led to a great deal of speculation and under-the-table deals that have plagued the sector’s development and inflated prices. A period of calm will allow professionals to regain control of the sector and weed out some of the greed and corruption. Also, a stagnation of property prices is already boosting the rental market, which is sorely in need of a transition from the informal to the formal economy and whose development would help address the country’s massive housing deficit.

The rise of the rental

Benmakhlouf pointed to rising interest and profitability in the overlooked and underdeveloped rental market saying, “Our network has been receiving a lot of people throughout this crisis; we’re actually making record revenue throughout this stagnation period — record transactions, because a lot of them are rental, when people cannot afford to buy, they rent, there is a trend now to go towards rental.” Reports indicate that the state will soon pass legislation protecting owners rights and extending their control over property, which will boost the rental market, as owners currently cannot evict tenants who fail to pay rent. Benmakhlouf added, “If you look at cosmopolitan cities around the world, you find that two-thirds are rented and one-third is owned by the person who is living there. In Morocco it is the opposite, right now its one-third renters and two-thirds owners, but we are moving towards the rental market.”

Mega-projects in the course of development by Gulf companies Emaar, Al Qudra Holding, Sama Dubai, Qatar Real Estate Partners and others will also support the sector’s sustained growth in Morocco and Tunisia in 2009. Since 2003, climbing oil prices created an excess liquidity in the Middle East that oil-fueled investors, mainly sovereign funds and wealthy families, have used to make record levels of global investments. Pursuing a forward-thinking strategy of diversifying their economies away from dependence on oil exports, these regional investors, equipped with a petrodollar windfall in excess of $2 trillion, invested heavily in the North African region. Tunisia and Morocco, thanks to sustained political stability, solid economic outlook and carefully crafted investor-friendly environment, received the bulk of the region’s megaprojects, most of which have been channeled into tourism-related developments and luxury residential real estate.

These projects also have a modernizing influence that will pay off over the next decade in terms of job creation, urban renewal and the transformation of unused plots of land into hubs of tourism and industry. Projects in Tunisia such as Tunis Sports City and Mediterranean Gate ‘Century’ City, both funded by Dubai investment at $25 billion and $5 billion, will feature golf courses, state-of-the-art sports academies, marinas, luxury hotels and thousands of residential units.

In Morocco, the renovation of the Rabat-Sale Bouregreg River, currently nearing completion, is considered an axis of the kingdom’s strategy to update its social and economic conditions, starting with the capital city. The project, which is being carried out in partnership with the United Arab Emirates, includes a tramway, a port on the Atlantic, a marina and a facelift to monuments and historical features of Morocco’s administrative center. And while Casablanca, the economic capital of Morocco, is still waiting for a comprehensive urban renewal program, it is at least experiencing a boom in commercial real estate. Two thousand and eight saw the breaking of ground on the Morocco Mall project, which will be the largest mall in Africa, featuring an Imax theater and over 200 name-brand stores.

Several large-scale infrastructural works are underway in Tunisia and Morocco, as both countries update their airports to increase capacity for tourism and modernize their train transport system. Tunisia awarded a contract to build its seventh international airport at Enfidha to the Turkish holding company Tepe Aksen Ventisres (TAV) in 2007 and plans to award a contract to build a deep water port in the same region. In November 2008, Morocco received a 625 million euro ($804.6 million) loan from France to fund a high-speed TGV route between Casablanca and Tangiers. Although much remains to be done, particularly in the areas of public transport and urban planning, investments in national infrastructure prove that Morocco and Tunisia, often known for corruption and misuse of public funds, are very serious about achieving a goal-oriented long-term sustainable economic development.

December 8, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Real estate

Realty reform

by Executive Staff December 8, 2008
written by Executive Staff

The UAE government has long been active in setting laws and regulations to improve the transparency of its real estate market and ensure long-term growth. Since the global financial crisis began, these attempts were further amplified by issuing new laws, intervening in the market by controlling future supply and by injecting liquidity into the banking sector to promote lending. “Every strong government provides its market with an ability to bounce back in difficult times and the UAE has shown over the last four decades its resilience and ambition in making [the country] one of the most buoyant economies in the world,” said Hayan Merchant, CEO of Ruwaad Holdings LLC.

On November 9, 2008, Dubai’s government formed a high-level committee consisting of a few private developers and Dubai-based master developers, including Emaar Properties, Nakheel and Dubai Properties, who jointly control around 70% of the property supply in Dubai. The committee aims to tackle the impact of the current financial crisis on the UAE’s real estate market, while looking into various options to restore confidence. Additionally, it was announced that no new projects can be launched without the committee’s approval, however, none of the already-launched projects will be called off.

The global financial crisis has hit the banking sector and rippled into the UAE real estate market. Some banks and mortgage lenders have considerably cut down or even stopped their real estate lending. For example, Amlak suspended new mortgage loans and NBD stopped lending to expat employees of real estate firms, fearing loan defaults. In response, the government in October began injecting $19 billion into UAE banks to overcome this liquidity squeeze. Additionally, the central bank has set up around $13.5 billion in an emergency credit fund for homeowners, investors and developers. It has also discussed proposals for introducing financial instruments to boost liquidity and insure the continuity of real estate loans.

New laws

Reforms of the real estate sector’s regulations started in July 2007, when a Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) was established in Dubai to set policies and to create awareness of rights and responsibilities in the property sector.

The Strata Law was issued and came into effect on March 31, 2008. It defines the responsibility of property owners and developers in the management of common areas in multi-owner developments, like gated communities and apartment buildings.

The interim registration law came into effect on August 31, decreeing that any ownership change of off-plan properties in Dubai will be invalid if not registered in RERA’s Interim Register, with all registered sales transferred to the Land Department Register. Additionally, transactions made before the law came into effect will not be exempted, as they were to have been registered within 60 days of the law enactment. “While this may cause a slowdown for off-plan buying, it will be very beneficial in the long term to stabilize the market and put off flippers and speculators,” said Mohamed Al Zarah, CEO of Great Properties.

Moreover, the new Dubai Property Court was established in September. It is expected to reduce the workload of RERA, which since its establishment has been swamped by property cases, including for project delays and noncompliance with a property developer’s initial description.

The new mortgage law, which came into effect on October 30, states that mortgages will not be valid if they are not registered at the Dubai Land Department or the new Interim Real Estate Register, and it includes all procedures concerning a mortgage and its legal effects on stakeholders. Additionally, it includes execution procedures for the mortgaged property and proper conduct between the bank and the borrower.

Abu Dhabi is following suit by finalizing a new law to regulate its property market and to put an end to dangerous speculation. Also, there are plans in the Emirates’ capital to introduce similar real estate laws that Dubai has earlier issued — like the strata, broker and escrow laws — in order to assure investors that they are investing in a safe environment with a solid legal structure.

“Thanks to measures taken by the authorities and the initial strength of the market, I firmly believe that the UAE will overcome this crisis,” said Jean Pierre Nammour, managing director of Al Nahda Real Estate. With these regulations, the UAE in general and Dubai in specific, are trying to move from a speculative to a more mature property market, without facing a sharp real estate crash. Though progress has been made, the road is yet long: new laws are being drafted, such as the ‘company law,’ the new banking credit law and a new foreign investment law, to further improve the investment environment in the country.

December 8, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Comment

All roads lead to India

by Norbert Schiller December 8, 2008
written by Norbert Schiller

Many years ago, an Indian friend of mine living in Dubai said to me, “If you want to send a plane to anywhere in the world, including the North Pole, and are worried that you won’t have enough passengers, land in Delhi and I promise you that the plane will take off without one empty seat.” He was correct. There are very few places in this world where there is not a large thriving Indian community. From the South Seas to Africa, Indians have this uncanny ability to adapt to just about any situation and succeed. At the same time, they are one of the few communities that, no matter where they go, manage to keep their cultural identity and ultimately aspire to return home.

This past month I covered the India Economic Summit 2008 in New Delhi. The summit has been an annual event for the past 24 years and brings together the country’s brightest and most influential political and business leaders from all strata of society — from the multi-billionaire entrepreneur Vijay Mallay, whose portfolio includes everything from air transport to beer and tourism developments, to J. Vasudev, sadhguru and founder of the Isha Foundation. The summit also attracted a few influential foreign personalities, most notably former US Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger and former US Secretary of Defense, William Cohen.

Unfortunately, the timing of the summit this year could not have been worse. Instead of focusing on ways to improve the lives of India’s billion-plus population, most of whom live at or below the poverty line, business and political leaders spent the better part of four days discussing the world’s financial crisis and how to minimize its impact on the region. There were, however, a few local Indian politicians who wanted to distance themselves from the ‘global agenda’ and to use the summit as a political platform, possibly because of the upcoming parliamentary elections, to focus on the plight of India’s poor.

There is no country in the world where the rich and poor are so diametrically opposed and where the divisions in society run so deep. The caste system was officially abolished years ago, but the imprint it has left will most likely last for generations to come. For the average Indian, the solution is not in finding ways to bail out the financial system. Their priorities are more basic: having enough food on the table, educating the children and obtaining proper healthcare. One Indian politician at the summit so rightly put it that, “they had nothing to do with creating the financial crisis in the first place, so why should they be burdened by it?”

After spending almost a week with India’s rich and famous, I set out to discover the other side of the country. While traveling along the road, it’s not difficult to see why some of India’s local parliamentarians attending the summit were keen on using the event as a platform for their campaigns. Everywhere you turn there is grinding poverty. It’s also not difficult to understand why so many Indians have left their country to settle elsewhere. In the past, Indians began settling in Africa and parts of Asia because that was where the trade routes took them. Today, many end up in the Arab Gulf countries as laborers working long hours for a little more pay than they would receive at home.

While staying at a small hotel in Agra, I got to talking with an elderly waiter about travel and where I had grown up. It turned out that the waiter had been quite the entrepreneurial traveler of his time. When I spoke about my time growing up in California and Europe he began to reminisce about his years in the States and how he ended up there after being invited by one of his students, who had been a Peace Corps volunteer in India back in the 1960s. He told me how he moved from job to job until he opened his first travel agency. After the first year he sold the agency and then with the money started another travel agency. Over the course of 15 years he opened and sold 15 travel agencies and then, after having had enough of being an entrepreneur, set out into the world, a traveler once again.

I asked him why he was working now as a waiter in the hotel; he told me that there was really nothing for him to do in India and the one thing he liked to do was be among travelers and reminisce. “Besides,” he said, “ultimately you go home.”

Norbert schiller is a Dubai-based photo-journalist and writer

December 8, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Real estate

Dubai‘s foundations mature

by Iseeb Rehman December 3, 2008
written by Iseeb Rehman

The decline in global property prices has started to seep into Dubai, although it’s arguable that this is a short- term correction born as a direct result of the world credit crisis and the speculative nature of investors. No one can deny the fundamental strengths of Dubai in terms of tourism, trade, real estate investment and as a potential financial power house of the Middle East.

The knock-on effect has been the pace of off-plan sales, which have inevitably slowed in recent weeks, although property that is completed or close to handover is still very much in demand and interestingly has seen minimal impact in pricing. Statistically the ratio of investors to end-users was originally 60:40. We have witnessed a turnaround, which is positive for the market as now we are seeing real buyers enter the market and purchasing for personal use.
The UAE market as we see it today is simply in a lull period. However, Dubai as we know is a global fusion metropolis. The current global economic crisis could yet become a bonus to the UAE, which can offer alternative support to investors as its banks are safe, liquidity is available and personal debt (in global terms) is at a minimum level. This is supported by the fact that Abu Dhabi is the federal capital of the UAE and Dubai is central to the continued success of the country.
Current investment opportunities in Dubai are appealing and I predict that in six months to one year prices will have stabilized at 2006 and 2007 values. In addition, the range of legislation implemented over the last year by RERA and the Land Department has provided transparency and stability to the market, which in turn will become attractive to international institutions when rebuilding their balance sheets. Dubai, in short, is in a period of transition where it has begun as an infant market and is developing to be both a professional and established one, as is everything else that is growing with it.
Of course, there are several specific factors that have helped shield Dubai from global market turmoil. For one, Dubai has firmly established itself as a highly marketable global brand, with its potential to maximize the business value of investors being among its biggest brand attractions. One hundred percent foreign ownership, zero personal and corporate taxation, state-of-the-art infrastructure, fast employee visa processing, full repatriation of capital — these are just a few popular incentives that define the conducive investment landscape of the emirate. Its massive investments to develop its air, sea and land transport facilities, which have transformed Dubai into one of the most highly accessible destinations in the world, have also helped accelerate Dubai’s reputation across global markets. With a strong transport sector, Dubai continues to drive more business and investment traffic into the emirate.
The combination of widespread infrastructure development, strategic location and proactive government policies has likewise cultivated a unique environment that breeds creativity, ingenuity, professional excellence and high technology — all of which are associated with the Dubai brand.
The message is thus clear: Dubai is a mature, yet highly dynamic investment destination. Mature, because Dubai has successfully incorporated key measures that ensure sustainability and long-term growth, e.g. gradually removing speculators from the real estate market and replacing them with longer-term investors and end-users. Ultimately, it is its dynamism reinforced by its resilient character and mature outlook that continues to enable Dubai to harness growth opportunities as they come, regardless of the circumstances.

Iseeb Rehman is managing director of Sherwoods Independent Property Consultants.

December 3, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economy & Finance

MENA – 2009 to tally the toll

by Executive Staff December 3, 2008
written by Executive Staff

The year 2008 will forever be remembered for bringing the global financial system to the brink of total collapse. “When I predicted earlier this year that we were facing the worst financial crisis since the 1930s, I did not anticipate that conditions would deteriorate so badly,” said George Soros, the billionaire American financial speculator, aptly capturing the scale of the global financial crisis in the New York Review of Books. Soros went on to warn that, “a deep recession is now inevitable and the possibility of a depression cannot be ruled out.” Thus, globally 2009 will be dominated by the repercussions of the financial crisis.

How the global financial crisis will impact the Middle East is still unclear and analysts expect the full implications to slowly emerge over the next year. Already there has been a dramatic drop in the price of oil, real estate in the GCC has been shaken, investor confidence rocked and stock markets in the region have shown a volatility similar to those in the major financial centers throughout the globe. Yet, concomitantly the Middle East has so far appeared to have navigated itself away from the most severe aspects of the financial crisis, as seen in the West. The economic fundamentals of the GCC are seen by analysts to be strong and able to withhold the continued onslaught from the outside.
As vice-president of MENA Capital Ziad Maalouf explained, “The banks have strong fundamentals in the GCC because the governments are behind them with their huge reserves and have shown in the crisis that they are willing to act to support the banks if need be. In the UAE we have already seen this [the central bank of the UAE introduced a $14 billion liquidity support facility].” In addition, the GCC governments have given a 100% guarantee on all bank deposits. The economic fundamentals in the Gulf became so strong primarily because of the huge surpluses obtained over the last few years due to record oil prices. Thus, stated Faisal Hasan, head of research at Global Investment House, “The governments of the region have saved 70% of their surplus oil revenues over the past five years and sovereign wealth funds in the MENA region have over $1.5 trillion at their disposal.”

Those with oil and those without
The current account surpluses of oil exporting countries are expected to reach 25% of GDP in 2008, according to the IMF. Thus, the economic fundamentals of the GCC are expected to be strong enough for growth to continue in 2009. For non-oil exporting countries next year is going to be very difficult. Amjad Ahmed, CEO of Investment and Merchant Banking at NBK Capital, said that Egypt and Turkey in particular are going to have a hard time as both these countries’ growths have relied on the inflows of foreign direct investment from the GCC and with the financial crisis, “FDI from the Gulf will be significantly reduced.”
The GCC states, while having the surplus liquidity to overcome the crisis, still had to face significant impacts on their economies. “Gulf stock markets have shed $160 billion of their total value during the first couple of weeks of the financial crisis, the Saudi All Share Index fell 17% and the Dubai Stock Market posted a 22.5% loss … several Arab sovereign funds incurred substantial losses as well on their worldwide portfolios,” said Fadlo Choueiri, head of research at Credit Libanais.
Exactly how much was lost by these SWFs is, unfortunately, guess work because of a complete lack of transparency. Jad Chaaban, acting president of the Lebanese Economic Association, warned that, “There are a lot of rumors that major sovereign funds [from the region] lost major amounts of cash in the US, but we don’t have numbers. But it has impacted the risk perception of investors.” This lack of transparency should be a cause for concern as it was a deficiency in transparency and regulation that caused the global financial near-meltdown.
While the economic fundamentals have been important in convincing investors and analysts that the GCC will be able to weather the financial hurricane, timing has also been essential in keeping the worst affects of the crisis at bay. As Ziad Abou Jamra, director of the Trading Desk at FIDUS, explained, “Lending standards were just starting to deteriorate in the GCC area when the crisis started overseas, which created a timely opportunity for GCC banks to adjust and halt all risky lending. US banks, on the other hand, were giving out loans with zero down payments, no documentation, and zero interest rates for the first two years [i.e. subprime loans].” Further to this, Hasan claimed, there was “weaker integration of MENA’s financial sector with those of the US and Europe. There were also improvements in MENA’s financial fundamentals over the last decade, including better fiscal and monetary management, more open regimes with more flexible exchange rates, and better debt and financial management that has reduced exposure to international capital markets.”
The independence of the GCC from the international financial system is contested. Choueiri said that there has been increased integration of the region into the world economy, “evidenced by some 89.18% correlation between the GCC 200 index and the Dow Jones Industrial Average during the period between September 7 and October 20,” adding “it is inevitable for government authorities in the region to implement stiffer regulation on banks and sovereign funds.”
The most significant implication of the 2008 global financial crisis on the region is likely the substantial hits that many individual investors took as, according to Ahmed, “their investment portfolios left them exposed to what happened in Europe and the US.”
It will not be until sometime next year that the extent to which individual investors in the GCC have been affected will be clear, but sentiment in the market suggests it was significant. What is maybe more significant is the advice that brokers are giving their clients, which is being repeated across the region and the globe. “We are telling our clients to liquidate some of their investments and move to safer types of products and we have re-initiated two structures that give more protection to our clients. So we are trying to protect our clients by investing in these structures instead of going straight into the market,” Ezzedine said.
It appears that 2009 will be a hard year for capitalists in the region. “Cash is scarce, many high net worth individuals lost substantial sums of money, the financial crisis has hit the ability to fundraise for Private Equity firms such as ours in the region,” said Gilles de Clerck, senior manager of Capital Trust.

The Lebanese great escape?
In Lebanon, 2008 will be remembered as the year of Riad Salameh, governor of the Banque du Lebanon, the country’s central bank. Many people in the sector believe he helped Lebanon escape the financial crisis’ worst effects. Ezzedine said that “Lebanese banking will not be affected [by the global financial crisis] because we do traditional banking in Lebanon, which means none of the Lebanese banks were allowed to invest in any of those derivatives that caused the crisis. This was because Riad Salameh saw this crisis occurring because of the over-leverage of properties and he saw the cycles and possibilities of a bubble bursting that would affect the whole financial system.”
Thus, miraculously, the financial crisis even brought an improvement to Lebanon’s economic situation. According to

Oil
Oil prices reached a record $147.27 per barrel on July 11 of this year and, according to the IMF, oil and gas exports will amount to an estimated $1.1 trillion in 2008, up from $700 billion in 2007. Analysts are putting this record price down to massive speculation on oil and the subsequent drop to $51, at the time Executive went to print, appears to confirm this view. “These speculators were buying every small dip in prices and the rally continued, which eventually led to the final blow off and $148-per-barrel prices. This latest drop in oil prices will definitely be a big negative for speculation in the region (lower liquidity) and will definitely lead to lower GDP growth levels,” said Ziad Abou Jamra, director of the trading desk at FIDUS. However, while speculation was no doubt a major cause of declining prices, the global financial crisis is now also causing a serious hemorrhage in demand. The uncertainty over what will happen to oil in 2009 has even led Goldman Sachs to close their recommendations for oil. Future markets expect oil to average $102 a barrel during 2009- 2013 on a cumulative basis, giving the region a projected fiscal revenue of $5.6 trillion over the five-year period, compared to $1.8 trillion during 2003-2007.
Sentiment among analysts in the region regarding the oil price is relatively upbeat, despite the uncertainty. As Faisal Hasan, head of research at Global Investment House, stated, “Trade balances and balance of payments are likely to remain positive… The sharp decline in oil prices will reduce the consolidated external current account surplus of the GCC countries by almost half, but still it will remain positive.” Most analysts in the region are remaining confident mainly because they believe that for most of 2008 oil was overpriced and they expect oil prices to stabilize at $60-70 per barrel next year, which will still be above the average $47 per barrel needed for the GCC to achieve a fiscal balance. Amjad Ahmed, CEO of Investment and Merchant Banking for NBK Capital, said that although the market is fluctuating a lot, “growth in India and China will ensure that oil is maintained at the $60-70 mark.”
Nonetheless, the continued dive in oil prices is not promising and the decision by Goldman Sachs to close their recommendations for oil pricing illustrates the uncertainty in the market. This is further accentuated by the fact that the continued slide in oil prices has occurred in the context of two production cuts by OPEC, Fadlo Choueiri, head of research for Credit Libanais, pointed out. However, Abou Jamra countered that, “speculators loved buying oil at around $150 and now they hate it at around $50. Betting against speculators is usually a winning proposition.”

Antoun Samya, a research analyst at BLOMINVEST, there has been an inflow of $8 billion into Lebanese banks from Arabs and expatriate Lebanese. “Lebanon is currently seen as a safe haven by high net worth individuals,” Samya said. However, negative impacts of the crisis in Lebanon are expected to be felt in 2009, despite the IMF estimating growth to reach 5% in real GDP. In Ezzedine’s view, “negative impacts have begun to appear and on the real estate side, some projects have been slowed down… also a slowdown in remittances from abroad will occur.”

2009: Wait and see
The economic fundamentals of the GCC are facing their biggest test yet and 2009 will be a year of continued questioning of these fundamentals. Analysts are quietly confident that there is enough liquidity in the region to escape any severe economic crisis in the GCC, but simultaneously there is nervousness as the full implications of the crisis in the region are still unclear. Oil prices continued their decline to the crucial $50 mark and the existing confidence is fragile. The coming year will be a long one and the start of an even longer recovery period for the global financial system. The age of conspicuous consumption is over.

December 3, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Capitalist Culture

Economic crisis – Fair-weather finance

by Michael Young December 3, 2008
written by Michael Young

In mid-November, with the US presidential election settled, congressional Democrats tried to push their advantage. They proposed massive government intervention to bail out the ailing American auto industry. Senate Republicans and outgoing President George W. Bush said no, the proposal was shelved. However, come January, Democrats will control both houses of Congress, allowing them to again table what is arguably the most burning global issue today: Is the global capitalist system working, or are we entering a period when massive government interference in the markets is inevitable?
The financial crisis, which is segueing into a global recession, has provoked heated discussion over the free market. As powerful financial institutions began to totter, defenders of state intervention said massive injections of government funds alone could halt the meltdown of the world’s financial order. They provided as evidence the panic that overcame stock markets when Lehman Brothers was allowed to go under, and argued that only more regulation could avert further disaster. This may have been a far cry from socialism; however, as the US administration and other governments embraced that logic, suddenly quite a few states found themselves with stakes in very sick companies.
Conversely, free market ideologs, most prominently libertarians, said governments were doing exactly the opposite of what they should do. The problem was not the free market, they posited, it was not the need for more regulation; the problem was that governments were not permitting markets to correct themselves by allowing poorly run financial institutions to collapse. Defending capitalism, they underlined, did not mean defending bad management of capitalist enterprises. In fact the opposite was true.
Andrew Davis, of the US Libertarian Party, forcefully made that argument: “Businessmen are bad for capitalism when they use the government as life support for failing ventures. Instead of letting other companies absorb these failing businesses, CEOs and government bailouts have distorted the natural forces of capitalism and prevented the necessary — and effective — economic turnaround that only comes through an unfettered free market.”
In theory the libertarians were right: It made no sense to blame free markets when governments were doing everything possible to prevent the markets from filtering bad companies. Where the libertarians came up short, however, was in failing to recognize that the crisis was essentially a political one. No government, and that included the supposedly free-market Bush administration, could allow major companies to fall like houses of cards, since the public’s response to this could have been cataclysmic.
And that’s not mentioning that self-correcting mechanisms in the market would have probably taken years to be effective and bring about some kind of new equilibrium. In the meantime, unemployment would have gone up dramatically, undermining economic confidence.
But where politics intervenes, sound policy becomes a luxury. That’s why the interventionists are wrong in seeing more government writ as an economic solution. It’s also why the way the debate is taking place today is worrisome. We should not be trying to determine whether capitalism is worth defending. As Matt Welch, the editor of the American libertarian magazine Reason, recently wrote: “After the collapse of communism and the attendant discrediting of Marxian economic models, the industrialized world more or less settled on democratic capitalism as the best available option for countries to grow and prosper. Old Europe slashed government involvement in industry, New Europe rode mass privatization to massive growth, East Asian countries went from emerging market ‘tigers’ to full-fledged market economies, and China used markets to yank hundreds of millions up from poverty. One could perhaps be forgiven for thinking the 20th century’s great economic argument had been settled.”
The discussion shouldn’t be whether capitalism works (of course it does), but how it can be made to work most efficiently, thus most freely, without pushing governments into situations where they need to spend hundreds of billions of taxpayers’ dollars to bail out companies. Should that mean more regulation? Perhaps some regulation is necessary, but the more governments regulate, the more inefficient economies become and the greater the costs to societies. The short-term panic should not in any way represent a blank check to stifle markets down the road.
Unfortunately, that seems to be precisely the direction in which governments, particularly the US government, are heading. When states intervene to save one economic sector, they cannot very well abandon others. Then political calculations kick in to muddy the waters further. That’s why the discussion of the free market’s merits is a red herring. The real issue is how consistently free-market ways can be applied so that the very notion of a ‘free market’ actually retains some meaning.

Michael Young

December 3, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Banking

Islamic Banking – Sharia‘s security

by Tenets of Islamic-based savings institutions pay dividends December 3, 2008
written by Tenets of Islamic-based savings institutions pay dividends

“Asset growth for the seven leading GCC Islamic banks [in the first three quarters 2008] goes something like this. Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank plus 12%. Al Rajhi Bank plus 31%. Bank Al Jazeera plus 9%. Boubyan Bank plus 27%. Dubai Bank plus 61%. Dubai Islamic Bank plus 4%. Kuwait Finance House plus 23%,” said Moody’s analyst Anouar Hassoune. These numbers paint a picture of growth for the Islamic finance industry in an otherwise gloomy global economic environment. And although Dubai Islamic Bank posted growth of just four percent, this low figure can be chalked up to a couple of extenuating factors. For starters, one of the bank’s former vice presidents was held by police this summer as part of a bribery investigation. It is more likely, however, that the low posting derives from DIB’s failure to make use of the United Arab Emirates Central Bank facility for refinancing in the face of the ongoing financial difficulties in the UAE. Even with minor hiccups like these in the industry, the Islamic banking sector is on track for asset growth of 27% for 2008, a repeat performance of 2007.

The formerly niche market of Islamic finance has quickly moved into the main stream in recent years, boasting over 390 Islamic financial institutions in 75 different countries. Studies suggest that the assets under management of these institutions will exceed $600 billion by the end of 2008. It is further predicted that 80% of GCC banks will be sharia compliant by 2015. But this rush to become sharia compliant should not be conflated with a uniform strategy in the sector. Evolution within the GCC Islamic banking sector in 2008 has highlighted the differences between countries. While the Islamic banking sector in most Gulf countries has moved towards a more commercial approach, Saudi Arabia’s sector has a comparatively conservative costumer base and no competition from conventional banks, which will likely promote stasis in the austere kingdom’s banking scene. Meanwhile, the Central Bank of Qatar has opened the door to competition within its Islamic banking sector by making licenses more available, in turn driving their Islamic financial institutions to compete more earnestly on the commercial level with their conventional banking competition. This development has been followed to its logical conclusion in the UAE where Islamic banks and commercial banks are virtually indistinguishable. Meanwhile, Kuwait’s Islamic banks have settled into mode of functioning like investment vehicles. They take funds from depositor accounts and invest them into ventures such as real estate projects. Profit from the project is then paid back to the depositor at their arranged rate of return.
Despite the different approaches of the region’s Islamic banks, there is one common thread among them: real estate. As Islamic finance prefers physical asset backed investments, Islamic banks have become heavily involved in the GCC’s spicy property markets in recent years. Some analysts have expressed concern about the fact that those institutions tend to be even more exposed to the region’s property markets than conventional lenders. It seems the deciding factor would be the amount of value lost. “A 10-to-15% decline in property value in Dubai might not have a big impact,” said Hassoune of Moody’s. “But a 30% decline in the property market starts to become a crisis.” Given the current state of the world’s economy, it is extremely difficult to predict what may happen to real estate markets in the Gulf. It is, however, expected by many analysts that the market will drop by at least 10%. Islamic bankers throughout the region will be holding their breath and hoping it doesn’t go much lower than that. Yet if even if their fears are realized, there may still be hope. Moody’s stress tests, which simulate worse case scenarios, suggest that even if there were a 50% fall in real estate prices most Islamic banks would survive the resulting substantial equity losses, while smaller banks would likely need to be bailed out. While most sharia compliant banks may survive the expected real estate turmoil, some Islamic mortgage providers have already begun to suffer. In late November, two of the UAE’s largest Islamic mortgage providers merged under pressure. Amlak Finance and Tamweel united under the banner of the Real Estate Bank (REB). REB is a government entity and the move was perceived by analysts as direct intervention by the UAE government to save troubled assets. This was the first time the federal government had rescued a company. Time will tell who will be the second.

Growth for 2009?
Even if Islamic mortgage providers are braving rough waters these days, the Islamic banking sector as a whole is set to grow for 2009. Yet it is unlikely that the industry will see the same 27% growth rate that it enjoyed for both 2007 and 2008. “The Islamic financial system is facing some structural weaknesses, which need to be overcome for the Islamic banking industry to keep growing. First is capital. To keep growing at 27% you need equity to maintain the same capitalization… [and] internal capital generation is not enough,” said Hassoune. While some investors, like governments, are willing to put money into the Islamic banking industry, non-sovereign investors have been constrained. So the key variable will be sovereign spending — sovereigns will need to spend next year in order to make their economy grow.
Another issue facing Islamic financial institutions in the Gulf is liquidity. “Liquidity needs to be there for you to keep on growing and liquidity management is very difficult,” Hassoune asserted. And managers have been “providing incentives not to grow the credit portfolio excessively. So liquidity is a structural constraint. Especially at times when liquidity is disappearing out of the money markets and out of the credit market anyway,” he concluded.
Given these constraints, it is not surprising that Islamic banking is expected to grow by only half of what was seen in 2007 and 2008. But even if the percentage of growth is in the mid-teens, that is still higher than the global market. And Islamic banks are still on pace to reach 20% of market share by the end of the decade.

Sukuk
In 2007, sukuk issuance grew by 90% on the previous year to hit the $47 billion mark. In 2008, however, it is expected that issuance will only have reached $20 billion, which is a 40% decrease. There are several reasons that sukuk issuance has declined. First, the spreads on sukuk have widened due to perceived higher systemic risk in the global banking system. Second, the liquidity needed to make the sukuk market run has dried up. Third, the initial spread on sukuk was too low because demand for sukuk was significantly higher than supply. Finally, the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) has cast doubt as to the sharia compliance of previously issued sukuk. Recent AAOIFI fatwa’s on the issue have, in part, prompted a shift toward one particular type of sukuk known as ijara. Even though ijara have buy back agreements, they are still sharia compliant, explained Moody’s Hassoune.
“AAOIFI scholars have said that a repurchase agreement is not incompliant with sharia. What is incompliant with sharia is to say five years ahead of the maturity of the sukuk that we will repurchase underlying assets at a given price, except for ijara. Ijara is leased assets, so because they are leased the assets are still the property of the originator. The repurchase agreement is just the originator saying to himself that he will buy back the asset at the price that is his price. At the end of the day the sukuk holders are not buying the underlying asset, they are buying the usufruct of these assets,” Hassoune explained.
Other developments in the sukuk industry include a shift away from the US dollar as the dominant issuing currency. Many issuers these days are using their own local currencies for ease of use rather than out of fear of an unstable dollar. The geographic distribution of sukuk is also widening. Senegal has considering issuing, while the Gambia and Sudan have both issued non-rated sukuk recently. It is likely that 2009 will see further shifts, including one away from corporate issuance (currently 75% of the market) and towards sovereign issuance (now just 25% of the market). These percentages will probably shift to half and half by the end of the year.
In conclusion, the sukuk market will slow in 2009. “Two thousand nine will probably resemble the second half of 2008, which is to say limited sukuk issuances, except for in domestic markets,” said Hassoune. Yet even with this decline, surely there are bankers in the West peering into the sukuk market with envy when compared to the mess they see brewing at home.

December 3, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Real estate

GCC – Development hits the wall

by Executive Staff December 3, 2008
written by Executive Staff

While the global economic uncertainty is increasingly trimming down investors’ confidence and consequently, leading to panic selling and the pulling out of millions of dollars worth of foreign investments, the stock market is bearing harsh consequences with share prices suffering precipitous fall. This drop in share value is also due to the sharp fall in oil prices, which has made investors increasingly concerned about the future of Gulf economies. All seven GCC markets fell in the past three months and $150 billion of their market capitalization has been lost since the end of 2007.

Since the beginning of the crisis, banks and mortgage houses have become very conscientious about lending and even though most GCC governments like Bahrain, UAE and Saudi Arabia are injecting liquidity into the banking sector to keep work going on major projects and to ease liquidity pressure, the real estate market has not shown any improvements yet. Moreover, amidst the increased government regulations and the corruption scandals in the UAE, the demand for real estate is slowing down and consequently causing real estate companies’ shares to experience heavy falls.

Emaar
Since the beginning of the year, Emaar, the Gulf’s largest property developer by market value, has lost more than 80% of its share value. To overcome this crisis, the company bought back 200,000 of its shares in October, aiming to restore investors’ confidence in the real estate sector and the entire UAE market. Mohamed Ali Alabbar, Emaar’s chairman, told Arabian Business that, “at Emaar, we firmly believe that there is no better investment we can make than in our own future. The decision taken by the board of directors to buy back Emaar shares reflects our firm belief that those shares are currently undervalued.” Apparently, this attempt was not effective since the company is now preparing to cut jobs by reviewing its 5,000-strong workforce. No details about how many employees will be fired have yet been announced. Moreover, Emaar — as well as Union Properties and ETA Star — has also started offering easy payment options to attract buyers.
Other companies have also started to cut jobs. DAMAC fired 200 employees in the beginning of November in response to the continuing global slowdown. Omniyat has also announced job cuts. No number has been publicized as yet, but it is estimated that around 60 jobs will be cut. Jean Pierre Nammour, managing director of Al Nahda Real Estate, remarked that this cut in budget could have a negative effect on the UAE economy. He explained that companies, after they lay off staff, will first begin to cut back on their advertising budgets, since they have already advertised previous projects and no new projects are currently initiated. Consequently, the advertising agencies will lose a large amount of revenue and will also let people go. Therefore, the effect will be extended to include other companies and thus hurt other sectors in the economy.

Dar al-Arkan
Dar al-Arkan, the largest Saudi developer by market value, has lost around 64% of its share value since the beginning of the year, despite announcing a 44.9% jump in second quarter profits. It seems that Dar Al-Arkan is not slowing down its business since it has already set up a mortgage finance company targeting the middle-class sector of Saudi Arabia’s growing population. The managing director of the company, Abdullatif bin Abdullah al- Shelash, showed upbeat expectations and told Arabian Business that with the measures that the kingdom has taken to increase liquidity, the market will not face any mortgage crisis. However, the company’s reputation was damaged when the Saudi bourse regulator imposed a SAR100,000 ($26,667) fine in early November, for violating disclosure regulations.
“Any problems faced by local real estate companies are a consequence of the global financial crisis, but as soon as the global financial markets begin to improve and the local real estate market starts to take shape again, companies on the stock market are definitely going to improve their current situation,” said Hayan Merchant, CEO of Ruwaad Holdings LLC.

Corruption in the UAE
A major corruption investigation in Dubai has lead to the arrest of dozens of executives in state-backed companies linked to the property sector. This is the most extensive anti-corruption exercise in the emirate’s history, as Sheikh Mohammed made it clear that Dubai will not tolerate any officials abusing their authority for personal gain.
The investigation began in April when the former CEO of Deeyar, Zack Shahin, two company executives and two company suppliers were arrested. Since then, the company’s shares started to lose their value, which have declined by 73% to date. Moreover, Mohammed Khalfan bin Kharbash, former chairman of Dubai Islamic Bank and its real-estate affiliate Deyaar, as well as Minister of State for Finance and Industry, was implicated in November in connection with allegations of financial wrongdoing at Deyaar. Many of the company’s ex-employees might also face trial.
In late August, four employees of Dubai Holding Subsidiary real estate developers Sama Dubai were taken into custody following accusations of bribery. A few days before that, two men from the sales department of Nakheel were also arrested.
In October, Abdullah Nasser Abdullah, the deputy CEO of Tamweel and CEO of Tamweel Properties and Investment LLC was arrested on charges of embezzlement. Additionally, the company’s former chief executive and the former head of investment were also arrested on embezzlement charges. In the same month, the former CEO of real estate developer Mizin was questioned over irregularities in selling lands.
This anti-corruption probe reduced investors’ confidence and was one of the main reasons for the freefall of stock prices. However, these developments should benefit the economy in the long-run by increasing transparency in the real estate market and creating a healthy environment for investors.

Scaling back activity
Currently, Dubai’s largest developers are reviewing their projects in response to the economic climate. For example, Nakheel announced that it is reassessing its business objectives and will scale back activity on some projects. Union Properties said it would not announce any new projects until the status of the credit market becomes clear. Sama Dubai, which has already unveiled projects worth almost $55.2 billion, is reviewing these to adapt to the current economic situation. DAMAC is following suit by reviewing its construction timetable and is planning to reschedule some of its latest projects. Additionally, Mohamed Al Zarah, CEO of Great Properties, announced that, “we will not be launching new projects this year as we feel it is a good time for us to reassess our projects and improve the company internally. This is key for us to successfully operate in the market alongside the credit crisis recovery phase.” He added that, “We will wait to see what January 2009 will bring.”

December 3, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economy & Finance

Inflation – Price bubble spring leak

by Executive Staff December 3, 2008
written by Executive Staff

Inflation was the biggest economic story in the Middle East for 2008, before the global financial system almost completely self-destructed. While inflation was a global problem due to a sharp rise in oil and food prices, levels in the Middle East were exceptionally high. The GCC’s average inflation rate was estimated to be 11.5%, according to Global Research. Inflation exerted significant pressure on much of the region’s population and civil unrest occurred from the UAE to Egypt. The causes for these high levels were largely related to the same underlying issues fuelling global inflation, but in the region they were further exasperated by the dollar peg, strong domestic demand and supply bottlenecks, especially in the GCC. Not surprisingly, the debate over the pegging of currencies to the dollar re-ignited, especially in the GCC.

The strong growth in both the GDP and the money supply in the GCC should have been accompanied by a tight monetary policy in which short-term interest rates would have been raised gradually, but because of the dollar peg this could not occur. “Very low interest rates coupled with high growth precipitated speculation and aggressive buying of real estate and financial instruments led to major bubbles in almost all asset classes,” said Ziad Abou Jamra, director of the trading desk at FIDUS. “Add to that the imported inflation that was due to a very weak dollar and high emerging market demand in China and India, and you had all the ingredients for spiraling inflation levels. In addition, this peg forced the Gulf central banks to print dinars, riyals and dirhams with which to buy dollars, and that money printing is inflationary.”
Subsequently, the big debate as to whether the GCC should move away from the dollar peg to a basket of currencies was taken up again. Kuwait was the first country to de-peg but its inflation still remained above 10% for much of 2008. Given this example, the idea of de-pegging from the dollar met much resistance and governments across the region had to look for other solutions. Amjad Ahmad, CEO of Investment and Merchant Banking at NBK Capital, stated that, “Although the dollar peg had some impact on inflation, ultimately it was the local economic realities of huge liquidity amounts, the high demand and small capacity, that were the underlying causes of inflation.”
To combat the effects of high inflation, many governments implemented broad-based wage increases but this risked second-round inflation effects. The IMF issued a warning to regional governments that broad-based wage increases should be avoided as it was only exacerbating the situation. Governments throughout the region were finding that their options in dealing with inflation and its effects were reduced. Tax cuts on food staples, consumption subsidies, price controls, trade restrictions to protect domestic supplies of food, boosting of social safety nets and supply side measures were all attempted yet none of these successfully mitigated rising inflation or its effects. Everything governments in the region have attempted in order to control inflation was ultimately fruitless. Zaid Maalouf, vice-president of MENA Capital, confirmed that, “Inflation is the most challenging problem for central governments and there are not many financial tools that the central banks in the GCC can use as the money markets here are not as well developed as in Europe.”

Inflation in Lebanon
Lebanon 2008’s inflationary trend was especially acute because of the dire political situation for the first six months of the year and the heavy dependence on imports. Estimated to be between 10-11.5%, depending on whose figures are taken, inflation is now at its highest point in 15 years. At the worst point during the political crisis, it was estimated to be at 13%. Jad Chaaban, acting president of the Lebanese Economic Association, noted another major problem in Lebanon that made inflation even worse: oligopolies. “Lebanese markets are very concentrated, so the importers have a tendency to shift prices immediately to consumers because they have the power to do so due to the fact that there is an oligopoly system in Lebanon. This also leads to an asymmetry of transmission, which means that when costs increase the retailer passes it on to the consumer but when those costs go down the prices to the consumer remain static,” he said.
Getting accurate figures for Lebanese inflation levels is a major problem. Chaaban claimed that the government figures are not correct and that there has not been enough of a concerted effort to reduce inflation. “The central bank does not have an active target for inflation so the government responds with measures that are ad hoc. You don’t see inflation as a top priority for the government and this is bad because in an open economy such as Lebanon, inflation is a major issue,” Chaaban said.
However, Jihad Azour, the then-finance minister, said in an interview in Executive’s April issue that attention is being shifted to fine tune inflation figures with efforts being made by the IMF and the Central Bank of Lebanon. Further to this, Azour noted that the government has a good record when it comes to controlling inflation and in 2008 took several measures to control it. “The first measure was to make sure the increase in the oil price was not passed onto the consumers and this has cost the government $1.1-1.2 billon. The government has lost more than $500 million of revenue per year and additional costs of more than $600 million due to the increase in oil prices in terms of deficit or subsidy to Électricité du Liban. In addition the government provided a 60% subsidy to the wheat that it is importing,” he explained. Nonetheless, despite all these various subsidies for much of 2008 inflation was at record levels.

From inflation to deflation?
Record inflation now appears to be confined to the history books due to the effects of the global financial crisis. “This latest crisis reversed all inflationary stimulators. The real estate bubble is popping, equities and other financial instruments are on sale, crude oil prices are dropping, down 63% from their July 2008 peak. In addition, the dollar is strengthening against all major currencies, paving the way for much lower import prices and halting the printing presses of the regions’ central banks. Lower liquidity means lower speculation and lower inflation,” said Abou Jamra. Subsequently, in 2009 inflation will not be a significant issue. In Europe and the US, where the reversal of inflationary stimulators are more severe, there is even worry of deflation. With the huge budget surpluses in the GCC, however, this is not a significant threat to the region. Yet, Abou Jamra warned, “If history is any guide, real estate and stock prices will continue their downward trend in 2009, notwithstanding a short-term rally for the coming three to six months and this will put a brake on the consumers’ purchases. The only offset to lower consumption is government spending by a lot. With crude oil prices at $55, we doubt that they can do that aggressively.”

December 3, 2008 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 491
  • 492
  • 493
  • 494
  • 495
  • …
  • 696

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    Executive Magazine
    • ISSUES
      • Current Issue
      • Past issues
    • BUSINESS
    • ECONOMICS & POLICY
    • OPINION
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • EXECUTIVE TALKS
    • MOVEMENTS
      • Change the image
      • Cannes lions
      • Transparency & accountability
      • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
      • Say No to Corruption
      • The Lebanon media development initiative
      • LPSN Policy Asks
      • Advocating the preservation of deposits
    • JOIN US
      • Join our movement
      • Attend our events
      • Receive updates
      • Connect with us
    • DONATE