• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
Economics & Policy

Mohamed shabib – General manager, MTC Touch

by Executive Staff December 1, 2005
written by Executive Staff

Executive talks to Mohamed Shabib, general manager of MTC Touch, one of the two cellular phone management companies, on the state and development of Lebanon’s mobile telecom sector.

E Following a year of challenges, do you see the Lebanese telecommunications industry as being in a better or worse position today than 12 months ago?

We are definitely very hopeful that changes are underway. In 2005, we didn’t have the opportunity to realize everything we wanted to do with the government. However, for next year we hope things will change for the better in terms of new services, network enhancement, expansions and the development of current services.

E Given the turbulent events of 2005, how difficult was it for you to maintain your planned trajectory for the year?

As you know this network is owned by the government so any expenditure needs to be approved by the government. Due to the events of 2005 – which we understand were beyond anyone’s control – and the changes in the Lebanese political arena, which shifted the telecom sector down a notch in terms of priorities, our getting the approval for our 2005 program was affected. Now there is a new government and talk of privatization, we are working with the government to see this process go through.

E Do you consider prospects for the final installation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority realistic in the short term, and what will the agency’s commencement of operations mean for the activities of MTC?

It has to be realistic. If the government wants to privatize they need to regulate and without a regulator it’s not going to work. They need to put a regulatory framework in place because privatization means competition and without regulation there will be no competition; there will be a war. So we have to go the way of other countries and have a proper regulatory body.

E And how will that affect MTC?

Well, we are looking forward to being part of privatization, to own the private services and offer the best we can to the market once we have a free hand, within the regulatory framework that the government will install.

E When you hear that the ministry of telecommunications (MoT) approved paying compensation to France Telecom, do you think that the country has fully overcome what Marwan Hamadeh has described as a debacle of the days when Lebanon’s governments were under Syrian tutelage?

We were not part of that period, so I would rather not comment on this. It could happen anywhere. Today, we believe that the government is serious about privatization. It won’t take place overnight, but if the process begins in 2006, we will be very happy.

E Were lapses such as the announcement and then recall of the switch away from ‘03’ numbers this autumn signs of structural problems in telecom decision making in Lebanon?

The new numbering plan was put in place to help expand the market from its initial bloc of 1 million ‘03’ numbers for both operators. There had to be a way to expand on this and the government proposed this scheme. Technically it is very simple but we wanted to give businesses time to adjust and tell other networks of our changes. However, during the build-up and preparation when we had the marketing campaign for the public, there was a political decision to postpone the process due to a belief that the switch might affect the previous records and in turn affect the investigation into the assassination of [ex-premier Rafik] Hariri.

E It was just bad luck then?

Not bad luck, just a decision. In my opinion if we had gone ahead with the number migration it would have not affected any records. As a technical person I can say this. The records are there and can always be cross-referenced with the new numbers. However I think the government wanted to be more conservative and delay the process.

E Did the abandoning of the switch result in financial damages for MTC?

The loss was in the preparation efforts and there was a certain loss of capital, but as you know, any capital comes from the government’s pocket not ours. But it’s not going to go to waste because we are simply on hold. Sooner or later they will have to switch.

E When MTC stepped into the management role at Mobile Intermediary Companies MIC2, or today MTC Touch, group general manger Saad Barrak told Executive that he would have preferred a direct role as a licensed operator over being a management company. Given that the past 18 months were not always smooth sailing for mobile networks, seen in technical problems at various points, are you in hindsight happier to have been “only the manager” over that period?

Our ambition in the Lebanese market is still to be an operator. At the time we were offered the management contract we were happy. We felt it was a way to prove ourselves. Had we been an operator or license owners from the start, the events of 2005 would not have altered our ambitions for the Lebanese market.

E So MTC still harbors strong ambitions to become a full-scale operator in Lebanon and acquire the necessary licenses?

Absolutely, Lebanon is very important to us.

E What value would you put on those licenses today?

I can’t share that information with you. There are a lot of factors involved. There is due diligence required and I am sure the government is doing its part in assessing the value.

E Higher than in 2000, when the government had an offer of $1.2 billion?

I really can’t comment.

E Does MTC have ambitions in the internet market?

If the license would be available to us, we will think about it. We do have a wide spectrum of services in Bahrain, where we have an ISP service, we have an international service license, we have an international facilities license and a value added service license. We have seven or eight licenses that are operational. To have the same in Lebanon would be great but let’s concentrate on the mobile business licenses.

E Does MTC have ambitions for rolling out 3G or UMTS [Universal Mobile Telecom Services] in Lebanon or other countries?

Absolutely. We have started with 3G in Bahrain and in Kuwait and Jordan we are gradually going in that direction. We are starting with Edge in Kuwait and Jordan and Iraq as well.

E When will it happen in Lebanon?

It is up to the government. With 3G, you are talking about a different band of the spectrum, frequency-wise. If that frequency is available to be licensed, then the government will have to take the necessary steps to offer it.

E How big a role in the MTC picture does the Lebanese operation currently play?

Like I said, we are managers, but as an operator it would be very important to us. We are in Kuwait and Jordan and Bahrain and there is a lot of traffic between Lebanon and those countries and we can provide a good service at attractive rates.

E If you were successful in gaining an operator license, how soon could you change the pricing structure, and what per-minute rates for pre- and post-paid would you want to offer?

Each market needs to be studied before you decide on rates. We agree they need to be reduced. By how much depends on how quickly you can roll out the new equipment that can cater for anticipated extra demand at lower rates. For example, let us say your half a million subscribers would talk an average of 100 minutes per month each at the present rate. If you reduced the rates by half, your expectations will be that these people will increase their usage to 180 or even 220 minutes. This extra demand would require additional capacity on the network and it won’t happen over night, so if we take the license today, we will have to study what we will need to cater to the extra demand, which might take six months to a year and we would gradually reduce the rates to a reasonable level comparable to the rest of the region. Jordan charges a fraction of what is charged in Lebanon.

E Orascom Telecom Holdings (OTH) recently announced a 125% increase in subscriber numbers in a year-on-year comparison between September 30, 2005, and September 30, 2005. OTH also achieved a 75% improvement of net profits in the first three quarters of 2005. The OTH subscriber numbers grew strongly in markets such as Pakistan, Algeria and Iraq. How do you assess the potential of Middle East telecom markets for further growth in 2006; which markets does MTC see as the most promising; and do you regard OTH as your main competitor in the Middle East?

We are competing with every operator in the region. Orascom and MTC are not in any one country together except Iraq. They have IRAQNA and we have MTC Atheer. At this level in Iraq we are not really competing. We are just trying to provide a service because the market is still available to everyone, so whoever satisfies the market first will start the real competition. Egypt still has potential. The penetration rate for the two operators is only 10%. Saudi Arabia is another. They are looking for a third operator. But Egypt is probably the most promising market.

E As the managing entity on behalf of the MoT, you have a fixed income from providing your services. That presumably reduces your worries over government decisions affecting telecoms in Lebanon. It certainly curbs your ability to set prices and policies. After 18 months of experience, does this situation also affect your motivation or slow your ability for growing MTC Touch subscriber numbers and introducing or improving services? 

Like I said, we are dependent on the government. It is frustrating but as a manager our job is to make sure the service is running properly and we have certain service thresholds that we want to maintain.

E That is fair enough, but how has your relationship been with the public who by and large probably don’t understand your mission and expected you to ride into town on a white horse and improve the service and make it cheaper?

Initially people looked to us to reduce the rates but between then and now they know we don’t have this control. All rate changes and additional services have to come from the government.

E How strong do you assess your chances in acquiring the license for the network when it comes to a bidding war? Are you afraid of political interference in a bidding scenario?

I am confident that the government will handle the bidding in a professional manner and give it to whoever can give the best offer. Regardless of what happens in [the privatization process of] 2006, we have a contract that we intend to respect and do our part until it expires in 2008. If nothing else happens, at least we have that.

E Did the World Summit on Information Societies (WSIS) in Tunisia last week change anything in setting guidelines and working parameters for operators such as MTC or the ICT industry at large?

As deputy chairman of the ITU Arab regional working party on private sector issues, I’m pleased with the outcome of the Tunisia WSIS, which addressed crucial issues such as the exchange of information on internet governance, financing issues for developing countries and the creation of a Digital Solidarity Fund. I believe the benefits from the Tunisia WSIS are very valuable in bridging the information gap between developing and developed countries.

E MTC Touch is heavily involved in corporate social responsibility activities. How and why is this important to the company?

Ever since MTC was awarded the management contract in June 2004, we have participated in a variety of events ranging from industry-related activities to social and cultural ones. To support the telecom industry in Lebanon, we sponsored Saitech, the Sidon Exhibition for Information Technology, back in August and we are also participating in Termium 2005, the main information and communication technology exhibition in Lebanon, which we consider to be an ideal environment for the brand. Our projects for 2006, include the sponsoring of the World Bank’s “2006 Mediterranean Development Forum.” But MTC Touch is also keen on expanding outside the corporate arena. Our commitment to the community we live in is a key component of our mission statement and an integral part of our company’s development.

December 1, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Economics & Policy

Telecom reforms get jammed in the system

by Tarek Zein December 1, 2005
written by Tarek Zein

Another year has passed, yet it seems that time is at a standstill for the Lebanese telecom industry. To date, there has been no privatization, the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) is yet to appear, as is a third mobile operator, broadband internet access, and the reduction in call costs. It even seems that due to some developments within the sector – such as the sudden abandonment of the new numbering plan – time has been regressing rather than advancing. The Lebanese government should take a close look at the calendar and realize that 1997 – the industry’s golden year – is long gone and that 2006 is upon us. It is time for the decision makers to recognize that most Arab countries are reaping the full benefits of competition and liberalization within the telecom industry, while Lebanon is constantly being tagged as having one of the most expensive call rates in the world.


No progress

Apart from the fact that eight mobile phones played a central role in the assassination of former prime minister Rafik Hariri – according to the UN report released by German investigator Detlev Mehlis, who charged Rambo-look-alike police officers with raiding the premises of the two mobile phone operators to collect important cellular call logs – 2005 was surely one of the slowest years for the local telecom industry. There were however some events of note, especially an advertisement circulating towards the end of October in several Lebanese newspapers. The text-only advertisement read: “As part of the reform initiatives to establish a merit-based, transparent and objective recruitment system for senior positions in the Lebanese public sector, the government of Lebanon – ministry of telecommunication – is inviting Lebanese professionals to apply for full-time positions at TRA.” This advertisement, which was published along with two other similar ones for senior position openings at the Electricite du Liban and the Civil Aviation Authority, clearly implied that the previous recruitment system was neither transparent nor objective – a necessary step to frankly transform any corrupt system. It continued: “The telecommunication regulatory authority will be overseeing one of the most important sectors in Lebanon … This sector is looked at as the milestone of the knowledge-based economy which has become a major factor in development and critical to Lebanon’s comparative advantage.”

Such a statement cannot be closer to the truth, however, after years of observing the ups and downs (especially downs) of the telecom market, local experts have become extremely skeptical about any potential for a positive change and prefer to wait and see before crying victory. How right they are: Lebanon’s comparative advantage has significantly dropped and keeps on dropping while politicians constantly state that DSL is to be introduced “soon” and that communication costs are to fall “soon.” In any case, the deadline for applying to the positions within the TRA was November 30, and its results, if positive, will be released before the end of the year, and if negative, will no doubt dissipate into thin air.

Calling on the courts

2005 was the year that telecom companies used the courts to demand their rights from the Lebanese government. LibanCell and Cellis – two names that were considered long gone after the two mobile operators’ BOT contracts were prematurely cut off by the Lebanese government in 2003 – came back in force in 2005. A series of events dating back from 2000, when the government began criticizing both companies of exceeding the amount of allowed subscribers stipulated in the BOT contracts and demanded that both companies pay a hefty $300 million fine in compensation – was at last solved by the Paris-based International Court of Arbitration. The court voted in favor of both companies and refuted the government’s claim to any fine. Its verdict, which cannot be appealed, even went further by demanding that the government pay Cellis $166 million and LibanCell $265 million. To this date the government has paid Cellis – majority owned by France Telecom – $96 million as an amicable out-of-court settlement and is looking to follow suite with LibanCell by placing $125 million on the table. However, LibanCell has so far refused to nudge and instead launched a large awareness campaign maintaining their right to the $265 million sum – a strategy that is regarded by some as LibanCell’s joker card for re-entering the Lebanese mobile sector as an operator.

2005 saw another ruling against the Lebanese government, this time from the other side of the Atlantic Ocean, from a Michigan court. A US telecommunications company, American Telecom Company, owned by Lebanese immigrant Issam Beydoun, sued the Lebanese government in July 2004, after being disqualified from a bid to manage one of Lebanon’s mobile networks. The company stated that the disqualification took place even though its $3.99 million per month bid for management of the mobile networks was lower than that of Fal Dete (Alfa’s) $4.2 million and MTC (MTC Touch’s) $4.25 million. In the beginning of 2005, the court ordered the Lebanese government to pay American Telecom Company $420 million by default because it said Lebanon failed to respond to the suit. A couple of months after the ruling, the case was suddenly thrown out of court for reasons of “technicality,” clearing the Lebanese government from any of these charges.

Lebanese telcos

Even though events in the local telecom industry were scarce, the same cannot be said of telecom companies owned by Lebanese nationals – namely Mikati-owned Investcom and Hariri-owned Oger Telecom.

Oger Telecom, which according to some reports is seeking avenues for listing 20% of its shares on the newly established Dubai International Financial Exchange (DIFX), has made one major move this year. In mid-November, the company was able to acquire a 55% stake of Turk Telecom – the world’s 13th largest fixed-line operator – by joining hands with Telecom Italia and BT Teleconsult. The enormous $6.55 billion acquisition has increased Oger Telecom’s number of fixed and mobile lines under its management to more than 27 million spread over four countries. It is important to note that Oger Telecom’s bid was 15% higher than the Russian runner-up.

Investcom on the other hand made a splash in London and Dubai when its early-October Initial Public Offering (IPO) raised a total $741 million, at the top end of expectations, making it the biggest international share sale by a Middle Eastern company. Each of the 59.9 million Global Depositary Shares, listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) and the DIFX, were offered at a price of $12.35, initially valuing the company at $3.3 billion. The market capitalization of Investcom as of December 2, stood at $3.67 billion. But it was in Lebanon again that the negative effect was felt: a large number of would-be investors had released other investment engagements to purchase Investcom’s shares, but in vain due to stringent share allocation arrangements. Audi Saradar Investment bank, a distribution agent for the company’s IPO, had to release a statement to 360 clients who generated a $1.2 billion demand to apologize for the inconvenience.

The rise of Investcom

Investcom’s operations are currently focused in five sub-Saharan African countries, Syria, Yemen and Sudan, and soon Guinea and Afghanistan. It now has its shares listed on the LSE and DIFX and is registered in Dubai, making it Lebanon’s sole telecom adventure in 2005. The company has been able to transform itself from solely offering telecommunications engineering services to managing one of the largest mobile telecommunications empires in the region by acquiring licenses in 10 countries with a total population of some 147 million people. The company, owned and managed by the powerful Mikati family, clocked a total subscriber base of over four million customers for the third quarter of 2005 – an impressive 18% increase compared to the same figure from the second quarter of the year. However, the customer base of Investcom is rather volatile, especially since over 83% of the company’s customer base uses Investcom’s services via the easily accessible pre-paid cards rather than the more binding post-paid subscriptions. Additionally, Investcom’s current revenue stream makes it a very easy target of any political instability, especially in Syria. The company’s revenues originate from three different sources: mobile telephony, international (through its Monaco-based Med Net) and fixed-line telephony and other services such as the provision of engineering and consulting services to third parties. Standing at $551 million in 2004, mobile telephony alone represented a large 87.2% of the company’s consolidated revenues, compared to 83% in 2003, and 73% in 2002. And out of the total of $551 million, Syria and Ghana contributed the largest amount to Investcom’s gross operating revenues from mobile telephony, standing at 53% and 22% for 2004 respectively. These unbalanced ratios are currently considered a major soft point for the company, but management promises that the revenue stream will balance out in 2006, as soon as revenues from Sudan and Afghanistan kick in. These results were first seen when third quarter financials were released, showcasing an increase in revenues from $441.5 million for the third quarter of 2004, to $645.9 million for the same period in 2005.

Looking ahead

With a donor conference around the corner, the authorities need to project their true intentions for reform to raise much needed cash. And the shortest route to persuade the international community that the Lebanese government is willing to reform is by reactivating the dusty privatization process. It would be expected that the profitable telecom sector would be one of the first sectors to go, after a much-heated public debate. But it would be rather shallow to assume that privatization of the telecom sector would take place so soon, especially since such a statement has been abused over and over again.

In terms of broadband, Ogero showcased the DSL service for the first time during Termium, raising the eyebrows of many. It is expected that DSL will be available towards mid-2006, but again, such a statement has been abused over and over again.

In terms of pricing, with the expected set up of the TRA and the introduction of a third mobile operator, prices will decrease substantially to the advantage of Lebanese consumers. However, such a statement has been abused over and over again. It is wiser to wait and see.

December 1, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Money Matters

Spending by Jordanian Visitors on the increase

by Executive Staff November 25, 2005
written by Executive Staff

Significant Increase of Tourists from Jordan

Statistics released by the Ministry of Tourism show a dramatic increase in the number of Jordanian visitors to Lebanon, due to the easing of the visa requirement that came into effect in June 2005. During the June-September period, the number of Jordanians tourists rose by 82% compared to the corresponding period in 2004.

Tax Free Spending by Jordanians on the increase 

The increase in inbound tourists corresponded with a significant rise in spending by Jordanian tourists during the June-September period. It peaked in July, when spending increased by 48% compared to July 2004. With regard to ranking of top spenders by nationality, in the June-September period Jordanians came in fifth place after Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates. Jordan climbed one spot, up from sixth position for the corresponding period in 2004.

Once the number of Jordanian visitors started increasing in June 2005, a rise in the number of Tax Free shopping transactions was anticipated. In July 2005, the number of transactions exceeded last year’s figure by 14% and it steadily increased until September when it reached as high as 101%.     

The rise in Tax Free shopping transactions, however, did not always correspond with an increase in spending in monetary terms. For example, in July 2005 the number of transactions rose by 14% and spending increased by 48% compared to the same period in 2004. Then in September 2005, the number of transactions rose by a staggering 101% but spending rose by just 26% compared to the same period in 2004. It is therefore safe to conclude that the subsequent rise in transactions indicates a greater awareness about Tax Free shopping by Jordanian tourists.

Preferred products among Jordanians:

The preferred product category among Jordanian tourists was fashion and clothing, which accounted for 77% of their total spending in the June-September 2005 period. Home and garden items follow with a 10% share. Interestingly, watches accounted for just 2% of their total spending, down eight percentage points from the 10% share it constituted for the corresponding period in 2004. 

November 25, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Money Matters

International Markets

by David Rosenberg November 25, 2005
written by David Rosenberg

• We are now convinced that the Federal Reserve is going to tighten through year-end and into 2006, and we have raised our funds forecast from 4% to a peak of 4.5%. We’ve done so even though we think that inflation worries are overdone. Moreover, because of that view, we are not turning bearish on long-term bonds.

• The recently released FOMC minutes were on the hawkish side, and we certainly did notice the plural in the comment “further rate increases probably would be required” to “contain inflationary pressures.” The Fed sees Katrina’s effect as temporary when it comes to growth, but longer-lasting when it comes to underlying inflation. The minutes were also sprinkled with concerns about fiscal policy and its inflationary implications. In addition, Fed staff economists raised their forecast of both growth and core inflation for 2006 (the former reflecting the rebuilding effort, the latter reflecting the spillover from higher energy prices).

• Almost a year ago, we published a report that acknowledged that we may be too light on our Fed funds forecast. We went back over the past three decades to see what the market and macro landscape looked like when the Fed was done tightening, and we came up with a checklist. So far, only two of the 10 indicators on that list are in areas that, in the past, pushed the Fed to the sidelines; the yield curve is very flat, and the VIX is 60% above its low. Three more indications are headed in that direction: retail sales need to be flat-to-down for two months (but the data have to be clean), industrial production has to be flat-to-negative for three months, and commodity prices need to have peaked or rolled over. The jury is still out on the other five indicators: non-farm payroll gains below 100,000 for three months, the ISM index at 50 or less, real GDP growth below 3% for two quarter or more, Baa credit spreads around 50 basis points, and the stock market down by about 15%.

• Any central bank that can hike rates – and hint at further increases – after an unprecedented two-month 20-point slide in consumer sentiment obviously has a long list of concerns. Among them are the excesses in the housing and mortgage market, investors’ complacency about risk, fiscal largesse, the pass-through of high energy costs to core inflation, rising unit labor costs, heightened inflation expectations, tightening labor markets, and the possibility that the output gap has closed.

• Perhaps the timing of Chairman Greenspan’s retirement is also playing a role in the Fed’s unwillingness to pause. That is pure conjecture, but it may be that Mr. Greenspan wants to defend his reputation as an inflation-slayer and eliminate the term “Greenspan put” from the investment lexicon. Another point: the impending change at the helm of the Fed may be adding to the prospect that more tightening lies ahead. How? The record shows that a new chairman follows his predecessor’s policy about 75% of the time. Or maybe—just maybe— the Fed wants to be out of the picture by the time Congress hits the campaign trail for the 2006 elections; if that is so, it would mean that the Fed would do more now rather than later.

• Our Taylor Rule model says that a funds rate of 3.5% is justified now in view of the size of the output gap, core inflation, and real interest-rate proxies. Even so, the Fed has already gone beyond that and is moving into the same “overshoot” territory that it reached in the past. In fact, the historical record shows that the Fed has typically overshot neutral by 200 basis points, based on the funds-rate peak benchmarked against our fair-value Taylor Rule estimate. We cannot see how the inflation or growth picture gives the Fed any reason to go that far.

• It may be that today’s potent combination of factors—the housing market’s “froth,” the bond market’s “conundrum,” fiscal concerns, the current-account deficit, Katrina-related stimulus, and the potential that high energy costs will feed through to general inflation—means that monetary policy has to look beyond the classic Taylor Rule. After all, the Taylor Rule relies heavily on the output gap estimate, which Fed Governor Kohn basically said was no longer a particularly reliable predictor of inflation. Overshoot? Inversion? Could Be.

• With that in mind, we may have to consider the possibility that a classic overshoot is in the cards. That is not to be taken lightly. In our view, it would necessarily entail an inversion of the yield curve. During the past three decades, the Fed has tightened on eight occasions, and when it did, the yield curve inverted five times. Each time there was an inversion, the economy fell into a recession. We would recommend watching the two-to-five-year part of the Treasury curve; in the past, it has shown an uncanny ability to lead the entire curve into an inversion. Right now, it is only a few basis points away.

• The risks that would spring from a policy mistake are not trivial. However, it almost sounds as if Mr. Greenspan is ready to accept those risks. Recall what he said in his closing remarks at Jackson Hole in August: “Surely difficult times lie ahead for the Fed, some undoubtedly of our own making, and others that will be thrust on us by market or other forces” [emphasis added]. By the time we see the “thrust,” most or all of the 10 conditions on our Fed checklist will probably have been met. The question is when. The answer, at least for now, is the first quarter of 2006.

David Rosenberg

North American Economist, MLPF&S

November 25, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Case StudyUncategorized

Taha Mikati

by Executive Staff November 25, 2005
written by Executive Staff

Taha Mikati is the founder of Investcom. He began building businesses in 1979 after founding a successful construction business called ACC in Abu Dhabi. His knowledge of the construction industry was based on his experience as a civil engineer. According to his PR Company In London, Taha Mikati decided to sell his share in ACC in 1992 “to focus his energies elsewhere.” Then it goes onto say that Taha Mikati “identified the opportunity to develop a high quality telephone service provider in developing, under-penetrated high growth mobile telecom markets. He founded Investcom for this purpose and remains today closely involved in the company’s strategy and operational performance.” His PR agency admitted that they had “no photograph of Mr. Mikati.” And apologized profusely.

Najib Mikati – Vice Chairman

Najib. Mikati is the brother of Taha Mikati and a former Lebanese prime minister, an office he held in the interim period after the murder of Rafik Hariri and the downfall of the government of Omar Karami. He has also held ministerial posts and is a former member of parliament. He was a member of the executive committee of the National US-Arab Chamber of Commerce in Washington DC, and a member of the Board of Directors, and Chairman of the Economic committee at the chamber of Commerce Industry and Agriculture of Beirut and Mount Lebanon. He has close ties with Syria’s ruling Assad family

Najib Mikati holds a Masters Degree in Business Administration from the American University of Beirut and according to Investcom’s PR company, “has also attended several Executive programs which include the “Owner/President Management Program” at Harvard, Boston in 1990, “Avira Program” at INSEAD, Fontainebleau France in 1994, and “Innovations in Governance Executive Program” at Harvard, Boston in 2004.

Azmi Mikati – Chief Executive Officer

Azmi. Mikati is the son of Taha Mikati. He was appointed CEO of Investcom Holding in 1998. He is responsible for the global strategy of the Holding and its implementation. Prior to this role, he was Director of T-One Corporation (International Carrier) and a board member of FTML (France Telecom subsidiary and the previous operator of one of two mobile networks in Lebanon). Azmi. Mikati was educated in the United States, where he earned a Bachelor degree in Science from Columbia University.

November 25, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Feature

Barrels of Potential

by Michael Karam November 25, 2005
written by Michael Karam

Last month, as prime minister Fuad Seniora approved the extension of beetroot subsidies for a further three years with funding totalling $6,000 per hectare, Lebanon’s wine makers, who receive no such public sector support, were cheerfully wrapping up their harvest, too busy to ponder on the importance of beetroot. Their new wines will eventually appear on the shelves of Lebanon’s supermarkets, on the pages of restaurant wine lists and in pallets stacked in containers ready for export to willing quaffers in France, the UK, Germany, Canada, the US, Scandinavia and beyond.

And unlike the beetroot industry, the wine sector is expanding. This year Akram Kassatly, whose Kassatly Chtaura is a leading producer of soft drinks and who, several years ago developed the homemade alco-pop Buzz, is returning to his first love of wine making and producing the first bottles of Chateau Makse. Elsewhere, the Saadeh Group is reportedly planting grapes in the West Bekaa with a view to eventually producing its own wine. Both are multi-million dollar investment projects and reflect the current optimism in wine’s potential.

Another, relatively more modest venture, is Chateau Khoury, located in the hills above Zahleh. Raymond Khoury, like Chateau Kefraya’s Michel de Bustros and Cave Kouroum’s Rahal family, is a former grape supplier who has turned his hand to wine production. He has 13 hectares (130,000 m2) planted with a wide range of grape varieties (including frustratingly difficult but potentially thrilling Pinot Noir) and will release his first wines into the market next year.

When we meet, Khoury is entertaining the regional sales agent for Seguin Moreau, the manufacturer of arguably the best oak barrels in the world. The family has gathered for lunch in an outhouse on the estate. Nearby the Chateau, which Khoury will use as a home, tasting center and hotel, is still being built. “Don’t ask me how much I have spent,” he laughs. “The winery itself cost $1 million. Then you must add the land and the buildings… let’s say over $3 million in all.”

His son, Jean-Pierre, has just finished his winemaking studies in France and will be responsible for production, while his daughter XXX, who gained valuable experience working in wineries in South Africa and California will be responsible for marketing. Khoury hopes to produce 30,000 bottles but is confident that within the next decade he will eventually increase production to 100,000.

Even by Lebanon’s microscopic – by global standards – production levels, Khoury’s output is small, but he is not alone. There is an increasing number of “micro-wineries”, who no doubt inspired by the achievements of similar garagistes in California and elsewhere in the wine producing New World, want to make limited quantities – usually 20,000-50,000 bottles per year – of premium wines. In the ultimate boutique nation their aim is to produce the ultimate boutique wines (typically wines made from low, carefully selected grape yields, matured in brand new oak barrels with minimal filtration).

Too small to make it onto the nation’s notoriously crowded (not to mention expensive) supermarket shelves, these producers are taking a leaf out of the small Californian producers and selling direct to loyal consumers through often nothing more than word of mouth.

“More than half of our 265 members produce less than 10,000 cases per year. Many are small family producers with several thousand case production, making them small and their wines can be hard to acquire if they are popular,” explains Tori Wilder, Communications Director for the Napa Valley Vintners in California. “These small wineries often sell the majority of their wines directly to consumers, through mailing lists and wine clubs.”

It is a strategy that at least one small Lebanese producer is beginning to wake up to. In Bhamdoun, once famous for its grapes, but never a hub of wine production, Naji Boutros and his American wife Jill, owners of Chateau Belle-Vue, have just completed their fourth third major harvest. “We got just over 22 tons this year,” says Jill who is responsible for marketing.

Compared to the steel of the Khoury winery, Belle Vue, with its plastic fermentation tanks is still very basic, but that is how Boutros likes it. For those who care to listen, he is an advocate of starting small and building gradually. But small is a relative term. He is insistent that only grapes picked in the Bhamdoun area are used in his wines and to achieve this he has been gradually buying up pockets of suitable land and planting them with wine grapes. “Let’s just say that I have invested several million dollars so far,” says Boutros

None of Belle-Vue’s four wines have been released on the market; that comes next year. In the meantime, they have been donated a two cellars, one of which Jill is developing into a cozy tasting room. “We are setting up a mailing list because we want a wine community to whom we can sell directly,” she explains.

The Belle-Vue initiative is entrenched the philosophy of reviving Bhamdoun’s once-proud vitiicultural heritage and much of the drive for his wine making initiative stemmed from a desire to rebuild. When the former Merrill Lynch executive returned to Bhamdoun in the mid-90s, the pain he felt at viewing the devastation, inspired him to plant vines – particularly on the site of his grandfather’s hotel Belle-Vue – and make great wine. His dream may just be realized. His second tier wine, the aptly-named Renaissance, has been listed with nine other Lebanese wines in the latest edition of The Sotheby’s Wine Encyclopedia.

On a similar trajectory – his flagship St John was listed in the award winning Wine Report – is Captain Habib Karam, a commercial airline pilot with Middle East Airlines (MEA). His day job gives him responsibility of hundreds of millions of dollars of aircraft and its passengers, but today, not far from Chateau Belle-Vue, on a rocky hillside in Ras el Harf, he has an altogether different challenge. A consignment of new, empty wine bottles destined for his modest Jezzine winery has slipped from their palette. The lorry driver and his assistant, stand around, scratching their heads as Karam wonders how is will transport 10,000 loose bottles. Such are the pitfalls of the small winery owner.

Karam’s initiative began about five years ago. Apart from a love of wine and a desire to produce small quantities of beautiful wines, he is a proud son of Jezzine and wants to encourage local farmers to plant wine grapes, a strategy that outside the Bekaa has met with mixed results. Karam says the locals have responded positively, planting both Merlot and Muscat but in Ras el Harf the scene of Karam’s fracassement de bouteilles, Clos de Qana owner Fadi Gerges admits that his initiative to convince local farmers to do the same, went off half-cocked. Boutros didn’t take the risk and bought his own. He has 12 hectares so far. He believes that this is the only way to achieve consistency and guarantee that his wines are always made from Bhamdouni grapes.

Karam has bought and harvested a total of 55 tons this year. His objective is straightforward. “I want to make low-cost expensive wine, reach a level of 60,000 bottles and maintain this production for the next ten years. Then we will see.” He admits he relishes the solidarity that wine making affords and that it is a useful antidote to his day job. “I am winemaker, accountant and administrator.” He is also passionate about Lebanon’s potential. “I have vinified in the US in France and in Lebanon. This is a paradise. We will soon have a real status in the wine world and we will sell our wines. I can’t see how we can fail when we make such small quantities. Out total production is the same as one French vineyard,”

Habib Karam, Naji Boutros and Raymond Khoury are not alone. Domaine des Tourelles, one of Lebanon’s oldest wineries and the maker of arak Le Brun, has upped its profile, hired a new winemaker and produced a premiere red, Marquis des Beys. Then there is the Nazih and May Metni, whose vineyard in Richmaya is the basis for Nabise Mont Liban, while in, near Batroun, retired General Joseph Bitar makes small quantities of Kfifane wine, for the American market. More will surely follow. The age of the small producer is upon us – and he is not farming beetroot.

November 25, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Feature

Can Syria go it alone

by Andrew Tabler November 25, 2005
written by Andrew Tabler

The inclusion of President Bashar al Assad’s brother and brother in law in a confidential version of the Mehlis report leaked on October 21st has deep implications for the Syrian regime. The pressure game is now on, as the United States and France push for Security Council Resolution that demands Syrian compliance with the ongoing investigation into Rafik al Hariri’s death or face possible UN sanctions. What remains to be seen is how international pressure will function in the milieu of Syrian reform, as the globalised environment so many Syrians have been looking to for hope begins to turn against them. So far, the Syrian government has organized poorly attended popular protests against what Damascus calls an “unprofessional investigation”, and all the while the implications of the report are beginning to sink in among Syria’s business classes.

Since Hariri’s assassination in February, power in the Syrian regime has been centralized in the hands of the Assad family. The president’s brother, Maher, is commander of Syria’s Republican Guards – elite forces that have been used to, among other things, put down rioting of Kurds in the spring of 2004. On February 14, the day of Hariri’s murder, the president’s brother in law, Asef Shawkat, was appointed head of Syrian Military Intelligence (MI) – perhaps the country’s most powerful mukhabarat agency. His rise through the ranks was relatively swift: Shawkat was named second in command of MI on November 20, just as UN Security Council 1559 went into effect.  At the same time, a rival to Assad from within the ruling Alawite sect, Ghazi Kanan, was demoted from the head of a mukhabarat agency to the civilian administration as Minister of Interior.

Then in June, during the Ba’ath Party conference, most of the country’s “old guard” retired from the party, including Vice President Abdel Halim Khaddam – long rumored to be a power center in the country. Khaddam played a key role in negotiating the end of the Lebanon War through the implementation of the Ta’if Accord. With Ghazi Kanan’s death in October in what officially was determined a suicide, most if not all alternatives to an Assad family-led Syria had been eliminated.

With the Mehlis investigation now pointing its finger at members of the Assad family, and Damascus promising it will cooperate, two options seem plausible. The first, full compliance with the probe to the extent that Maher or Shawkat would be delivered to an international tribunal, would likely lead to the collapse of the Assad regime rather quickly, or at very least, the transformation of Bashar into a Juan Carlos who presides over a democratic transition. The other and most likely option is Syrian compliance falling short of delivering Assad family members for trial. As Mehlis has indicated his work is far from finished, the moment for full UN sanctions is still not at hand.

Most people in Syria are betting on the second option. Damascus will now be in full defensive mode, and will likely hunker down and hope the storm blows over. Even if it does not, many question remain over Damascus’ ability to survive a blocade similar to that inflicted in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.

Since Syria’s currency crisis of the mid 1980s, Damascus has employed a strict foreign exchange regime designed to suck up as much hard currency into Syria and keep it there, what economists call a “safe” model. Hard currency deposited in banks in the form of cash is not allowed to leave the country. Dollars transferred into the country, however, both for personal use or investment, can be transferred back out. The result has been impressive. To date, the Central Bank of Syria and the state’s mammoth Commercial Bank of Syria hold around $18 billion in reserves, enough to finance current import levels for three years. The majority of Central Bank reserves are held in cash. Currently, some $13 billion in Central Bank deposits held by the Commercial Bank of Syria are deposited outside the country at very low interest rates.

Even under pressure, the Syrian private sector will most likely continue to finance its hard currency needs through the black market, which is partially run through Lebanon. Reigning in that system could be difficult, as its remains unclear if Banque du Liban would pursue lesser offenders as they have Lebanese and Syrian security chiefs.

Other questions remain about how Syria’s new joint-venture private banks – most of which have Lebanese involvement – will fair under increased pressure.

“Sanctions would pose a lot of challenges for the new banks,” says Bassel Hamwi, Deputy Chairman and General Manager of Bank Audi Syria. “But we still don’t know what shape sanctions might take. Regardless of what happens, having a Lebanese partner is a strength.”

The real worry among banking sector observers is that increased pressure will impact ongoing reforms to Syria’s restrictive foreign exchange laws. Over the past six months, the Central Bank and Commercial Bank have eased access to hard currency to facilitate trade and better compete with private banks that are taking in larger and larger deposits every month. Some analysts predict that Syria’s foreign exchange restrictions are likely to remain in place for the foreseeable future.

In terms of agriculture and energy, two key commodities that could keep the country running even under the harshest of measures, Syria remains self-sufficient. While oil production is in decline, the government’s recent conversion of power stations from oil to natural gas could help the regime squeeze out every last drop for domestic use. Vital foreign involvement to develop Syrian oil fields, however, could be restricted as it was in Libya following the Lockerbie bombing. Best estimates show Syria has about 10 years of oil reserves, with rapid dips in production after five.

If the UN decides to cut off oil exports, however, this could go a long way to bringing the Assad house down. Officially, oil proceeds account for about half of all state revenue. Other estimates put that percentage much higher. Over the last few years, the Ministry of Finance has reduced Syria’s tax rates in a bid to entice Syria’s business classes to forego double and triple bookkeeping. While the law was passed with the business community’s input, another law enacted the same day gave the Ministry of Finance broad powers to investigate tax evasion. Businessmen immediately protested the move, causing the ministry to back down. Just how far the state would push businesspeople to pay taxes as Syria is under the gun remains unknown.

Syria is also skillful at circumventing sanctions as well. Damascus has been under US sanctions since 1979, which were toughed up in 2004 with the implementation of the Syrian Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act (SALSA). Despite both measures, US goods are still readily available in Syria. The Syrian government allows sanctioned items to be imported through third countries, with Lebanon and Dubai topping the list. As the US embassy in Damascus openly admits that it does not have the resources to enforce its sanctions in Syria, it could soon be up to US companies to acquire end-user certificates for every microchip, modem and wireless router in the Middle East.

There are concerns over the Mehlis investigation’s impact on foreign investment. Syria’s population growth rate of 2.85% per annum remains one of the highest in the Arab World. Over the last few years, the State Planning Commission has produced studies showing that hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign investment per year will be necessary to create the minimum 185,000 jobs per year to absorb new market entrants. As current capital and labor productivity rates are pitifully low (with one World Bank team reporting that Syria has the lowest Total Factor Productivity in the world), it seems certain that any dip in investment from the Arab Gulf would spell disaster for Syria. Following Hariri’s assassination, capital from Saudi Arabia – one of Syria’s main foreign investors – slowed considerably. While projects funded from Qatar, the UAE and Kuwait have filled the gap for now, it remains to be seen if the petrodollar tap will keep flowing if Mehlis finds top-level Syrian responsibility for the murder.

Interesting thus far have been popular reactions to the report. Rallies held throughout Syria on Monday were considerably smaller than those held in March. Private sector sponsors, who last time donned company t-shirts while carrying banners opposing outside intervention, were no where to be seen. Only one mobile phone company, Syriatel, which is owned by Assad’s cousin, Rami Makhlouf, sent out text messages ahead of the event calling on Syrians to come out in support for their government. Students made up the majority of protestors. Most of those carrying banners in English renouncing foreign intervention in Syria affairs openly admitted they had no idea what their placards said. And last but not least, while the rally lasted but a few hours, Syrian TV kept replaying tape of the rally’s peak the entire afternoon before iftar.

Thus far, the report has been somewhat of a wake up call for Syrians, whose nationalist sentiments seem to be growing.

“People are starting to understand that we are in big trouble,” said one accountant, who preferred to remain anonymous. “They are starting to understand that all of Syria will soon be under pressure. This will rally support around the president for sure.”

Or will it? Ahead of the Mehlis report’s release, American diplomats in Syria have openly asked Syrians how the US and UN could punish the Syrian regime without hurting the population at large. The limited impact of SALSA thus far, however, shows that Washington’s ability to come up with much promised “smart sanctions”, where a regime is pressured to change without hurting the population at large, remains to be seen.

“Worldwide experience with sanctions shows that they hit from the bottom up,” says Hamwi. “The government can wait it out, and the people with resources will survive. Twenty years ago it would have been different. The private sector is the engine of economic growth in Syria now.”

November 25, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Development

A long-due story of mismanagement

by Safa Jafari November 25, 2005
written by Safa Jafari

This year marks the beginning of the International Water for Life Decade 2005-2015.  The United Nations, through the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and World Health Organization (WHO), have introduced ten critical years, which started on March 22, 2005, to focus global attention on what should be obvious: water for life and aims, not just to highlight the magnitude of the world’s water problem, but also to bring all “stakeholders” together to apply workable solutions.

Clean water is asserted by the UNICEF’s Executive Director Carol Bellamy as “an inviolable right, not a privilege.” It is the basis of all life and is recognized as a humanitarian issue and a human right, the misallocation of which becomes a breach of legal norms.  According to UNICEF, two buckets – 20 liters – of safe water a day is the bare minimum a child needs to live.  This is enough for drinking and eating, washing and basic sanitation. But around 4,000 children die every day due to lack of access to an adequate supply of clean water. 

If that were not enough, each year more than 1 billion of the world’s people have little choice but to resort to using potentially harmful sources of water. About four out of every 10 people in the world do not have access to even a simple pit latrine and nearly two in 10 have no source of safe drinking-water, thwarting progress towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) discussed in last month’s issue.  Within these MDGs there is a specific target: to cut by half, by 2015, the number of people without sustainable access to safe drinking-water and basic sanitation. However, the UN Millennium Project Task Force on Water and Sanitation, however, recently added that integrated development and management of water resources are crucial to the success or failure of all the MDGs, as water is central to the livelihood systems, particularly those of the world’s poor. 

Lebanon was the first Arab country to host celebrations marking the United Nations’ World Environment Day on June 5, 2003, the theme selected was the aptly titled ‘Water – Two Billion People are Dying for It!’.  The agenda sought, “to give a human face to environmental issues, empower people to become active agents of sustainable and equitable development, promote the understanding that communities are pivotal to changing attitudes toward environmental issues, and advocate partnership among nations to allow people to enjoy a safer and more prosperous future.”

But the promotion of sustainable development entails more than just the engagement of communities.  These cannot be ‘active agents’ so long as better awareness of the problems is not coupled by effective means to tackle them, i.e. a healthy interplay amongst: grass-root action, accountable policy, and effective infrastructure. 

To what extent are these three present in Lebanon?  Let’s put it another way: the story of water in Lebanon is that a culture of mismanagement that has led to shortage and contamination.

Ironically Lebanon has a wealth of water resources in its numerous rivers, its underground aquifers, and has generous winter rains. But the country faces a perennial water shortage. It could theoretically meet all its own needs as well as export hundreds of millions of cubic meters to its more arid neighbors.  Most households suffer regular water cuts and irregular access to fresh drinking water. 

About half of the 2,600 million cubic meters of accessible surface and groundwater is wasted every year as it is left to flow into the Mediterranean.  Estimates of Lebanon’s annual water demand vary from 1.1 (Parsons study) billion to 1.4 (ESCWA) billion cubic meters. A USAID funded study by Development Alternatives in 2001 estimated that Lebanon uses 75% of its annual water supply for irrigation.  Domestic use accounts for 165 mcm and industrial use 130 mcm, according to Parsons.  However, the Parsons study concluded that real domestic demand for water is over 300 mcm.  For many Beirutis, water is rationed – or is not available at all – during summer.  Many Lebanese have to fill water bottles at public fountains or buy water from trucks.  Demand for water is expected to rise to 2.5 billion cubic meters by 2015, and perhaps as much as 4.0 billion cubic meters by 2025, according to ESCWA.

Donors have spent over $600 million since the end of the civil war on renovating the antiquated water supply networks, but a USAID-funded study estimates that more than half of the distribution systems still need to be overhauled. Irrigation systems are in equally bad shape. They use mostly inefficient flood methods and reach less than half of the potential agricultural areas. USAID has funded almost $6 million in potable water and irrigation projects in the past decade, while Japanese, French and other governments have also funded different water projects calling for privatizing the water sector, renovating potable water networks and the conducting of better water pricing schemes. 

To make matters worse, there have been disputes with Israel over accessibility of the Lebanese government to the Wazzani tributary from the Hasbani River. However, talk of building dams are still under way and Arab donors have pledged over $150 million to fund the first phase of the Litani River Project in the south.  Long-due plans for water projects are hoped to provide drinking water, irrigation and electricity.

But all that shines is not fresh water. Estimates of pollution in Lebanon’s waters vary and statistics are minimal, out of date, or faulty.  One study estimated Lebanon’s deposit of raw sewage to equal 38,095 cubic meters per day.  Another study stated the figure was as high as 500,000 cubic meters of untreated sewage. Sadly, both studies agree on two facts: sewage is untreated and deposited into Lebanon’s waters. Out of Beirut alone, there are 15 discharge points of raw sewage and a further 23 points along the Lebanese coast we bathe in.  And raw sewage is only part of what is being deposited in our waters.  Research carried out by the Greenpeace Organization in October 1997 showed the presence of ‘a high rate of heavy metal and organic bacteria in Lebanese waters’.

A study published last September in the Daily Star newspaper and another published last July in the Environment and Development magazine – showed that the Litani River has a high average discharge rate of 770 million cubic meters (mcm). Domestic wastewater is the largest pollutant in the upper basin of the Litani. And although about 50 percent of the population is connected to a sewer system, there are no wastewater treatment plants there yet. The Litani’s Qaraoun Dam, completed in 1956, holds some 220 mcms and approximately 70 percent of the damn is polluted water.  The levels of pollution vary from season to season but there are no ongoing tests being conducted on the dam. The tests that have taken place indicate high pollution in certain areas and some conclude that the upstream Litani River is microbiologically unsuitable for domestic use or bathing.

Several of the Litani’s tributaries are highly polluted due to contaminated discharge, not excluding solid waste. Most industrial facilities within the Litani area do not treat their wastewater before directly discharging it into the Litani or its tributaries. Also, the overuse and misuse of agrochemicals by farmers and farm run-off is another source of contamination.

The World Health Organization (WHO) measures the level of Fecal Coliform bacteria found in water to determine the level of its pollution. It is not recommended to swim in an area containing more than one hundred colonies of Fecal Coliform bacteria per one hundred millimeters of water.  Prolonged contact with contaminated sea water can lead to several health problems, most notably various forms of skin disease, as well as diarrhea and vomiting.  Studies carried out by Environment and Development magazine on September 14 showed that the level of Fecal Coliform bacteria found at one of Beirut’s most luxurious resorts and private beaches was drastically above international standards at 620 colonies per 100 millimeters of water.  This brings no surprise when waste from slaughterhouses is freely allowed to be tossed or flooded into nearby rivers.  

Incidentally, November 19 is World Toilet Day, an event that has been celebrated annually since 2001 on the same day.  The goal of the World Toilet Day is to educate people on sanitation issues and promote better toilets around the world.  President of the World Toilet Organization Jack Sim was quoted by Reuters as stating that 2.6 billion people, or 40% of the human population, do not have access to proper sanitation.  Ironically, to celebrate this day, countries such as Japan and others in the EU went on to compete in the design of the most luxurious and exquisite toilets while our part of the world continues to search for ways to dispose of its daily waste without severely putting human lives at risk. 

What we must understand here is that we are all stakeholders in this as we eat and drink; swim and bathe; and allow our children to play on formerly flooded riversides whose odor provides an indication of the bacteria they hold.  In addition to health and hygiene, the nation’s economic development is at stake.  Tourism is at risk as beaches and running water are declared unsuitable for human use, and Lebanese employees are naturally less productive if they end up often taking leave due to some mysterious ‘stomach virus’.

During the war much of the information about Lebanon’s sewage system was misplaced, lost or destroyed.  Water losses exceed 50% in many areas. Much of the country’s irrigation system dates from before the civil war, and cracks in canals, evaporation, and illegal use of canal water account for irrigation efficiency of only 30 to 40%.  It is also estimated that about 40% of the population uses cesspools, which consist of porous pits that receive wastewater from the toilets, showers, wash basins or other sanitary fixtures, with no proper service for sludge removal, so they are subject to overflow or contamination of groundwater.  Naturally, contamination finds its way to our potable water system through leaks from damaged networks, clogged wells, or flooding rivers. 

Due to lack of regulation, the Beirut River, as one example, has become a dump for garbage and sewage and according to Greenpeace Lebanon, if nothing significant is done before the rainy season starts, the river and underground reservoirs will be entirely polluted. 

Numerous governmental decrees have established standards for the proper disposal of pollutants. There are guidelines and “environmental limit values” set by various ministries. And there are decrees for the management of healthcare and hospital waste.  The problem, however, lies in two facts:  there is no system of accountability for those who breach the law, and there is no centralized, regular and uninterrupted monitoring of pollution quantities and qualities in Lebanon to date.

The people of Lebanon know that their country suffers a shortage and contamination of its waters; the funds have come to Lebanon, particularly to help solve the water problem; and our policy makers are well aware of the situation that has haunted them since the civil war.  Where does the problem lie?  The problem lies in the management of those three ingredients:  the people, the funds and policy. The people need to change their environmentally harmful behavior.  New and healthy infrastructure must be created to support the widening water network in the country.  And an effective policy must be put to force whereby any misconduct is monitored and its doers are held accountable.  For some reason, we seem to think that the problem of water in Lebanon yet needs to be made known to the people who today smell and taste the water they use – whenever it is available.

November 25, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
State department

Investing in people’s futures is good business

by Washington Correspondent November 25, 2005
written by Washington Correspondent

The urgency in bringing rapid relief to survivors of Pakistan’s devastating earthquake might not pass as a major business decision, but ultimately it is. Call it long-term investment in terror prevention, and file it under “insurance claims.”

In the aftermath of the catastrophe – close to 50,000 dead, maybe twice that figure once the numbers are finally in; 15,000 villages affected by the disaster, and, according to reports from international relief agencies and Pakistani government officials in the field; possibly as many as 3 million, possibly 4 million, people homeless. The numbers are astounding by any standard; it would be the equivalent of almost the entire population of Lebanon living in the street. The earthquake has destroyed more than 80 percent of structures in parts of northern Pakistan and strong aftershocks threaten buildings already damaged by the initial quake. Winter in the Himalayas is just weeks away and unless aid arrives fast, tens of thousands of people will starve and freeze to death.  The U.N. coordinator, Undersecretary General for Emergency Relief Jan Egeland, who was touring the area around Muzaffarabad described the situation on the ground as “desperate.” “With wintry conditions arriving in the higher elevations, children are facing a potentially deadly combination of cold, malnutrition and disease,” said UNICEF Executive Director Ann Veneman in New York. “Most housing has been destroyed in the hardest hit areas, so the survival of thousands of young children is now at stake. Shelter, nutrition, and health care for children must be a priority.”

And all this is taking place in a region of the world where you need only scratch the surface to discover the deep-rooted sympathy for al-Qaida.

How is this an economic affair? Simple mathematics really. Unless relief from the West arrives in the affected areas post haste, there are excellent chances for the region to turn into a vast breeding ground for potential al-Qaida conscripts. Recruiters from radical organizations seeking to refill their ranks will not waste time in signing up a new crop of jihadi fighters from among the tens of thousands of men aged 15-45 who overnight find themselves alone, homeless, jobless, penniless and ripe for the recruiter from any of the militant politicized Islamist organization, of which there is no shortage in Pakistan, will gladly join the ranks of those organizations who are willing to give them food, shelter and an AK-47.

That’s assuming they have not already started doing so. Already, the day after the disaster, reports from the quake-affected areas made mention of mujahedin fighters arriving with blankets, food and medicine to assist survivors in one village where no other help arrived.

Little matter to the cost of the relief operation, it will turn out costing the international community far less in the long run.

Back to the math: working on the assumption that the lower of the estimates is correct, assuming that among the 2 million homeless only a small percentage — just half a percent — of males aged between 15 and 45 accept the offer from the Islamists. That is still a staggering 10,000 possible recruits.

Much closer to reality the numbers could well be in the tens of thousands, if not more. As a reminder, it took only 19 men to carry out the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

If the investment is not made today to save those left stranded on the cold, barren hills of Pakistani Kashmir, a far greater investment will have to be made to fight them later. Consider it a race between international relief organizations and Islamists groups for the hearts and minds (and bodies) of the refugees. The importance of providing for the victims cannot be stressed enough. If it means deploying NATO, U.S. and EU forces toward that end, then it should be done. Every hour wasted could mean a successful “close” for the recruiter; every recruit a potential future terrorist.

It will get far worse unless massive amounts of aid start to arrive without further delay. Many cities and villages in Pakistan-administered Kashmir and the North-West Frontier Province, the most affected areas, have been wiped out. NWFP abuts Afghanistan and is the area where Osama bin Laden is believed to be hiding. He could soon be offering many more people refuge in his cave. His fighters are believed to frequently trek back and forth across the Pakistan-Afghan frontier.

The scope of the disaster requires new thinking – thinking outside the box. Once these disaffected youths have been fed and clothed, there will be the need to keep them occupied. This is where a sort of Pakistani Peace Corps should be created and financed by the international community, so that in turn, they can help rebuild the devastated areas.  In the long run, it will prove to have been a relatively low price to pay for the dividends reaped.

November 25, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
For your information

Daniel Kaufmann

by Executive Contributor November 25, 2005
written by Executive Contributor

Daniel Kaufmann is the director of global programs at the World Bank Institute and a noted researcher on issues of governance. On the occasion of his visit to Lebanon, he talked to Executive about the World Bank’s work to enhance governance, reduce corruption and alleviate poverty.

Is your visit to Lebanon part of a regional tour, or was it purposely scheduled?

It was purposely scheduled because of excellent discussions we had with the minister of finance [Jihad Azour] during the annual meetings of the World Bank and IMF [in September]. My visit is a follow-up to that. I don’t believe in regional tours for tours’ sake, I go only to places where there is a possibility for concrete help and work.

The World Bank categorizes nations into four brackets in terms of governance indicators. Knowing that you said you are not an expert on Lebanon, which policy recommendations tend to be the most important for a country situated in the lower middle bracket of achieving good governance, as Lebanon is?

Lebanon has a set of viable institutions. This is not a failed state, of which there are some. Lebanon has institutions and human capital. The range of issues in this type of country is the following.

One, we discuss the whole regulatory framework. Are there too many excessive regulations? This is usually associated with a lack of governance, monopolistic power, capture of state, and more corruption. 

Second, procurement. What are the vulnerabilities in terms of procurement and what reforms are required in that area?

Third, and related, is transparency. In all kinds of different realms, including procurement, transparency is very important. But transparency also relates to full disclosure of assets of politicians, of judges, public officials and their dependents.

Fourth is public finance, the issue of the budget. Are all public expenditures transparent through the budget, or are a lot offline? Are there issues of governance in tax collection? These are the broad areas that apply almost everywhere in countries with this type of challenge. In terms of specific issues, more research is required.

One peculiarity that participants also were alluding to in yesterday’s discussion is that data collection in Lebanon seems very weak and that even some high-ranking decision makers treat data in a very liberal fashion.

Let me say three things about that, because it is very important. Point number one is that data needs to be treated very cautiously anywhere in the world. This is not only about governance but also about investment climate and many other issues, and applies in some cases particularly to official data. 

The second point is that precisely because we are aware of that [need to be careful about data] we use different techniques to gather data from many different organizations, including international organizations. We have reasonable confidence that this data can be used with the caveat.

The third point is that there is not always objective criticism. It is not uncommon that a minority has a vested interest in criticizing data. It is what we call shooting the messenger. Nobody complains about our numbers if one is doing okay. When we come out with our numbers on governance, we have never heard criticism from officials in a country where things are improving. It is a one-to-one correlation as to where the criticism comes from. Let me rest my case there.

You were also discussing myths to debunk when discussing anti-corruption strategies. Of the myths about fighting corruption, is there one that you consider the most important to unravel?

The most important one to get rid of at the generic level is a bullet message: one does not fight corruption by fighting corruption. Corruption is a symptom of significant weaknesses somewhere else and one has to understand the issues of governance. That is why I mentioned those policy points. The myth that one can fight corruption by fighting corruption can be unbundled into sub-myths, such as [that it is effective to] throw another institution at the problem. It is very easy to create another anti-corruption commission or adopt another decree against it, do another campaign.

Does that mean that more stringent laws and higher penalties would not be key measures?

Setting of higher penalties is fine. The problem is the incessant drafting of laws which may or may not get adopted. Obviously having tougher penalties within reasonable limits – we don’t believe in people being executed because of corruption – is important. It is the drafting and thinking that the law needs to be improved.

Most every country in the world has decent laws against corruption. The problem is that they are not implemented effectively. Getting away from a state that is monopolizing who can have the dealership of such and such company, or a radio or TV or newspaper and who cannot, those are the much more difficult issues than creating another commission.

Research into human behavior that you quoted yesterday seemed to indicate that people are more inclined to act in a moral way when they are watched then when they are not. Do you advocate monitoring as key measure for inducing governance and better behavior?

The expression is that sunshine is the best disinfectant. We are not talking about monitoring but we are talking about transparency. Transparency in my view is a much more effective tool of policy and sometimes a substitute to other regulations. Having all kinds of procedures and regulations sometimes can create even more corruption. Instead, let’s have sunshine – if for no other reason that first you start rating the cost of corruption through the reputational risk.

In some countries, where politicians and others don’t care, the question of reputation may not matter. But it increasingly matters internationally in the competitive world. It matters for investors; it matters for the electorate, and so on.

Is improvement of governance a realistic possibility or is it a dream? Is human nature per se corruptible, or do you believe that human beings could be different from the corrupted?

Of course I believe in that, otherwise I wouldn’t be doing what I do. There is no question that you will never get rid of corruption. The challenge is to move from a situation where there is a systemic, endemic or even pandemic – not here but in some other countries – corruption to another stage where corruption is still widespread but not endemic or pandemic, and then to where it becomes individual. In a country like Norway, there is corruption. But it is individualized and is the exception, and when it comes to the light, it is a real scandal and penalties may be applied.

So, although you said yesterday that improvements of governance on the whole have not been strong over the past ten years, you have seen progress.

We have seen how countries have managed to make progress. What better example than to show that some countries are doing very well, even among emerging economies? That is why I bring in my own country, Chile. Singapore and Hong Kong were extremely corrupt only 20, 25 years ago. They have contained it. England took longer. It was a very corrupt country years ago, now it is doing very well. In Eastern European countries, the evidence speaks [of governance improvements] in countries like Slovenia and even in Africa. Botswana has better ratings than some countries in southern Europe.

Between public sector corruption and petty corruption in the public sector, how important is corporate corruption on your map of problems?

It is very important. The crucial issue with corporate corruption is how corporate corruption affects public corruption. More important than fraud within a company or between two companies is the collusion between the private and the public sector. Bribery takes two to tender, a briber and a bribed. Very often we are finding out that it is not the public official who is always extorting from the private sector. Some very powerful private interests sometimes capture the politician or the public official; in that case they have an enormous responsibility.

The Middle East has many autocratic regimes. How well can autocratic methods function in defeating corruption and inducing change in governance?

On the Middle East, you are the expert. What we find on average and on balance worldwide is that a country that gives more voice and freedom of expression and has also more transparency, is better able to control corruption. Of course that is not the only thing that matters. Countries can make very significant efforts through other means, through rule of law, transparency of budget.

But there is no evidence in the data that autocratic governments do better in fighting corruption than democratic ones. On average, it is to the contrary. It has to be that the citizens become the auditors of their country. What is the probability in a place like Lebanon that big daddy can be watching everybody? The whole idea of the freedom of expression is creating millions of auditors.

In a definition of governance you described it as a set of traditions and institutions in a country. In this region, religion-based traditions and institutions play a strong role. Can you fit them into your model of governance?

We are mindful of the relevance and importance of the religious dimension. We do not enter it into the data exercise. In part, this is deliberate because we want to remain neutral vis-à-vis religious beliefs. Our approach to what constitutes good governance is a more universal approach. I must say, however, that the World Bank has made a very concerted effort over the past seven, eight years of reaching out to the faith community and to the interfaith community. In all interfaith activism, the commitment to poverty alleviation and the same objectives that we have is extremely strong.

When you presented your evaluation of Lebanon in terms of corruption control, the graph’s margin of error was very large. Why?

Because there are very few sources. The margin of error in a significant way is a function of how many surveys there are. That’s an issue, because a country like Lebanon, a financial center, is not being rated by the World Economic Forum. If a country is jumping aboard the train of globalization, the moment that the WEF, IMD and others cover them, the margins of error start coming down. The first order of business is to be on the radar of all these investment ratings agencies and other large entities. There is nothing worse than being ignored. It is much better to be rated not very well.

In assessing governance in Lebanon at the World Bank, do you find a lot of cooperation from the Lebanese side?

Lebanon is now very interested in these issues of measurement and thinking where one can go in the next stage. But one has to distinguish two things. One is a worldwide measure – the indices on governance. This is all from independent outside sources, that’s why we cover the world. The other is what is needed when a country wants to do something about the problems. There one needs an in-depth study and analysis, and I find that the Lebanese are very open.  

How important is it for you personally to believe in the improvability of governance?

I think that the theme of justice, of alleviating poverty in the world, particularly in emerging economies, and empowering people to take their destiny in their own hands and improve their own welfare, is crucially important. Just giving people the opportunity and the enabling environment of not enormous regulations to be entrepreneurs, to express their views and innovations, that is what motivates me and that is why I work on governance for poverty alleviation. I feel affinity to a place like Lebanon, because I am Chilean. Chile until only about 15 years ago was considered a very troubled place. It was a country that was not living to its potential and not doing all the reforms that were needed. I feel enormous affinity to those type of challenges of the emerging world. I think it is feasible within a realistic timeframe to make enormous progress but it is very hard work, it is political leadership for governance improvement.

November 25, 2005 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 624
  • 625
  • 626
  • 627
  • 628
  • …
  • 686

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    Executive Magazine
    • ISSUES
      • Current Issue
      • Past issues
    • BUSINESS
    • ECONOMICS & POLICY
    • OPINION
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • EXECUTIVE TALKS
    • MOVEMENTS
      • Change the image
      • Cannes lions
      • Transparency & accountability
      • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
      • Say No to Corruption
      • The Lebanon media development initiative
      • LPSN Policy Asks
      • Advocating the preservation of deposits
    • JOIN US
      • Join our movement
      • Attend our events
      • Receive updates
      • Connect with us
    • DONATE