• Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us
Executive Magazine
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Past issues
  • BUSINESS
  • ECONOMICS & POLICY
  • OPINION
  • SPECIAL REPORTS
  • EXECUTIVE TALKS
  • MOVEMENTS
    • Change the image
    • Cannes lions
    • Transparency & accountability
    • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
    • Say No to Corruption
    • The Lebanon media development initiative
    • LPSN Policy Asks
    • Advocating the preservation of deposits
  • JOIN US
    • Join our movement
    • Attend our events
    • Receive updates
    • Connect with us
  • DONATE
For your information

Banking on Lebanese films

by Executive Contributor October 13, 2004
written by Executive Contributor

On September 19, Lebanese director Philippe Aractingi started the shooting of Autobus, a full-length musical that he hopes will receive international play. It is Lebanon’s first feature film fully financed by private investors.

“To make the film,” said Walid Hayek, investment manager at the Arab Finance Corporation (AFC), “we had to come up with a new financial structure called investment certificates. Unlike shares, they offer a right on future revenues, but no right to vote. We had to avoid the situation that the investor on paper was able to interfere with the director.”

Asked to help in putting together a finance structure by the film’s producer Fantascope, AFC set up a proper business plan based on estimated cost and revenues to attract investors, and issued 140 investment certificates of $10,000 each, producing a total budget of $1.4 million. “So far, we’ve managed to raise $840,000,” said Hayek, “which is enough to make the film. The remainder of the proposed budget, $560,000, is mainly meant for marketing and promotion. Now that shooting has started, however, I’m sure we will be able to attract further funding.”

The film’s projected revenues have been estimated at $2.1 million, which include theater admissions in Lebanon and the Middle East, as well as from television, video and DVD sales. What’s more, Fantascope and Hayek hope to cash in on the sales of CDs and cassettes with the film’s music.

So far, all the investors are Lebanese, among whom the LBCI chairman Pierre Daher. “Daher is a strategic investor,” said Hayek, “who is not just interested in making money, but who wants to test the market and see what the possibilities are. If this film works, he may be interested in making more.”

This seems to be the motto for all involved in the making of Autobus: including AFC, which has traditionally been focused on investment banking, brokering and portfolio management. “We are interested in targeting other sectors,” said Hayek, “among them audiovisuals, which have so been disregarded by bankers.”

October 13, 2004 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
For your information

We can use more education

by Executive Contributor October 13, 2004
written by Executive Contributor

Returns on university investments are highly beneficial to both individuals and national economies, reports the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in its latest report on global education levels. According to the September 2004 report, individuals investing in their tertiary education on average achieved substantially higher returns than the potential rate of return from investing in financial markets. As for the benefits to a country’s overall prosperity, across OECD countries one additional year of education was estimated to boost economic output by between 3-6 percent

In light of such findings, Lebanon’s unabated fascination with higher education should simply spell good national economic prospects. Today, with an excess of 40 licensed institutions of higher education, the Lebanese university and college sector is continuing to see high demand from education seekers.

When it comes to matching supply and demand, the main surge in student numbers seems to be occurring at institutions with low- to medium-range tuition fees, which were licensed four to five years ago and, since, undertook massive expansion of their facilities. Admission officers at the American University College for Science and Technology (AUST) last month were working overtime to process student applications, anticipating a total enrolment of 4,500 or more, a 50 percent increase over 2002. At C&E American University, administrators told Executive they expected enrolment to reach 2,000 on their three campuses. The institution’s first two graduation classes of 2003 and 2004 numbered 300 in total. Another provider with massive ambitions is Global University, which wants to grow from a student body of 300 students today to “become one of the largest campuses in the area,” says an official,

October 13, 2004 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
For your information

Competing over Martyrs Square

by Executive Contributor October 13, 2004
written by Executive Contributor

To introduce a new face for Martyrs Square and the central axis of Beirut’s central district, Solidere has launched an international Urban Design and Ideas Competition open to both professional architects and students of architecture, urban design, urban planning and landscaping. In past plans, the axis along the square was meant to be Beirut’s main business and office area, but that seems to have changed.

“There are no limitations or requirements concerning the way participants can envision the new center of Beirut,” said Fadi Jamali, manager of Solidere’s Town Planning Department “It’s a mixed use area, so the square’s direct surroundings can be destined for shops, offices, or any other activities.”

However, Solidere does have a preference that the new heart of the city should reflect the reemergence of the center as a meeting point for people of all confessions and backgrounds. The notions of connection and communication play a major role and in that sense Solidere hopes the new center may become something of a media city.

“Martyrs Square symbolizes the link between past and future, East and West, old and new,” said Jamali. “In that sense not only the media, but also Internet companies and ad agencies could play a role.”

Solidere will award six cash prizes for student participants in the first stage with a ranking of the first three selected urban ideas and three honorary mentions. In addition, 5-7 professional architects will be asked to further develop their ideas and will be paid a fee for their work.

The second phase requires professional accreditation. Three cash prizes will be awarded after the second stage, while the winner will cooperate with Solidere in executing the design. Mid October the jury will decide upon student winners and the architects who will go through to the second round, the deadline of which is mid April. Winners will be announced on Martyrs Day, May 6, 2005.

October 13, 2004 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
For your information

The perils of cheaper gas

by Executive Contributor October 13, 2004
written by Executive Contributor

After a summer of high-flying energy costs, oil prices rose above $46 as autumn knocked, minimizing prospects in the foreseeable future that a barrel of crude would be available for $30 or less in international markets. Earlier this year, oil exporting countries and analysts had still claimed that a target range of $28-35 was attainable. Today, however, some analysts contend that the recently feared $50 threshold could soon turn out to be a price platform rather than a ceiling–the high price levels making Western consumers pay at the pump for the cost of the Iraq war.

In this context, Lebanese motorists ought to dismiss any hopes for a near-term reduction in gasoline costs to $10 per 20-liter tank filling. However, the political decision to not let gasoline prices rise above $15 per tank has thus far shielded local drivers from possible further increases. “We used to raise prices immediately after they increased on international markets, but this is no longer done,” confirmed an analyst at the ministry of finance.

So at least for the time being, Lebanon’s system of government-mandated gasoline prices, with fixed trade margins for gasoline importers and gas stations, works to the benefit of the consumer, while the Lebanese state is bearing the burden of international oil price increases. It is impossible today to predict the exact impact of international oil market developments on Lebanon’s fiscal situation, however upward price movements will inescapably cut deeper into the state’s revenue from excise taxes on imported oil derivatives. Over the past years, these taxes had increased dramatically in their importance, reaching almost $500 million in 2002. In the context of the dismal state finances, it appears only a matter of time until the government could see itself forced to look at re-adjusting those revenue flows and lift the price cap on gasoline, even if this risks another price shock to the economy.

October 13, 2004 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
For your information

A diplomatic advertiser

by Executive Contributor October 13, 2004
written by Executive Contributor

Bigger is not always better, at least that is what the newly founded advertisement and marketing company Adbox is out to prove. With a personalized market approach and a touch of feminine charm, the Gemazieh-based company has quickly found its niche in Lebanon’s highly competitive market.

“Adbox is aspires to be a boutique agency offering tailor-made marketing and advertisement services for small and medium sized companies,” said its owner Ghida al-Solh. “Not everyone can afford or wants to work with the big agencies, as they will never be treated as premium clients. Adbox offers a premium, personalized treatment and the same international standard.”

The company offers anything from public relations, media strategies and brochures to ads, packaging, corporate identity development and direct mailing. Having opened only this summer, Adbox’ clients include the jeweler Tufenkjian Freres, the Rest House in Tyre, Al-Baba Al-Mumtaza Sweets and Bear Real Estate. “For the next two years,” said Solh, a Lebanese American University graduate who worked for 7 years in a PR and marketing company, “I want to work with no more than six clients, after that we’ll see.”

To keep the costs down and remain flexible, Adbox is largely a one-person show. “Apart from my secretary,” Solh said, “I have no staff. I work only with freelancers on a project basis. I know most people in the business. While one may be excellent in layout, another’s specialty may be packaging. So, not only do I keep my operating cost down, I also work with only the best in the market.”

The young entrepreneur thinks she has one more asset allowing her to compete in Lebanon’s advertisement and marketing market, which she defines as “male dominated and rather aggressive.” She claims to “work with a much smoother, yet no less determined approach. I guess I’m just a bit more diplomatic. Perhaps that’s the family genes at work.”

October 13, 2004 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
For your information

Bad medicine

by Executive Contributor October 13, 2004
written by Executive Contributor

The Lebanese Pharmaceutical Importers Association (LPIA) claims the import of counterfeit pharmaceuticals and the illegal import of registered products have increased over the last few months. “We have no estimation of the volume,” said LPIA president Armand Phares, “but several of our members have witnessed more incidents of illegal imports and-or counterfeit products on the market.”

It’s estimated that about 6% of the $230 billion pharmaceutical market worldwide includes counterfeit medicines. Generally, the percentage is higher in developing countries, yet surprisingly a recent documentary on France’s TV5 showed that in the USA an estimated 15% is counterfeit. In Lebanon, according to Phares, “it’s definitely far below the world average.” Still he called upon importers and pharmacists to remain vigilant and to inform authorities and the public whenever they come across smuggled or bogus products.

Preventing the import of such products is the duty of the customs authorities. But at the same time it is the task of the inspection department at the ministry of health, as well as the Order of Pharmacists, to conduct “heavy controls,” so that products are located and people dealing with them arrested and judged.

Meanwhile, to make illegal imports more difficult, the LPIA has decided to introduce a special hologram, which will be added to import forms. By law, a pharmaceuticals importer must put two stickers on the outer pack of a medicine, one indicating the registration number at the ministry of health, the other indicating the price in Lebanese pounds.

“Having noticed that this system can be easily falsified,” Phares said, “the LPIA has decided to introduce a 3D hologram showing both the LPIA and the importer’s name, which is very difficult, if not impossible to falsify. This will take a few months to implement, but will give very strong protection to patients.’

October 13, 2004 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
For your information

New winery in Kefraya

by Executive Contributor October 13, 2004
written by Executive Contributor

The Saadeh Group, which already has wine interests in Syria, is building a new winery, Terres & Vignobles, in Kefraya in the Western Bekaa. Yussef Kamel, the Saadeh Group’s vice-president for investment, refused to reveal any details of the venture, but admitted that “planting would begin very soon,” an indication that the new winery will grow its own grapes rather than buy from local growers. If this is the case, it will be at least three years before Terres & Vignobles will produce it first harvest and also means that further planting will take place in an area where wine grape growers have seen prices fall by as much as 40% over the past three years.  

Still, Kamel was upbeat. “We believe that wine is a business Lebanon should leverage, given the obvious qualities of the country’s soil and weather, adding, “If there were a danger of saturation, we wouldn’t be in the business.”

The new venture comes at a time, when Lebanon’s $25 million wine industry is at a crossroads in its development. UVL (Union Vinicole du Liban) President Serge Hochar has said that the long awaited national wine institute, must, like in France, control the level of planting according to demand.

Unchecked expansion would, according to one local producer, affect the price and quality of grapes and threaten the quality of future vintages. For a country, whose only hope of competing in a fiercely competitive international market, is to create a boutique identity, this would be a disaster.

“There is a danger that such uncontrolled development – not necessarily by the Saadeh Group I must add – could damage the reputation of Lebanese wine,” he said. “The sector is now in such peril of being overwhelmed, and damaged, by unrestrained investment and unethical practices that the government and associated legislative bodies must step in to protect us.”

October 13, 2004 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Society

Down but not out

by Marianne Mirabeau October 1, 2004
written by Marianne Mirabeau

There was a time, in the late 90s, when Lebanese basketball could do no wrong. Lebanese teams – brimming with home-grown talent and the odd high-profile import – beat everyone in sight, games were shown on prime-time TV and crowds of enthusiastic fans blocked streets for hours, celebrating victory after victory. Lebanon appeared to have found its national sport and the sponsors could not get their checkbooks out fast enough.

That was then. Today, the clubs, deserted by their sponsors, are propped up by wealthy patrons, marred by scandals, feuds and crises. The recession did not help, but when Antoine Choueiry, advertising mogul and the so-called “Godfather of Basketball,” recently announced his retirement from the presidency of Sagesse and indeed from the sport in general, basketball’s last hope appeared to have hung up his shirt. So what went wrong and what now for the sport that promised so much?

A sport supported by patrons

Essentially Lebanese basketball was always a loss-making concern, largely dependent on patrons willing to pick up the check. In the first division, all teams have one to two main patrons, covering virtually the entirety of their budgets, which averaged $1.5 million in 2004.

Relationships were formed out of a love for the sport, politics and business interests. Hence BLC Bank became one of Champville’s main sponsors, contributing $350,000 annually to the team, because tuition fees to Champville School were deposited with BLC. UFA insured the club and went on to sponsor the team to the tune of between $200,000 to $300,000 annually (although this jumped up to $800,000 in 2004 when UFA General Manager Henri Chalhoub was nominated team president).

“Each club has a certain person paying the deficit,” said Federation of Lebanese Basketball (FLB) Manager Roland Tabet. “For Blue Stars, it’s [Banque Saradar’s] Mario Saradar or [Loto Libanais’s] Rainier Jreissati. The club is not making a profit. None of them are.”

The Choueiry factor

It was Antoine Choueiry’s goal to make the game financially self-sufficient when he took over Sagesse in 1994. He may have failed in his bid, but his tenure as the sports most high-profile patron changed the face of the game. “Regardless of what anyone might say about Antoine Choueiry, what he did for basketball was memorable,” said Carlo Vincenti, who represents William Lawson, a former major sponsor of Sagesse. “His approach to basketball was very interesting, and it is what Lebanon needed – a more global approach, a more commercial approach.”

Choueiry injected significant amounts of capital both into his own team as well as into that of others. “He backed other teams up financially such as Antranik and Hannibal. He used to pay them $150,000 so they could play in the league,” explains a major Lebanese sports agent, who did not want to be named. With a solid group of teams competing at the highest level, Choueiry upped the ante by buying overseas professional players (mainly from the US) to shore up the quality of his own team. Such a move catapulted both Sagesse and the Lebanese national team on a winning streak, which culminated in Sagesse’s victory at the Asian Basketball Championship in 1999 and Lebanon’s qualification for the World Basketball Championship in Indianapolis, USA, in 2002. The media took the bait and the hype surrounding the sport reached a frenzy in 2000, when Choueiry, who controls 70% of Lebanon’s ad-spend, convinced LBCI to broadcast basketball games during prime time. “He got all the teams together and brought LBCI in to cover them, broadcasting the games live on satellite TV,” said the sports agent. “People started watching more and more basketball.”

Summing up the philosophy behind his strategy, Choueiry was quoted as saying that “to be competitive in sports, you need money, to get money, you need sponsoring, to get sponsoring you need exposure, for exposure you need TV, for TV to be interested you need true competition of a certain level. This needs important teams, to get important teams you need money.”

The sponsors liked what they saw. Despite representing a non-sport oriented product, William Lawson went from an obscure Scottish Whisky to a household name in three years by sponsoring Sagesse. “It was definitely effective in terms of brand building. When we started (sponsoring Sagesse in 1999), basketball wasn’t that big,” he said. “And basically while we were sponsoring Sagesse, it started winning tournaments, starting with the Lebanese championship, the Pan-Arab games and then all the way to the Asian Basketball Championship. So there was a major hype around basketball, and we got a lot of exposure from it. Before Choueiry you would never have seen a basketball game playing on prime time on LBCI. What sponsors need is the exposure – for them a basketball game playing at midnight or a game playing at 8:30 pm makes a big difference.”

The sport of choice

The increasing exposure made basketball the sport of choice in Lebanon, both in terms of audience and practice. According to Tabet, the number of licensed basketball players in Lebanon has been steadily increasing since 2000, when the Federation counted approximately 6,000 players. Today, this figure stands at 15,000. “Everybody loves basketball,” boasted Riaydi coach Fouad Abou Chacra. “In every family in Lebanon you have someone playing basketball. It’s the biggest sport.”

For Pepsi, the growing appeal of basketball in the country, especially among the youth, served as a big draw to get involved in the sport, and from 2000 on, the multinational signed up. “Pepsi wants to get close to what the youth likes, and in Lebanon, that sport is basketball more so than football,” explained Roula Safi, a regional account director at Impact/BBDO, Pepsi’s regional advertising agent.

Piggybacking on the significant exposure brought to basketball through prime time TV coverage, Pepsi went on to sign deals with LBCI, as well as buying ad space on courts. They launched a major ad campaign around Rony Seikaly, a fading, but high-profile Lebanese NBA player, and organized a promotional competition in 2003 to attract young, new talent to basketball.

“LBCI has done a good job of promoting the game, creating a hype – that’s why we have been sponsoring the game for the past three years,” Safi added. “As all the games are retransmitted, there is a lot of brand visibility, so branding on courts has been a good investment for us.”

Too much hype?

The sport reached it peak in 2000, after which the hype began to fizzle. Explaining William Lawson’s decision to terminate its sponsoring contract with Sagesse in 2000, Vincenti said: “Once you’ve reached the top it’s difficult to keep the interest going. They won the Asian Championship… then what? When you win the Lebanese championship ten years in a row, it becomes boring.”

For now, the brand is not considering returning to sport sponsorship any time soon. “Lebanon is not sports-oriented,” Vincenti said. “Actually, they are quite sports oriented, but not toward local sports, it’s much more international. Football is small and basketball was basically the most popular sport.”

It’s the economy stupid! Compounding the slump was the slight problem of a recession. Sponsors are pulling out, contracts are going for less, and advertising spots are being sold for a fraction of the price they used to. Getting one’s brand on the coveted center circle of the basketball court once went for $50,000 to $100,000, depending on the club. Today, it can go for as little as $6,000.

“The economic situation in Lebanon has been getting worse in the past five years, and thus the overall advertising budget is also down proportionally, by nearly 30% compared to what it was six years ago,” Choueiry complained last year.

Tabet agrees. “Instead of having a contract for $50,000, probably now they are negotiating for $15,000 to $20,000.”

Following the withdrawal of LibanCell, Sagesse is now saying goodbye to Adidas, its second biggest sponsor and one that had been with the team for years. “Adidas sponsored us for five to six years,” said Barakat. “This is in part because they are transferring their regional headquarters to Dubai, but it is also due to the fact that they are cutting down on their sponsoring budget and focusing on big international teams.” Adidas declined to comment on the matter.

The vote of no-confidence will undoubtedly affect the earning power of Lebanon’s top players, many of whom earn as much as $20,000 a month. “Even Lebanese players are earning between $5,000 and $7,000 per month,” said Barakat. The unraveling of the sport

However the sport’s struggle to obtain sponsoring cannot only be blamed on the economy. Crises, scandals, and mud-slinging have destroyed confidence among fans, players, team owners and sponsors alike. Topping the list of scandals is Café Najjar’s decision to dissolve its team following the brawl that erupted between its players and an Algerian team at the Arab Championships in Jeddahin May 2004. “Georges Najjar was unhappy with the fact that a team associated with his company, which is expanding into Algeria, was seen fighting on TV with the Algerian team,” the agent explained. “There are problems in Lebanese basketball,” admitted Joseph Abdel Massih, a member of Champville’s Sports Committee. “The championships never really finish. Every year you have a problem at the end of the championship. The clubs and the Federation need to solve these problems –sponsors don’t want to see players wearing their jersey having problems. Everything has to be calm.”

To others, the problems go beyond the perpetual feuds between the FLB and the teams. “The problem is that we’re in Lebanon – no law is applied, there is no legal recourse,” a Blue Stars affiliate complained. “It’s the law of the jungle, the law of the strongest that prevails. And who is the strongest here? Choueiry.” But while Choueiry’s sudden departure from Sagesse left a few rubbing their hands in glee, the most prevalent reaction was that of widespread regret. That the sport will suffer a set-back financially due to his retirement is beyond doubt and many patrons are abandoning what they see as a sinking ship. Henri Chalhoub is apparently to leave Champville and take UFA’s sponsorship with him. “I am almost certain that we won’t sponsor Champville anymore,” an associate of Chalhoub confided.

The challenges ahead

As patrons and big sponsors desert the court, the onus is on the sport to clean up its act, and on the teams to build up a strategy to re-attract enough sponsors to become self-sufficient. “Within five years, we plan to have sponsors covering our budget,” said Riyadi coach Abou Chacra. “We can achieve this target. This team will be able to attract all the big companies – it has the biggest number of supporters and it’s the oldest club.”

Others are more cautious in their predictions. Acknowledging that Choueiry’s departure will require an extended recovery period for the sport, they do however, point to the strengths Lebanese basketball has been able to build up over the recent years: the number of enlisted players, the enduring preference for basketball over other sports, the continued broadcasting on LBCI and the on-going plan to establish a Lebanese-Syrian-Jordanian Superleague.

“This [super league] will attract sponsors,” said Sagesse technical director Rizkallah Zaloum. “Next season the sponsorship will increase.” Pepsi is cautiously confident. “We do research assessments on the game’s appeal every year, notably to see if it is still attracting youth,” said Safi on behalf of Pepsi. “If it is still generating the interest that it is now, that will serve as a major factor in our decision as to whether or not we will continue sponsoring the sport.”

October 1, 2004 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Society

Battle of the Titans ends in merger

by Anthony Mills October 1, 2004
written by Anthony Mills

This year, more than four million cinema tickets will be sold in Lebanon, despite the offer of a cheaper alternative by hundreds of cable TV and DVD pirates. The ABC mall cinema in Achrafieh has finally thrown open its doors – after months of delay. A 12-screen multiplex north of Beirut, reportedly the Middle East’s biggest, is slated for completion by year’s end. The big story however, is the merger between Lebanon’s two major cinema distributors, Planete and Empire. The move comes after an almost ten-year battle for market supremacy, one in which Empire ultimately prevailed.

Both companies confirmed to EXECUTIVE that Planete has committed to a November 4 management takeover by Empire, in a possible prelude to a buy-out. The announcement comes after Planete saw the 65% market share it acquired in just a few years after its 1995 launch drop to less than 25% in 2004. The official announcement of the deal will come in mid-October. The decline in Planete’s share of the roughly $20 million Lebanese cinema sector was precipitated by an aggressive Empire campaign to rebuild its market share, primarily by renting more space for cinemas. Unable to follow suit, because unlike Empire it had already spent a fortune buying cinema space, Planete looked on helplessly as Hollywood studio giants Warner and UIP re-defected to the Empire camp two years ago, and revenues plummeted. “We had different strategies. We invested much more than they did. Our strategy was to run theaters we owned. Theirs was to manage theaters. Now we understand that their strategy was the right one, and we were wrong,” declared Planete Manager Gilbert Chammas.

Planete’s brisk march to success after it broke into the sector almost 10 years ago took Empire by surprise. “We hadn’t taken Planete seriously,” admitted Empire Manager Gino Haddad. “But after the first year we saw that their figures were good. They began to eat away at our market share.”

When, after only a few years, Planete had a bigger market share than Empire, the alarm bells started ringing. The problem, explained Haddad, was that Empire simply didn’t have enough screens to satisfy distributors by playing all their movies, and keeping them on offer long enough. And so, a number of the distributors had decided that their interests would be better served by Planete. Empire’s response? “We opened more cinemas,” chuckled Haddad. “And we took the prime locations: Sodeco, Dunes, and recently the ABC mall cinema.”

In the absence of a counter move by Planete, the additional high-end Empire screens quickly tilted the market share balance back in Empire’s favor. Distributors began drifting back. But Chammas contended that they didn’t move back solely to maximize ticket sales. “When UIP was with us, they used to have 400,000 to 500,000 admissions a year. With Empire they now have only 150,000,” he asserted. He refused to reveal what he believed the distributors’ true motives were, saying only that Empire benefit from the alliances.

“Planete was starting from scratch,” echoed Haddad. Empire, on the other hand, has been around in one form or another for almost a century. The business distributed Lebanon’s three highest-grossing movies ever – TITANIC (about $2 million),” The PASSION OF CHRIST (about $1.4 million), and THE MASK OF ZORRO (roughly $600,000 – and sold about 2.6 million seats in 2003.

“Planete, I think, welcomes the management takeover move because all the major movies shown in Lebanon are now shown by Empire,” declared Haddad. “This year, our market share has grown to 78%. If things had continued like this, maybe next year we would have had 85%. And that’s how it would have ended. This is actually in the interest of Planete.” “It’s a win-win deal,” agreed Chammas.

Negotiations began over six months ago, according to Haddad. Both he and Chammas declined to disclose who initiated the merger discussions, but they stressed that the talks were amicable. Asked if Empire planned an eventual buyout of Planete, Haddad said: “There is the possibility of a buyout if the price is convenient for both parties.” Yes, he added, there had been discussions about whether or not Empire would be interested in buying. Planete was valuing itself in excess of $5 million, he said. Chammas confirmed the possibility of a buyout at a later stage. Haddad claimed, though, that Empire was adopting a cautious approach to the buyout option. He said the earliest a buyout would come in a year, after Empire had had time to assess the prospects of Planete cinemas under Empire management.

“Buying today is a risk, because in ten years’ time, I can’t tell you if Abraj and Zouk will still be doing the same figures,” he said. It is still unclear, he explained, what effect the ABC mall cinema will have on other cinemas. “ABC is exactly four-and-a-half minutes’ drive from Abraj, along the motorway. For every cinema that goes up, one goes down. ABC has gone up. Either Sodeco or Abraj will go down.”

Under the terms of the management takeover deal, Empire is to assume control of Planete’s Tripoli, Zouk and Abraj cinemas, which will retain their Planete brand identity. Planete will continue to manage its Concorde venue in Verdun. Overall, Planete theaters count a total of 28 screens and about 5,500 seats. The merger will give Empire control of 60 screens in Lebanon.

Empire is to pay Planete a percentage of revenue or “rental fee.” Haddad said he was unable to reveal figures, but said the fee would represent a “good chunk of revenue,” at least equal to current Planete earnings. A product of the merger, said Haddad, will be the homogenization of cinema movie selections across Empire and Planete screens. The curtains will be drawn on an almost-10-year Empire-Planete tussle for exclusive agreements with international distributors and on the mutually exclusive Empire and Planete movie listings these fluctuating alliances spawned. Soon, choice of movies will no longer figure among the criteria used by cinemagoers to decide which cinema to head for. Instead, they will be paying greater attention to décor, surroundings, location (including proximity to home), and atmosphere. “We want to get to the point where, like in the United States, people choose the site, and not the movie,” stated Haddad. “Having all the good movies in each cinema will increase revenue.”

And once the audiences are choosing sites, not movies, Empire intends to charge more for high-end venue tickets than for others. Just as moviegoers pay £11 to see a movie at a Leicester Square cinema in the heart of London, and less in the suburbs, so, Haddad explained, Lebanese audiences will be charged more to watch a movie at the ABC mall in Achrafieh, than at a cinema in Tripoli. “We might price tickets at new sites, with the best seats, sound and screen, at $10. But we would price the same movie at an old, dying site at $5.00,” he said. Even Sodeco tickets would cost less than ABC ones.

Another product of the deal will be the amalgamation of Empire Espace and Planete Zouk, both north of Beirut, to create a 12- or 13-screen 3,000-seat multiplex venue, complete with a media store and entertainment facilities. Espace Planete, as it will be known, will be the biggest multiplex venue in the Middle East, according to Chammas, and is scheduled to begin screening before the end of the year.

Empire believes there is money to be made from the massive influx of Gulf Arabs. The company’s newly-opened cinema at the ABC mall in Achrafieh attracted flocks of Gulf visitors in July and August, according to Haddad. In part to cater to Gulf Arab visitors, Empire is pioneering a staggered show-time approach – already standard practice in America and Britain – at its ABC mall cinema. Instead of showing movies at fixed times, a new screening begins in one of the nine theaters every 15 minutes. This routine allows viewers to dispense with the bustle of getting to the cinema ‘on time,’ and to integrate their cinema visit with a ramble around the mall, or a bite to eat at one of the shopping center’s cafés or restaurants. Gulf Arab families who have come to Lebanon to relax welcome the stress-free approach.

Although Gulf Arabs still represent a fraction of Lebanon’s annual box office receipts, they spend far more than Lebanese viewers at the concessions stands. “The average Lebanese spends a dollar or two. A Gulf Arab spends $7 to $10,” observed Haddad. And concession takings constitute between 20% and 30% of Empire’s overall annual revenue, he noted.

When it comes to taste, the younger Lebanese crowd isn’t too hot on Arabic movies, apart from the iconic ones like “West Beirut.” That explains why you might see only one Arabic movie a year in an Empire cinema, observed Haddad.

And there is no hope at all in Lebanon for art house movie theaters, which are popular in the West. “We tried,” said Haddad. “But no one wants to go to those kinds of cinemas anymore here. If there was a huge library in Lebanon, like in France or England, with old, interesting books, how many people would you see in it?” Home theaters are taking a steadily increasing, but bearable, toll on cinema owners. DVD and cable TV pirates, on the other hand, have, for several years been slashing huge chunks out of cinema revenues. According to lawyer Walid Nasser, who has been tasked by major American film studios with limiting the damages to their interests caused by piracy in Lebanon, cinemas here have lost more than 50% of their audiences because of the problem. “And the government is doing nothing about it.”

Nasser said there were as many as 700 pirate cable companies operating in Lebanon, with up to 750,000 subscribers, who pay an average of $10.50 each a month. This translates into a total monthly revenue of over $7.5 million for pirates.

“You can buy fake DVDs from Malaysia here for $2. We have pirated cable TV providers who play all the new movies. It’s a huge problem. In other countries they are finding solutions, but not in Lebanon. There are too many people involved. There’s too much money being made by people who control the market and have an interest in keeping things as they are,” lamented Haddad. “It’s like the electricity problem. In Jounieh, everyone pays. In Dahieh, no one does. It’s simple: politics. At the border, when they bring over pirated DVDs, someone gets $100 and a phone call. And even if pirates do get arrested, nothing happens to them. They have to pay $400 or $500, or another phone call is made.”

“There was one case in Sidon, where we went to raid a major pirate,” recalled Nasser. “He had a Kalashnikov on his desk. That put an end to the raid pretty fast.”

Asked if some pirates were protected by powerful public figures, Nasser said: “Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised because of the amount of money that’s collected on a monthly basis – $7.5 million is a lot of money.”

If piracy was being combated properly in Lebanon, Haddad said, Empire would double its DVD sales. On a positive note, though, in contrast to other Arab countries, censorship in Lebanon is no longer proving too much of a headache for cinema industry professionals. “We have come a long way from the days when you couldn’t show a breast,” remarked Haddad.

TYRING TO REMAIN INDEPENDENT IN A CHANGING MARKET

Cinema runs in the blood of the Fathallah family. Since its inception in the age of silent movies, the Fathallah family cinema business has been passed down from generation to generation. Today, the Fathallah Films Co. rests in the hands of A.K. Fathallah, independent owner of the one-screen Aresco Palace and Montreal cinemas in Sanaya and Hamra respectively. Unable, though, to compete with Empire and Planete in the English-language film market, or to survive on Arabic film screenings alone, A.K. is battling the unthinkable: an inauspicious shutdown of the family’s cinema business interests.

Years ago, Fathallah Films used to distribute to cinemas across Lebanon, from Tripoli to Sidon, and throughout Beirut and its suburbs. Today, it finds itself confined to two locations in Beirut.

“There used to about 20 theaters in Hamra. We are the sole survivors. We’re trying to continue,” mused A.K.. “These days, we can show only Arabic movies, because Empire and Planete, who own all English-language film distribution rights for Lebanon, won’t give us any movies. Sometimes they say they don’t have enough prints, sometimes that they are waiting for confirmation from America. But the truth is they have their own cinemas and have no interest in letting anyone else show their films.”

A.K.’s audience numbers have been given a modest boost by the increase in Gulf Arab visitors. This year, A.K. opened a cinema for two months in Bhamdoun, to tap into the summer Gulf market up there. But there just aren’t enough popular Arabic movies, or Gulf tourists, around to pack A.K.’s cinemas consistently. During the lulls, he rents out his theaters for plays and shows. A mark of desperation? “It’s difficult,” A.K. concedes.

Increasing cable piracy since the end of the war in 1991 has only made matters worse. “The last five years have been terrible,” declared A.K.. “Everything is working against cinema. And no one is helping. They ask me for my certificates. Why does no one ask the pirates for theirs? People can watch 100 stations at home and pay nothing. Nowadays, to get someone out of their chair to go to the cinema, you need to offer a big choice or a big movie.”

Fathallah Films’ plight has been aggravated by changing audience preferences. Today’s younger generation in Lebanon is shying away from Arabic movies and one-screen cinemas, in favor of action-packed American blockbusters and multiplex venues. Back in 1980, Fathallah Films drew audiences to one of its cinemas for a year with the same Arabic movie. Today, that would be inconceivable. A.K.’s cinemas draw about 55,000 viewers (or roughly $260,000 revenue) a year, a far cry from Empire’s 2.6 million. No one has offered to buy out Fathallah Films’ cinema interests – an ominous indication, maybe, that, from a market perspective, they are simply not worth buying. This explains why the company has, in recent years, placed ever-greater emphasis on its non-cinematic interests. “We are shifting from cinema to television,” stated A.K. Fathallah Films distributes programs, including documentaries and cartoons, to television broadcasters like MBC and Dubai Television. Asked if Fathallah Films could survive today on cinema alone, A.K. responded: “Never. It’s impossible to survive on our two cinemas and low audiences.”

“I hope we don’t have to close down our cinema interests altogether,” he added. “I love cinema. My brother loves cinema. Our family started this company with cinema.”

October 1, 2004 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

Head shots

by Michael Young October 1, 2004
written by Michael Young

Oh, how Adam Smith would have shuddered to know that the “invisible hand,” which he described as the guiding force of markets, can be seen most often these days cutting the necks of videotaped hostages in Iraq and Saudi Arabia – and that this, too, is guiding a new and exotic market, that of execution CDs. In September, the passion to film atrocities was evident in Beslan, South Ossetia, where Chechen gunmen shot footage of the booby trapped gymnasium where they were holding hundreds of captive schoolchildren, though the exact reason why they filmed remains unclear. Perhaps it was to warn off Russian security forces by showing them the surfeit of explosives in the room; perhaps it was to record the event for posterity or for propaganda purposes. That said, few experiences are more ghastly than watching similarly reasoned videotapes from the Chechen war, where rebels filmed themselves cutting the throats of pleading Russian prisoners.

Everywhere, it seems, militant Islamists, or self-described “freedom fighters,” have been transformed into ghoulish Irving Thalbergs, producing what was hitherto an urban legend: snuff films. And where there is sensationalism, there is supply and demand: According to a Reuters reporter in Iraq: “The hottest-selling item at Baghdad’s video CD market is not a movie or a music video –it’s an ordinary Egyptian whose beheading was filmed by his Muslim militant captors.” And how big a market is that? “We see about 300 to 400 clips a week,” said one shopkeeper, who didn’t have the nerve to watch what he was selling. At about 70 cents a CD, that’s (for Iraq) a respectable $210 to $280 a week. The paradox of the execution CD sales, much like that of al-Qaeda’s ability to use new computer technology or to decipher and exploit the Byzantine ways of international financial transfers, is that utterly illiberal gentlemen are at ease in the ways of the free market. The market is, in theory, amoral, so that whichever product finds an aficionado should also find a price for its purchase. In fact, that rule is repeatedly broken, for example in the sale of child pornography or the distribution of drugs. But where do the execution CDs take their place?

The answer would appear simple: in the dustbin. But that’s clearly not where Iraqi shopkeepers are storing them, or where avid spectators are watching them. Why? Because somehow death has been hitched to things regarded as legitimate: anti-Americanism, the alleged apostasy or guilt of the filmed victims, perceived resistance, and the like. More easily illustrating this trait, another of the big CD sellers in Iraq show images of the young cleric Moqtada al-Sadr edited in with war scenes showing people lying in their own blood. Watching exhibitionist violence becomes eminently acceptable if viewers regard it as part of a justifiable experience, a fact splendidly exploited by Al-Jazeera, which has embraced, if not largely propelled, the market of videotaped captive-taking.

In that context, for example, Iraqi viewers may watch CDs with images from Abu Ghraib (with spliced-in scenes from a Hungarian pornographic film showing alleged American soldiers raping Arab women) because he or she feels it is a duty to confirm the evil nature of the American occupation. NBC correspondent Hanson Hosein recently quoted a shopkeeper: “The Abu Ghraib scandal CDs are very popular … people are angry at what the American soldiers are doing.” Of course, one cannot underestimate the brute titillation some members of the public feel while watching someone being butchered. It’s apparently not all stern duty. And one suspects that not a few Al-Jazeera viewers (or those of Al-Arabiya, which is less beloved by the chop-chop set) watch the edited murders much as they would a spectral scene from Werner Herzog’s NOSFERATU THE VAMPYRE. What is the moral of the atrocity CDs or videos making the rounds in Baghdad or Riyadh? That even those who wish to carry the world backwards to some vague time immemorial will adopt the most modern techniques to do so; that even the most outrageous of human actions can produce a market of sorts, proving that free minds and free markets need not invariably be one; that human beings will readily watch other humans being killed for various reasons, and will usually seek to justify this on moral or political grounds; and that even the most ardent defenders of freedom, in particular the freedom to broadcast and watch atrocity tapes, can define it truly only as the right to be free without harming others.

October 1, 2004 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 656
  • 657
  • 658
  • 659
  • 660
  • …
  • 708

Latest Cover

About us

Since its first edition emerged on the newsstands in 1999, Executive Magazine has been dedicated to providing its readers with the most up-to-date local and regional business news. Executive is a monthly business magazine that offers readers in-depth analyses on the Lebanese world of commerce, covering all the major sectors – from banking, finance, and insurance to technology, tourism, hospitality, media, and retail.

  • Donate
  • Our Purpose
  • Contact Us

Sign up for our newsletter

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    Executive Magazine
    • ISSUES
      • Current Issue
      • Past issues
    • BUSINESS
    • ECONOMICS & POLICY
    • OPINION
    • SPECIAL REPORTS
    • EXECUTIVE TALKS
    • MOVEMENTS
      • Change the image
      • Cannes lions
      • Transparency & accountability
      • ECONOMIC ROADMAP
      • Say No to Corruption
      • The Lebanon media development initiative
      • LPSN Policy Asks
      • Advocating the preservation of deposits
    • JOIN US
      • Join our movement
      • Attend our events
      • Receive updates
      • Connect with us
    • DONATE