The drone debate in America has become depressingly polarized. While critics point to the civilians killed and argue that most of the suspects could be captured, proponents counter that the targets are legitimate, that there are checks and balances and that, unfortunately, some level of ‘collateral damage’ is inevitable. That’s how things look from Washington — or even Yemen’s capital Sana’a — and that’s why many in the West welcomed Obama’s speech last month in which he suggested new limits on the use of drones. But this debate becomes increasingly irrelevant if one considers how such policies have created complex realities on the ground in remote areas across Yemen. Crucially, drone strikes are counter-productive for both the governments of Yemen and the US. They cost Yemen monetarily, have destroyed social cohesion, created local conflicts, deter humanitarian work and, for the US, help fuel the forces that Obama and others claim
